<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/linux.git/fs/btrfs/relocation.c, branch linux-6.0.y</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=linux-6.0.y</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=linux-6.0.y'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2022-08-17T14:19:12+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers</title>
<updated>2022-08-17T14:19:12+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Josef Bacik</name>
<email>josef@toxicpanda.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-07-26T20:24:04+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c</id>
<content type='text'>
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs/752500 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff97e1875a97b8 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -&gt; #2 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
	 btrfs_init_new_buffer+0x7d/0x2c0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x120/0x3b0
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x136/0x600
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x230
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x53b/0xb70
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0xa0
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x280
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x24c/0x290
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
	 process_one_work+0x271/0x590
	 worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
	 kthread+0xf0/0x120
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -&gt; #1 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x3c3/0xb70
	 do_relocation+0x10c/0x6b0
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x317/0x6d0
	 relocate_block_group+0x1f1/0x560
	 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
	 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
	 btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
	 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  -&gt; #0 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
	 lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
	 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
	 btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
	 replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
	 merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
	 merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
	 relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
	 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
	 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
	 btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
	 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    btrfs-treloc-02#2 --&gt; btrfs-tree-01 --&gt; btrfs-tree-01/1

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
    lock(btrfs-treloc-02#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  7 locks held by btrfs/752500:
   #0: ffff97e292fdf460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x208/0x2c90
   #1: ffff97e284c02050 (&amp;fs_info-&gt;reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x55f/0xe40
   #2: ffff97e284c00878 (&amp;fs_info-&gt;cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x236/0x400
   #3: ffff97e292fdf650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xef/0x610
   #4: ffff97e284c02378 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
   #5: ffff97e284c023a0 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
   #6: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 752500 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ #775
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:

   dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73
   check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
   __lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
   lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
   ? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
   down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
   ? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
   __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
   btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
   btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
   ? lock_release+0x137/0x2d0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x128/0x180
   replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
   merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
   merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
   relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
   btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
   btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
   ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

This isn't necessarily new, it's just tricky to hit in practice.  There
are two competing things going on here.  With relocation we create a
snapshot of every fs tree with a reloc tree.  Any extent buffers that
get initialized here are initialized with the reloc root lockdep key.
However since it is a snapshot, any blocks that are currently in cache
that originally belonged to the fs tree will have the normal tree
lockdep key set.  This creates the lock dependency of

  reloc tree -&gt; normal tree

for the extent buffer locking during the first phase of the relocation
as we walk down the reloc root to relocate blocks.

However this is problematic because the final phase of the relocation is
merging the reloc root into the original fs root.  This involves
searching down to any keys that exist in the original fs root and then
swapping the relocated block and the original fs root block.  We have to
search down to the fs root first, and then go search the reloc root for
the block we need to replace.  This creates the dependency of

  normal tree -&gt; reloc tree

which is why lockdep complains.

Additionally even if we were to fix this particular mismatch with a
different nesting for the merge case, we're still slotting in a block
that has a owner of the reloc root objectid into a normal tree, so that
block will have its lockdep key set to the tree reloc root, and create a
lockdep splat later on when we wander into that block from the fs root.

Unfortunately the only solution here is to make sure we do not set the
lockdep key to the reloc tree lockdep key normally, and then reset any
blocks we wander into from the reloc root when we're doing the merged.

This solves the problem of having mixed tree reloc keys intermixed with
normal tree keys, and then allows us to make sure in the merge case we
maintain the lock order of

  normal tree -&gt; reloc tree

We handle this by setting a bit on the reloc root when we do the search
for the block we want to relocate, and any block we search into or COW
at that point gets set to the reloc tree key.  This works correctly
because we only ever COW down to the parent node, so we aren't resetting
the key for the block we're linking into the fs root.

With this patch we no longer have the lockdep splat in btrfs/187.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik &lt;josef@toxicpanda.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()</title>
<updated>2022-08-17T14:18:58+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Zixuan Fu</name>
<email>r33s3n6@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-07-21T07:48:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb'/>
<id>urn:sha1:85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb</id>
<content type='text'>
In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated.  Then
btrfs_relocate_block_group() calls

relocate_block_group()
  prepare_to_relocate()
    set_reloc_control()

that assigns rc to the variable fs_info-&gt;reloc_ctl. When
prepare_to_relocate() returns, it calls

btrfs_commit_transaction()
  btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups()
    btrfs_alloc_path()
      kmem_cache_zalloc()

which may fail for example (or other errors could happen). When the
failure occurs, btrfs_relocate_block_group() detects the error and frees
rc and doesn't set fs_info-&gt;reloc_ctl to NULL. After that, in
btrfs_init_reloc_root(), rc is retrieved from fs_info-&gt;reloc_ctl and
then used, which may cause a use-after-free bug.

This possible bug can be triggered by calling btrfs_ioctl_balance()
before calling btrfs_ioctl_defrag().

To fix this possible bug, in prepare_to_relocate(), check if
btrfs_commit_transaction() fails. If the failure occurs,
unset_reloc_control() is called to set fs_info-&gt;reloc_ctl to NULL.

The error log in our fault-injection testing is shown as follows:

  [   58.751070] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
  ...
  [   58.753577] Call Trace:
  ...
  [   58.755800]  kasan_report+0x45/0x60
  [   58.756066]  btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
  [   58.757304]  record_root_in_trans+0x792/0xa10 [btrfs]
  [   58.757748]  btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x463/0x4f0 [btrfs]
  [   58.758231]  start_transaction+0x896/0x2950 [btrfs]
  [   58.758661]  btrfs_defrag_root+0x250/0xc00 [btrfs]
  [   58.759083]  btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x467/0xa00 [btrfs]
  [   58.759513]  btrfs_ioctl+0x3c95/0x114e0 [btrfs]
  ...
  [   58.768510] Allocated by task 23683:
  [   58.768777]  ____kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xf0
  [   58.769069]  __kmalloc+0x227/0x3d0
  [   58.769325]  alloc_reloc_control+0x10a/0x3d0 [btrfs]
  [   58.769755]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x7aa/0x1e20 [btrfs]
  [   58.770228]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
  [   58.770655]  __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
  [   58.771071]  btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
  [   58.771472]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
  [   58.771902]  btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
  ...
  [   58.773337] Freed by task 23683:
  ...
  [   58.774815]  kfree+0xda/0x2b0
  [   58.775038]  free_reloc_control+0x1d6/0x220 [btrfs]
  [   58.775465]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x115c/0x1e20 [btrfs]
  [   58.775944]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
  [   58.776369]  __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
  [   58.776784]  btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
  [   58.777185]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
  [   58.777621]  btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
  ...

Reported-by: TOTE Robot &lt;oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn&gt;
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy &lt;sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me&gt;
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov &lt;nborisov@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Zixuan Fu &lt;r33s3n6@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'folio-5.19' of git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache</title>
<updated>2022-05-25T02:55:07+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-05-25T02:55:07+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=fdaf9a5840acaab18694a19e0eb0aa51162eeeed'/>
<id>urn:sha1:fdaf9a5840acaab18694a19e0eb0aa51162eeeed</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull page cache updates from Matthew Wilcox:

 - Appoint myself page cache maintainer

 - Fix how scsicam uses the page cache

 - Use the memalloc_nofs_save() API to replace AOP_FLAG_NOFS

 - Remove the AOP flags entirely

 - Remove pagecache_write_begin() and pagecache_write_end()

 - Documentation updates

 - Convert several address_space operations to use folios:
     - is_dirty_writeback
     - readpage becomes read_folio
     - releasepage becomes release_folio
     - freepage becomes free_folio

 - Change filler_t to require a struct file pointer be the first
   argument like -&gt;read_folio

* tag 'folio-5.19' of git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache: (107 commits)
  nilfs2: Fix some kernel-doc comments
  Appoint myself page cache maintainer
  fs: Remove aops-&gt;freepage
  secretmem: Convert to free_folio
  nfs: Convert to free_folio
  orangefs: Convert to free_folio
  fs: Add free_folio address space operation
  fs: Convert drop_buffers() to use a folio
  fs: Change try_to_free_buffers() to take a folio
  jbd2: Convert release_buffer_page() to use a folio
  jbd2: Convert jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers to take a folio
  reiserfs: Convert release_buffer_page() to use a folio
  fs: Remove last vestiges of releasepage
  ubifs: Convert to release_folio
  reiserfs: Convert to release_folio
  orangefs: Convert to release_folio
  ocfs2: Convert to release_folio
  nilfs2: Remove comment about releasepage
  nfs: Convert to release_folio
  jfs: Convert to release_folio
  ...
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: remove unnecessary check of iput argument</title>
<updated>2022-05-16T15:03:12+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Lv Ruyi</name>
<email>lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-11T03:22:52+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=8aa1e49ea1fdcc585be4bcfe8c62684a087cc7c6'/>
<id>urn:sha1:8aa1e49ea1fdcc585be4bcfe8c62684a087cc7c6</id>
<content type='text'>
iput() already handles NULL and non-NULL parameter, so it is not needed
to check that. This unifies all iput calls.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot &lt;zealci@zte.com.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi &lt;lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: remove unnecessary type casts</title>
<updated>2022-05-16T15:03:11+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yu Zhe</name>
<email>yuzhe@nfschina.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-31T10:34:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=0d031dc4aa05819beb8b9188f4306a3f2bc17f55'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0d031dc4aa05819beb8b9188f4306a3f2bc17f55</id>
<content type='text'>
Explicit type casts are not necessary when it's void* to another pointer
type.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe &lt;yuzhe@nfschina.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: assert that relocation is protected with sb_start_write()</title>
<updated>2022-05-16T15:03:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Naohiro Aota</name>
<email>naohiro.aota@wdc.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-29T06:56:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=0320b3538b2b819c24daa699a26aa184f3d3cc6c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0320b3538b2b819c24daa699a26aa184f3d3cc6c</id>
<content type='text'>
Relocation of a data block group creates ordered extents. They can cause
a hang when a process is trying to thaw the filesystem.

We should have called sb_start_write(), so the filesystem is not being
frozen. Add an ASSERT to check it is protected.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana &lt;fdmanana@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota &lt;naohiro.aota@wdc.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: avoid blocking on space revervation when doing nowait dio writes</title>
<updated>2022-05-16T15:03:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Filipe Manana</name>
<email>fdmanana@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-03-23T16:19:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=d4135134ab8feb994369d44884733e8031b0f800'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d4135134ab8feb994369d44884733e8031b0f800</id>
<content type='text'>
When doing a NOWAIT direct IO write, if we can NOCOW then it means we can
proceed with the non-blocking, NOWAIT path. However reserving the metadata
space and qgroup meta space can often result in blocking - flushing
delalloc, wait for ordered extents to complete, trigger transaction
commits, etc, going against the semantics of a NOWAIT write.

So make the NOWAIT write path to try to reserve all the metadata it needs
without resulting in a blocking behaviour - if we get -ENOSPC or -EDQUOT
then return -EAGAIN to make the caller fallback to a blocking direct IO
write.

This is part of a patchset comprised of the following patches:

  btrfs: avoid blocking on page locks with nowait dio on compressed range
  btrfs: avoid blocking nowait dio when locking file range
  btrfs: avoid double nocow check when doing nowait dio writes
  btrfs: stop allocating a path when checking if cross reference exists
  btrfs: free path at can_nocow_extent() before checking for checksum items
  btrfs: release path earlier at can_nocow_extent()
  btrfs: avoid blocking when allocating context for nowait dio read/write
  btrfs: avoid blocking on space revervation when doing nowait dio writes

The following test was run before and after applying this patchset:

  $ cat io-uring-nodatacow-test.sh
  #!/bin/bash

  DEV=/dev/sdc
  MNT=/mnt/sdc

  MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd -o nodatacow"
  MKFS_OPTIONS="-R free-space-tree -O no-holes"

  NUM_JOBS=4
  FILE_SIZE=8G
  RUN_TIME=300

  cat &lt;&lt;EOF &gt; /tmp/fio-job.ini
  [io_uring_rw]
  rw=randrw
  fsync=0
  fallocate=posix
  group_reporting=1
  direct=1
  ioengine=io_uring
  iodepth=64
  bssplit=4k/20:8k/20:16k/20:32k/10:64k/10:128k/5:256k/5:512k/5:1m/5
  filesize=$FILE_SIZE
  runtime=$RUN_TIME
  time_based
  filename=foobar
  directory=$MNT
  numjobs=$NUM_JOBS
  thread
  EOF

  echo performance | \
     tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor

  umount $MNT &amp;&gt; /dev/null
  mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV &amp;&gt; /dev/null
  mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT

  fio /tmp/fio-job.ini

  umount $MNT

The test was run a 12 cores box with 64G of ram, using a non-debug kernel
config (Debian's default config) and a spinning disk.

Result before the patchset:

 READ: bw=407MiB/s (427MB/s), 407MiB/s-407MiB/s (427MB/s-427MB/s), io=119GiB (128GB), run=300175-300175msec
WRITE: bw=407MiB/s (427MB/s), 407MiB/s-407MiB/s (427MB/s-427MB/s), io=119GiB (128GB), run=300175-300175msec

Result after the patchset:

 READ: bw=436MiB/s (457MB/s), 436MiB/s-436MiB/s (457MB/s-457MB/s), io=128GiB (137GB), run=300044-300044msec
WRITE: bw=435MiB/s (456MB/s), 435MiB/s-435MiB/s (456MB/s-456MB/s), io=128GiB (137GB), run=300044-300044msec

That's about +7.2% throughput for reads and +6.9% for writes.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana &lt;fdmanana@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: Convert btrfs to read_folio</title>
<updated>2022-05-09T20:21:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)</name>
<email>willy@infradead.org</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-29T15:12:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=fb12489b0dfd0028dc504575f3fae0532c412cf4'/>
<id>urn:sha1:fb12489b0dfd0028dc504575f3fae0532c412cf4</id>
<content type='text'>
This is a "weak" conversion which converts straight back to using pages.
A full conversion should be performed at some point, hopefully by
someone familiar with the filesystem.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) &lt;willy@infradead.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm/readahead: Convert page_cache_async_readahead to take a folio</title>
<updated>2022-05-08T18:45:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)</name>
<email>willy@infradead.org</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-18T02:38:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=2ebdd1df316636c2faf25a1780e12553adf09cf7'/>
<id>urn:sha1:2ebdd1df316636c2faf25a1780e12553adf09cf7</id>
<content type='text'>
Removes a couple of calls to compound_head and saves a few bytes.
Also convert verity's read_file_data_page() to be folio-based.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) &lt;willy@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>btrfs: unify the error handling pattern for read_tree_block()</title>
<updated>2022-03-14T12:13:53+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Qu Wenruo</name>
<email>wqu@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-02-22T07:41:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=4eb150d6122bf51744d07c569ea811e8ce4bdd6d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:4eb150d6122bf51744d07c569ea811e8ce4bdd6d</id>
<content type='text'>
We had an error handling pattern for read_tree_block() like this:

	eb = read_tree_block();
	if (IS_ERR(eb)) {
		/*
		 * Handling error here
		 * Normally ended up with return or goto out.
		 */
	} else if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
		/*
		 * Different error handling here
		 * Normally also ended up with return or goto out;
		 */
	}

This is fine, but if we want to add extra check for each
read_tree_block(), the existing if-else-if is not that expandable and
will take reader some seconds to figure out there is no extra branch.

Here we change it to a more common way, without the extra else:

	eb = read_tree_block();
	if (IS_ERR(eb)) {
		/*
		 * Handling error here
		 */
		return eb or goto out;
	}
	if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) {
		/*
		 * Different error handling here
		 */
		return eb or goto out;
	}

This also removes some oddball call sites which uses some creative way
to check error.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo &lt;wqu@suse.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David Sterba &lt;dsterba@suse.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
