kernel/linux.git/fs/ext2, branch v5.10.257

minmax: add in_range() macro

2025-10-29T13:01:15+00:00

[ Upstream commit f9bff0e31881d03badf191d3b0005839391f5f2b ] Patch series "New page table range API", v6. This patchset changes the API used by the MM to set up page table entries. The four APIs are: set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep, pte, nr) update_mmu_cache_range(vma, addr, ptep, nr) flush_dcache_folio(folio) flush_icache_pages(vma, page, nr) flush_dcache_folio() isn't technically new, but no architecture implemented it, so I've done that for them. The old APIs remain around but are mostly implemented by calling the new interfaces. The new APIs are based around setting up N page table entries at once. The N entries belong to the same PMD, the same folio and the same VMA, so ptep++ is a legitimate operation, and locking is taken care of for you. Some architectures can do a better job of it than just a loop, but I have hesitated to make too deep a change to architectures I don't understand well. One thing I have changed in every architecture is that PG_arch_1 is now a per-folio bit instead of a per-page bit when used for dcache clean/dirty tracking. This was something that would have to happen eventually, and it makes sense to do it now rather than iterate over every page involved in a cache flush and figure out if it needs to happen. The point of all this is better performance, and Fengwei Yin has measured improvement on x86. I suspect you'll see improvement on your architecture too. Try the new will-it-scale test mentioned here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230206140639.538867-5-fengwei.yin@intel.com/ You'll need to run it on an XFS filesystem and have CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE set. This patchset is the basis for much of the anonymous large folio work being done by Ryan, so it's received quite a lot of testing over the last few months. This patch (of 38): Determine if a value lies within a range more efficiently (subtraction + comparison vs two comparisons and an AND). It also has useful (under some circumstances) behaviour if the range exceeds the maximum value of the type. Convert all the conflicting definitions of in_range() within the kernel; some can use the generic definition while others need their own definition. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230802151406.3735276-1-willy@infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230802151406.3735276-2-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext2: Verify bitmap and itable block numbers before using them

2024-08-19T03:40:56+00:00

commit 322a6aff03937aa1ece33b4e46c298eafaf9ac41 upstream. Verify bitmap block numbers and inode table blocks are sane before using them for checking bits in the block bitmap. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext2: fix datatype of block number in ext2_xattr_set2()

2023-09-23T09:01:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit e88076348425b7d0491c8c98d8732a7df8de7aa3 ] I run a small server that uses external hard drives for backups. The backup software I use uses ext2 filesystems with 4KiB block size and the server is running SELinux and therefore relies on xattr. I recently upgraded the hard drives from 4TB to 12TB models. I noticed that after transferring some TBs I got a filesystem error "Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 18446744071529317386, count = 1" and the backup process stopped. Trying to fix the fs with e2fsck resulted in a completely corrupted fs. The error probably came from ext2_free_blocks(), and because of the large number 18e19 this problem immediately looked like some kind of integer overflow. Whereas the 4TB fs was about 1e9 blocks, the new 12TB is about 3e9 blocks. So, searching the ext2 code, I came across the line in fs/ext2/xattr.c:745 where ext2_new_block() is called and the resulting block number is stored in the variable block as an int datatype. If a block with a block number greater than INT32_MAX is returned, this variable overflows and the call to sb_getblk() at line fs/ext2/xattr.c:750 fails, then the call to ext2_free_blocks() produces the error. Signed-off-by: Georg Ottinger Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Message-Id: <20230815100340.22121-1-g.ottinger@gmx.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: Drop fragment support

2023-08-11T09:57:54+00:00

commit 404615d7f1dcd4cca200e9a7a9df3a1dcae1dd62 upstream. Ext2 has fields in superblock reserved for subblock allocation support. However that never landed. Drop the many years dead code. Reported-by: syzbot+af5e10f73dbff48f70af@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext2: Check block size validity during mount

2023-05-30T11:57:48+00:00

[ Upstream commit 62aeb94433fcec80241754b70d0d1836d5926b0a ] Check that log of block size stored in the superblock has sensible value. Otherwise the shift computing the block size can overflow leading to undefined behavior. Reported-by: syzbot+4fec412f59eba8c01b77@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: Add more validity checks for inode counts

2022-08-21T13:15:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit fa78f336937240d1bc598db817d638086060e7e9 ] Add checks verifying number of inodes stored in the superblock matches the number computed from number of inodes per group. Also verify we have at least one block worth of inodes per group. This prevents crashes on corrupted filesystems. Reported-by: syzbot+d273f7d7f58afd93be48@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: correct max file size computing

2022-04-08T12:40:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 50b3a818991074177a56c87124c7a7bdf5fa4f67 ] We need to calculate the max file size accurately if the total blocks that can address by block tree exceed the upper_limit. But this check is not correct now, it only compute the total data blocks but missing metadata blocks are needed. So in the case of "data blocks < upper_limit && total blocks > upper_limit", we will get wrong result. Fortunately, this case could not happen in reality, but it's confused and better to correct the computing. bits data blocks metadatablocks upper_limit 10 16843020 66051 2147483647 11 134480396 263171 1073741823 12 1074791436 1050627 536870911 (*) 13 8594130956 4198403 268435455 (*) 14 68736258060 16785411 134217727 (*) 15 549822930956 67125251 67108863 (*) 16 4398314962956 268468227 33554431 (*) [*] Need to calculate in depth. Fixes: 1c2d14212b15 ("ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220212050532.179055-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ext2: fix sleeping in atomic bugs on error

2021-10-09T12:40:56+00:00

[ Upstream commit 372d1f3e1bfede719864d0d1fbf3146b1e638c88 ] The ext2_error() function syncs the filesystem so it sleeps. The caller is holding a spinlock so it's not allowed to sleep. ext2_statfs() <- disables preempt -> ext2_count_free_blocks() -> ext2_get_group_desc() Fix this by using WARN() to print an error message and a stack trace instead of using ext2_error(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210921203233.GA16529@kili Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Merge branch 'work.misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

2020-10-24T19:26:05+00:00

Pull misc vfs updates from Al Viro: "Assorted stuff all over the place (the largest group here is Christoph's stat cleanups)" * 'work.misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: fs: remove KSTAT_QUERY_FLAGS fs: remove vfs_stat_set_lookup_flags fs: move vfs_fstatat out of line fs: implement vfs_stat and vfs_lstat in terms of vfs_fstatat fs: remove vfs_statx_fd fs: omfs: use kmemdup() rather than kmalloc+memcpy [PATCH] reduce boilerplate in fsid handling fs: Remove duplicated flag O_NDELAY occurring twice in VALID_OPEN_FLAGS selftests: mount: add nosymfollow tests Add a "nosymfollow" mount option.

Merge tag 'fs_for_v5.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs

2020-10-15T21:56:15+00:00

Pull UDF, reiserfs, ext2, quota fixes from Jan Kara: - a couple of UDF fixes for issues found by syzbot fuzzing - a couple of reiserfs fixes for issues found by syzbot fuzzing - some minor ext2 cleanups - quota patches to support grace times beyond year 2038 for XFS quota APIs * tag 'fs_for_v5.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs: reiserfs: Fix oops during mount udf: Limit sparing table size udf: Remove pointless union in udf_inode_info udf: Avoid accessing uninitialized data on failed inode read quota: clear padding in v2r1_mem2diskdqb() reiserfs: Initialize inode keys properly udf: Fix memory leak when mounting udf: Remove redundant initialization of variable ret reiserfs: only call unlock_new_inode() if I_NEW ext2: Fix some kernel-doc warnings in balloc.c quota: Expand comment describing d_itimer quota: widen timestamps for the fs_disk_quota structure reiserfs: Fix memory leak in reiserfs_parse_options() udf: Use kvzalloc() in udf_sb_alloc_bitmap() ext2: remove duplicate include