kernel/linux.git/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c, branch v6.1.168

pwm: sysfs: Do not apply state to already disabled PWMs

2023-07-19T14:21:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit 38ba83598633373f47951384cfc389181c8d1bed ] If the PWM is exported but not enabled, do not call pwm_class_apply_state(). First of all, in this case, period may still be unconfigured and this would make pwm_class_apply_state() return -EINVAL, and then suspend would fail. Second, it makes little sense to apply state onto PWM that is not enabled before suspend. Failing case: " $ echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/export $ echo mem > /sys/power/state ... pwm pwmchip4: PM: dpm_run_callback(): pwm_class_suspend+0x1/0xa8 returns -22 pwm pwmchip4: PM: failed to suspend: error -22 PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected " Working case: " $ echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/export $ echo 100 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/pwm1/period $ echo 10 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip4/pwm1/duty_cycle $ echo mem > /sys/power/state ... " Do not call pwm_class_apply_state() in case the PWM is disabled to fix this issue. Fixes: 7fd4edc57bbae ("pwm: sysfs: Add suspend/resume support") Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Fixes: ef2bf4997f7d ("pwm: Improve args checking in pwm_apply_state()") Reviewed-by: Brian Norris Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

pwm: sysfs: Replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit()

2022-09-28T15:52:02+00:00

While the uses in this code are unproblematic, it's generally safer for sysfs outputs to use the new sysfs_emit() helper instead of raw calls to sprintf() and friends. This also has the benefit of annotating the uses, which makes them easier to audit and potentially use them to generate sysfs documentation from them. This patch replaces existing sprintf() calls straightforwardly with the new helper. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding

pwm: sysfs: Switch to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() and pm_sleep_ptr()

2022-09-28T12:07:53+00:00

Using these newer macros allows the compiler to remove the unused structure and functions when !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP + removes the need to mark pm functions __maybe_unused. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding

pwm: Allow store 64-bit duty cycle from sysfs interface

2020-09-24T07:18:14+00:00

PWM core was converted to u64 by the commit a9d887dc1c60 ("pwm: Convert period and duty cycle to u64") but did not change the duty_cycle_store() so it will error out if trying to pass a numeric string bigger than 2^32-1. Fix this by using u64 and kstrtou64() in duty_cycle_store(). Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula Acked-by: Guru Das Srinagesh Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding

pwm: Convert period and duty cycle to u64

2020-06-17T18:42:11+00:00

Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to ~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 in the structs of the PWM framework so that higher durations may be set. Also use the right format specifiers in debug prints in both core.c, pwm-stm32-lp.c as well as video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding

Merge tag 'pwm/for-5.3-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm

2019-07-09T15:57:45+00:00

Pull pwm updates from Thierry Reding: "This set of changes contains a new driver for SiFive SoCs as well as enhancements to the core (device links are used to track dependencies between PWM providers and consumers, support for PWM controllers via ACPI, sysfs will now suspend/resume PWMs that it has claimed) and various existing drivers" * tag 'pwm/for-5.3-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm: (37 commits) pwm: fsl-ftm: Make sure to unlock mutex on failure pwm: fsl-ftm: Use write protection for prescaler & polarity pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period pwm: atmel-hlcdc: Add compatible for SAM9X60 HLCDC's PWM pwm: bcm2835: Improve precision of PWM leds: pwm: Support ACPI via firmware-node framework pwm: Add support referencing PWMs from ACPI pwm: rcar: Remove suspend/resume support pwm: sysfs: Add suspend/resume support pwm: Add power management descriptions pwm: meson: Add documentation to the driver pwm: meson: Add support PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED when disabling pwm: meson: Don't cache struct pwm_state internally pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state() pwm: meson: Simplify the calculation of the pre-divider and count pwm: meson: Move pwm_set_chip_data() to meson_pwm_request() pwm: meson: Add the per-channel register offsets and bits in a struct pwm: meson: Add the meson_pwm_channel data to struct meson_pwm pwm: meson: Pass struct pwm_device to meson_pwm_calc() pwm: meson: Don't duplicate the polarity internally ...

pwm: sysfs: Add suspend/resume support

2019-06-26T09:39:11+00:00

According to the Documentation/pwm.txt, all PWM consumers should have power management. Since this sysfs interface is one of consumers so that this patch adds suspend/resume support. Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Simon Horman [thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix build warnings for !PM] Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 118

2019-05-24T15:39:02+00:00

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 44 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana Reviewed-by: Allison Randal Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190523091651.032047323@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

pwm: sysfs: fix typo "its" -> "it's"

2019-03-20T11:34:14+00:00

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding

pwm: Fix deadlock warning when removing PWM device

2019-03-20T11:21:31+00:00

This patch fixes deadlock warning if removing PWM device when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled. This issue can be reproceduced by the following steps on the R-Car H3 Salvator-X board if the backlight is disabled: # cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0 # echo 0 > export # ls device export npwm power pwm0 subsystem uevent unexport # cd device/driver # ls bind e6e31000.pwm uevent unbind # echo e6e31000.pwm > unbind [ 87.659974] ====================================================== [ 87.666149] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 87.672327] 5.0.0 #7 Not tainted [ 87.675549] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 87.681723] bash/2986 is trying to acquire lock: [ 87.686337] 000000005ea0e178 (kn->count#58){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.694528] [ 87.694528] but task is already holding lock: [ 87.700353] 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.707405] [ 87.707405] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 87.707405] [ 87.715574] [ 87.715574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 87.723048] [ 87.723048] -> #1 (pwm_lock){+.+.}: [ 87.728017] __mutex_lock+0x70/0x7e4 [ 87.732108] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.736547] pwm_request_from_chip.part.6+0x34/0x74 [ 87.741940] pwm_request_from_chip+0x20/0x40 [ 87.746725] export_store+0x6c/0x1f4 [ 87.750820] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28 [ 87.754998] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.759175] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.763615] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.767619] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.771448] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.775278] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.779721] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.783986] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.788858] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.792947] [ 87.792947] -> #0 (kn->count#58){++++}: [ 87.798260] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 87.802353] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 87.806790] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.811836] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 87.816447] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 87.820971] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 87.825583] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 87.830197] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 87.834201] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 87.838638] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 87.843509] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 87.847773] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 87.852039] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 87.856651] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 87.862391] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 87.867175] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 87.871265] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 87.875442] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.879618] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.884055] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.888057] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.891887] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.895716] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.900154] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.904417] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.909289] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.913378] [ 87.913378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 87.913378] [ 87.921374] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 87.921374] [ 87.927286] CPU0 CPU1 [ 87.931808] ---- ---- [ 87.936331] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.939293] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.945120] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.950599] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.953908] [ 87.953908] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 87.953908] [ 87.959821] 4 locks held by bash/2986: [ 87.963563] #0: 00000000ace7bc30 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x188/0x19c [ 87.971044] #1: 00000000287991b2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xb4/0x1e8 [ 87.978872] #2: 00000000f739d016 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x21c [ 87.988001] #3: 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.995481] [ 87.995481] stack backtrace: [ 87.999836] CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0 #7 [ 88.005489] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795 ES1.x (DT) [ 88.012791] Call trace: [ 88.015235] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190 [ 88.018891] show_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 88.022204] dump_stack+0xb0/0xec [ 88.025514] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x1d0/0x2e0 [ 88.030385] __lock_acquire+0x1318/0x1864 [ 88.034388] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 88.037958] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 88.041874] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 88.046398] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 88.050487] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 88.054490] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 88.058580] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 88.062671] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 88.066154] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 88.070070] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 88.074421] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 88.078163] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 88.081906] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 88.085996] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 88.091215] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 88.095478] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 88.099048] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 88.102704] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 88.106359] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 88.110275] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 88.113757] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 88.117065] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 88.120374] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 88.124291] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 88.128034] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 88.132384] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 The sysfs unexport in pwmchip_remove() is completely asymmetric to what we do in pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and commit 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") is a strong indication that this was wrong to begin with. We should just move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() where it belongs, which is right after pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). In that case, we do not need separate functions anymore either. We also really want to remove sysfs irrespective of whether or not the chip will be removed as a result of pwmchip_remove(). We can only assume that the driver will be gone after that, so we shouldn't leave any dangling sysfs files around. This warning disappears if we move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() to the top of pwmchip_remove(), pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). That way it is also outside of the pwm_lock section, which indeed doesn't seem to be needed. Moving the pwmchip_sysfs_export() call outside of that section also seems fine and it'd be perfectly symmetric with pwmchip_remove() again. So, this patch fixes them. Signed-off-by: Phong Hoang [shimoda: revise the commit log and code] Fixes: 76abbdde2d95 ("pwm: Add sysfs interface") Fixes: 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda Tested-by: Hoan Nguyen An Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding