kernel/linux.git/fs/crypto/bio.c, branch v6.12.91

fscrypt: rename fscrypt_info => fscrypt_inode_info

2023-10-09T03:44:26+00:00

We are going to track per-extent information, so it'll be necessary to distinguish between inode infos and extent infos. Rename fscrypt_info to fscrypt_inode_info, adjusting any lines that now exceed 80 characters. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik [ebiggers: rebased onto fscrypt tree, renamed fscrypt_get_info(), adjusted two comments, and fixed some lines over 80 characters] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005025757.33521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: support crypto data unit size less than filesystem block size

2023-09-26T05:34:33+00:00

Until now, fscrypt has always used the filesystem block size as the granularity of file contents encryption. Two scenarios have come up where a sub-block granularity of contents encryption would be useful: 1. Inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size that is less than the filesystem block size. 2. Support for direct I/O at a granularity less than the filesystem block size, for example at the block device's logical block size in order to match the traditional direct I/O alignment requirement. (1) first came up with older eMMC inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size of 512 bytes. That specific case ultimately went away because all systems with that hardware continued using out of tree code and never actually upgraded to the upstream inline crypto framework. But, now it's coming back in a new way: some current UFS controllers only support a data unit size of 4096 bytes, and there is a proposal to increase the filesystem block size to 16K. (2) was discussed as a "nice to have" feature, though not essential, when support for direct I/O on encrypted files was being upstreamed. Still, the fact that this feature has come up several times does suggest it would be wise to have available. Therefore, this patch implements it by using one of the reserved bytes in fscrypt_policy_v2 to allow users to select a sub-block data unit size. Supported data unit sizes are powers of 2 between 512 and the filesystem block size, inclusively. Support is implemented for both the FS-layer and inline crypto cases. This patch focuses on the basic support for sub-block data units. Some things are out of scope for this patch but may be addressed later: - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64, in most cases. Unfortunately this combination usually causes data unit indices to exceed 32 bits, and thus fscrypt_supported_policy() correctly disallows it. The users who potentially need this combination are using f2fs. To support it, f2fs would need to provide an option to slightly reduce its max file size. - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32. This has the same problem described above, but also it will need special code to make DUN wraparound still happen on a FS block boundary. - Supporting use case (2) mentioned above. The encrypted direct I/O code will need to stop requiring and assuming FS block alignment. This won't be hard, but it belongs in a separate patch. - Supporting this feature on filesystems other than ext4 and f2fs. (Filesystems declare support for it via their fscrypt_operations.) On UBIFS, sub-block data units don't make sense because UBIFS encrypts variable-length blocks as a result of compression. CephFS could support it, but a bit more work would be needed to make the fscrypt_*_block_inplace functions play nicely with sub-block data units. I don't think there's a use case for this on CephFS anyway. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: use WARN_ON_ONCE instead of WARN_ON

2023-03-28T04:15:50+00:00

As per Linus's suggestion (https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=whefxRGyNGzCzG6BVeM=5vnvgb-XhSeFJVxJyAxAF8XRA@mail.gmail.com), use WARN_ON_ONCE instead of WARN_ON. This barely adds any extra overhead, and it makes it so that if any of these ever becomes reachable (they shouldn't, but that's the point), the logs can't be flooded. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320233943.73600-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

fscrypt: support decrypting data from large folios

2023-01-28T23:10:12+00:00

Try to make the filesystem-level decryption functions in fs/crypto/ aware of large folios. This includes making fscrypt_decrypt_bio() support the case where the bio contains large folios, and making fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() take a folio instead of a page. There's no way to actually test this with large folios yet, but I've tested that this doesn't cause any regressions. Note that this patch just handles *decryption*, not encryption which will be a little more difficult. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127224202.355629-1-ebiggers@kernel.org

fscrypt: stop using PG_error to track error status

2022-09-06T22:15:56+00:00

As a step towards freeing the PG_error flag for other uses, change ext4 and f2fs to stop using PG_error to track decryption errors. Instead, if a decryption error occurs, just mark the whole bio as failed. The coarser granularity isn't really a problem since it isn't any worse than what the block layer provides, and errors from a multi-page readahead aren't reported to applications unless a single-page read fails too. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu # for f2fs part Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220815235052.86545-2-ebiggers@kernel.org

block: pass a block_device and opf to bio_reset

2022-02-02T14:50:00+00:00

Pass the block_device that we plan to use this bio for and the operation to bio_reset to optimize the assigment. A NULL block_device can be passed, both for the passthrough case on a raw request_queue and to temporarily avoid refactoring some nasty code. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124091107.642561-20-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

block: pass a block_device and opf to bio_alloc

2022-02-02T14:49:59+00:00

Pass the block_device and operation that we plan to use this bio for to bio_alloc to optimize the assignment. NULL/0 can be passed, both for the passthrough case on a raw request_queue and to temporarily avoid refactoring some nasty code. Also move the gfp_mask argument after the nr_vecs argument for a much more logical calling convention matching what most of the kernel does. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124091107.642561-18-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

fscrypt: clean up comments in bio.c

2021-09-21T02:32:34+00:00

The file comment in bio.c is almost completely irrelevant to the actual contents of the file; it was originally copied from crypto.c. Fix it up, and also add a kerneldoc comment for fscrypt_decrypt_bio(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210909190737.140841-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

block: rename BIO_MAX_PAGES to BIO_MAX_VECS

2021-03-11T14:47:48+00:00

Ever since the addition of multipage bio_vecs BIO_MAX_PAGES has been horribly confusingly misnamed. Rename it to BIO_MAX_VECS to stop confusing users of the bio API. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311110137.1132391-2-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

fscrypt: add inline encryption support

2020-07-08T17:29:30+00:00

Add support for inline encryption to fs/crypto/. With "inline encryption", the block layer handles the decryption/encryption as part of the bio, instead of the filesystem doing the crypto itself via Linux's crypto API. This model is needed in order to take advantage of the inline encryption hardware present on most modern mobile SoCs. To use inline encryption, the filesystem needs to be mounted with '-o inlinecrypt'. Blk-crypto will then be used instead of the traditional filesystem-layer crypto whenever possible to encrypt the contents of any encrypted files in that filesystem. Fscrypt still provides the key and IV to use, and the actual ciphertext on-disk is still the same; therefore it's testable using the existing fscrypt ciphertext verification tests. Note that since blk-crypto has a fallback to Linux's crypto API, and also supports all the encryption modes currently supported by fscrypt, this feature is usable and testable even without actual inline encryption hardware. Per-filesystem changes will be needed to set encryption contexts when submitting bios and to implement the 'inlinecrypt' mount option. This patch just adds the common code. Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702015607.1215430-3-satyat@google.com Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers