kernel/linux.git/fs/btrfs, branch v5.15.209

btrfs: fix double-decrement of bytes_may_use in submit_one_async_extent()

2026-06-01T15:35:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 82323b1a7088b7a5c3e528a5d634bff447fa286f ] submit_one_async_extent() calls btrfs_reserve_extent(), which decrements bytes_may_use. If the call btrfs_create_io_em() fails, we jump to out_free_reserve, which calls extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(). Because we're specifying EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, i.e. EXTENT_CLEAR_META_RESV | EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV, this decreases bytes_may_use again. This can lead to problems later on, as an initial write can fail only for the writeback to silently ENOSPC. Fix this by replacing EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING with EXTENT_CLEAR_META_RESV. This parallels a4fe134fc1d8eb ("btrfs: fix a double release on reserved extents in cow_one_range()"), which is the same fix in cow_one_range(). Fixes: 151a41bc46df ("Btrfs: fix what bits we clear when erroring out from delalloc") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: lock the inode in shared mode before starting fiemap

2026-06-01T15:35:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit 519b7e13b5ae8dd38da1e52275705343be6bb508 ] Currently fiemap does not take the inode's lock (VFS lock), it only locks a file range in the inode's io tree. This however can lead to a deadlock if we have a concurrent fsync on the file and fiemap code triggers a fault when accessing the user space buffer with fiemap_fill_next_extent(). The deadlock happens on the inode's i_mmap_lock semaphore, which is taken both by fsync and btrfs_page_mkwrite(). This deadlock was recently reported by syzbot and triggers a trace like the following: task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:20264 pid:5668 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 wait_on_state fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:707 [inline] wait_extent_bit+0x577/0x6f0 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:751 lock_extent+0x1c2/0x280 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:1742 find_lock_delalloc_range+0x4e6/0x9c0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:488 writepage_delalloc+0x1ef/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1863 __extent_writepage+0x736/0x14e0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2174 extent_write_cache_pages+0x983/0x1220 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3091 extent_writepages+0x219/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3211 do_writepages+0x3c3/0x680 mm/page-writeback.c:2581 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x11e/0x170 mm/filemap.c:388 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:421 [inline] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x175/0x200 mm/filemap.c:439 btrfs_fdatawrite_range fs/btrfs/file.c:3850 [inline] start_ordered_ops fs/btrfs/file.c:1737 [inline] btrfs_sync_file+0x4ff/0x1190 fs/btrfs/file.c:1839 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2885 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0xcd3/0x1280 fs/btrfs/file.c:1684 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2189 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x7dc/0xc50 fs/read_write.c:584 ksys_write+0x177/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:637 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f7d4054e9b9 RSP: 002b:00007f7d404fa2f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7d405d87a0 RCX: 00007f7d4054e9b9 RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f7d405a51d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 61635f65646f6e69 R13: 65646f7475616f6e R14: 7261637369646f6e R15: 00007f7d405d87a8 INFO: task syz-executor361:5697 blocked for more than 145 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-00376-g7c6984405241 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:21216 pid:5697 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x5f9/0x930 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1095 __down_read_common+0x54/0x2a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1260 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x417/0xc80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8526 do_page_mkwrite+0x19e/0x5e0 mm/memory.c:2947 wp_page_shared+0x15e/0x380 mm/memory.c:3295 handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:4949 [inline] __handle_mm_fault mm/memory.c:5073 [inline] handle_mm_fault+0x1b79/0x26b0 mm/memory.c:5219 do_user_addr_fault+0x69b/0xcb0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1428 handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1519 [inline] exc_page_fault+0x7a/0x110 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1575 asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:570 RIP: 0010:copy_user_short_string+0xd/0x40 arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:233 Code: 74 0a 89 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000570f330 EFLAGS: 00050202 RAX: ffffffff843e6601 RBX: 00007fffffffefc8 RCX: 0000000000000007 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffc9000570f3e0 RDI: 0000000020000120 RBP: ffffc9000570f490 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffff52000ae1e83 R10: fffff52000ae1e83 R11: 1ffff92000ae1e7c R12: 0000000000000038 R13: ffffc9000570f3e0 R14: 0000000020000120 R15: ffffc9000570f3e0 copy_user_generic arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:37 [inline] raw_copy_to_user arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:58 [inline] _copy_to_user+0xe9/0x130 lib/usercopy.c:34 copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:169 [inline] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x22e/0x410 fs/ioctl.c:144 emit_fiemap_extent+0x22d/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3458 fiemap_process_hole+0xa00/0xad0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3716 extent_fiemap+0xe27/0x2100 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3922 btrfs_fiemap+0x172/0x1e0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8209 ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:219 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x185b/0x2980 fs/ioctl.c:810 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x83/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f7d4054e9b9 RSP: 002b:00007f7d390d92f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7d405d87b0 RCX: 00007f7d4054e9b9 RDX: 0000000020000100 RSI: 00000000c020660b RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f7d405a51d0 R08: 00007f7d390d9700 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f7d390d9700 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 61635f65646f6e69 R13: 65646f7475616f6e R14: 7261637369646f6e R15: 00007f7d405d87b8 What happens is the following: 1) Task A is doing an fsync, enters btrfs_sync_file() and flushes delalloc before locking the inode and the i_mmap_lock semaphore, that is, before calling btrfs_inode_lock(); 2) After task A flushes delalloc and before it calls btrfs_inode_lock(), another task dirties a page; 3) Task B starts a fiemap without FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC, so the page dirtied at step 2 remains dirty and unflushed. Then when it enters extent_fiemap() and it locks a file range that includes the range of the page dirtied in step 2; 4) Task A calls btrfs_inode_lock() and locks the inode (VFS lock) and the inode's i_mmap_lock semaphore in write mode. Then it tries to flush delalloc by calling start_ordered_ops(), which will block, at find_lock_delalloc_range(), when trying to lock the range of the page dirtied at step 2, since this range was locked by the fiemap task (at step 3); 5) Task B generates a page fault when accessing the user space fiemap buffer with a call to fiemap_fill_next_extent(). The fault handler needs to call btrfs_page_mkwrite() for some other page of our inode, and there we deadlock when trying to lock the inode's i_mmap_lock semaphore in read mode, since the fsync task locked it in write mode (step 4) and the fsync task can not progress because it's waiting to lock a file range that is currently locked by us (the fiemap task, step 3). Fix this by taking the inode's lock (VFS lock) in shared mode when entering fiemap. This effectively serializes fiemap with fsync (except the most expensive part of fsync, the log sync), preventing this deadlock. Reported-by: syzbot+cc35f55c41e34c30dcb5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000032dc7305f2a66f46@google.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Robert Garcia Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: do not strictly require dirty metadata threshold for metadata writepages

2026-06-01T15:35:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4e159150a9a56d66d247f4b5510bed46fe58aa1c ] [BUG] There is an internal report that over 1000 processes are waiting at the io_schedule_timeout() of balance_dirty_pages(), causing a system hang and trigger a kernel coredump. The kernel is v6.4 kernel based, but the root problem still applies to any upstream kernel before v6.18. [CAUSE] >From Jan Kara for his wisdom on the dirty page balance behavior first. This cgroup dirty limit was what was actually playing the role here because the cgroup had only a small amount of memory and so the dirty limit for it was something like 16MB. Dirty throttling is responsible for enforcing that nobody can dirty (significantly) more dirty memory than there's dirty limit. Thus when a task is dirtying pages it periodically enters into balance_dirty_pages() and we let it sleep there to slow down the dirtying. When the system is over dirty limit already (either globally or within a cgroup of the running task), we will not let the task exit from balance_dirty_pages() until the number of dirty pages drops below the limit. So in this particular case, as I already mentioned, there was a cgroup with relatively small amount of memory and as a result with dirty limit set at 16MB. A task from that cgroup has dirtied about 28MB worth of pages in btrfs btree inode and these were practically the only dirty pages in that cgroup. So that means the only way to reduce the dirty pages of that cgroup is to writeback the dirty pages of btrfs btree inode, and only after that those processes can exit balance_dirty_pages(). Now back to the btrfs part, btree_writepages() is responsible for writing back dirty btree inode pages. The problem here is, there is a btrfs internal threshold that if the btree inode's dirty bytes are below the 32M threshold, it will not do any writeback. This behavior is to batch as much metadata as possible so we won't write back those tree blocks and then later re-COW them again for another modification. This internal 32MiB is higher than the existing dirty page size (28MiB), meaning no writeback will happen, causing a deadlock between btrfs and cgroup: - Btrfs doesn't want to write back btree inode until more dirty pages - Cgroup/MM doesn't want more dirty pages for btrfs btree inode Thus any process touching that btree inode is put into sleep until the number of dirty pages is reduced. Thanks Jan Kara a lot for the analysis of the root cause. [ENHANCEMENT] Since kernel commit b55102826d7d ("btrfs: set AS_KERNEL_FILE on the btree_inode"), btrfs btree inode pages will only be charged to the root cgroup which should have a much larger limit than btrfs' 32MiB threshold. So it should not affect newer kernels. But for all current LTS kernels, they are all affected by this problem, and backporting the whole AS_KERNEL_FILE may not be a good idea. Even for newer kernels I still think it's a good idea to get rid of the internal threshold at btree_writepages(), since for most cases cgroup/MM has a better view of full system memory usage than btrfs' fixed threshold. For internal callers using btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() since that function is already doing internal threshold check, we don't need to bother them. But for external callers of btree_writepages(), just respect their requests and write back whatever they want, ignoring the internal btrfs threshold to avoid such deadlock on btree inode dirty page balancing. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org CC: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba [ The context change is due to the commit 41044b41ad2c ("btrfs: add helper to get fs_info from struct inode pointer") in v6.9 and the commit c66f2afc7148 ("btrfs: remove pointless writepages callback wrapper") in v6.10 which are irrelevant to the logic of this patch. ] Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: send: check for inline extents in range_is_hole_in_parent()

2026-06-01T15:35:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 08b096c1372cd69627f4f559fb47c9fb67a52b39 ] Before accessing the disk_bytenr field of a file extent item we need to check if we are dealing with an inline extent. This is because for inline extents their data starts at the offset of the disk_bytenr field. So accessing the disk_bytenr means we are accessing inline data or in case the inline data is less than 8 bytes we can actually cause an invalid memory access if this inline extent item is the first item in the leaf or access metadata from other items. Fixes: 82bfb2e7b645 ("Btrfs: incremental send, fix unnecessary hole writes for sparse files") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba [ Avoid leaking the path by using { ret = 0; goto out; } instead of returning directly. ] Signed-off-by: Alva Lan Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: reject root items with drop_progress and zero drop_level

2026-04-18T08:33:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit b17b79ff896305fd74980a5f72afec370ee88ca4 ] [BUG] When recovering relocation at mount time, merge_reloc_root() and btrfs_drop_snapshot() both use BUG_ON(level == 0) to guard against an impossible state: a non-zero drop_progress combined with a zero drop_level in a root_item, which can be triggered: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1545! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 283 ... Tainted: 6.18.0+ #16 PREEMPT(voluntary) Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2, BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 RIP: 0010:merge_reloc_root+0x1266/0x1650 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1545 Code: ffff0000 00004589 d7e9acfa ffffe8a1 79bafebe 02000000 Call Trace: merge_reloc_roots+0x295/0x890 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1861 btrfs_recover_relocation+0xd6e/0x11d0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4195 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xa4d/0x1810 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3130 open_ctree+0x5824/0x5fe0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3640 btrfs_fill_super fs/btrfs/super.c:987 [inline] btrfs_get_tree_super fs/btrfs/super.c:1951 [inline] btrfs_get_tree_subvol fs/btrfs/super.c:2094 [inline] btrfs_get_tree+0x111c/0x2190 fs/btrfs/super.c:2128 vfs_get_tree+0x9a/0x370 fs/super.c:1758 fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1199 [inline] do_new_mount_fc fs/namespace.c:3642 [inline] do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3718 [inline] path_mount+0x5b8/0x1ea0 fs/namespace.c:4028 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4041 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4229 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4206 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x282/0x320 fs/namespace.c:4206 ... RIP: 0033:0x7f969c9a8fde Code: 0f1f4000 48c7c2b0 fffffff7 d8648902 b8ffffff ffc3660f ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The bug is reproducible on 7.0.0-rc2-next-20260310 with our dynamic metadata fuzzing tool that corrupts btrfs metadata at runtime. [CAUSE] A non-zero drop_progress.objectid means an interrupted btrfs_drop_snapshot() left a resume point on disk, and in that case drop_level must be greater than 0 because the checkpoint is only saved at internal node levels. Although this invariant is enforced when the kernel writes the root item, it is not validated when the root item is read back from disk. That allows on-disk corruption to provide an invalid state with drop_progress.objectid != 0 and drop_level == 0. When relocation recovery later processes such a root item, merge_reloc_root() reads drop_level and hits BUG_ON(level == 0). The same invalid metadata can also trigger the corresponding BUG_ON() in btrfs_drop_snapshot(). [FIX] Fix this by validating the root_item invariant in tree-checker when reading root items from disk: if drop_progress.objectid is non-zero, drop_level must also be non-zero. Reject such malformed metadata with -EUCLEAN before it reaches merge_reloc_root() or btrfs_drop_snapshot() and triggers the BUG_ON. After the fix, the same corruption is correctly rejected by tree-checker and the BUG_ON is no longer triggered. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: don't take device_list_mutex when querying zone info

2026-04-18T08:33:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit 77603ab10429fe713a03345553ca8dbbfb1d91c6 ] Shin'ichiro reported sporadic hangs when running generic/013 in our CI system. When enabling lockdep, there is a lockdep splat when calling btrfs_get_dev_zone_info_all_devices() in the mount path that can be triggered by i.e. generic/013: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 7.0.0-rc1+ #355 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ mount/1043 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8881020b5470 (&vblk->vdev_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: virtblk_report_zones+0xda/0x430 but task is already holding lock: ffff888102a738e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_get_dev_zone_info_all_devices+0x45/0x90 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0xa3/0x1360 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1f4/0x9d0 __btrfs_end_transaction+0x3e/0x2e0 btrfs_zoned_reserve_data_reloc_bg+0x2f8/0x390 open_ctree+0x1934/0x23db btrfs_get_tree.cold+0x105/0x26c vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xb0 __do_sys_fsconfig+0x324/0x680 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x4f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #3 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}: join_transaction+0xc2/0x5c0 start_transaction+0x17c/0xbc0 btrfs_zoned_reserve_data_reloc_bg+0x2b4/0x390 open_ctree+0x1934/0x23db btrfs_get_tree.cold+0x105/0x26c vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xb0 __do_sys_fsconfig+0x324/0x680 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x4f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}: lock_release+0x163/0x4b0 __btrfs_end_transaction+0x1c7/0x2e0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x6f/0xd0 touch_atime+0xe5/0x2c0 btrfs_file_mmap_prepare+0x65/0x90 __mmap_region+0x4b9/0xf00 mmap_region+0xf7/0x120 do_mmap+0x43d/0x610 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd6/0x190 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x7e/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x4f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}: __might_fault+0x68/0xa0 _copy_to_user+0x22/0x70 blkdev_copy_zone_to_user+0x22/0x40 virtblk_report_zones+0x282/0x430 blkdev_report_zones_ioctl+0xfd/0x130 blkdev_ioctl+0x20f/0x2c0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x86/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x4f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&vblk->vdev_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x1522/0x2680 lock_acquire+0xd5/0x2f0 __mutex_lock+0xa3/0x1360 virtblk_report_zones+0xda/0x430 blkdev_report_zones_cached+0x162/0x190 btrfs_get_dev_zones+0xdc/0x2e0 btrfs_get_dev_zone_info+0x219/0xe80 btrfs_get_dev_zone_info_all_devices+0x62/0x90 open_ctree+0x1200/0x23db btrfs_get_tree.cold+0x105/0x26c vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xb0 __do_sys_fsconfig+0x324/0x680 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x4f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &vblk->vdev_mutex --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&vblk->vdev_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by mount/1043: #0: ffff88811063e878 (&fc->uapi_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __do_sys_fsconfig+0x2ae/0x680 #1: ffff88810cb9f0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#31/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super+0xc0/0x3e0 #2: ffff888102a738e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_get_dev_zone_info_all_devices+0x45/0x90 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1043 Comm: mount Not tainted 7.0.0-rc1+ #355 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.17.0-9.fc43 06/10/2025 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80 print_circular_bug.cold+0x18d/0x1d8 check_noncircular+0x10d/0x130 __lock_acquire+0x1522/0x2680 ? vmap_small_pages_range_noflush+0x3ef/0x820 lock_acquire+0xd5/0x2f0 ? virtblk_report_zones+0xda/0x430 ? lock_is_held_type+0xcd/0x130 __mutex_lock+0xa3/0x1360 ? virtblk_report_zones+0xda/0x430 ? virtblk_report_zones+0xda/0x430 ? __pfx_copy_zone_info_cb+0x10/0x10 ? virtblk_report_zones+0xda/0x430 virtblk_report_zones+0xda/0x430 ? __pfx_copy_zone_info_cb+0x10/0x10 blkdev_report_zones_cached+0x162/0x190 ? __pfx_copy_zone_info_cb+0x10/0x10 btrfs_get_dev_zones+0xdc/0x2e0 btrfs_get_dev_zone_info+0x219/0xe80 btrfs_get_dev_zone_info_all_devices+0x62/0x90 open_ctree+0x1200/0x23db btrfs_get_tree.cold+0x105/0x26c ? rcu_is_watching+0x18/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xb0 __do_sys_fsconfig+0x324/0x680 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x4f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f615e27a40e RSP: 002b:00007fff11b18fb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001af RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055572e92ab10 RCX: 00007f615e27a40e RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fff11b19100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000055572e92bc40 R14: 00007f615e3faa60 R15: 000055572e92bd08 Don't hold the device_list_mutex while calling into btrfs_get_dev_zone_info() in btrfs_get_dev_zone_info_all_devices() to mitigate the issue. This is safe, as no other thread can touch the device list at the moment of execution. Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix lost error when running device stats on multiple devices fs

2026-04-18T08:33:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1c37d896b12dfd0d4c96e310b0033c6676933917 ] Whenever we get an error updating the device stats item for a device in btrfs_run_dev_stats() we allow the loop to go to the next device, and if updating the stats item for the next device succeeds, we end up losing the error we had from the previous device. Fix this by breaking out of the loop once we get an error and make sure it's returned to the caller. Since we are in the transaction commit path (and in the critical section actually), returning the error will result in a transaction abort. Fixes: 733f4fbbc108 ("Btrfs: read device stats on mount, write modified ones during commit") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix super block offset in error message in btrfs_validate_super()

2026-04-18T08:33:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit b52fe51f724385b3ed81e37e510a4a33107e8161 ] Fix the superblock offset mismatch error message in btrfs_validate_super(): we changed it so that it considers all the superblocks, but the message still assumes we're only looking at the first one. The change from %u to %llu is because we're changing from a constant to a u64. Fixes: 069ec957c35e ("btrfs: Refactor btrfs_check_super_valid") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: tree-checker: fix misleading root drop_level error message

2026-04-18T08:33:19+00:00

[ Upstream commit fc1cd1f18c34f91e78362f9629ab9fd43b9dcab9 ] Fix tree-checker error message to report "invalid root drop_level" instead of the misleading "invalid root level". Fixes: 259ee7754b67 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add ROOT_ITEM check") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: abort transaction on failure to update root in the received subvol ioctl

2026-04-18T08:33:16+00:00

commit 0f475ee0ebce5c9492b260027cd95270191675fa upstream. If we failed to update the root we don't abort the transaction, which is wrong since we already used the transaction to remove an item from the uuid tree. Fixes: dd5f9615fc5c ("Btrfs: maintain subvolume items in the UUID tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.12+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman