kernel/linux.git/fs/btrfs/file.c, branch v6.6.131

btrfs: always fallback to buffered write if the inode requires checksum

2026-03-25T10:05:58+00:00

commit 968f19c5b1b7d5595423b0ac0020cc18dfed8cb5 upstream. [BUG] It is a long known bug that VM image on btrfs can lead to data csum mismatch, if the qemu is using direct-io for the image (this is commonly known as cache mode 'none'). [CAUSE] Inside the VM, if the fs is EXT4 or XFS, or even NTFS from Windows, the fs is allowed to dirty/modify the folio even if the folio is under writeback (as long as the address space doesn't have AS_STABLE_WRITES flag inherited from the block device). This is a valid optimization to improve the concurrency, and since these filesystems have no extra checksum on data, the content change is not a problem at all. But the final write into the image file is handled by btrfs, which needs the content not to be modified during writeback, or the checksum will not match the data (checksum is calculated before submitting the bio). So EXT4/XFS/NTRFS assume they can modify the folio under writeback, but btrfs requires no modification, this leads to the false csum mismatch. This is only a controlled example, there are even cases where multi-thread programs can submit a direct IO write, then another thread modifies the direct IO buffer for whatever reason. For such cases, btrfs has no sane way to detect such cases and leads to false data csum mismatch. [FIX] I have considered the following ideas to solve the problem: - Make direct IO to always skip data checksum This not only requires a new incompatible flag, as it breaks the current per-inode NODATASUM flag. But also requires extra handling for no csum found cases. And this also reduces our checksum protection. - Let hardware handle all the checksum AKA, just nodatasum mount option. That requires trust for hardware (which is not that trustful in a lot of cases), and it's not generic at all. - Always fallback to buffered write if the inode requires checksum This was suggested by Christoph, and is the solution utilized by this patch. The cost is obvious, the extra buffer copying into page cache, thus it reduces the performance. But at least it's still user configurable, if the end user still wants the zero-copy performance, just set NODATASUM flag for the inode (which is a common practice for VM images on btrfs). Since we cannot trust user space programs to keep the buffer consistent during direct IO, we have no choice but always falling back to buffered IO. At least by this, we avoid the more deadly false data checksum mismatch error. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6 [ Conflicts caused by code extracted into direct-io.c ] Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: mark dirty extent range for out of bound prealloc extents

2025-11-24T09:29:47+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3b1a4a59a2086badab391687a6a0b86e03048393 ] In btrfs_fallocate(), when the allocated range overlaps with a prealloc extent and the extent starts after i_size, the range doesn't get marked dirty in file_extent_tree. This results in persisting an incorrect disk_i_size for the inode when not using the no-holes feature. This is reproducible since commit 41a2ee75aab0 ("btrfs: introduce per-inode file extent tree"), then became hidden since commit 3d7db6e8bd22 ("btrfs: don't allocate file extent tree for non regular files") and then visible again after commit 8679d2687c35 ("btrfs: initialize inode::file_extent_tree after i_mode has been set"), which fixes the previous commit. The following reproducer triggers the problem: $ cat test.sh MNT=/mnt/test DEV=/dev/vdb mkdir -p $MNT mkfs.btrfs -f -O ^no-holes $DEV mount $DEV $MNT touch $MNT/file1 fallocate -n -o 1M -l 2M $MNT/file1 umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT len=$((1 * 1024 * 1024)) fallocate -o 1M -l $len $MNT/file1 du --bytes $MNT/file1 umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT du --bytes $MNT/file1 umount $MNT Running the reproducer gives the following result: $ ./test.sh (...) 2097152 /mnt/test/file1 1048576 /mnt/test/file1 The difference is exactly 1048576 as we assigned. Fix by adding a call to btrfs_inode_set_file_extent_range() in btrfs_fallocate_update_isize(). Fixes: 41a2ee75aab0 ("btrfs: introduce per-inode file extent tree") Signed-off-by: austinchang Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: avoid page_lockend underflow in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()

2025-05-02T05:50:43+00:00

[ Upstream commit bc2dbc4983afedd198490cca043798f57c93e9bf ] [BUG] When running btrfs/004 with 4K fs block size and 64K page size, sometimes fsstress workload can take 100% CPU for a while, but not long enough to trigger a 120s hang warning. [CAUSE] When such 100% CPU usage happens, btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() is always in the call trace. One example when this problem happens, the function btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() got the following parameters: lock_start = 4096, lockend = 20469 Then we calculate @page_lockstart by rounding up lock_start to page boundary, which is 64K (page size is 64K). For @page_lockend, we round down the value towards page boundary, which result 0. Then since we need to pass an inclusive end to filemap_range_has_page(), we subtract 1 from the rounded down value, resulting in (u64)-1. In the above case, the range is inside the same page, and we do not even need to call filemap_range_has_page(), not to mention to call it with (u64)-1 at the end. This behavior will cause btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() to busy loop waiting for irrelevant range to have its pages dropped. [FIX] Calculate @page_lockend by just rounding down @lockend, without decreasing the value by one. So @page_lockend will no longer overflow. Then exit early if @page_lockend is no larger than @page_lockstart. As it means either the range is inside the same page, or the two pages are adjacent already. Finally only decrease @page_lockend when calling filemap_range_has_page(). Fixes: 0528476b6ac7 ("btrfs: fix the filemap_range_has_page() call in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix hole expansion when writing at an offset beyond EOF

2025-02-21T12:57:19+00:00

commit da2dccd7451de62b175fb8f0808d644959e964c7 upstream. At btrfs_write_check() if our file's i_size is not sector size aligned and we have a write that starts at an offset larger than the i_size that falls within the same page of the i_size, then we end up not zeroing the file range [i_size, write_offset). The code is this: start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize); oldsize = i_size_read(inode); if (start_pos > oldsize) { /* Expand hole size to cover write data, preventing empty gap */ loff_t end_pos = round_up(pos + count, fs_info->sectorsize); ret = btrfs_cont_expand(BTRFS_I(inode), oldsize, end_pos); if (ret) return ret; } So if our file's i_size is 90269 bytes and a write at offset 90365 bytes comes in, we get 'start_pos' set to 90112 bytes, which is less than the i_size and therefore we don't zero out the range [90269, 90365) by calling btrfs_cont_expand(). This is an old bug introduced in commit 9036c10208e1 ("Btrfs: update hole handling v2"), from 2008, and the buggy code got moved around over the years. Fix this by discarding 'start_pos' and comparing against the write offset ('pos') without any alignment. This bug was recently exposed by test case generic/363 which tests this scenario by polluting ranges beyond EOF with an mmap write and than verify that after a file increases we get zeroes for the range which is supposed to be a hole and not what we wrote with the previous mmaped write. We're only seeing this exposed now because generic/363 used to run only on xfs until last Sunday's fstests update. The test was failing like this: $ ./check generic/363 FSTYP -- btrfs PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.13.0-rc7-btrfs-next-185+ #17 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 3 12:28:46 WET 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1 generic/363 0s ... [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad) # --- tests/generic/363.out 2025-02-05 15:31:14.013646509 +0000 # +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad 2025-02-05 17:25:33.112630781 +0000 @@ -1 +1,46 @@ QA output created by 363 +READ BAD DATA: offset = 0xdcad, size = 0xd921, fname = /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/dev/junk +OFFSET GOOD BAD RANGE +0x1609d 0x0000 0x3104 0x0 +operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4 +0x1609e 0x0000 0x0472 0x1 +operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4 ... (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/363.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: generic/363 Failures: generic/363 Failed 1 of 1 tests Fixes: 9036c10208e1 ("Btrfs: update hole handling v2") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix data race when accessing the inode's disk_i_size at btrfs_drop_extents()

2025-02-17T08:40:03+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5324c4e10e9c2ce307a037e904c0d9671d7137d9 ] A data race occurs when the function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()` and the function `btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` are executed concurrently. The function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()` is not locked when reading inode->disk_i_size, causing `btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` to cause data competition when writing inode->disk_i_size, thus affecting the value of `modify_tree`. The specific call stack that appears during testing is as follows: ============DATA_RACE============ btrfs_drop_extents+0x89a/0xa060 [btrfs] insert_reserved_file_extent+0xb54/0x2960 [btrfs] insert_ordered_extent_file_extent+0xff5/0x1760 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x1b85/0x36a0 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs] process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10 worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190 kthread+0x292/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ============OTHER_INFO============ btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write+0x4ec/0x600 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x24c7/0x36a0 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs] process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10 worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190 kthread+0x292/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ================================= The main purpose of the check of the inode's disk_i_size is to avoid taking write locks on a btree path when we have a write at or beyond EOF, since in these cases we don't expect to find extent items in the root to drop. However if we end up taking write locks due to a data race on disk_i_size, everything is still correct, we only add extra lock contention on the tree in case there's concurrency from other tasks. If the race causes us to not take write locks when we actually need them, then everything is functionally correct as well, since if we find out we have extent items to drop and we took read locks (modify_tree set to 0), we release the path and retry again with write locks. Since this data race does not affect the correctness of the function, it is a harmless data race, use data_race() to check inode->disk_i_size. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Hao-ran Zheng Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fd

2024-10-04T14:29:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7ee85f5515e86a4e2a2f51969795920733912bad ] When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file's private_data pointer into a local variable named 'private', which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file->private_data into its local variable 'private', which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there's also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode's spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it's used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future. Fixes: 3c32c7212f16 ("btrfs: use cached state when looking for delalloc ranges with lseek") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd

2024-09-12T09:11:45+00:00

commit cd9253c23aedd61eb5ff11f37a36247cd46faf86 upstream. If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a race where we can end up either: 1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode's lock, triggering an assertion failures when assertions are enabled; 2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed. The race happens like this: 1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT; 2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example; 3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes, while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor. 4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread doing fsyncs; 5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the file's private to an on stack allocated private with the member 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true; 6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there's a private structure associated to the file which has 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true, so it skips locking the inode's VFS lock; 7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file's private to NULL since it had no prior private and our private was stack allocated. Then it unlocks the inode's VFS lock; 8) Task B enters btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging(), then the assertion that checks the inode's VFS lock is held fails, since task B never locked it and task A has already unlocked it. The stack trace produced is the following: assertion failed: inode_is_locked(&inode->vfs_inode), in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 9 PID: 5072 Comm: worker Tainted: G U OE 6.10.5-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 69f48d427608e1c09e60ea24c6c55e2ca1b049e8 Hardware name: Acer Predator PH315-52/Covini_CFS, BIOS V1.12 07/28/2020 RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs] Code: 50 d6 86 c0 e8 (...) RSP: 0018:ffff9e4a03dcfc78 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff9078a9868e98 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff907dce4a7800 RDI: ffff907dce4a7800 RBP: ffff907805518800 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff9e4a03dcfb38 R10: ffff9e4a03dcfb30 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff907684ae7800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff90774646b600 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f04b96006c0(0000) GS:ffff907dce480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f32acbfc000 CR3: 00000001fd4fa005 CR4: 00000000003726f0 Call Trace: ? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x24 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] btrfs_sync_file+0x21a/0x4d0 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? __seccomp_filter+0x31d/0x4f0 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160 ? do_futex+0xcb/0x190 ? __x64_sys_futex+0x10e/0x1d0 ? switch_fpu_return+0x4f/0xd0 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Another problem here is if task B grabs the private pointer and then uses it after task A has finished, since the private was allocated in the stack of task A, it results in some invalid memory access with a hard to predict result. This issue, triggering the assertion, was observed with QEMU workloads by two users in the Link tags below. Fix this by not relying on a file's private to pass information to fsync that it should skip locking the inode and instead pass this information through a special value stored in current->journal_info. This is safe because in the relevant section of the direct IO write path we are not holding a transaction handle, so current->journal_info is NULL. The following C program triggers the issue: $ cat repro.c /* Get the O_DIRECT definition. */ #ifndef _GNU_SOURCE #define _GNU_SOURCE #endif #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include static int fd; static ssize_t do_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count, off_t offset) { while (count > 0) { ssize_t ret; ret = pwrite(fd, buf, count, offset); if (ret < 0) { if (errno == EINTR) continue; return ret; } count -= ret; buf += ret; } return 0; } static void *fsync_loop(void *arg) { while (1) { int ret; ret = fsync(fd); if (ret != 0) { perror("Fsync failed"); exit(6); } } } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { long pagesize; void *write_buf; pthread_t fsyncer; int ret; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Use: %s \n", argv[0]); return 1; } fd = open(argv[1], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_DIRECT, 0666); if (fd == -1) { perror("Failed to open/create file"); return 1; } pagesize = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); if (pagesize == -1) { perror("Failed to get page size"); return 2; } ret = posix_memalign(&write_buf, pagesize, pagesize); if (ret) { perror("Failed to allocate buffer"); return 3; } ret = pthread_create(&fsyncer, NULL, fsync_loop, NULL); if (ret != 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Failed to create writer thread: %d\n", ret); return 4; } while (1) { ret = do_write(fd, write_buf, pagesize, 0); if (ret != 0) { perror("Write failed"); exit(5); } } return 0; } $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi $ mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi $ timeout 10 ./repro /mnt/sdi/foo Usually the race is triggered within less than 1 second. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Reported-by: Paulo Dias Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219187 Reported-by: Andreas Jahn Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219199 Reported-by: syzbot+4704b3cc972bd76024f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000044ff540620d7dee2@google.com/ Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix double inode unlock for direct IO sync writes

2024-08-14T11:59:04+00:00

commit e0391e92f9ab4fb3dbdeb139c967dcfa7ac4b115 upstream. If we do a direct IO sync write, at btrfs_sync_file(), and we need to skip inode logging or we get an error starting a transaction or an error when flushing delalloc, we end up unlocking the inode when we shouldn't under the 'out_release_extents' label, and then unlock it again at btrfs_direct_write(). Fix that by checking if we have to skip inode unlocking under that label. Reported-by: syzbot+7dbbb74af6291b5a5a8b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000dfd631061eaeb4bc@google.com/ Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write

2024-08-14T11:59:02+00:00

commit 939b656bc8ab203fdbde26ccac22bcb7f0985be5 upstream. During an append (O_APPEND write flag) direct IO write if the input buffer was not previously faulted in, we can corrupt the file in a way that the final size is unexpected and it includes an unexpected hole. The problem happens like this: 1) We have an empty file, with size 0, for example; 2) We do an O_APPEND direct IO with a length of 4096 bytes and the input buffer is not currently faulted in; 3) We enter btrfs_direct_write(), lock the inode and call generic_write_checks(), which calls generic_write_checks_count(), and that function sets the iocb position to 0 with the following code: if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_APPEND) iocb->ki_pos = i_size_read(inode); 4) We call btrfs_dio_write() and enter into iomap, which will end up calling btrfs_dio_iomap_begin() and that calls btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write(), where we update the i_size of the inode to 4096 bytes; 5) After btrfs_dio_iomap_begin() returns, iomap will attempt to access the page of the write input buffer (at iomap_dio_bio_iter(), with a call to bio_iov_iter_get_pages()) and fail with -EFAULT, which gets returned to btrfs at btrfs_direct_write() via btrfs_dio_write(); 6) At btrfs_direct_write() we get the -EFAULT error, unlock the inode, fault in the write buffer and then goto to the label 'relock'; 7) We lock again the inode, do all the necessary checks again and call again generic_write_checks(), which calls generic_write_checks_count() again, and there we set the iocb's position to 4K, which is the current i_size of the inode, with the following code pointed above: if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_APPEND) iocb->ki_pos = i_size_read(inode); 8) Then we go again to btrfs_dio_write() and enter iomap and the write succeeds, but it wrote to the file range [4K, 8K), leaving a hole in the [0, 4K) range and an i_size of 8K, which goes against the expectations of having the data written to the range [0, 4K) and get an i_size of 4K. Fix this by not unlocking the inode before faulting in the input buffer, in case we get -EFAULT or an incomplete write, and not jumping to the 'relock' label after faulting in the buffer - instead jump to a location immediately before calling iomap, skipping all the write checks and relocking. This solves this problem and it's fine even in case the input buffer is memory mapped to the same file range, since only holding the range locked in the inode's io tree can cause a deadlock, it's safe to keep the inode lock (VFS lock), as was fixed and described in commit 51bd9563b678 ("btrfs: fix deadlock due to page faults during direct IO reads and writes"). A sample reproducer provided by a reporter is the following: $ cat test.c #ifndef _GNU_SOURCE #define _GNU_SOURCE #endif #include #include #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if (argc < 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s \n", argv[0]); return 1; } int fd = open(argv[1], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_DIRECT | O_APPEND, 0644); if (fd < 0) { perror("creating test file"); return 1; } char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); ssize_t ret = write(fd, buf, 4096); if (ret < 0) { perror("pwritev2"); return 1; } struct stat stbuf; ret = fstat(fd, &stbuf); if (ret < 0) { perror("stat"); return 1; } printf("size: %llu\n", (unsigned long long)stbuf.st_size); return stbuf.st_size == 4096 ? 0 : 1; } A test case for fstests will be sent soon. Reported-by: Hanna Czenczek Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0b841d46-12fe-4e64-9abb-871d8d0de271@redhat.com/ Fixes: 8184620ae212 ("btrfs: fix lost file sync on direct IO write with nowait and dsync iocb") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Tested-by: Hanna Czenczek Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix qgroup_free_reserved_data int overflow

2023-12-20T16:02:03+00:00

commit 9e65bfca24cf1d77e4a5c7a170db5867377b3fe7 upstream. The reserved data counter and input parameter is a u64, but we inadvertently accumulate it in an int. Overflowing that int results in freeing the wrong amount of data and breaking reserve accounting. Unfortunately, this overflow rot spreads from there, as the qgroup release/free functions rely on returning an int to take advantage of negative values for error codes. Therefore, the full fix is to return the "released" or "freed" amount by a u64 argument and to return 0 or negative error code via the return value. Most of the call sites simply ignore the return value, though some of them handle the error and count the returned bytes. Change all of them accordingly. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman