kernel/linux.git/fs/super.c, branch v5.10.257

fs: explicitly unregister per-superblock BDIs

2024-10-17T13:07:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0b3ea0926afb8dde70cfab00316ae0a70b93a7cc ] Add a new SB_I_ flag to mark superblocks that have an ephemeral bdi associated with them, and unregister it when the superblock is shut down. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211021124441.668816-4-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Cc: Miquel Raynal Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Stable-dep-of: 4bcda1eaf184 ("mount: handle OOM on mnt_warn_timestamp_expiry") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs: don't allow non-init s_user_ns for filesystems without FS_USERNS_MOUNT

2024-08-19T03:41:06+00:00

[ Upstream commit e1c5ae59c0f22f7fe5c07fb5513a29e4aad868c9 ] Christian noticed that it is possible for a privileged user to mount most filesystems with a non-initial user namespace in sb->s_user_ns. When fsopen() is called in a non-init namespace the caller's namespace is recorded in fs_context->user_ns. If the returned file descriptor is then passed to a process priviliged in init_user_ns, that process can call fsconfig(fd_fs, FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE), creating a new superblock with sb->s_user_ns set to the namespace of the process which called fsopen(). This is problematic. We cannot assume that any filesystem which does not set FS_USERNS_MOUNT has been written with a non-initial s_user_ns in mind, increasing the risk for bugs and security issues. Prevent this by returning EPERM from sget_fc() when FS_USERNS_MOUNT is not set for the filesystem and a non-initial user namespace will be used. sget() does not need to be updated as it always uses the user namespace of the current context, or the initial user namespace if SB_SUBMOUNT is set. Fixes: cb50b348c71f ("convenience helpers: vfs_get_super() and sget_fc()") Reported-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240724-s_user_ns-fix-v1-1-895d07c94701@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs: Protect reconfiguration of sb read-write from racing writes

2023-08-11T09:57:54+00:00

commit c541dce86c537714b6761a79a969c1623dfa222b upstream. The reconfigure / remount code takes a lot of effort to protect filesystem's reconfiguration code from racing writes on remounting read-only. However during remounting read-only filesystem to read-write mode userspace writes can start immediately once we clear SB_RDONLY flag. This is inconvenient for example for ext4 because we need to do some writes to the filesystem (such as preparation of quota files) before we can take userspace writes so we are clearing SB_RDONLY flag before we are fully ready to accept userpace writes and syzbot has found a way to exploit this [1]. Also as far as I'm reading the code the filesystem remount code was protected from racing writes in the legacy mount path by the mount's MNT_READONLY flag so this is relatively new problem. It is actually fairly easy to protect remount read-write from racing writes using sb->s_readonly_remount flag so let's just do that instead of having to workaround these races in the filesystem code. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/00000000000006a0df05f6667499@google.com/T/ Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Message-Id: <20230615113848.8439-1-jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

2022-11-10T17:14:25+00:00

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream. Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to generic_shutdown_super() so that the filesystem's block device(s) are still available. Unfortunately, this causes a memory leak in the case where a mount is attempted with the test_dummy_encryption mount option, but the mount fails after the option has already been processed. To fix this, attempt the keyring destruction in both places. Reported-by: syzbot+104c2a89561289cec13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011213838.209879-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

2022-11-10T17:14:24+00:00

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream. The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key structs as the payloads of "struct key" objects contained in a "struct key" keyring has outlived its usefulness. The original idea was to simplify the code by reusing code from the keyrings subsystem. However, several issues have arisen that can't easily be resolved: - When a master key struct is destroyed, blk_crypto_evict_key() must be called on any per-mode keys embedded in it. (This started being the case when inline encryption support was added.) Yet, the keyrings subsystem can arbitrarily delay the destruction of keys, even past the time the filesystem was unmounted. Therefore, currently there is no easy way to call blk_crypto_evict_key() when a master key is destroyed. Currently, this is worked around by holding an extra reference to the filesystem's request_queue(s). But it was overlooked that the request_queue reference is *not* guaranteed to pin the corresponding blk_crypto_profile too; for device-mapper devices that support inline crypto, it doesn't. This can cause a use-after-free. - When the last inode that was using an incompletely-removed master key is evicted, the master key removal is completed by removing the key struct from the keyring. Currently this is done via key_invalidate(). Yet, key_invalidate() takes the key semaphore. This can deadlock when called from the shrinker, since in fscrypt_ioctl_add_key(), memory is allocated with GFP_KERNEL under the same semaphore. - More generally, the fact that the keyrings subsystem can arbitrarily delay the destruction of keys (via garbage collection delay, or via random processes getting temporary key references) is undesirable, as it means we can't strictly guarantee that all secrets are ever wiped. - Doing the master key lookups via the keyrings subsystem results in the key_permission LSM hook being called. fscrypt doesn't want this, as all access control for encrypted files is designed to happen via the files themselves, like any other files. The workaround which SELinux users are using is to change their SELinux policy to grant key search access to all domains. This works, but it is an odd extra step that shouldn't really have to be done. The fix for all these issues is to change the implementation to what I should have done originally: don't use the keyrings subsystem to keep track of the filesystem's fscrypt_master_key structs. Instead, just store them in a regular kernel data structure, and rework the reference counting, locking, and lifetime accordingly. Retain support for RCU-mode key lookups by using a hash table. Replace fscrypt_sb_free() with fscrypt_sb_delete(), which releases the keys synchronously and runs a bit earlier during unmount, so that block devices are still available. A side effect of this patch is that neither the master keys themselves nor the filesystem keyrings will be listed in /proc/keys anymore. ("Master key users" and the master key users keyrings will still be listed.) However, this was mostly an implementation detail, and it was intended just for debugging purposes. I don't know of anyone using it. This patch does *not* change how "master key users" (->mk_users) works; that still uses the keyrings subsystem. That is still needed for key quotas, and changing that isn't necessary to solve the issues listed above. If we decide to change that too, it would be a separate patch. I've marked this as fixing the original commit that added the fscrypt keyring, but as noted above the most important issue that this patch fixes wasn't introduced until the addition of inline encryption support. Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vfs: make freeze_super abort when sync_filesystem returns error

2022-02-23T11:00:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2719c7160dcfaae1f73a1c0c210ad3281c19022e ] If we fail to synchronize the filesystem while preparing to freeze the fs, abort the freeze. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

devtmpfs regression fix: reconfigure on each mount

2022-01-20T08:17:49+00:00

commit a6097180d884ddab769fb25588ea8598589c218c upstream. Prior to Linux v5.4 devtmpfs used mount_single() which treats the given mount options as "remount" options, so it updates the configuration of the single super_block on each mount. Since that was changed, the mount options used for devtmpfs are ignored. This is a regression which affect systemd - which mounts devtmpfs with "-o mode=755,size=4m,nr_inodes=1m". This patch restores the "remount" effect by calling reconfigure_single() Fixes: d401727ea0d7 ("devtmpfs: don't mix {ramfs,shmem}_fill_super() with mount_single()") Acked-by: Christian Brauner Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vfs: move __sb_{start,end}_write* to fs.h

2020-11-11T00:53:11+00:00

Now that we've straightened out the callers, move these three functions to fs.h since they're fairly trivial. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Jan Kara

vfs: separate __sb_start_write into blocking and non-blocking helpers

2020-11-11T00:53:07+00:00

Break this function into two helpers so that it's obvious that the trylock versions return a value that must be checked, and the blocking versions don't require that. While we're at it, clean up the return type mismatch. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig

vfs: remove lockdep bogosity in __sb_start_write

2020-11-11T00:49:29+00:00

__sb_start_write has some weird looking lockdep code that claims to exist to handle nested freeze locking requests from xfs. The code as written seems broken -- if we think we hold a read lock on any of the higher freeze levels (e.g. we hold SB_FREEZE_WRITE and are trying to lock SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT), it converts a blocking lock attempt into a trylock. However, it's not correct to downgrade a blocking lock attempt to a trylock unless the downgrading code or the callers are prepared to deal with that situation. Neither __sb_start_write nor its callers handle this at all. For example: sb_start_pagefault ignores the return value completely, with the result that if xfs_filemap_fault loses a race with a different thread trying to fsfreeze, it will proceed without pagefault freeze protection (thereby breaking locking rules) and then unlocks the pagefault freeze lock that it doesn't own on its way out (thereby corrupting the lock state), which leads to a system hang shortly afterwards. Normally, this won't happen because our ownership of a read lock on a higher freeze protection level blocks fsfreeze from grabbing a write lock on that higher level. *However*, if lockdep is offline, lock_is_held_type unconditionally returns 1, which means that percpu_rwsem_is_held returns 1, which means that __sb_start_write unconditionally converts blocking freeze lock attempts into trylocks, even when we *don't* hold anything that would block a fsfreeze. Apparently this all held together until 5.10-rc1, when bugs in lockdep caused lockdep to shut itself off early in an fstests run, and once fstests gets to the "race writes with freezer" tests, kaboom. This might explain the long trail of vanishingly infrequent livelocks in fstests after lockdep goes offline that I've never been able to diagnose. We could fix it by spinning on the trylock if wait==true, but AFAICT the locking works fine if lockdep is not built at all (and I didn't see any complaints running fstests overnight), so remove this snippet entirely. NOTE: Commit f4b554af9931 in 2015 created the current weird logic (which used to exist in a different form in commit 5accdf82ba25c from 2012) in __sb_start_write. XFS solved this whole problem in the late 2.6 era by creating a variant of transactions (XFS_TRANS_NO_WRITECOUNT) that don't grab intwrite freeze protection, thus making lockdep's solution unnecessary. The commit claims that Dave Chinner explained that the trylock hack + comment could be removed, but nobody ever did. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Jan Kara