kernel/linux.git/drivers/regulator, branch v5.10.264

regulator: ltc3676: Fix incorrect IRQSTAT bit offsets

2026-07-24T13:49:16+00:00

commit 50dce2e2f84b56d8b4b406d97a1543709e8a87f5 upstream. The LTC3676_IRQSTAT_* bit definitions do not match the IRQSTAT (Interrupt Request Status) register layout documented in Table 15 of the LTC3676/LTC3676-1 datasheet: bit 0 - Pushbutton Status Active bit 1 - Hard Reset Occurred bit 2 - PGOOD Timeout Occurred bit 3 - Undervoltage Warning bit 4 - Undervoltage Standby (Fault) Occurred bit 5 - Overtemperature Warning bit 6 - Overtemperature Standby (Fault) Occurred bit 7 - Reserved The driver instead defines these starting at bit 3, one bit higher than the datasheet specifies, which causes ltc3676_regulator_isr() to check the wrong status bits and misreport (or miss) PGOOD timeout, undervoltage and thermal warning/fault conditions. Fix the bit offsets to match the datasheet. Fixes: 37b918a034fe ("regulator: Add LTC3676 support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Abhishek Ojha Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260715170408.295552-1-Abhishek.ojha@savoirfairelinux.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

regulator: core: regulator_lock_two() should test for EDEADLK not EDEADLOCK

2026-07-24T13:49:08+00:00

[ Upstream commit d38f8bd771c4999b797d7074b348cf201414bd34 ] Compare against -EDEADLK, which is what ww_mutex_lock() actually returns and what every other deadlock check in this file already uses. Function regulator_lock_two() acquires two regulators via regulator_lock_nested() -> ww_mutex_lock(). On contention, ww_mutex_lock() returns -EDEADLK, which is the caller's signal to drop the lock it holds and retry the acquisition in the canonical order. However, regulator_lock_two() tests the return value against -EDEADLOCK rather than -EDEADLK. On most architectures, EDEADLK and EDEADLOCK are the same value, so the comparison happens to be correct and the bug is invisible. But on MIPS, SPARC, and PowerPC, those two errors have different values. The test is wrong: a genuine -EDEADLK backoff no longer matches -EDEADLOCK, so instead of unlocking and retrying, the code falls into WARN_ON(ret) and returns with only one of the two regulators locked. In practice, this is a bug only on MIPS, because the regulator core is not built or used on the other two platforms. In general, EDEADLK is preferred over EDEADLOCK for new code. Fixes: cba6cfdc7c3f ("regulator: core: Avoid lockdep reports when resolving supplies") Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260708235722.2953579-1-ttabi@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

regulator: core: Make regulator_lock_two() logic easier to follow

2026-07-24T13:49:08+00:00

[ Upstream commit 37473397b852f556d8b9428ccbfd51886037842d ] The regulator_lock_two() function could be made clearer in the case of lock contention by having a local variable for each of the held and contended locks. Let's do that. At the same time, let's use the swap() function instead of open coding it. This change is expected to be a no-op and simply improves code clarity. Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAE-0n53Eb1BeDPmjBycXUaQAF4ppiAM6UDWje_jiB9GAmR8MMw@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230413173359.1.I1ae92b25689bd6579952e6d458b79f5f8054a0c9@changeid Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Stable-dep-of: d38f8bd771c4 ("regulator: core: regulator_lock_two() should test for EDEADLK not EDEADLOCK") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

regulator: core: fix locking in regulator_resolve_supply() error path

2026-07-04T11:38:38+00:00

commit 497330b203d2c59c5ff3fa4c34d14494d7203bc3 upstream. If late enabling of a supply regulator fails in regulator_resolve_supply(), the code currently triggers a lockdep warning: WARNING: drivers/regulator/core.c:2649 at _regulator_put+0x80/0xa0, CPU#6: kworker/u32:4/596 ... Call trace: _regulator_put+0x80/0xa0 (P) regulator_resolve_supply+0x7cc/0xbe0 regulator_register_resolve_supply+0x28/0xb8 as the regulator_list_mutex must be held when calling _regulator_put(). To solve this, simply switch to using regulator_put(). While at it, we should also make sure that no concurrent access happens to our rdev while we clear out the supply pointer. Add appropriate locking to ensure that. While the code in question will be removed altogether in a follow-up commit, I believe it is still beneficial to have this corrected before removal for future reference. Fixes: 36a1f1b6ddc6 ("regulator: core: Fix memory leak in regulator_resolve_supply()") Fixes: 8e5356a73604 ("regulator: core: Clear the supply pointer if enabling fails") Signed-off-by: André Draszik Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260109-regulators-defer-v2-2-1a25dc968e60@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Nazar Kalashnikov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

regulator: act8945a: fix OF node reference imbalance

2026-06-01T15:29:28+00:00

commit 0d15ce31375ccef4162f960b34547a821b7619d2 upstream. The driver reuses the OF node of the parent multi-function device but fails to take another reference to balance the one dropped by the platform bus code when unbinding the MFD and deregistering the child devices. Fix this by using the intended helper for reusing OF nodes. Fixes: 38c09961048b ("regulator: act8945a: add regulator driver for ACT8945A") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.6 Cc: Wenyou Yang Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408073055.5183-7-johan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

regulator: max77650: fix OF node reference imbalance

2026-06-01T15:29:27+00:00

commit 2edaf5f7ada0ab5c9ec1f0836bd19779a8d85262 upstream. The driver reuses the OF node of the parent multi-function device but fails to take another reference to balance the one dropped by the platform bus code when unbinding the MFD and deregistering the child devices. Fix this by using the intended helper for reusing OF nodes. Fixes: bcc61f1c44fd ("regulator: max77650: add regulator support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1 Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408073055.5183-4-johan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

regulator: pca9450: Correct interrupt type

2026-04-18T08:30:54+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5d0efaf47ee90ac60efae790acee3a3ed99ebf80 ] Kernel warning on i.MX8MP-EVK when doing module test: irq: type mismatch, failed to map hwirq-3 for gpio@30200000! Per PCA945[X] specification: The IRQ_B pin is pulled low when any unmasked interrupt bit status is changed and it is released high once application processor read INT1 register. So the interrupt should be configured as IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW, not IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING. Fixes: 0935ff5f1f0a4 ("regulator: pca9450: add pca9450 pmic driver") Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260310-pca9450-irq-v1-1-36adf52c2c55@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

regulator: pca9450: Make IRQ optional

2026-04-18T08:30:54+00:00

[ Upstream commit 83808c54064eef620ad8645dfdcaffe125551532 ] The IRQ line might not be connected on some boards. Allow the driver to be probed without it. Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240708084107.38986-5-frieder@fris.de Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Stable-dep-of: 5d0efaf47ee9 ("regulator: pca9450: Correct interrupt type") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

regulator: core: move supply check earlier in set_machine_constraints()

2026-03-04T12:19:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit 86a8eeb0e913f4b6a55dabba5122098d4e805e55 ] Since commit 98e48cd9283d ("regulator: core: resolve supply for boot-on/always-on regulators"), set_machine_constraints() can return -EPROBE_DEFER very late, after it has done a lot of work and configuration of the regulator. This means that configuration will happen multiple times for no benefit in that case. Furthermore, this can lead to timing-dependent voltage glitches as mentioned e.g. in commit 8a866d527ac0 ("regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init"). We can know that it's going to fail very early, in particular before going through the complete regulator configuration by moving some code around a little. Do so to avoid re-configuring the regulator multiple times, also avoiding the voltage glitches if we can. Fixes: 98e48cd9283d ("regulator: core: resolve supply for boot-on/always-on regulators") Signed-off-by: André Draszik Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260109-regulators-defer-v2-3-1a25dc968e60@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

regulator: core: Shorten off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on by time since booted

2026-03-04T12:19:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit 691c1fcda5351ed98a44610b7dccc0e3ee920020 ] This is very close to a straight revert of commit 218320fec294 ("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"). We've identified that patch as causing a boot speed regression on sc7180-trogdor boards. While boot speed certainly isn't more important than making sure that power sequencing is correct, looking closely at the original change it doesn't seem to have been fully justified. It mentions "cycling issues" without describing exactly what the issues were. That means it's possible that the cycling issues were really a problem that should be fixed in a different way. Let's take a careful look at how we should handle regulators that have an off-on-delay and that are boot-on or always-on. Linux currently doesn't have any way to identify whether a GPIO regulator was already on when the kernel booted. That means that when the kernel boots we probe a regulator, see that it wants boot-on / always-on we, and then turn the regulator on. We could be in one of two cases when we do this: a) The regulator might have been left on by the bootloader and we're ensuring that it stays on. b) The regulator might have been left off by the bootloader and we're just now turning it on. For case a) we definitely don't need any sort of delay. For case b) we _might_ need some delay in case the bootloader turned the regulator off _right_ before booting the kernel. To get the proper delay for case b) then we can just assume a `last_off` of 0, which is what it gets initialized to by default. As per above, we can't tell whether we're in case a) or case b) so we'll assume the longer delay (case b). This basically puts the code to how it was before commit 218320fec294 ("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"). However, we add one important change: we make sure that the delay is actually honored if `last_off` is 0. Though the original "cycling issues" cited were vague, I'm hopeful that this important extra change will be enough to fix the issues that the initial commit mentioned. With this fix, I've confined that on a sc7180-trogdor board the delay at boot goes down from 500 ms to ~250 ms. That's not as good as the 0 ms that we had prior to commit 218320fec294 ("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"), but it's probably safer because we don't know if the bootloader turned the regulator off right before booting. One note is that it's possible that we could be in a state that's not a) or b) if there are other issues in the kernel. The only one I can think of is related to pinctrl. If the pinctrl driver being used on a board isn't careful about avoiding glitches when setting up a pin then it's possible that setting up a pin could cause the regulator to "turn off" briefly immediately before the regulator probes. If this is indeed causing problems then the pinctrl driver should be fixed, perhaps in a similar way to what was done in commit d21f4b7ffc22 ("pinctrl: qcom: Avoid glitching lines when we first mux to output") Fixes: 218320fec294 ("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators") Cc: Christian Kohlschütter Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313111806.1.I2eaad872be0932a805c239a7c7a102233fb0b03b@changeid Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Stable-dep-of: 86a8eeb0e913 ("regulator: core: move supply check earlier in set_machine_constraints()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin