kernel/linux.git/fs/ext4, branch v5.10.257

ext4: publish jinode after initialization

2026-04-18T08:31:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1aec30021edd410b986c156f195f3d23959a9d11 ] ext4_inode_attach_jinode() publishes ei->jinode to concurrent users. It used to set ei->jinode before jbd2_journal_init_jbd_inode(), allowing a reader to observe a non-NULL jinode with i_vfs_inode still unset. The fast commit flush path can then pass this jinode to jbd2_wait_inode_data(), which dereferences i_vfs_inode->i_mapping and may crash. Below is the crash I observe: ``` BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000010beb47f4 PGD 110e51067 P4D 110e51067 PUD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 4850 Comm: fc_fsync_bench_ Not tainted 6.18.0-00764-g795a690c06a5 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:xas_find_marked+0x3d/0x2e0 Code: e0 03 48 83 f8 02 0f 84 f0 01 00 00 48 8b 47 08 48 89 c3 48 39 c6 0f 82 fd 01 00 00 48 85 c9 74 3d 48 83 f9 03 77 63 4c 8b 0f <49> 8b 71 08 48 c7 47 18 00 00 00 00 48 89 f1 83 e1 03 48 83 f9 02 RSP: 0018:ffffbbee806e7bf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 000000000010beb4 RBX: 000000000010beb4 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000002000300000 RDI: ffffbbee806e7c10 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000002000300000 R09: 000000010beb47ec R10: ffff9ea494590090 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000002000300000 R13: ffffbbee806e7c90 R14: ffff9ea494513788 R15: ffffbbee806e7c88 FS: 00007fc2f9e3e6c0(0000) GS:ffff9ea6b1444000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000010beb47f4 CR3: 0000000119ac5000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: filemap_get_folios_tag+0x87/0x2a0 __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x5f/0xd0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __schedule+0x3e7/0x10c0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? cap_safe_nice+0x37/0x70 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors+0x12/0x40 ext4_fc_commit+0x697/0x8b0 ? ext4_file_write_iter+0x64b/0x950 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? vfs_write+0x356/0x480 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? preempt_count_sub+0x5f/0x80 ext4_sync_file+0xf7/0x370 do_fsync+0x3b/0x80 ? syscall_trace_enter+0x108/0x1d0 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ... ``` Fix this by initializing the jbd2_inode first. Use smp_wmb() and WRITE_ONCE() to publish ei->jinode after initialization. Readers use READ_ONCE() to fetch the pointer. Fixes: a361293f5fede ("jbd2: Fix oops in jbd2_journal_file_inode()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Li Chen Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260225082617.147957-1-me@linux.beauty Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org [ adapted READ_ONCE(jinode) wrapping to split ext4_fc_submit_inode_data_all() and ext4_fc_wait_inode_data_all() ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fix iloc.bh leak in ext4_fc_replay_inode() error paths

2026-04-18T08:31:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit ec0a7500d8eace5b4f305fa0c594dd148f0e8d29 ] During code review, Joseph found that ext4_fc_replay_inode() calls ext4_get_fc_inode_loc() to get the inode location, which holds a reference to iloc.bh that must be released via brelse(). However, several error paths jump to the 'out' label without releasing iloc.bh: - ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() failure - sync_dirty_buffer() failure - ext4_mark_inode_used() failure - ext4_iget() failure Fix this by introducing an 'out_brelse' label placed just before the existing 'out' label to ensure iloc.bh is always released. Additionally, make ext4_fc_replay_inode() propagate errors properly instead of always returning 0. Reported-by: Joseph Qi Fixes: 8016e29f4362 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260323060836.3452660-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fix the might_sleep() warnings in kvfree()

2026-04-18T08:31:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit 496bb99b7e66f48b178126626f47e9ba79e2d0fa ] Use the kvfree() in the RCU read critical section can trigger the following warnings: EXT4-fs (vdb): unmounting filesystem cd983e5b-3c83-4f5a-a136-17b00eb9d018. WARNING: suspicious RCU usage ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:409 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xbb/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x15a/0x1b0 __might_resched+0x375/0x4d0 ? put_object.part.0+0x2c/0x50 __might_sleep+0x108/0x160 vfree+0x58/0x910 ? ext4_group_desc_free+0x27/0x270 kvfree+0x23/0x40 ext4_group_desc_free+0x111/0x270 ext4_put_super+0x3c8/0xd40 generic_shutdown_super+0x14c/0x4a0 ? __pfx_shrinker_free+0x10/0x10 kill_block_super+0x40/0x90 ext4_kill_sb+0x6d/0xb0 deactivate_locked_super+0xb4/0x180 deactivate_super+0x7e/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x296/0x3e0 __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20 task_work_run+0x157/0x250 ? __pfx_task_work_run+0x10/0x10 ? exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x6a/0x550 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x102/0x550 do_syscall_64+0x44a/0x500 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:3441 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 556, name: umount preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 556 Comm: umount Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xbb/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __might_resched+0x275/0x4d0 ? put_object.part.0+0x2c/0x50 __might_sleep+0x108/0x160 vfree+0x58/0x910 ? ext4_group_desc_free+0x27/0x270 kvfree+0x23/0x40 ext4_group_desc_free+0x111/0x270 ext4_put_super+0x3c8/0xd40 generic_shutdown_super+0x14c/0x4a0 ? __pfx_shrinker_free+0x10/0x10 kill_block_super+0x40/0x90 ext4_kill_sb+0x6d/0xb0 deactivate_locked_super+0xb4/0x180 deactivate_super+0x7e/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x296/0x3e0 __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20 task_work_run+0x157/0x250 ? __pfx_task_work_run+0x10/0x10 ? exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x6a/0x550 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x102/0x550 do_syscall_64+0x44a/0x500 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The above scenarios occur in initialization failures and teardown paths, there are no parallel operations on the resources released by kvfree(), this commit therefore remove rcu_read_lock/unlock() and use rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference() operations. Fixes: 7c990728b99e ("ext4: fix potential race between s_flex_groups online resizing and access") Fixes: df3da4ea5a0f ("ext4: fix potential race between s_group_info online resizing and access") Signed-off-by: Zqiang Reviewed-by: Baokun Li Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319094545.19291-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org [ adapted inline rcu_read_lock/rcu_dereference/rcu_read_unlock removal ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: reject mount if bigalloc with s_first_data_block != 0

2026-04-18T08:31:07+00:00

commit 3822743dc20386d9897e999dbb990befa3a5b3f8 upstream. bigalloc with s_first_data_block != 0 is not supported, reject mounting it. Signed-off-by: Helen Koike Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o Reported-by: syzbot+b73703b873a33d8eb8f6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b73703b873a33d8eb8f6 Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260317142325.135074-1-koike@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: avoid allocate block from corrupted group in ext4_mb_find_by_goal()

2026-04-18T08:31:07+00:00

commit 46066e3a06647c5b186cc6334409722622d05c44 upstream. There's issue as follows: ... EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 206 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 2243 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 2239 at logical offset 0 with max blocks 1 with error 117 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): This should not happen!! Data will be lost EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): error count since last fsck: 1 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): initial error at time 1765597433: ext4_mb_generate_buddy:760 EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p1): last error at time 1765597433: ext4_mb_generate_buddy:760 ... According to the log analysis, blocks are always requested from the corrupted block group. This may happen as follows: ext4_mb_find_by_goal ext4_mb_load_buddy ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp ext4_mb_init_cache ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait ext4_wait_block_bitmap ext4_validate_block_bitmap if (!grp || EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(grp)) return -EFSCORRUPTED; // There's no logs. if (err) return err; // Will return error ext4_lock_group(ac->ac_sb, group); if (unlikely(EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(e4b->bd_info))) // Unreachable goto out; After commit 9008a58e5dce ("ext4: make the bitmap read routines return real error codes") merged, Commit 163a203ddb36 ("ext4: mark block group as corrupt on block bitmap error") is no real solution for allocating blocks from corrupted block groups. This is because if 'EXT4_MB_GRP_BBITMAP_CORRUPT(e4b->bd_info)' is true, then 'ext4_mb_load_buddy()' may return an error. This means that the block allocation will fail. Therefore, check block group if corrupted when ext4_mb_load_buddy() returns error. Fixes: 163a203ddb36 ("ext4: mark block group as corrupt on block bitmap error") Fixes: 9008a58e5dce ("ext4: make the bitmap read routines return real error codes") Signed-off-by: Ye Bin Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260302134619.3145520-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: make recently_deleted() properly work with lazy itable initialization

2026-04-18T08:31:07+00:00

commit bd060afa7cc3e0ad30afa9ecc544a78638498555 upstream. recently_deleted() checks whether inode has been used in the near past. However this can give false positive result when inode table is not initialized yet and we are in fact comparing to random garbage (or stale itable block of a filesystem before mkfs). Ultimately this results in uninitialized inodes being skipped during inode allocation and possibly they are never initialized and thus e2fsck complains. Verify if the inode has been initialized before checking for dtime. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260216164848.3074-3-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: convert inline data to extents when truncate exceeds inline size

2026-04-18T08:31:07+00:00

commit ed9356a30e59c7cc3198e7fc46cfedf3767b9b17 upstream. Add a check in ext4_setattr() to convert files from inline data storage to extent-based storage when truncate() grows the file size beyond the inline capacity. This prevents the filesystem from entering an inconsistent state where the inline data flag is set but the file size exceeds what can be stored inline. Without this fix, the following sequence causes a kernel BUG_ON(): 1. Mount filesystem with inode that has inline flag set and small size 2. truncate(file, 50MB) - grows size but inline flag remains set 3. sendfile() attempts to write data 4. ext4_write_inline_data() hits BUG_ON(write_size > inline_capacity) The crash occurs because ext4_write_inline_data() expects inline storage to accommodate the write, but the actual inline capacity (~60 bytes for i_block + ~96 bytes for xattrs) is far smaller than the file size and write request. The fix checks if the new size from setattr exceeds the inode's actual inline capacity (EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_size) and converts the file to extent-based storage before proceeding with the size change. This addresses the root cause by ensuring the inline data flag and file size remain consistent during truncate operations. Reported-by: syzbot+7de5fe447862fc37576f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7de5fe447862fc37576f Tested-by: syzbot+7de5fe447862fc37576f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260207043607.1175976-1-kartikey406@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown

2026-04-18T08:30:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit 94a8cea54cd935c54fa2fba70354757c0fc245e3 ] fstests test generic/388 occasionally reproduces a warning in ext4_put_super() associated with the dirty clusters count: WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 76064 at fs/ext4/super.c:1324 ext4_put_super+0x48c/0x590 [ext4] Tracing the failure shows that the warning fires due to an s_dirtyclusters_counter value of -1. IOW, this appears to be a spurious decrement as opposed to some sort of leak. Further tracing of the dirty cluster count deltas and an LLM scan of the resulting output identified the cause as a double decrement in the error path between ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() and the caller ext4_mb_new_blocks(). First, note that generic/388 is a shutdown vs. fsstress test and so produces a random set of operations and shutdown injections. In the problematic case, the shutdown triggers an error return from the ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() call(s) made from ext4_mb_mark_context(). The changed value is non-zero at this point, so ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() does not exit after the error bubbles up from ext4_mb_mark_context(). Instead, the former decrements both cluster counters and returns the error up to ext4_mb_new_blocks(). The latter falls into the !ar->len out path which decrements the dirty clusters counter a second time, creating the inconsistency. To avoid this problem and simplify ownership of the cluster reservation in this codepath, lift the counter reduction to a single place in the caller. This makes it more clear that ext4_mb_new_blocks() is responsible for acquiring cluster reservation (via ext4_claim_free_clusters()) in the !delalloc case as well as releasing it, regardless of whether it ends up consumed or returned due to failure. Fixes: 0087d9fb3f29 ("ext4: Fix s_dirty_blocks_counter if block allocation failed with nodelalloc") Signed-off-by: Brian Foster Reviewed-by: Baokun Li Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260113171905.118284-1-bfoster@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org [ Drop mballoc-test changes ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: drop extent cache when splitting extent fails

2026-04-18T08:30:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit 79b592e8f1b435796cbc2722190368e3e8ffd7a1 ] When the split extent fails, we might leave some extents still being processed and return an error directly, which will result in stale extent entries remaining in the extent status tree. So drop all of the remaining potentially stale extents if the splitting fails. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Baokun Li Cc: stable@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo Message-ID: <20251129103247.686136-8-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o [ bring error handling pattern closer to upstream ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: don't set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting before submitting I/O

2026-04-18T08:30:58+00:00

[ Upstream commit feaf2a80e78f89ee8a3464126077ba8683b62791 ] When allocating blocks during within-EOF DIO and writeback with dioread_nolock enabled, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO was set to split an existing large unwritten extent. However, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT was set when calling ext4_split_convert_extents(), which may potentially result in stale data issues. Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the second half. [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree |<- ->| ----> dio write this range First, ext4_iomap_alloc() call ext4_map_blocks() with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT and EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE flags set. ext4_map_blocks() find this extent and call ext4_split_convert_extents() with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT and the above flags set. Then, ext4_split_convert_extents() calls ext4_split_extent() with EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, and it calls ext4_split_extent_at() to split the second half with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1, EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 flags set. However, ext4_split_extent_at() failed to insert extent since a temporary lack -ENOSPC. It zeroes out the first half but convert the entire on-disk extent to written since the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set, but left the second half as unwritten in the extent status tree. [0000000000SSSSSS] data S: stale data, 0: zeroed [WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent [WWWWWWWWWWUUUUUU] extent status tree Finally, if the DIO failed to write data to the disk, the stale data in the second half will be exposed once the cached extent entry is gone. Fix this issue by not passing EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting an unwritten extent before submitting I/O, and make ext4_split_convert_extents() to zero out the entire extent range to zero for this case, and also mark the extent in the extent status tree for consistency. Fixes: b8a8684502a0 ("ext4: Introduce FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag for fallocate") Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo Reviewed-by: Baokun Li Cc: stable@kernel.org Message-ID: <20251129103247.686136-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o [ different function signatures ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman