kernel/linux.git/drivers/pwm, branch v4.4.235

pwm: fsl-ftm: Use flat regmap cache

2020-06-20T08:23:15+00:00

commit ad06fdeeef1cbadf86ebbe510e8079abada8b44e upstream. Use flat regmap cache to avoid lockdep warning at probe: [ 0.697285] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2755 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x15c/0x160() [ 0.697449] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) The RB-tree regmap cache needs to allocate new space on first writes. However, allocations in an atomic context (e.g. when a spinlock is held) are not allowed. The function regmap_write calls map->lock, which acquires a spinlock in the fast_io case. Since the pwm-fsl-ftm driver uses MMIO, the regmap bus of type regmap_mmio is being used which has fast_io set to true. The MMIO space of the pwm-fsl-ftm driver is reasonable condense, hence using the much faster flat regmap cache is anyway the better choice. Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner Cc: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

pwm: bcm2835: Dynamically allocate base

2020-05-02T15:20:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2c25b07e5ec119cab609e41407a1fb3fa61442f5 ] The newer 2711 and 7211 chips have two PWM controllers and failure to dynamically allocate the PWM base would prevent the second PWM controller instance being probed for succeeding with an -EEXIST error from alloc_pwms(). Fixes: e5a06dc5ac1f ("pwm: Add BCM2835 PWM driver") Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

pwm: renesas-tpu: Fix late Runtime PM enablement

2020-05-02T15:20:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit d5a3c7a4536e1329a758e14340efd0e65252bd3d ] Runtime PM should be enabled before calling pwmchip_add(), as PWM users can appear immediately after the PWM chip has been added. Likewise, Runtime PM should always be disabled after the removal of the PWM chip, even if the latter failed. Fixes: 99b82abb0a35b073 ("pwm: Add Renesas TPU PWM driver") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

pwm: rcar: Fix late Runtime PM enablement

2020-05-02T15:20:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1451a3eed24b5fd6a604683f0b6995e0e7e16c79 ] Runtime PM should be enabled before calling pwmchip_add(), as PWM users can appear immediately after the PWM chip has been added. Likewise, Runtime PM should be disabled after the removal of the PWM chip. Fixes: ed6c1476bf7f16d5 ("pwm: Add support for R-Car PWM Timer") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

pwm: Clear chip_data in pwm_put()

2019-12-05T14:27:13+00:00

commit e926b12c611c2095c7976e2ed31753ad6eb5ff1a upstream. After a PWM is disposed by its user the per chip data becomes invalid. Clear the data in common code instead of the device drivers to get consistent behaviour. Before this patch only three of nine drivers cleaned up here. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

pwm: Fix deadlock warning when removing PWM device

2019-06-22T06:18:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit 347ab9480313737c0f1aaa08e8f2e1a791235535 ] This patch fixes deadlock warning if removing PWM device when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled. This issue can be reproceduced by the following steps on the R-Car H3 Salvator-X board if the backlight is disabled: # cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0 # echo 0 > export # ls device export npwm power pwm0 subsystem uevent unexport # cd device/driver # ls bind e6e31000.pwm uevent unbind # echo e6e31000.pwm > unbind [ 87.659974] ====================================================== [ 87.666149] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 87.672327] 5.0.0 #7 Not tainted [ 87.675549] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 87.681723] bash/2986 is trying to acquire lock: [ 87.686337] 000000005ea0e178 (kn->count#58){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.694528] [ 87.694528] but task is already holding lock: [ 87.700353] 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.707405] [ 87.707405] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 87.707405] [ 87.715574] [ 87.715574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 87.723048] [ 87.723048] -> #1 (pwm_lock){+.+.}: [ 87.728017] __mutex_lock+0x70/0x7e4 [ 87.732108] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.736547] pwm_request_from_chip.part.6+0x34/0x74 [ 87.741940] pwm_request_from_chip+0x20/0x40 [ 87.746725] export_store+0x6c/0x1f4 [ 87.750820] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28 [ 87.754998] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.759175] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.763615] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.767619] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.771448] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.775278] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.779721] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.783986] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.788858] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.792947] [ 87.792947] -> #0 (kn->count#58){++++}: [ 87.798260] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 87.802353] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 87.806790] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.811836] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 87.816447] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 87.820971] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 87.825583] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 87.830197] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 87.834201] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 87.838638] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 87.843509] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 87.847773] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 87.852039] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 87.856651] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 87.862391] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 87.867175] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 87.871265] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 87.875442] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.879618] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.884055] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.888057] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.891887] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.895716] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.900154] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.904417] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.909289] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.913378] [ 87.913378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 87.913378] [ 87.921374] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 87.921374] [ 87.927286] CPU0 CPU1 [ 87.931808] ---- ---- [ 87.936331] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.939293] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.945120] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.950599] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.953908] [ 87.953908] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 87.953908] [ 87.959821] 4 locks held by bash/2986: [ 87.963563] #0: 00000000ace7bc30 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x188/0x19c [ 87.971044] #1: 00000000287991b2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xb4/0x1e8 [ 87.978872] #2: 00000000f739d016 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x21c [ 87.988001] #3: 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.995481] [ 87.995481] stack backtrace: [ 87.999836] CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0 #7 [ 88.005489] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795 ES1.x (DT) [ 88.012791] Call trace: [ 88.015235] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190 [ 88.018891] show_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 88.022204] dump_stack+0xb0/0xec [ 88.025514] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x1d0/0x2e0 [ 88.030385] __lock_acquire+0x1318/0x1864 [ 88.034388] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 88.037958] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 88.041874] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 88.046398] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 88.050487] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 88.054490] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 88.058580] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 88.062671] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 88.066154] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 88.070070] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 88.074421] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 88.078163] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 88.081906] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 88.085996] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 88.091215] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 88.095478] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 88.099048] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 88.102704] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 88.106359] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 88.110275] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 88.113757] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 88.117065] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 88.120374] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 88.124291] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 88.128034] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 88.132384] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 The sysfs unexport in pwmchip_remove() is completely asymmetric to what we do in pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and commit 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") is a strong indication that this was wrong to begin with. We should just move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() where it belongs, which is right after pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). In that case, we do not need separate functions anymore either. We also really want to remove sysfs irrespective of whether or not the chip will be removed as a result of pwmchip_remove(). We can only assume that the driver will be gone after that, so we shouldn't leave any dangling sysfs files around. This warning disappears if we move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() to the top of pwmchip_remove(), pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). That way it is also outside of the pwm_lock section, which indeed doesn't seem to be needed. Moving the pwmchip_sysfs_export() call outside of that section also seems fine and it'd be perfectly symmetric with pwmchip_remove() again. So, this patch fixes them. Signed-off-by: Phong Hoang [shimoda: revise the commit log and code] Fixes: 76abbdde2d95 ("pwm: Add sysfs interface") Fixes: 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda Tested-by: Hoan Nguyen An Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

pwm: tiehrpwm: Update shadow register for disabling PWMs

2019-06-22T06:18:21+00:00

[ Upstream commit b00ef53053191d3025c15e8041699f8c9d132daf ] It must be made sure that immediate mode is not already set, when modifying shadow register value in ehrpwm_pwm_disable(). Otherwise modifications to the action-qualifier continuous S/W force register(AQSFRC) will be done in the active register. This may happen when both channels are being disabled. In this case, only the first channel state will be recorded as disabled in the shadow register. Later, when enabling the first channel again, the second channel would be enabled as well. Setting RLDCSF to zero, first, ensures that the shadow register is updated as desired. Fixes: 38dabd91ff0b ("pwm: tiehrpwm: Fix disabling of output of PWMs") Signed-off-by: Christoph Vogtländer [vigneshr@ti.com: Improve commit message] Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

pwm: tiehrpwm: Fix disabling of output of PWMs

2018-09-09T18:04:35+00:00

commit 38dabd91ff0bde33352ca3cc65ef515599b77a05 upstream. pwm-tiehrpwm driver disables PWM output by putting it in low output state via active AQCSFRC register in ehrpwm_pwm_disable(). But, the AQCSFRC shadow register is not updated. Therefore, when shadow AQCSFRC register is re-enabled in ehrpwm_pwm_enable() (say to enable second PWM output), previous settings are lost as shadow register value is loaded into active register. This results in things like PWMA getting enabled automatically, when PWMB is enabled and vice versa. Fix this by updating AQCSFRC shadow register as well during ehrpwm_pwm_disable(). Fixes: 19891b20e7c2 ("pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: PWM driver support for EHRPWM") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Vignesh R Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

pwm: tegra: Increase precision in PWM rate calculation

2018-03-22T08:23:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 250b76f43f57d578ebff5e7211eb2c73aa5cd6ca ] The rate of the PWM calculated as follows: hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns; rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz; This has the precision loss in lower PWM rate. Change this to have more precision as: hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC * 100, period_ns); rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * 100, hz) Example: 1. period_ns = 16672000, PWM clock rate is 200 KHz. Based on old formula hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns = 1000000000ul/16672000 = 59 (59.98) rate = (200K + 59/2)/59 = 3390 Based on new method: hz = 5998 rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(200000*100, 5998) = 3334 If we measure the PWM signal rate, we will get more accurate period with rate value of 3334 instead of 3390. 2. period_ns = 16803898, PWM clock rate is 200 KHz. Based on old formula: hz = 59, rate = 3390 Based on new formula: hz = 5951, rate = 3360 The PWM signal rate of 3360 is more near to requested period than 3333. Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

pwm: pca9685: Fix period change with same duty cycle

2017-03-15T01:57:14+00:00

commit 8d254a340efb12b40c4c1ff25a48a4f48f7bbd6b upstream. When first implementing support for changing the output frequency, an optimization was added to continue the PWM after changing the prescaler without having to reprogram the ON and OFF registers for the duty cycle, in case the duty cycle stayed the same. This was flawed, because we compared the absolute value of the duty cycle in nanoseconds instead of the ratio to the period. Fix the problem by removing the shortcut. Fixes: 01ec8472009c9 ("pwm-pca9685: Support changing the output frequency") Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman