kernel/linux.git/include/drm/drm_displayid.h, branch v6.6.134

drm/edid: Parse topology block for all DispID structure v1.x

2024-06-12T09:12:05+00:00

[ Upstream commit e0a200ab4b72afd581bd6f82fc1ef510a4fb5478 ] DisplayID spec v1.3 revision history notes do claim that the toplogy block was added in v1.3 so requiring structure v1.2 would seem correct, but there is at least one EDID in edid.tv with a topology block and structure v1.0. And there are also EDIDs with DisplayID structure v1.3 which seems to be totally incorrect as DisplayID spec v1.3 lists structure v1.2 as the only legal value. Unfortunately I couldn't find copies of DisplayID spec v1.0-v1.2 anywhere (even on vesa.org), so I'll have to go on empirical evidence alone. We used to parse the topology block on all v1.x structures until the check for structure v2.0 was added. Let's go back to doing that as the evidence does suggest that there are DisplayIDs in the wild that would miss out on the topology stuff otherwise. Also toss out DISPLAY_ID_STRUCTURE_VER_12 entirely as it doesn't appear we can really use it for anything. I *think* we could technically skip all the structure version checks as the block tags shouldn't conflict between v2.0 and v1.x. But no harm in having a bit of extra sanity checks I guess. So far I'm not aware of any user reported regressions from overly strict check, but I do know that it broke igt/kms_tiled_display's fake DisplayID as that one gets generated with structure v1.0. Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: Dmitry Osipenko Fixes: c5a486af9df7 ("drm/edid: parse Tiled Display Topology Data Block for DisplayID 2.0") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240410180139.21352-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/displayid: provide access to DisplayID version and primary use case

2023-02-26T23:58:38+00:00

The DisplayID structure version and primary use case are stored in the DisplayID Base Section. We should be checking them in a number of places when parsing the DisplayID blocks. Currently, we completely ignore the primary use case, and just look at the block tags without cross-checking against structure version. Store the version and primary use case in the DisplayID iterator, and provide accessors to them. In general, the information is needed when iterating the blocks, and this is a convenient place to both store and retrieve the information during parsing. Promote using accessors rather than users poking at the iterator directly. Cc: Iaroslav Boliukin Cc: Dmitry Osipenko Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ad8a35c109f97ffe115e6b18e4a132b592f11089.1676580180.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/displayid: convert to drm_edid

2022-05-13T15:55:13+00:00

We'll need to propagate drm_edid everywhere. v2: Rebase Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/a52a6882e87a4bb6b1670918f3aba13f9b52f6de.1652097712.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/edid: parse the DisplayID v2.0 VESA vendor block for MSO

2021-09-14T11:21:53+00:00

The VESA Organization Vendor-Specific Data Block, defined in VESA DisplayID Standard v2.0, specifies the eDP Multi-SST Operation (MSO) stream count and segment pixel overlap. DisplayID v1.3 has Appendix B: DisplayID as an EDID Extension, describing how DisplayID sections may be embedded in EDID extension blocks. DisplayID v2.0 does not have such a section, perhaps implying that DisplayID v2.0 data should not be included in EDID extensions, but rather in a "pure" DisplayID structure at its own DDC address pair A4h/A5h, as described in VESA E-DDC Standard v1.3 chapter 3. However, in practice, displays out in the field have embedded DisplayID v2.0 data blocks in EDID extensions, including, in particular, some eDP MSO displays, where a pure DisplayID structure is not available at all. Parse the MSO data from the DisplayID data block. Do it as part of drm_add_display_info(), extending it to parse also DisplayID data to avoid requiring extra calls to update the information. v2: Check for VESA OUI (Ville) Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar Acked-by: Maxime Ripard Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/73ca2887e7b37880690f5c9ba4594c9cd1170669.1630419362.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/displayid: add DisplayID v2.0 data blocks and primary use cases

2021-09-14T11:21:42+00:00

DisplayID v2.0 changes the data block identifiers and product types (now called primary use cases). Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar Acked-by: Maxime Ripard Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/5a5c7e4477782c174f494947e2a2ea618b2b1ef2.1630419362.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/displayid: re-align data block macros

2021-09-14T11:21:19+00:00

Make the values easier to read. Also add DisplayID Structure version and revision information (this is different from the spec version). Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar Acked-by: Maxime Ripard Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b73d3ff2d5e4b23834ed0005186c5cf3a9de5c9e.1630419362.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/displayid: rename displayid_hdr to displayid_header

2021-03-31T12:42:39+00:00

Avoid any confusion with High Dynamic Range. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ce083bd2789c7e22a91710726162287db88e3f6c.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/edid: use the new displayid iterator for tile info

2021-03-31T12:42:02+00:00

Neatly reduce displayid boilerplate in code. Remove excessive debug logging while at it, no other functional changes. The old displayid iterator becomes unused; remove it as well as make drm_find_displayid_extension() static. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fa4b5c790b5bdd82063545a6f209f8e9d78a63a7.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/displayid: add new displayid section/block iterators

2021-03-31T12:41:43+00:00

Iterating DisplayID blocks across sections (in EDID extensions) is unnecessarily complicated for the caller. Implement DisplayID iterators to go through all blocks in all sections. Usage example: const struct displayid_block *block; struct displayid_iter iter; displayid_iter_edid_begin(edid, &iter); displayid_iter_for_each(block, &iter) { /* operate on block */ } displayid_iter_end(&iter); When DisplayID is stored in EDID extensions, the DisplayID sections map to extensions as described in VESA DisplayID v1.3 Appendix B: DisplayID as an EDID Extension. This is implemented here. When DisplayID is stored in its dedicated DDC device 0xA4, according to VESA E-DDC v1.3, different rules apply for the structure. This is not implemented here, as we don't currently use it, but the idea is you'd have a different call for beginning the iteration, for example simply: displayid_iter_begin(displayid, &iter); instead of displayid_iter_edid_begin(), and everything else would be hidden away in the iterator functions. v2: - sizeof(struct displayid_block) -> sizeof(*block) (Ville) - remove __ prefix from displayid_iter_block Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/da3dead1752ab16c061f7bd248ac1a4268f7fefb.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/displayid: add separate drm_displayid.c

2021-03-31T12:41:35+00:00

We'll be adding more DisplayID specific functions going forward, so start off by splitting out a few functions to a separate file. We don't bother with exporting the functions; at least for now they should be needed solely within drm.ko. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/07942d5011891b8e8f77245c78b34f4af97a9315.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com