kernel/linux.git/fs/fscache, branch v6.6.132

netfs/fscache: Add a memory barrier for FSCACHE_VOLUME_CREATING

2024-12-09T09:31:45+00:00

[ Upstream commit 22f9400a6f3560629478e0a64247b8fcc811a24d ] In fscache_create_volume(), there is a missing memory barrier between the bit-clearing operation and the wake-up operation. This may cause a situation where, after a wake-up, the bit-clearing operation hasn't been detected yet, leading to an indefinite wait. The triggering process is as follows: [cookie1] [cookie2] [volume_work] fscache_perform_lookup fscache_create_volume fscache_perform_lookup fscache_create_volume fscache_create_volume_work cachefiles_acquire_volume clear_and_wake_up_bit test_and_set_bit test_and_set_bit goto maybe_wait goto no_wait In the above process, cookie1 and cookie2 has the same volume. When cookie1 enters the -no_wait- process, it will clear the bit and wake up the waiting process. If a barrier is missing, it may cause cookie2 to remain in the -wait- process indefinitely. In commit 3288666c7256 ("fscache: Use clear_and_wake_up_bit() in fscache_create_volume_work()"), barriers were added to similar operations in fscache_create_volume_work(), but fscache_create_volume() was missed. By combining the clear and wake operations into clear_and_wake_up_bit() to fix this issue. Fixes: bfa22da3ed65 ("fscache: Provide and use cache methods to lookup/create/free a volume") Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107110649.3980193-6-wozizhi@huawei.com Acked-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fscache: delete fscache_cookie_lru_timer when fscache exits to avoid UAF

2024-09-12T09:11:27+00:00

commit 72a6e22c604c95ddb3b10b5d3bb85b6ff4dbc34f upstream. The fscache_cookie_lru_timer is initialized when the fscache module is inserted, but is not deleted when the fscache module is removed. If timer_reduce() is called before removing the fscache module, the fscache_cookie_lru_timer will be added to the timer list of the current cpu. Afterwards, a use-after-free will be triggered in the softIRQ after removing the fscache module, as follows: ================================================================== BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff803c9e9 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 21ffea067 P4D 21ffea067 PUD 21ffe6067 PMD 110a7c067 PTE 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G W 6.11.0-rc3 #855 Tainted: [W]=WARN RIP: 0010:__run_timer_base.part.0+0x254/0x8a0 Call Trace: tmigr_handle_remote_up+0x627/0x810 __walk_groups.isra.0+0x47/0x140 tmigr_handle_remote+0x1fa/0x2f0 handle_softirqs+0x180/0x590 irq_exit_rcu+0x84/0xb0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20 default_idle_call+0x38/0x60 do_idle+0x2b5/0x300 cpu_startup_entry+0x54/0x60 start_secondary+0x20d/0x280 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x148 Modules linked in: [last unloaded: netfs] ================================================================== Therefore delete fscache_cookie_lru_timer when removing the fscahe module. Fixes: 12bb21a29c19 ("fscache: Implement cookie user counting and resource pinning") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826112056.2458299-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com Acked-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fs/netfs/fscache_cookie: add missing "n_accesses" check

2024-08-29T15:33:15+00:00

commit f71aa06398aabc2e3eaac25acdf3d62e0094ba70 upstream. This fixes a NULL pointer dereference bug due to a data race which looks like this: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 33 PID: 16573 Comm: kworker/u97:799 Not tainted 6.8.7-cm4all1-hp+ #43 Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9/ProLiant DL380 Gen9, BIOS P89 10/17/2018 Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work RIP: 0010:cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0 Code: 57 41 56 45 89 ce 41 55 49 89 cd 41 54 49 89 d4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 48 8b 47 08 48 83 7f 10 00 48 89 34 24 48 8b 68 20 <48> 8b 45 08 4c 8b 38 74 45 49 8b 7f 50 e8 4e a9 b0 ff 48 8b 73 10 RSP: 0018:ffffb4e78113bde0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffff976126be6d10 RBX: ffff97615cdb8438 RCX: 0000000000020000 RDX: ffff97605e6c4c68 RSI: ffff97605e6c4c60 RDI: ffff97615cdb8438 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000278333 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff97605e6c4600 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97605e6c4c68 R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff976064fe2c00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9776dfd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000005942c002 CR4: 00000000001706f0 Call Trace: ? __die+0x1f/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x15d/0x440 ? search_module_extables+0xe/0x40 ? fixup_exception+0x22/0x2f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x5f/0x100 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0 netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work+0x135/0x2e0 process_one_work+0x137/0x2c0 worker_thread+0x2e9/0x400 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcc/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Modules linked in: CR2: 0000000000000008 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This happened because fscache_cookie_state_machine() was slow and was still running while another process invoked fscache_unuse_cookie(); this led to a fscache_cookie_lru_do_one() call, setting the FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD flag, which was picked up by fscache_cookie_state_machine(), withdrawing the cookie via cachefiles_withdraw_cookie(), clearing cookie->cache_priv. At the same time, yet another process invoked cachefiles_prepare_write(), which found a NULL pointer in this code line: struct cachefiles_object *object = cachefiles_cres_object(cres); The next line crashes, obviously: struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object->volume->cache; During cachefiles_prepare_write(), the "n_accesses" counter is non-zero (via fscache_begin_operation()). The cookie must not be withdrawn until it drops to zero. The counter is checked by fscache_cookie_state_machine() before switching to FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_RELINQUISHING and FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_WITHDRAWING (in "case FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_FAILED"), but not for FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_LRU_DISCARDING ("case FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_ACTIVE"). This patch adds the missing check. With a non-zero access counter, the function returns and the next fscache_end_cookie_access() call will queue another fscache_cookie_state_machine() call to handle the still-pending FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD. Fixes: 12bb21a29c19 ("fscache: Implement cookie user counting and resource pinning") Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann Signed-off-by: David Howells Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240729162002.3436763-2-dhowells@redhat.com cc: Jeff Layton cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfs, fscache: export fscache_put_volume() and add fscache_try_get_volume()

2024-07-25T07:50:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit 85b08b31a22b481ec6528130daf94eee4452e23f ] Export fscache_put_volume() and add fscache_try_get_volume() helper function to allow cachefiles to get/put fscache_volume via linux/fscache-cache.h. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-2-libaokun@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Stable-dep-of: 522018a0de6b ("cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in fscache_withdraw_volume()") Stable-dep-of: 5d8f80578907 ("cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie()") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfs, fscache: Prevent Oops in fscache_put_cache()

2024-02-01T00:19:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3be0b3ed1d76c6703b9ee482b55f7e01c369cc68 ] This function dereferences "cache" and then checks if it's IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). Check first, then dereference. Fixes: 9549332df4ed ("fscache: Implement cache registration") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: David Howells Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e84bc740-3502-4f16-982a-a40d5676615c@moroto.mountain/ # v2 Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fscache: Use clear_and_wake_up_bit() in fscache_create_volume_work()

2023-01-30T12:51:54+00:00

fscache_create_volume_work() uses wake_up_bit() to wake up the processes which are waiting for the completion of volume creation. According to comments in wake_up_bit() and waitqueue_active(), an extra smp_mb() is needed to guarantee the memory order between FSCACHE_VOLUME_CREATING flag and waitqueue_active() before invoking wake_up_bit(). Fixing it by using clear_and_wake_up_bit() to add the missing memory barrier. Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113115211.2895845-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ # v3

fscache: Use wait_on_bit() to wait for the freeing of relinquished volume

2023-01-30T12:51:53+00:00

The freeing of relinquished volume will wake up the pending volume acquisition by using wake_up_bit(), however it is mismatched with wait_var_event() used in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision() and it will never wake up the waiter in the wait-queue because these two functions operate on different wait-queues. According to the implementation in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(), if the wake-up of pending acquisition is delayed longer than 20 seconds (e.g., due to the delay of on-demand fd closing), the first wait_var_event_timeout() will timeout and the following wait_var_event() will hang forever as shown below: FS-Cache: Potential volume collision new=00000024 old=00000022 ...... INFO: task mount:1148 blocked for more than 122 seconds. Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6+ #1 task:mount state:D stack:0 pid:1148 ppid:1 Call Trace: __schedule+0x2f6/0xb80 schedule+0x67/0xe0 fscache_wait_on_volume_collision.cold+0x80/0x82 __fscache_acquire_volume+0x40d/0x4e0 erofs_fscache_register_volume+0x51/0xe0 [erofs] erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x19c/0x240 [erofs] erofs_fc_fill_super+0x746/0xaf0 [erofs] vfs_get_super+0x7d/0x100 get_tree_nodev+0x16/0x20 erofs_fc_get_tree+0x20/0x30 [erofs] vfs_get_tree+0x24/0xb0 path_mount+0x2fa/0xa90 do_mount+0x7c/0xa0 __x64_sys_mount+0x8b/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x30/0x60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 Considering that wake_up_bit() is more selective, so fix it by using wait_on_bit() instead of wait_var_event() to wait for the freeing of relinquished volume. In addition because waitqueue_active() is used in wake_up_bit() and clear_bit() doesn't imply any memory barrier, use clear_and_wake_up_bit() to add the missing memory barrier between cursor->flags and waitqueue_active(). Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration") Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113115211.2895845-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ # v3

Merge tag 'pull-iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

2022-12-13T02:29:54+00:00

Pull iov_iter updates from Al Viro: "iov_iter work; most of that is about getting rid of direction misannotations and (hopefully) preventing more of the same for the future" * tag 'pull-iov_iter' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializers iov_iter: saner checks for attempt to copy to/from iterator [xen] fix "direction" argument of iov_iter_kvec() [vhost] fix 'direction' argument of iov_iter_{init,bvec}() [target] fix iov_iter_bvec() "direction" argument [s390] memcpy_real(): WRITE is "data source", not destination... [s390] zcore: WRITE is "data source", not destination... [infiniband] READ is "data destination", not source... [fsi] WRITE is "data source", not destination... [s390] copy_oldmem_kernel() - WRITE is "data source", not destination csum_and_copy_to_iter(): handle ITER_DISCARD get rid of unlikely() on page_copy_sane() calls

fscache: Fix oops due to race with cookie_lru and use_cookie

2022-12-07T19:49:18+00:00

If a cookie expires from the LRU and the LRU_DISCARD flag is set, but the state machine has not run yet, it's possible another thread can call fscache_use_cookie and begin to use it. When the cookie_worker finally runs, it will see the LRU_DISCARD flag set, transition the cookie->state to LRU_DISCARDING, which will then withdraw the cookie. Once the cookie is withdrawn the object is removed the below oops will occur because the object associated with the cookie is now NULL. Fix the oops by clearing the LRU_DISCARD bit if another thread uses the cookie before the cookie_worker runs. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 ... CPU: 31 PID: 44773 Comm: kworker/u130:1 Tainted: G E 6.0.0-5.dneg.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/26/2022 Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work [netfs] RIP: 0010:cachefiles_prepare_write+0x28/0x90 [cachefiles] ... Call Trace: netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work+0x11c/0x320 [netfs] process_one_work+0x217/0x3e0 worker_thread+0x4a/0x3b0 kthread+0xd6/0x100 Fixes: 12bb21a29c19 ("fscache: Implement cookie user counting and resource pinning") Reported-by: Daire Byrne Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski Signed-off-by: David Howells Tested-by: Daire Byrne Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117115023.1350181-1-dwysocha@redhat.com/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117142915.1366990-1-dwysocha@redhat.com/ # v2 Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializers

2022-11-25T18:01:55+00:00

READ/WRITE proved to be actively confusing - the meanings are "data destination, as used with read(2)" and "data source, as used with write(2)", but people keep interpreting those as "we read data from it" and "we write data to it", i.e. exactly the wrong way. Call them ITER_DEST and ITER_SOURCE - at least that is harder to misinterpret... Signed-off-by: Al Viro