<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/linux.git/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c, branch v6.12.102</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v6.12.102</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v6.12.102'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2026-08-03T09:17:29+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices()</title>
<updated>2026-08-03T09:17:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-29T15:21:27+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=97a688563be71ec6fefc071aff69a66c69dbe244'/>
<id>urn:sha1:97a688563be71ec6fefc071aff69a66c69dbe244</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 6fe4e4b8259e1330945b5f3c9476e08473b8e0e8 upstream.

When a blk_crypto_key starts being used or is evicted, fs/crypto/ calls
fscrypt_get_devices() to get the filesystem's list of block devices,
then iterates over them and calls blk_crypto_config_supported(),
blk_crypto_start_using_key(), or blk_crypto_evict_key() on each one.

Currently, the block device pointers are placed in a dynamically
allocated array.  This dynamic allocation is problematic because:

- It can fail, especially at the fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() call
  site when it's invoked for inode eviction under direct reclaim.

- fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() doesn't handle the failure.  It
  just zeroizes and frees the blk_crypto_key without calling
  blk_crypto_evict_key().  That causes a use-after-free.

For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable
way by switching to an on-stack array.  Currently the fscrypt
multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded
limit of 8 block devices.  An on-stack array works fine for that.

(Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block
devices.  For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block
device iteration into the filesystem.  Or in the case of btrfs, which
will only support blk-crypto-fallback, we should make it just call
blk-crypto-fallback directly, so the block devices won't be needed.)

Fixes: 22e9947a4b2b ("fscrypt: stop holding extra request_queue references")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sashiko &lt;sashiko-bot@kernel.org&gt;
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713023708.9245-1-ebiggers%40kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260719055602.78828-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: Fix key setup in edge case with multiple data unit sizes</title>
<updated>2026-07-24T14:11:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2026-07-17T04:43:02+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=eff39322a57ce396f6fa67a671f4c59af6c4b796'/>
<id>urn:sha1:eff39322a57ce396f6fa67a671f4c59af6c4b796</id>
<content type='text'>
commit dd015b566d505d698386103e9c80b739c7336eb8 upstream.

The addition of support for customizable data unit sizes introduced an
edge case where a file's contents can be en/decrypted with the wrong
data unit size.  It occurs when there are multiple v2 policies that:

- Have *different* data unit sizes, via the log2_data_unit_size field

- Share the same master_key_identifier, contents_encryption_mode, and
  either FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY,
  FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32, or
  FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64

- Are being used on the same filesystem, which also must be mounted with
  the "inlinecrypt" mount option.

Fortunately this edge case doesn't actually occur in practice.  I just
found it via code review.  But it needs to be fixed regardless.

The bug is caused by the data unit size not being fully considered when
blk_crypto_keys are cached in mk_direct_keys, mk_iv_ino_lblk_32_keys,
and mk_iv_ino_lblk_64_keys.  They're differentiated only by master key,
encryption mode, and flag.  However, each one actually has a data unit
size too.  Only the first data unit size that is cached is used.

To fix this, start using the data unit size to differentiate the cached
keys.  For several reasons, including avoiding increasing the size of
struct fscrypt_master_key, just replace all three arrays with a single
linked list instead of changing them into two-dimensional arrays.  This
works well when considering that in practice at most 2 entries are used
across all three arrays, so it was already mostly wasted space.

For simplicity, make the list also take over the publish/subscribe of
the prepared key itself.  That is, create separate list nodes for
blk_crypto_keys vs crypto_skciphers, and add nodes to the list only when
their key is actually prepared.  (Note that the legacy
fscrypt_direct_keys table in fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c already works this
way.)  This eliminates the need for the additional memory barriers when
reading and writing the fields of struct fscrypt_prepared_key.

Note that I technically should have included the data unit size in the
HKDF info string as well.  But it's too late to change that.

Fixes: 5b1188847180 ("fscrypt: support crypto data unit size less than filesystem block size")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260618180652.52742-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: convert bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num to use a folio</title>
<updated>2024-05-06T00:53:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)</name>
<email>willy@infradead.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-04-23T22:55:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=262f014dd7de3747f20ae7d1c3cb5cc68241e770'/>
<id>urn:sha1:262f014dd7de3747f20ae7d1c3cb5cc68241e770</id>
<content type='text'>
Patch series "Remove page_mapping()".

There are only a few users left.  Convert them all to either call
folio_mapping() or just use folio-&gt;mapping directly.  


This patch (of 6):

Remove uses of page-&gt;index, page_mapping() and b_page.  Saves a call
to compound_head().

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240423225552.4113447-1-willy@infradead.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240423225552.4113447-2-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) &lt;willy@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand &lt;david@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar &lt;sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: rename fscrypt_info =&gt; fscrypt_inode_info</title>
<updated>2023-10-09T03:44:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Josef Bacik</name>
<email>josef@toxicpanda.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-10-05T02:55:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=3e7807d5a7d770c59837026e9967fe99ad043174'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3e7807d5a7d770c59837026e9967fe99ad043174</id>
<content type='text'>
We are going to track per-extent information, so it'll be necessary to
distinguish between inode infos and extent infos.  Rename fscrypt_info
to fscrypt_inode_info, adjusting any lines that now exceed 80
characters.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik &lt;josef@toxicpanda.com&gt;
[ebiggers: rebased onto fscrypt tree, renamed fscrypt_get_info(),
 adjusted two comments, and fixed some lines over 80 characters]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005025757.33521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa &lt;neal@gompa.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: support crypto data unit size less than filesystem block size</title>
<updated>2023-09-26T05:34:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-09-25T05:54:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=5b11888471806edf699316d4dcb9b426caebbef2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5b11888471806edf699316d4dcb9b426caebbef2</id>
<content type='text'>
Until now, fscrypt has always used the filesystem block size as the
granularity of file contents encryption.  Two scenarios have come up
where a sub-block granularity of contents encryption would be useful:

1. Inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size
   that is less than the filesystem block size.

2. Support for direct I/O at a granularity less than the filesystem
   block size, for example at the block device's logical block size in
   order to match the traditional direct I/O alignment requirement.

(1) first came up with older eMMC inline crypto hardware that only
supports a crypto data unit size of 512 bytes.  That specific case
ultimately went away because all systems with that hardware continued
using out of tree code and never actually upgraded to the upstream
inline crypto framework.  But, now it's coming back in a new way: some
current UFS controllers only support a data unit size of 4096 bytes, and
there is a proposal to increase the filesystem block size to 16K.

(2) was discussed as a "nice to have" feature, though not essential,
when support for direct I/O on encrypted files was being upstreamed.

Still, the fact that this feature has come up several times does suggest
it would be wise to have available.  Therefore, this patch implements it
by using one of the reserved bytes in fscrypt_policy_v2 to allow users
to select a sub-block data unit size.  Supported data unit sizes are
powers of 2 between 512 and the filesystem block size, inclusively.
Support is implemented for both the FS-layer and inline crypto cases.

This patch focuses on the basic support for sub-block data units.  Some
things are out of scope for this patch but may be addressed later:

- Supporting sub-block data units in combination with
  FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64, in most cases.  Unfortunately this
  combination usually causes data unit indices to exceed 32 bits, and
  thus fscrypt_supported_policy() correctly disallows it.  The users who
  potentially need this combination are using f2fs.  To support it, f2fs
  would need to provide an option to slightly reduce its max file size.

- Supporting sub-block data units in combination with
  FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32.  This has the same problem
  described above, but also it will need special code to make DUN
  wraparound still happen on a FS block boundary.

- Supporting use case (2) mentioned above.  The encrypted direct I/O
  code will need to stop requiring and assuming FS block alignment.
  This won't be hard, but it belongs in a separate patch.

- Supporting this feature on filesystems other than ext4 and f2fs.
  (Filesystems declare support for it via their fscrypt_operations.)
  On UBIFS, sub-block data units don't make sense because UBIFS encrypts
  variable-length blocks as a result of compression.  CephFS could
  support it, but a bit more work would be needed to make the
  fscrypt_*_block_inplace functions play nicely with sub-block data
  units.  I don't think there's a use case for this on CephFS anyway.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-6-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: compute max_lblk_bits from s_maxbytes and block size</title>
<updated>2023-09-26T05:34:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-09-25T05:54:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=f0904e8bc3c513e9fd50bdca5365f998578177a0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f0904e8bc3c513e9fd50bdca5365f998578177a0</id>
<content type='text'>
For a given filesystem, the number of bits used by the maximum file
logical block number is computable from the maximum file size and the
block size.  These values are always present in struct super_block.
Therefore, compute it this way instead of using the value from
fscrypt_operations::get_ino_and_lblk_bits.  Since filesystems always
have to set the super_block fields anyway, this avoids having to provide
this information redundantly via fscrypt_operations.

This change is in preparation for adding support for sub-block data
units.  For that, the value that is needed will become "the maximum file
data unit index".  A hardcoded value won't suffice for that; it will
need to be computed anyway.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>blk-crypto: add a blk_crypto_config_supported_natively helper</title>
<updated>2022-11-21T18:39:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christoph Hellwig</name>
<email>hch@lst.de</email>
</author>
<published>2022-11-14T04:29:43+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=6715c98b6cf003f26b1b2f655393134e9d999a05'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6715c98b6cf003f26b1b2f655393134e9d999a05</id>
<content type='text'>
Add a blk_crypto_config_supported_natively helper that wraps
__blk_crypto_cfg_supported to retrieve the crypto_profile from the
request queue.  With this fscrypt can stop including
blk-crypto-profile.h and rely on the public consumer interface in
blk-crypto.h.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114042944.1009870-3-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>blk-crypto: don't use struct request_queue for public interfaces</title>
<updated>2022-11-21T18:39:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christoph Hellwig</name>
<email>hch@lst.de</email>
</author>
<published>2022-11-14T04:29:42+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=fce3caea0f241f5d34855c82c399d5e0e2d91f07'/>
<id>urn:sha1:fce3caea0f241f5d34855c82c399d5e0e2d91f07</id>
<content type='text'>
Switch all public blk-crypto interfaces to use struct block_device
arguments to specify the device they operate on instead of th
request_queue, which is a block layer implementation detail.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114042944.1009870-2-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'statx-dioalign-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux</title>
<updated>2022-10-04T03:33:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-10-04T03:33:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=725737e7c21d2d25a4312c2aaa82a52bd03e3126'/>
<id>urn:sha1:725737e7c21d2d25a4312c2aaa82a52bd03e3126</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull STATX_DIOALIGN support from Eric Biggers:
 "Make statx() support reporting direct I/O (DIO) alignment information.

  This provides a generic interface for userspace programs to determine
  whether a file supports DIO, and if so with what alignment
  restrictions. Specifically, STATX_DIOALIGN works on block devices, and
  on regular files when their containing filesystem has implemented
  support.

  An interface like this has been requested for years, since the
  conditions for when DIO is supported in Linux have gotten increasingly
  complex over time. Today, DIO support and alignment requirements can
  be affected by various filesystem features such as multi-device
  support, data journalling, inline data, encryption, verity,
  compression, checkpoint disabling, log-structured mode, etc.

  Further complicating things, Linux v6.0 relaxed the traditional rule
  of DIO needing to be aligned to the block device's logical block size;
  now user buffers (but not file offsets) only need to be aligned to the
  DMA alignment.

  The approach of uplifting the XFS specific ioctl XFS_IOC_DIOINFO was
  discarded in favor of creating a clean new interface with statx().

  For more information, see the individual commits and the man page
  update[1]"

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220722074229.148925-1-ebiggers@kernel.org [1]

* tag 'statx-dioalign-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux:
  xfs: support STATX_DIOALIGN
  f2fs: support STATX_DIOALIGN
  f2fs: simplify f2fs_force_buffered_io()
  f2fs: move f2fs_force_buffered_io() into file.c
  ext4: support STATX_DIOALIGN
  fscrypt: change fscrypt_dio_supported() to prepare for STATX_DIOALIGN
  vfs: support STATX_DIOALIGN on block devices
  statx: add direct I/O alignment information
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: work on block_devices instead of request_queues</title>
<updated>2022-09-22T03:33:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christoph Hellwig</name>
<email>hch@lst.de</email>
</author>
<published>2022-09-01T19:32:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=0e91fc1e0f5c70ce575451103ec66c2ec21f1a6e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0e91fc1e0f5c70ce575451103ec66c2ec21f1a6e</id>
<content type='text'>
request_queues are a block layer implementation detail that should not
leak into file systems.  Change the fscrypt inline crypto code to
retrieve block devices instead of request_queues from the file system.
As part of that, clean up the interaction with multi-device file systems
by returning both the number of devices and the actual device array in a
single method call.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
[ebiggers: bug fixes and minor tweaks]
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
