kernel/linux.git/drivers/powercap, branch v6.12.80

powercap: intel_rapl: Add PL4 support for Ice Lake

2026-03-04T12:20:54+00:00

[ Upstream commit 54b3cd55a515c7c0fcfa0c1f0b10d62c11d64bcc ] Microsoft Surface Pro 7 firmware throttles the processor upon boot/resume. Userspace needs to be able to restore the correct value. Link: https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface/issues/706 Signed-off-by: Daniel Tang Link: https://patch.msgid.link/6088605.ChMirdbgyp@daniel-desktop3 Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

powercap: intel_rapl_tpmi: Remove FW_BUG from invalid version check

2026-03-04T12:20:35+00:00

[ Upstream commit c7d54dafa042cf379859dba265fe5afef6fa8770 ] On partitioned systems, multiple TPMI instances may exist per package, but RAPL registers are only valid on one instance since RAPL has package-scope control. Other instances return invalid versions during domain parsing, which is expected behavior on such systems. Currently this generates a firmware bug warning: intel_rapl_tpmi: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid version Remove the FW_BUG tag, downgrade to pr_debug(), and update the message to clarify that invalid versions are expected on partitioned systems where only one instance can be valid. Fixes: 9eef7f9da928 ("powercap: intel_rapl: Introduce RAPL TPMI interface driver") Reported-by: Zhang Rui Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Reviewed-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260211223401.1575776-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

powercap: fix sscanf() error return value handling

2026-01-17T15:31:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit efc4c35b741af973de90f6826bf35d3b3ac36bf1 ] Fix inconsistent error handling for sscanf() return value check. Implicit boolean conversion is used instead of explicit return value checks. The code checks if (!sscanf(...)) which is incorrect because: 1. sscanf returns the number of successfully parsed items 2. On success, it returns 1 (one item passed) 3. On failure, it returns 0 or EOF 4. The check 'if (!sscanf(...))' is wrong because it treats success (1) as failure All occurrences of sscanf() now uses explicit return value check. With this behavior it returns '-EINVAL' when parsing fails (returns 0 or EOF), and continues when parsing succeeds (returns 1). Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251207151549.202452-1-sumeet4linux@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

powercap: fix race condition in register_control_type()

2026-01-17T15:31:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7bda1910c4bccd4b8d4726620bb3d6bbfb62286e ] The device becomes visible to userspace via device_register() even before it fully initialized by idr_init(). If userspace or another thread tries to register a zone immediately after device_register(), the control_type_valid() will fail because the control_type is not yet in the list. The IDR is not yet initialized, so this race condition causes zone registration failure. Move idr_init() and list addition before device_register() fix the race condition. Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar [ rjw: Subject adjustment, empty line added ] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251205190216.5032-1-sumeet4linux@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

powercap: dtpm_cpu: Fix NULL pointer dereference in get_pd_power_uw()

2025-08-15T10:13:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit 46dc57406887dd02565cb264224194a6776d882b ] The get_pd_power_uw() function can crash with a NULL pointer dereference when em_cpu_get() returns NULL. This occurs when a CPU becomes impossible during runtime, causing get_cpu_device() to return NULL, which propagates through em_cpu_get() and leads to a crash when em_span_cpus() dereferences the NULL pointer. Add a NULL check after em_cpu_get() and return 0 if unavailable, matching the existing fallback behavior in __dtpm_cpu_setup(). Fixes: eb82bace8931 ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load") Signed-off-by: Sivan Zohar-Kotzer Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250701221355.96916-1-sivany32@gmail.com [ rjw: Drop an excess empty code line ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

powercap: intel_rapl: Do not change CLAMPING bit if ENABLE bit cannot be changed

2025-07-10T14:05:12+00:00

commit 964209202ebe1569c858337441e87ef0f9d71416 upstream. PL1 cannot be disabled on some platforms. The ENABLE bit is still set after software clears it. This behavior leads to a scenario where, upon user request to disable the Power Limit through the powercap sysfs, the ENABLE bit remains set while the CLAMPING bit is inadvertently cleared. According to the Intel Software Developer's Manual, the CLAMPING bit, "When set, allows the processor to go below the OS requested P states in order to maintain the power below specified Platform Power Limit value." Thus this means the system may operate at higher power levels than intended on such platforms. Enhance the code to check ENABLE bit after writing to it, and stop further processing if ENABLE bit cannot be changed. Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Fixes: 2d281d8196e3 ("PowerCap: Introduce Intel RAPL power capping driver") Cc: All applicable Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250619071340.384782-1-rui.zhang@intel.com [ rjw: Use str_enabled_disabled() instead of open-coded equivalent ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

powercap: call put_device() on an error path in powercap_register_control_type()

2025-03-22T19:54:14+00:00

[ Upstream commit 93c66fbc280747ea700bd6199633d661e3c819b3 ] powercap_register_control_type() calls device_register(), but does not release the refcount of the device when it fails. Call put_device() before returning an error to balance the refcount. Since the kfree(control_type) will be done by powercap_release(), remove the lines in powercap_register_control_type() before returning the error. This bug was found by an experimental verifier that I am developing. Signed-off-by: Joe Hattori Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250110010554.1583411-1-joe@pf.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

powercap: dtpm_devfreq: Fix error check against dev_pm_qos_add_request()

2024-10-21T11:23:06+00:00

The caller of the function dev_pm_qos_add_request() checks again a non zero value but dev_pm_qos_add_request() can return '1' if the request already exists. Therefore, the setup function fails while the QoS request actually did not failed. Fix that by changing the check against a negative value like all the other callers of the function. Fixes: e44655617317 ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add dtpm devfreq with energy model support") Signed-off-by: Yuan Can Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241018021205.46460-1-yuancan@huawei.com [ rjw: Subject edit ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

powercap: intel_rapl_msr: Add PL4 support for ArrowLake-H

2024-10-16T20:34:03+00:00

Add ArrowLake-H to the list of processors where PL4 is supported. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241016154851.1293654-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

powercap: intel_rapl_msr: Add PL4 support for Arrowlake-U

2024-10-08T19:39:33+00:00

Add PL4 support for ArrowLake-U platform. Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui Reviewed-by: Srinivas Pandruvada Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240930081801.28502-5-rui.zhang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki