kernel/linux.git/drivers/md/raid5.c, branch v4.14.286

md/raid5: fix oops during stripe resizing

2020-11-05T10:06:58+00:00

commit b44c018cdf748b96b676ba09fdbc5b34fc443ada upstream. KoWei reported crash during raid5 reshape: [ 1032.252932] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI [...] [ 1032.252943] RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10 [...] [ 1032.252947] RSP: 0018:ffffba1ac0c03b78 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 1032.252949] RAX: 0000784ac0000000 RBX: ffff91bec3d09740 RCX: 0000000000001000 [ 1032.252951] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffff91be6781c000 RDI: 0000784ac0000000 [ 1032.252953] RBP: ffffba1ac0c03bd8 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: ffffba1ac0c03bf8 [ 1032.252954] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffba1ac0c03bf8 [ 1032.252955] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 1032.252958] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff91becf500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 1032.252959] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 1032.252961] CR2: 0000784ac0000000 CR3: 000000031780a002 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 1032.252962] Call Trace: [ 1032.252969] ? async_memcpy+0x179/0x1000 [async_memcpy] [ 1032.252977] ? raid5_release_stripe+0x8e/0x110 [raid456] [ 1032.252982] handle_stripe_expansion+0x15a/0x1f0 [raid456] [ 1032.252988] handle_stripe+0x592/0x1270 [raid456] [ 1032.252993] handle_active_stripes.isra.0+0x3cb/0x5a0 [raid456] [ 1032.252999] raid5d+0x35c/0x550 [raid456] [ 1032.253002] ? schedule+0x42/0xb0 [ 1032.253006] ? schedule_timeout+0x10e/0x160 [ 1032.253011] md_thread+0x97/0x160 [ 1032.253015] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 [ 1032.253019] kthread+0x104/0x140 [ 1032.253022] ? md_start_sync+0x60/0x60 [ 1032.253024] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [ 1032.253027] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 This is because cache_size_mutex was unlocked too early in resize_stripes, which races with grow_one_stripe() that grow_one_stripe() allocates a stripe with wrong pool_size. Fix this issue by unlocking cache_size_mutex after updating pool_size. Cc: # v4.4+ Reported-by: KoWei Sung Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

md/raid5: Fix Force reconstruct-write io stuck in degraded raid5

2020-08-21T07:48:18+00:00

commit a1c6ae3d9f3dd6aa5981a332a6f700cf1c25edef upstream. In degraded raid5, we need to read parity to do reconstruct-write when data disks fail. However, we can not read parity from handle_stripe_dirtying() in force reconstruct-write mode. Reproducible Steps: 1. Create degraded raid5 mdadm -C /dev/md2 --assume-clean -l5 -n3 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 missing 2. Set rmw_level to 0 echo 0 > /sys/block/md2/md/rmw_level 3. IO to raid5 Now some io may be stuck in raid5. We can use handle_stripe_fill() to read the parity in this situation. Cc: # v4.4+ Reviewed-by: Alex Wu Reviewed-by: BingJing Chang Reviewed-by: Danny Shih Signed-off-by: ChangSyun Peng Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

raid5: need to set STRIPE_HANDLE for batch head

2019-12-17T19:40:03+00:00

[ Upstream commit a7ede3d16808b8f3915c8572d783530a82b2f027 ] With commit 6ce220dd2f8ea71d6afc29b9a7524c12e39f374a ("raid5: don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is in batch list"), we don't want to set STRIPE_HANDLE flag for sh which is already in batch list. However, the stripe which is the head of batch list should set this flag, otherwise panic could happen inside init_stripe at BUG_ON(sh->batch_head), it is reproducible with raid5 on top of nvdimm devices per Xiao oberserved. Thanks for Xiao's effort to verify the change. Fixes: 6ce220dd2f8ea ("raid5: don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is in batch list") Reported-by: Xiao Ni Tested-by: Xiao Ni Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

md/raid6: Set R5_ReadError when there is read failure on parity disk

2019-10-05T10:48:10+00:00

commit 143f6e733b73051cd22dcb80951c6c929da413ce upstream. 7471fb77ce4d ("md/raid6: Fix anomily when recovering a single device in RAID6.") avoids rereading P when it can be computed from other members. However, this misses the chance to re-write the right data to P. This patch sets R5_ReadError if the re-read fails. Also, when re-read is skipped, we also missed the chance to reset rdev->read_errors to 0. It can fail the disk when there are many read errors on P member disk (other disks don't have read error) V2: upper layer read request don't read parity/Q data. So there is no need to consider such situation. This is Reported-by: kbuild test robot Fixes: 7471fb77ce4d ("md/raid6: Fix anomily when recovering a single device in RAID6.") Cc: #4.4+ Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

raid5: don't increment read_errors on EILSEQ return

2019-10-05T10:48:02+00:00

[ Upstream commit b76b4715eba0d0ed574f58918b29c1b2f0fa37a8 ] While MD continues to count read errors returned by the lower layer. If those errors are -EILSEQ, instead of -EIO, it should NOT increase the read_errors count. When RAID6 is set up on dm-integrity target that detects massive corruption, the leg will be ejected from the array. Even if the issue is correctable with a sector re-write and the array has necessary redundancy to correct it. The leg is ejected because it runs up the rdev->read_errors beyond conf->max_nr_stripes. The return status in dm-drypt when there is a data integrity error is -EILSEQ (BLK_STS_PROTECTION). Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

raid5: don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is in batch list

2019-10-05T10:48:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6ce220dd2f8ea71d6afc29b9a7524c12e39f374a ] If stripe in batch list is set with STRIPE_HANDLE flag, then the stripe could be set with STRIPE_ACTIVE by the handle_stripe function. And if error happens to the batch_head at the same time, break_stripe_batch_list is called, then below warning could happen (the same report in [1]), it means a member of batch list was set with STRIPE_ACTIVE. [7028915.431770] stripe state: 2001 [7028915.431815] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [7028915.431828] WARNING: CPU: 18 PID: 29089 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4614 break_stripe_batch_list+0x203/0x240 [raid456] [...] [7028915.431879] CPU: 18 PID: 29089 Comm: kworker/u82:5 Tainted: G O 4.14.86-1-storage #4.14.86-1.2~deb9 [7028915.431881] Hardware name: Supermicro SSG-2028R-ACR24L/X10DRH-iT, BIOS 3.1 06/18/2018 [7028915.431888] Workqueue: raid5wq raid5_do_work [raid456] [7028915.431890] task: ffff9ab0ef36d7c0 task.stack: ffffb72926f84000 [7028915.431896] RIP: 0010:break_stripe_batch_list+0x203/0x240 [raid456] [7028915.431898] RSP: 0018:ffffb72926f87ba8 EFLAGS: 00010286 [7028915.431900] RAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: ffff9aaa84a98000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [7028915.431901] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff9ab2bfa15458 RDI: ffff9ab2bfa15458 [7028915.431902] RBP: ffff9aaa8fb4e900 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000002eb4 [7028915.431903] R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9ab1736f1b00 [7028915.431904] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9aaa8fb4e900 R15: 0000000000000001 [7028915.431906] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ab2bfa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [7028915.431907] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [7028915.431908] CR2: 00007ff953b9f5d8 CR3: 0000000bf4009002 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [7028915.431909] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [7028915.431910] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [7028915.431910] Call Trace: [7028915.431923] handle_stripe+0x8e7/0x2020 [raid456] [7028915.431930] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x89/0xc0 [7028915.431935] handle_active_stripes.isra.58+0x35f/0x560 [raid456] [7028915.431939] raid5_do_work+0xc6/0x1f0 [raid456] Also commit 59fc630b8b5f9f ("RAID5: batch adjacent full stripe write") said "If a stripe is added to batch list, then only the first stripe of the list should be put to handle_list and run handle_stripe." So don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is already in batch list, otherwise the stripe could be put to handle_list and run handle_stripe, then the above warning could be triggered. [1]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg62552.html Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

md/raid: raid5 preserve the writeback action after the parity check

2019-05-25T16:25:37+00:00

commit b2176a1dfb518d870ee073445d27055fea64dfb8 upstream. The problem is that any 'uptodate' vs 'disks' check is not precise in this path. Put a "WARN_ON(!test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags)" on the device that might try to kick off writes and then skip the action. Better to prevent the raid driver from taking unexpected action *and* keep the system alive vs killing the machine with BUG_ON. Note: fixed warning reported by kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state"

2019-05-25T16:25:37+00:00

commit a25d8c327bb41742dbd59f8c545f59f3b9c39983 upstream. This reverts commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef. Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Nigel Croxon Cc: Xiao Ni Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state

2019-05-16T17:42:33+00:00

commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef upstream. Changing state from check_state_check_result to check_state_compute_result not only is unsafe but also doesn't appear to serve a valid purpose. A raid6 check should only be pushing out extra writes if doing repair and a mis-match occurs. The stripe dev management will already try and do repair writes for failing sectors. This patch makes the raid6 check_state_check_result handling work more like raid5's. If somehow too many failures for a check, just quit the check operation for the stripe. When any checks pass, don't try and use check_state_compute_result for a purpose it isn't needed for and is unsafe for. Just mark the stripe as in sync for passing its parity checks and let the stripe dev read/write code and the bad blocks list do their job handling I/O errors. Repro steps from Xiao: These are the steps to reproduce this problem: 1. redefined OPT_MEDIUM_ERR_ADDR to 12000 in scsi_debug.c 2. insmod scsi_debug.ko dev_size_mb=11000 max_luns=1 num_tgts=1 3. mdadm --create /dev/md127 --level=6 --raid-devices=5 /dev/sde1 /dev/sde2 /dev/sde3 /dev/sde5 /dev/sde6 sde is the disk created by scsi_debug 4. echo "2" >/sys/module/scsi_debug/parameters/opts 5. raid-check It panic: [ 4854.730899] md: data-check of RAID array md127 [ 4854.857455] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 4854.859246] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 Sense Key : Medium Error [current] [ 4854.860694] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error [ 4854.862207] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#80 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2d 88 00 04 00 00 [ 4854.864196] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 11656 flags 0 [ 4854.867409] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 4854.869469] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 Sense Key : Medium Error [current] [ 4854.871206] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error [ 4854.872858] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#100 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e0 00 00 08 00 [ 4854.874587] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12000 flags 4000 [ 4854.876456] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 4854.878552] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 Sense Key : Medium Error [current] [ 4854.880278] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error [ 4854.881846] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#101 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e8 00 00 08 00 [ 4854.883691] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12008 flags 4000 [ 4854.893927] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE [ 4854.896002] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 Sense Key : Medium Error [current] [ 4854.897561] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error [ 4854.899110] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdr] tag#166 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 2e e0 00 00 10 00 [ 4854.900989] print_req_error: critical medium error, dev sdr, sector 12000 flags 0 [ 4854.902757] md/raid:md127: read error NOT corrected!! (sector 9952 on sdr1). [ 4854.904375] md/raid:md127: read error NOT corrected!! (sector 9960 on sdr1). [ 4854.906201] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 4854.907341] kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:4190! raid5.c:4190 above is this BUG_ON: handle_parity_checks6() ... BUG_ON(s->uptodate < disks - 1); /* We don't need Q to recover */ Cc: # v3.16+ OriginalAuthor: David Jeffery Cc: Xiao Ni Tested-by: David Jeffery Signed-off-by: David Jeffy Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

md: Fix failed allocation of md_register_thread

2019-03-23T13:35:30+00:00

commit e406f12dde1a8375d77ea02d91f313fb1a9c6aec upstream. mddev->sync_thread can be set to NULL on kzalloc failure downstream. The patch checks for such a scenario and frees allocated resources. Committer node: Added similar fix to raid5.c, as suggested by Guoqing. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+ Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman