<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/linux.git/fs/crypto/bio.c, branch v7.0.10</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v7.0.10</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v7.0.10'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2026-01-11T19:55:41+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>blk-crypto: handle the fallback above the block layer</title>
<updated>2026-01-11T19:55:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christoph Hellwig</name>
<email>hch@lst.de</email>
</author>
<published>2026-01-09T06:07:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=bb8e2019ad613dd023a59bf91d1768018d17e09b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:bb8e2019ad613dd023a59bf91d1768018d17e09b</id>
<content type='text'>
Add a blk_crypto_submit_bio helper that either submits the bio when
it is not encrypted or inline encryption is provided, but otherwise
handles the encryption before going down into the low-level driver.
This reduces the risk from bio reordering and keeps memory allocation
as high up in the stack as possible.

Note that if the submitter knows that inline enctryption is known to
be supported by the underyling driver, it can still use plain
submit_bio.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: keep multiple bios in flight in fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt</title>
<updated>2026-01-11T19:55:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christoph Hellwig</name>
<email>hch@lst.de</email>
</author>
<published>2026-01-09T06:07:42+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=bc26e2efa2c5bb9289fa894834446840dea0bc31'/>
<id>urn:sha1:bc26e2efa2c5bb9289fa894834446840dea0bc31</id>
<content type='text'>
This should slightly improve performance for large zeroing operations,
but more importantly prepares for blk-crypto refactoring that requires
all fscrypt users to call submit_bio directly.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: pass a real sector_t to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt</title>
<updated>2026-01-11T19:55:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Christoph Hellwig</name>
<email>hch@lst.de</email>
</author>
<published>2026-01-09T06:07:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=c22756a9978e8f5917ff41cf17fc8db00d09e776'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c22756a9978e8f5917ff41cf17fc8db00d09e776</id>
<content type='text'>
While the pblk argument to fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt is
declared as a sector_t it actually is interpreted as a logical block
size unit, which is highly unusual.  Switch to passing the 512 byte
units that sector_t is defined for.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/linux</title>
<updated>2025-09-29T22:33:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-09-29T22:33:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=d60ac92c105fd8c09224b92c3e34dd03327ba3f4'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d60ac92c105fd8c09224b92c3e34dd03327ba3f4</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull fscrypt updates from Eric Biggers:
 "Make fs/crypto/ use the HMAC-SHA512 library functions instead of
  crypto_shash.

  This is simpler, faster, and more reliable"

* tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/linux:
  fscrypt: use HMAC-SHA512 library for HKDF
  fscrypt: Remove redundant __GFP_NOWARN
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: replace raw loads of info pointer with helper function</title>
<updated>2025-08-21T11:58:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-08-10T07:56:54+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=6c9468aad215a198742c8375b0415e42521c905c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6c9468aad215a198742c8375b0415e42521c905c</id>
<content type='text'>
Add and use a helper function fscrypt_get_inode_info_raw().  It loads an
inode's fscrypt info pointer using a raw dereference, which is
appropriate when the caller knows the key setup already happened.

This eliminates most occurrences of inode::i_crypt_info in the source,
in preparation for replacing that with a filesystem-specific field.

Co-developed-by: Christian Brauner &lt;brauner@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250810075706.172910-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner &lt;brauner@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: Remove redundant __GFP_NOWARN</title>
<updated>2025-08-11T17:27:32+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Qianfeng Rong</name>
<email>rongqianfeng@vivo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-08-03T10:22:40+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=0e6608d4938eb209616e8673c95364bb2a7d55bd'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0e6608d4938eb209616e8673c95364bb2a7d55bd</id>
<content type='text'>
GFP_NOWAIT already includes __GFP_NOWARN, so let's remove
the redundant __GFP_NOWARN.

Signed-off-by: Qianfeng Rong &lt;rongqianfeng@vivo.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250803102243.623705-3-rongqianfeng@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: Remove gfp_t argument from fscrypt_crypt_data_unit()</title>
<updated>2025-07-10T19:33:08+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-07-10T06:07:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=a9a95ecd9d3a24402a302595ee12029772a9f593'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a9a95ecd9d3a24402a302595ee12029772a9f593</id>
<content type='text'>
This argument is no longer used, so remove it.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250710060754.637098-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: Explicitly include &lt;linux/export.h&gt;</title>
<updated>2025-06-20T21:30:23+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2025-06-14T22:13:01+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=c6a14b32c9ba041fbe043aa30ebd5c6b467d6518'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c6a14b32c9ba041fbe043aa30ebd5c6b467d6518</id>
<content type='text'>
Fix build warnings with W=1 that started appearing after
commit a934a57a42f6 ("scripts/misc-check: check missing #include
&lt;linux/export.h&gt; when W=1").

While at it, also sort the include lists alphabetically.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250614221301.100803-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: rename fscrypt_info =&gt; fscrypt_inode_info</title>
<updated>2023-10-09T03:44:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Josef Bacik</name>
<email>josef@toxicpanda.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-10-05T02:55:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=3e7807d5a7d770c59837026e9967fe99ad043174'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3e7807d5a7d770c59837026e9967fe99ad043174</id>
<content type='text'>
We are going to track per-extent information, so it'll be necessary to
distinguish between inode infos and extent infos.  Rename fscrypt_info
to fscrypt_inode_info, adjusting any lines that now exceed 80
characters.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik &lt;josef@toxicpanda.com&gt;
[ebiggers: rebased onto fscrypt tree, renamed fscrypt_get_info(),
 adjusted two comments, and fixed some lines over 80 characters]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005025757.33521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa &lt;neal@gompa.dev&gt;
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>fscrypt: support crypto data unit size less than filesystem block size</title>
<updated>2023-09-26T05:34:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Biggers</name>
<email>ebiggers@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-09-25T05:54:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=5b11888471806edf699316d4dcb9b426caebbef2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5b11888471806edf699316d4dcb9b426caebbef2</id>
<content type='text'>
Until now, fscrypt has always used the filesystem block size as the
granularity of file contents encryption.  Two scenarios have come up
where a sub-block granularity of contents encryption would be useful:

1. Inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size
   that is less than the filesystem block size.

2. Support for direct I/O at a granularity less than the filesystem
   block size, for example at the block device's logical block size in
   order to match the traditional direct I/O alignment requirement.

(1) first came up with older eMMC inline crypto hardware that only
supports a crypto data unit size of 512 bytes.  That specific case
ultimately went away because all systems with that hardware continued
using out of tree code and never actually upgraded to the upstream
inline crypto framework.  But, now it's coming back in a new way: some
current UFS controllers only support a data unit size of 4096 bytes, and
there is a proposal to increase the filesystem block size to 16K.

(2) was discussed as a "nice to have" feature, though not essential,
when support for direct I/O on encrypted files was being upstreamed.

Still, the fact that this feature has come up several times does suggest
it would be wise to have available.  Therefore, this patch implements it
by using one of the reserved bytes in fscrypt_policy_v2 to allow users
to select a sub-block data unit size.  Supported data unit sizes are
powers of 2 between 512 and the filesystem block size, inclusively.
Support is implemented for both the FS-layer and inline crypto cases.

This patch focuses on the basic support for sub-block data units.  Some
things are out of scope for this patch but may be addressed later:

- Supporting sub-block data units in combination with
  FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64, in most cases.  Unfortunately this
  combination usually causes data unit indices to exceed 32 bits, and
  thus fscrypt_supported_policy() correctly disallows it.  The users who
  potentially need this combination are using f2fs.  To support it, f2fs
  would need to provide an option to slightly reduce its max file size.

- Supporting sub-block data units in combination with
  FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32.  This has the same problem
  described above, but also it will need special code to make DUN
  wraparound still happen on a FS block boundary.

- Supporting use case (2) mentioned above.  The encrypted direct I/O
  code will need to stop requiring and assuming FS block alignment.
  This won't be hard, but it belongs in a separate patch.

- Supporting this feature on filesystems other than ext4 and f2fs.
  (Filesystems declare support for it via their fscrypt_operations.)
  On UBIFS, sub-block data units don't make sense because UBIFS encrypts
  variable-length blocks as a result of compression.  CephFS could
  support it, but a bit more work would be needed to make the
  fscrypt_*_block_inplace functions play nicely with sub-block data
  units.  I don't think there's a use case for this on CephFS anyway.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-6-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers &lt;ebiggers@google.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
