<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/linux.git/drivers/net/wan/Makefile, branch v5.18.2</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v5.18.2</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v5.18.2'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2021-09-16T13:08:04+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>net: wan: wanxl: define CROSS_COMPILE_M68K</title>
<updated>2021-09-16T13:08:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Adam Borowski</name>
<email>kilobyte@angband.pl</email>
</author>
<published>2021-09-12T21:23:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=84fb7dfc7463afcba61281f36535576a7f7b0626'/>
<id>urn:sha1:84fb7dfc7463afcba61281f36535576a7f7b0626</id>
<content type='text'>
It was used but never set.  The hardcoded value from before the dawn of
time was non-standard; the usual name for cross-tools is $TRIPLET-$TOOL

Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski &lt;kilobyte@angband.pl&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>wan: remove sbni/granch driver</title>
<updated>2021-08-03T12:05:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Arnd Bergmann</name>
<email>arnd@arndb.de</email>
</author>
<published>2021-08-03T11:40:49+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=72bcad5393a7079706fcfe02d84ed1599716d6a2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:72bcad5393a7079706fcfe02d84ed1599716d6a2</id>
<content type='text'>
The driver was merged in 1999 and has only ever seen treewide cleanups
since then, with no indication whatsoever that anyone has actually
had access to hardware for testing the patches.

&gt;From the information in the link below, it appears that the hardware
is for some leased line system in Russia that has since been
discontinued, and useless without any remote end to connect to.

As the driver still feels like a Linux-2.2 era artifact today, it
appears that the best way forward is to just delete it.

Link: https://www.tms.ru/%D0%90%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80_%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%8F_%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85_%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9_Granch_SBNI12-10
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann &lt;arnd@arndb.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: wan: Delete the DLCI / SDLA drivers</title>
<updated>2020-11-17T21:33:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Xie He</name>
<email>xie.he.0141@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-14T15:09:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=f73659192b0bdf7bad826587b3530cef43cc048d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f73659192b0bdf7bad826587b3530cef43cc048d</id>
<content type='text'>
The DLCI driver (dlci.c) implements the Frame Relay protocol. However,
we already have another newer and better implementation of Frame Relay
provided by the HDLC_FR driver (hdlc_fr.c).

The DLCI driver's implementation of Frame Relay is used by only one
hardware driver in the kernel - the SDLA driver (sdla.c).

The SDLA driver provides Frame Relay support for the Sangoma S50x devices.
However, the vendor provides their own driver (along with their own
multi-WAN-protocol implementations including Frame Relay), called WANPIPE.
I believe most users of the hardware would use the vendor-provided WANPIPE
driver instead.

(The WANPIPE driver was even once in the kernel, but was deleted in
commit 8db60bcf3021 ("[WAN]: Remove broken and unmaintained Sangoma
drivers.") because the vendor no longer updated the in-kernel WANPIPE
driver.)

Cc: Mike McLagan &lt;mike.mclagan@linux.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Xie He &lt;xie.he.0141@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201114150921.685594-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: x25_asy: Delete the x25_asy driver</title>
<updated>2020-11-07T22:13:44+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Xie He</name>
<email>xie.he.0141@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-05T07:34:34+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=f8ae7bbec726f4d09ca19ecea45ea147b8801e10'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f8ae7bbec726f4d09ca19ecea45ea147b8801e10</id>
<content type='text'>
This driver transports LAPB (X.25 link layer) frames over TTY links.

I can safely say that this driver has no actual user because it was
not working at all until:
commit 8fdcabeac398 ("drivers/net/wan/x25_asy: Fix to make it work")

The code in its current state still has problems:

1.
The uses of "struct x25_asy" in x25_asy_unesc (when receiving) and in
x25_asy_write_wakeup (when sending) are not protected by locks against
x25_asy_change_mtu's changing of the transmitting/receiving buffers.
Also, all "netif_running" checks in this driver are not protected by
locks against the ndo_stop function.

2.
The driver stops all TTY read/write when the netif is down.
I think this is not right because this may cause the last outgoing frame
before the netif goes down to be incompletely transmitted, and the first
incoming frame after the netif goes up to be incompletely received.

And there may also be other problems.

I was planning to fix these problems but after recent discussions about
deleting other old networking code, I think we may just delete this
driver, too.

Signed-off-by: Xie He &lt;xie.he.0141@gmail.com&gt;
Acked-by: Martin Schiller &lt;ms@dev.tdt.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105073434.429307-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: wan: wanxl: refactor the firmware rebuild rule</title>
<updated>2020-03-29T13:37:53+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-03-26T05:57:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=7d7df745b0a63af33415ec234b29b9d6ed59ad8c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:7d7df745b0a63af33415ec234b29b9d6ed59ad8c</id>
<content type='text'>
Split the big recipe into 3 stages: compile, link, and hexdump.

After this commit, the build log with CONFIG_WANXL_BUILD_FIRMWARE
will look like this:

  M68KAS  drivers/net/wan/wanxlfw.o
  M68KLD  drivers/net/wan/wanxlfw.bin
  BLDFW   drivers/net/wan/wanxlfw.inc
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wan/wanxl.o

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: wan: wanxl: use $(M68KCC) instead of $(M68KAS) for rebuilding firmware</title>
<updated>2020-03-29T13:37:53+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-03-26T05:57:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=734f3719d3438f9cc181d674c33ca9762e9148a1'/>
<id>urn:sha1:734f3719d3438f9cc181d674c33ca9762e9148a1</id>
<content type='text'>
The firmware source, wanxlfw.S, is currently compiled by the combo of
$(CPP) and $(M68KAS). This is not what we usually do for compiling *.S
files. In fact, this Makefile is the only user of $(AS) in the kernel
build.

Instead of combining $(CPP) and (AS) from different tool sets, using
$(M68KCC) as an assembler driver is simpler, and saner.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net: wan: wanxl: use allow to pass CROSS_COMPILE_M68k for rebuilding firmware</title>
<updated>2020-03-29T13:37:53+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Masahiro Yamada</name>
<email>masahiroy@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-03-26T05:57:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=63b903dfebdea92aa92ad337d8451a6fbfeabf9d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:63b903dfebdea92aa92ad337d8451a6fbfeabf9d</id>
<content type='text'>
As far as I understood from the Kconfig help text, this build rule is
used to rebuild the driver firmware, which runs on an old m68k-based
chip. So, you need m68k tools for the firmware rebuild.

wanxl.c is a PCI driver, but CONFIG_M68K does not select CONFIG_HAVE_PCI.
So, you cannot enable CONFIG_WANXL_BUILD_FIRMWARE for ARCH=m68k. In other
words, ifeq ($(ARCH),m68k) is false here.

I am keeping the dead code for now, but rebuilding the firmware requires
'as68k' and 'ld68k', which I do not have in hand.

Instead, the kernel.org m68k GCC [1] successfully built it.

Allowing a user to pass in CROSS_COMPILE_M68K= is handier.

[1] https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/9.2.0/x86_64-gcc-9.2.0-nolibc-m68k-linux.tar.xz

Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven &lt;geert@linux-m68k.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada &lt;masahiroy@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>net/wan: dscc4: remove broken dscc4 driver</title>
<updated>2019-09-16T07:14:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Dan Carpenter</name>
<email>dan.carpenter@oracle.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-13T13:28:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=28c9eb9042a954d4e9fbec91484bddce280f1beb'/>
<id>urn:sha1:28c9eb9042a954d4e9fbec91484bddce280f1beb</id>
<content type='text'>
Using static analysis, I discovered that the "dpriv-&gt;pci_priv-&gt;pdev"
pointer is always NULL.  This pointer was supposed to be initialized
during probe and is essential for the driver to work.  It would be easy
to add a "ppriv-&gt;pdev = pdev;" to dscc4_found1() but this driver has
been broken since before we started using git and no one has complained
so probably we should just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter &lt;dan.carpenter@oracle.com&gt;
Acked-by: Francois Romieu &lt;romieu@fr.zoreil.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license</title>
<updated>2017-11-02T10:10:55+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Greg Kroah-Hartman</name>
<email>gregkh@linuxfoundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2017-11-01T14:07:57+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=b24413180f5600bcb3bb70fbed5cf186b60864bd'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b24413180f5600bcb3bb70fbed5cf186b60864bd</id>
<content type='text'>
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
 - file had no licensing information it it.
 - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
 - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode &amp; Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
 - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
 - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained &gt;5
   lines of source
 - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if &lt;5
   lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

 - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
   considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
   COPYING file license applied.

   For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0                                              11139

   and resulted in the first patch in this series.

   If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
   Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|-------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930

   and resulted in the second patch in this series.

 - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
   of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
   any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
   it (per prior point).  Results summary:

   SPDX license identifier                            # files
   ---------------------------------------------------|------
   GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
   GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
   LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
   GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
   ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
   LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
   LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
   ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1

   and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

 - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
   the concluded license(s).

 - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
   license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
   licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

 - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
   resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
   which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

 - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
   confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

 - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
   the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
   in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
 - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
   license ids and scores
 - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
   files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
 - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
   was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
   SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart &lt;kstewart@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne &lt;pombredanne@nexb.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Maxim/driver: Add driver for maxim ds26522</title>
<updated>2016-06-29T08:05:14+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Zhao Qiang</name>
<email>qiang.zhao@nxp.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-06-27T01:30:22+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=c37d4a0085c58d9e45930ead6acd13ac75a8fb67'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c37d4a0085c58d9e45930ead6acd13ac75a8fb67</id>
<content type='text'>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang &lt;qiang.zhao@nxp.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
