kernel/linux.git/fs/crypto/crypto.c, branch v6.19.11

fscrypt: replace raw loads of info pointer with helper function

2025-08-21T11:58:06+00:00

Add and use a helper function fscrypt_get_inode_info_raw(). It loads an inode's fscrypt info pointer using a raw dereference, which is appropriate when the caller knows the key setup already happened. This eliminates most occurrences of inode::i_crypt_info in the source, in preparation for replacing that with a filesystem-specific field. Co-developed-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250810075706.172910-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner

fscrypt: Remove gfp_t argument from fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace()

2025-07-10T19:33:13+00:00

This argument is no longer used, so remove it. Reviewed-by: Alex Markuze Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250710060754.637098-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: Remove gfp_t argument from fscrypt_crypt_data_unit()

2025-07-10T19:33:08+00:00

This argument is no longer used, so remove it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250710060754.637098-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: Switch to sync_skcipher and on-stack requests

2025-07-10T19:33:08+00:00

Now that fscrypt uses only synchronous skciphers, switch to the actual sync_skcipher API and the corresponding on-stack requests. This eliminates a heap allocation per en/decryption operation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250710060754.637098-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: Don't use asynchronous CryptoAPI algorithms

2025-07-10T19:33:08+00:00

Now that fscrypt's incomplete support for non-inline crypto engines has been removed, and none of the CPU-based algorithms have the CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC flag set anymore, there is no need to accommodate asynchronous algorithms. Therefore, explicitly allocate only synchronous algorithms. Then, remove the code that handled waiting for asynchronous en/decryption operations to complete. This commit should *not* be backported to kernels that lack commit 0ba6ec5b2972 ("crypto: x86/aes - stop using the SIMD helper"), as then it would disable the use of the optimized AES code on x86. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250710060754.637098-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: Explicitly include

2025-06-20T21:30:23+00:00

Fix build warnings with W=1 that started appearing after commit a934a57a42f6 ("scripts/misc-check: check missing #include when W=1"). While at it, also sort the include lists alphabetically. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250614221301.100803-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: Change fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks() to take a folio

2025-03-05T11:57:15+00:00

ext4 and ceph already have a folio to pass; f2fs needs to be properly converted but this will do for now. This removes a reference to page->index and page->mapping as well as removing a call to compound_head(). Signed-off-by: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304170224.523141-1-willy@infradead.org Acked-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner

fscrypt: rename fscrypt_info => fscrypt_inode_info

2023-10-09T03:44:26+00:00

We are going to track per-extent information, so it'll be necessary to distinguish between inode infos and extent infos. Rename fscrypt_info to fscrypt_inode_info, adjusting any lines that now exceed 80 characters. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik [ebiggers: rebased onto fscrypt tree, renamed fscrypt_get_info(), adjusted two comments, and fixed some lines over 80 characters] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005025757.33521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: support crypto data unit size less than filesystem block size

2023-09-26T05:34:33+00:00

Until now, fscrypt has always used the filesystem block size as the granularity of file contents encryption. Two scenarios have come up where a sub-block granularity of contents encryption would be useful: 1. Inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size that is less than the filesystem block size. 2. Support for direct I/O at a granularity less than the filesystem block size, for example at the block device's logical block size in order to match the traditional direct I/O alignment requirement. (1) first came up with older eMMC inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size of 512 bytes. That specific case ultimately went away because all systems with that hardware continued using out of tree code and never actually upgraded to the upstream inline crypto framework. But, now it's coming back in a new way: some current UFS controllers only support a data unit size of 4096 bytes, and there is a proposal to increase the filesystem block size to 16K. (2) was discussed as a "nice to have" feature, though not essential, when support for direct I/O on encrypted files was being upstreamed. Still, the fact that this feature has come up several times does suggest it would be wise to have available. Therefore, this patch implements it by using one of the reserved bytes in fscrypt_policy_v2 to allow users to select a sub-block data unit size. Supported data unit sizes are powers of 2 between 512 and the filesystem block size, inclusively. Support is implemented for both the FS-layer and inline crypto cases. This patch focuses on the basic support for sub-block data units. Some things are out of scope for this patch but may be addressed later: - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64, in most cases. Unfortunately this combination usually causes data unit indices to exceed 32 bits, and thus fscrypt_supported_policy() correctly disallows it. The users who potentially need this combination are using f2fs. To support it, f2fs would need to provide an option to slightly reduce its max file size. - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32. This has the same problem described above, but also it will need special code to make DUN wraparound still happen on a FS block boundary. - Supporting use case (2) mentioned above. The encrypted direct I/O code will need to stop requiring and assuming FS block alignment. This won't be hard, but it belongs in a separate patch. - Supporting this feature on filesystems other than ext4 and f2fs. (Filesystems declare support for it via their fscrypt_operations.) On UBIFS, sub-block data units don't make sense because UBIFS encrypts variable-length blocks as a result of compression. CephFS could support it, but a bit more work would be needed to make the fscrypt_*_block_inplace functions play nicely with sub-block data units. I don't think there's a use case for this on CephFS anyway. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: make the bounce page pool opt-in instead of opt-out

2023-09-25T06:03:09+00:00

Replace FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES with a bit flag 'needs_bounce_pages' which has the opposite meaning. I.e., filesystems now opt into the bounce page pool instead of opt out. Make fscrypt_alloc_bounce_page() check that the bounce page pool has been initialized. I believe the opt-in makes more sense, since nothing else in fscrypt_operations is opt-out, and these days filesystems can choose to use blk-crypto which doesn't need the fscrypt bounce page pool. Also, I happen to be planning to add two more flags, and I wanted to fix the "FS_CFLG_" name anyway as it wasn't prefixed with "FSCRYPT_". Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers