kernel/linux.git/fs/fuse/control.c, branch v5.15.209

fuse: quiet down complaints in fuse_conn_limit_write

2026-06-01T15:35:12+00:00

commit 129a45f9755a89f573c6a513a6b9e3d234ce89b0 upstream. gcc 15 complains about an uninitialized variable val that is passed by reference into fuse_conn_limit_write: control.c: In function ‘fuse_conn_congestion_threshold_write’: include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:55:37: warning: ‘val’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 55 | *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val); \ | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~ include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:61:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__WRITE_ONCE’ 61 | __WRITE_ONCE(x, val); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ control.c:178:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’ 178 | WRITE_ONCE(fc->congestion_threshold, val); | ^~~~~~~~~~ control.c:166:18: note: ‘val’ was declared here 166 | unsigned val; | ^~~ Unfortunately there's enough macro spew involved in kstrtoul_from_user that I think gcc gives up on its analysis and sprays the above warning. AFAICT it's not actually a bug, but we could just zero-initialize the variable to enable using -Wmaybe-uninitialized to find real problems. Previously we would use some weird uninitialized_var annotation to quiet down the warnings, so clearly this code has been like this for quite some time. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9 Fixes: 3f649ab728cda8 ("treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage") Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: Remove the control interface for virtio-fs

2022-08-17T12:24:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit c64797809a64c73497082aa05e401a062ec1af34 ] The commit 15c8e72e88e0 ("fuse: allow skipping control interface and forced unmount") tries to remove the control interface for virtio-fs since it does not support aborting requests which are being processed. But it doesn't work now. This patch fixes it by skipping creating the control interface if fuse_conn->no_control is set. Fixes: 15c8e72e88e0 ("fuse: allow skipping control interface and forced unmount") Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: name fs_context consistently

2021-08-04T11:22:58+00:00

Naming convention under fs/fuse/: struct fuse_conn *fc; struct fs_context *fsc; Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi

fuse: split fuse_mount off of fuse_conn

2020-09-18T13:17:41+00:00

We want to allow submounts for the same fuse_conn, but with different superblocks so that each of the submounts has its own device ID. To do so, we need to split all mount-specific information off of fuse_conn into a new fuse_mount structure, so that multiple mounts can share a single fuse_conn. We need to take care only to perform connection-level actions once (i.e. when the fuse_conn and thus the first fuse_mount are established, or when the last fuse_mount and thus the fuse_conn are destroyed). For example, fuse_sb_destroy() must invoke fuse_send_destroy() until the last superblock is released. To do so, we keep track of which fuse_mount is the root mount and perform all fuse_conn-level actions only when this fuse_mount is involved. Signed-off-by: Max Reitz Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi

treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage

2020-07-16T19:35:15+00:00

Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining needless uses with the following script: git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \ xargs perl -pi -e \ 's/\buninitialized_var$([^$]+)\)/\1/g; s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;' drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid pathological white-space. No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0 for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64, alpha, and m68k. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5 Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe # IB Acked-by: Kalle Valo # wireless drivers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu # erofs Signed-off-by: Kees Cook

convenience helper: get_tree_single()

2019-07-05T02:01:58+00:00

counterpart of mount_single(); switch fusectl to it Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fuse: Convert fusectl to use the new mount API

2019-04-24T15:05:07+00:00

Convert the fusectl filesystem to the new internal mount API as the old one will be obsoleted and removed. This allows greater flexibility in communication of mount parameters between userspace, the VFS and the filesystem. See Documentation/filesystems/mount_api.txt for more information. Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi

fuse: clean up aborted

2019-02-13T12:15:14+00:00

The only caller that needs fc->aborted set is fuse_conn_abort_write(). Setting fc->aborted is now racy (fuse_abort_conn() may already be in progress or finished) but there's no reason to care. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi

fuse: introduce fc->bg_lock

2018-09-28T14:43:22+00:00

To reduce contention of fc->lock, this patch introduces bg_lock for protection of fields related to background queue. These are: max_background, congestion_threshold, num_background, active_background, bg_queue and blocked. This allows next patch to make async reads not requiring fc->lock, so async reads and writes will have better performance executed in parallel. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi

fuse: add locking to max_background and congestion_threshold changes

2018-09-28T14:43:22+00:00

Functions sequences like request_end()->flush_bg_queue() require that max_background and congestion_threshold are constant during their execution. Otherwise, checks like if (fc->num_background == fc->max_background) made in different time may behave not like expected. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi