Linux kernel stable tree (mirror) https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v5.4.113 2021-02-10T08:25:32+00:00 2021-02-10T08:25:32+00:00 Xiao Ni xni@redhat.com 2020-12-10T06:33:32+00:00 urn:sha1:7018edb19a926d124e07ba9825474bf68a437d10 commit dc5d17a3c39b06aef866afca19245a9cfb533a79 upstream. One customer reports a crash problem which causes by flush request. It triggers a warning before crash. /* new request after previous flush is completed */ if (ktime_after(req_start, mddev->prev_flush_start)) { WARN_ON(mddev->flush_bio); mddev->flush_bio = bio; bio = NULL; } The WARN_ON is triggered. We use spin lock to protect prev_flush_start and flush_bio in md_flush_request. But there is no lock protection in md_submit_flush_data. It can set flush_bio to NULL first because of compiler reordering write instructions. For example, flush bio1 sets flush bio to NULL first in md_submit_flush_data. An interrupt or vmware causing an extended stall happen between updating flush_bio and prev_flush_start. Because flush_bio is NULL, flush bio2 can get the lock and submit to underlayer disks. Then flush bio1 updates prev_flush_start after the interrupt or extended stall. Then flush bio3 enters in md_flush_request. The start time req_start is behind prev_flush_start. The flush_bio is not NULL(flush bio2 hasn't finished). So it can trigger the WARN_ON now. Then it calls INIT_WORK again. INIT_WORK() will re-initialize the list pointers in the work_struct, which then can result in a corrupted work list and the work_struct queued a second time. With the work list corrupted, it can lead in invalid work items being used and cause a crash in process_one_work. We need to make sure only one flush bio can be handled at one same time. So add spin lock in md_submit_flush_data to protect prev_flush_start and flush_bio in an atomic way. Reviewed-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2020-12-30T10:51:45+00:00 Zhao Heming heming.zhao@suse.com 2020-11-19T11:41:34+00:00 urn:sha1:2fb550de7563950edeffd02763b293fb405d6354 commit bca5b0658020be90b6b504ca514fd80110204f71 upstream. md-cluster uses MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK to make node can exclusively send msg. During sending msg, node can concurrently receive msg from another node. When node does resync job, grab token_lockres:EX may trigger a deadlock: ``` nodeA nodeB -------------------- -------------------- a. send METADATA_UPDATED held token_lockres:EX b. md_do_sync resync_info_update send RESYNCING + set MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK + wait for holding token_lockres:EX c. mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/sdg + held reconfig_mutex + send REMOVE + wait_event(MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK) d. recv_daemon //METADATA_UPDATED from A process_metadata_update + (mddev_trylock(mddev) || MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD) //this time, both return false forever ``` Explaination: a. A send METADATA_UPDATED This will block another node to send msg b. B does sync jobs, which will send RESYNCING at intervals. This will be block for holding token_lockres:EX lock. c. B do "mdadm --remove", which will send REMOVE. This will be blocked by step <b>: MD_CLUSTER_SEND_LOCK is 1. d. B recv METADATA_UPDATED msg, which send from A in step <a>. This will be blocked by step <c>: holding mddev lock, it makes wait_event can't hold mddev lock. (btw, MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD keep ZERO in this scenario.) There is a similar deadlock in commit 0ba959774e93 ("md-cluster: use sync way to handle METADATA_UPDATED msg") In that commit, step c is "update sb". This patch step c is "mdadm --remove". For fixing this issue, we can refer the solution of function: metadata_update_start. Which does the same grab lock_token action. lock_comm can use the same steps to avoid deadlock. By moving MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD from lock_token to lock_comm. It enlarge a little bit window of MD_CLUSTER_HOLDING_MUTEX_FOR_RECVD, but it is safe & can break deadlock. Repro steps (I only triggered 3 times with hundreds tests): two nodes share 3 iSCSI luns: sdg/sdh/sdi. Each lun size is 1GB. ``` ssh root@node2 "mdadm -S --scan" mdadm -S --scan for i in {g,h,i};do dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd$i oflag=direct bs=1M \ count=20; done mdadm -C /dev/md0 -b clustered -e 1.2 -n 2 -l mirror /dev/sdg /dev/sdh \ --bitmap-chunk=1M ssh root@node2 "mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sdg /dev/sdh" sleep 5 mkfs.xfs /dev/md0 mdadm --manage --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdi mdadm --wait /dev/md0 mdadm --grow --raid-devices=3 /dev/md0 mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/sdg mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/sdg mdadm --grow --raid-devices=2 /dev/md0 ``` test script will hung when executing "mdadm --remove". ``` # dump stacks by "echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger" md0_cluster_rec D 0 5329 2 0x80004000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x1f6/0x560 ? _cond_resched+0x2d/0x40 ? schedule+0x4a/0xb0 ? process_metadata_update.isra.0+0xdb/0x140 [md_cluster] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 ? process_recvd_msg+0x113/0x1d0 [md_cluster] ? recv_daemon+0x9e/0x120 [md_cluster] ? md_thread+0x94/0x160 [md_mod] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 ? md_congested+0x30/0x30 [md_mod] ? kthread+0x115/0x140 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 mdadm D 0 5423 1 0x00004004 Call Trace: __schedule+0x1f6/0x560 ? __schedule+0x1fe/0x560 ? schedule+0x4a/0xb0 ? lock_comm.isra.0+0x7b/0xb0 [md_cluster] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 ? remove_disk+0x4f/0x90 [md_cluster] ? hot_remove_disk+0xb1/0x1b0 [md_mod] ? md_ioctl+0x50c/0xba0 [md_mod] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 ? blkdev_ioctl+0xa2/0x2a0 ? block_ioctl+0x39/0x40 ? ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0 ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 ? do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x150 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 md0_resync D 0 5425 2 0x80004000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x1f6/0x560 ? schedule+0x4a/0xb0 ? dlm_lock_sync+0xa1/0xd0 [md_cluster] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80 ? lock_token+0x2d/0x90 [md_cluster] ? resync_info_update+0x95/0x100 [md_cluster] ? raid1_sync_request+0x7d3/0xa40 [raid1] ? md_do_sync.cold+0x737/0xc8f [md_mod] ? md_thread+0x94/0x160 [md_mod] ? md_congested+0x30/0x30 [md_mod] ? kthread+0x115/0x140 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 ``` At last, thanks for Xiao's solution. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming <heming.zhao@suse.com> Suggested-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2020-12-30T10:51:45+00:00 Zhao Heming heming.zhao@suse.com 2020-11-19T11:41:33+00:00 urn:sha1:7523d147087b07506e203cc9a5dc9131db70b6be commit a8da01f79c89755fad55ed0ea96e8d2103242a72 upstream. Reshape request should be blocked with ongoing resync job. In cluster env, a node can start resync job even if the resync cmd isn't executed on it, e.g., user executes "mdadm --grow" on node A, sometimes node B will start resync job. However, current update_raid_disks() only check local recovery status, which is incomplete. As a result, we see user will execute "mdadm --grow" successfully on local, while the remote node deny to do reshape job when it doing resync job. The inconsistent handling cause array enter unexpected status. If user doesn't observe this issue and continue executing mdadm cmd, the array doesn't work at last. Fix this issue by blocking reshape request. When node executes "--grow" and detects ongoing resync, it should stop and report error to user. The following script reproduces the issue with ~100% probability. (two nodes share 3 iSCSI luns: sdg/sdh/sdi. Each lun size is 1GB) ``` # on node1, node2 is the remote node. ssh root@node2 "mdadm -S --scan" mdadm -S --scan for i in {g,h,i};do dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd$i oflag=direct bs=1M \ count=20; done mdadm -C /dev/md0 -b clustered -e 1.2 -n 2 -l mirror /dev/sdg /dev/sdh ssh root@node2 "mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sdg /dev/sdh" sleep 5 mdadm --manage --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdi mdadm --wait /dev/md0 mdadm --grow --raid-devices=3 /dev/md0 mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/sdg mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/sdg mdadm --grow --raid-devices=2 /dev/md0 ``` Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming <heming.zhao@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2020-12-30T10:51:00+00:00 Dae R. Jeong dae.r.jeong@kaist.ac.kr 2020-10-22T01:21:28+00:00 urn:sha1:de630248e740df1647d1b0e0796afec8139a2877 commit c731b84b51bf7fe83448bea8f56a6d55006b0615 upstream. Syzkaller reports a warning as belows. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9647 at drivers/md/md.c:7169 ... Call Trace: ... RIP: 0010:md_ioctl+0x4017/0x5980 drivers/md/md.c:7169 RSP: 0018:ffff888096027950 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffff88809322c380 RBX: 0000000000000932 RCX: ffffffff84e266f2 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff84e299f7 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: ffff888096027bc0 R08: ffff88809322c380 R09: ffffed101341a482 R10: ffff888096027940 R11: ffff88809a0d240f R12: 0000000000000932 R13: ffff8880a2c14100 R14: ffff88809a0d2268 R15: ffff88809a0d2408 __blkdev_driver_ioctl block/ioctl.c:304 [inline] blkdev_ioctl+0xece/0x1c10 block/ioctl.c:606 block_ioctl+0xee/0x130 fs/block_dev.c:1930 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline] file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:509 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0xd5f/0x1380 fs/ioctl.c:696 ksys_ioctl+0xab/0xd0 fs/ioctl.c:713 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:718 do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x680 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe This is caused by a race between two concurrenct md_ioctl()s closing the array. CPU1 (md_ioctl()) CPU2 (md_ioctl()) ------ ------ set_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags); did_set_md_closing = true; WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags)); if(did_set_md_closing) clear_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags); Fix the warning by returning immediately if the MD_CLOSING bit is set in &mddev->flags which indicates that the array is being closed. Fixes: 065e519e71b2 ("md: MD_CLOSING needs to be cleared after called md_set_readonly or do_md_stop") Reported-by: syzbot+1e46a0864c1a6e9bd3d8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dae R. Jeong <dae.r.jeong@kaist.ac.kr> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2020-08-19T06:15:58+00:00 Colin Ian King colin.king@canonical.com 2020-07-02T11:35:02+00:00 urn:sha1:6f01de256dd00fa2bd677950a841a9a44f7645d0 [ Upstream commit 9a5a85972c073f720d81a7ebd08bfe278e6e16db ] Pointer mddev is being dereferenced with a test_bit call before mddev is being null checked, this may cause a null pointer dereference. Fix this by moving the null pointer checks to sanity check mddev before it is dereferenced. Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference before null check") Fixes: 62f7b1989c02 ("md raid0/linear: Mark array as 'broken' and fail BIOs if a member is gone") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 2020-06-22T07:31:05+00:00 Guoqing Jiang guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com 2020-04-04T21:57:09+00:00 urn:sha1:cd4013947eae450d93ec02f39c552ad73186a80f [ Upstream commit f6766ff6afff70e2aaf39e1511e16d471de7c3ae ] We need to check mddev->del_work before flush workqueu since the purpose of flush is to ensure the previous md is disappeared. Otherwise the similar deadlock appeared if LOCKDEP is enabled, it is due to md_open holds the bdev->bd_mutex before flush workqueue. kernel: [ 154.522645] ====================================================== kernel: [ 154.522647] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected kernel: [ 154.522650] 5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25 Tainted: G O kernel: [ 154.522651] ------------------------------------------------------ kernel: [ 154.522653] mdadm/2482 is trying to acquire lock: kernel: [ 154.522655] ffff888078529128 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522673] kernel: [ 154.522673] but task is already holding lock: kernel: [ 154.522675] ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522691] kernel: [ 154.522691] which lock already depends on the new lock. kernel: [ 154.522691] kernel: [ 154.522694] kernel: [ 154.522694] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: kernel: [ 154.522696] kernel: [ 154.522696] -> #4 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522704] __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950 kernel: [ 154.522706] __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522708] blkdev_get+0x65/0x140 kernel: [ 154.522709] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x2f/0x40 kernel: [ 154.522716] lock_rdev+0x3d/0x90 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522719] md_import_device+0xd6/0x1b0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522723] new_dev_store+0x15e/0x210 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522728] md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522732] kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0 kernel: [ 154.522735] vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522737] ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0 kernel: [ 154.522745] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522748] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522749] kernel: [ 154.522749] -> #3 (&mddev->reconfig_mutex){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522752] __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950 kernel: [ 154.522756] new_dev_store+0xc9/0x210 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522759] md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522761] kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0 kernel: [ 154.522763] vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522765] ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0 kernel: [ 154.522767] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522769] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522770] kernel: [ 154.522770] -> #2 (kn->count#253){++++}: kernel: [ 154.522775] __kernfs_remove+0x253/0x2c0 kernel: [ 154.522778] kernfs_remove+0x1f/0x30 kernel: [ 154.522780] kobject_del+0x28/0x60 kernel: [ 154.522783] mddev_delayed_delete+0x24/0x30 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522786] process_one_work+0x2a7/0x5f0 kernel: [ 154.522788] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 kernel: [ 154.522793] kthread+0x117/0x130 kernel: [ 154.522795] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 kernel: [ 154.522796] kernel: [ 154.522796] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&mddev->del_work)){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522800] process_one_work+0x27e/0x5f0 kernel: [ 154.522802] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 kernel: [ 154.522804] kthread+0x117/0x130 kernel: [ 154.522806] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 kernel: [ 154.522807] kernel: [ 154.522807] -> #0 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}: kernel: [ 154.522813] __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522816] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522818] flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522821] md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522823] __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522825] blkdev_get+0x65/0x140 kernel: [ 154.522828] do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380 kernel: [ 154.522831] path_openat+0x567/0xcc0 kernel: [ 154.522834] do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110 kernel: [ 154.522836] do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0 kernel: [ 154.522838] do_sys_open+0x57/0x80 kernel: [ 154.522840] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522842] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522844] kernel: [ 154.522844] other info that might help us debug this: kernel: [ 154.522844] kernel: [ 154.522846] Chain exists of: kernel: [ 154.522846] (wq_completion)md_misc --> &mddev->reconfig_mutex --> &bdev->bd_mutex kernel: [ 154.522846] kernel: [ 154.522850] Possible unsafe locking scenario: kernel: [ 154.522850] kernel: [ 154.522852] CPU0 CPU1 kernel: [ 154.522853] ---- ---- kernel: [ 154.522854] lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); kernel: [ 154.522856] lock(&mddev->reconfig_mutex); kernel: [ 154.522858] lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); kernel: [ 154.522860] lock((wq_completion)md_misc); kernel: [ 154.522861] kernel: [ 154.522861] *** DEADLOCK *** kernel: [ 154.522861] kernel: [ 154.522864] 1 lock held by mdadm/2482: kernel: [ 154.522865] #0: ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522868] kernel: [ 154.522868] stack backtrace: kernel: [ 154.522873] CPU: 1 PID: 2482 Comm: mdadm Tainted: G O 5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25 kernel: [ 154.522875] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 kernel: [ 154.522878] Call Trace: kernel: [ 154.522881] dump_stack+0x8f/0xcb kernel: [ 154.522884] check_noncircular+0x194/0x1b0 kernel: [ 154.522888] ? __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522890] __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522893] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0 kernel: [ 154.522895] ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522898] flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522900] ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0 kernel: [ 154.522905] ? md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522908] md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod] kernel: [ 154.522910] __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590 kernel: [ 154.522912] ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0 kernel: [ 154.522914] blkdev_get+0x65/0x140 kernel: [ 154.522916] ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0 kernel: [ 154.522918] do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380 kernel: [ 154.522921] path_openat+0x567/0xcc0 kernel: [ 154.522923] ? __lock_acquire+0x380/0x1690 kernel: [ 154.522926] do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110 kernel: [ 154.522929] ? __alloc_fd+0xe5/0x1f0 kernel: [ 154.522935] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x28c/0x630 kernel: [ 154.522939] ? do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0 kernel: [ 154.522941] do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0 kernel: [ 154.522944] do_sys_open+0x57/0x80 kernel: [ 154.522946] do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0 kernel: [ 154.522948] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe kernel: [ 154.522951] RIP: 0033:0x7f98d279d9ae And md_alloc also flushed the same workqueue, but the thing is different here. Because all the paths call md_alloc don't hold bdev->bd_mutex, and the flush is necessary to avoid race condition, so leave it as it is. Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 2020-04-17T08:50:04+00:00 Guoqing Jiang guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com 2020-02-11T10:10:04+00:00 urn:sha1:2d29a61a14faa8b75ac1098d7c3db90ac52160aa [ Upstream commit 6b40bec3b13278d21fa6c1ae7a0bdf2e550eed5f ] Don't call quiesce(1) and quiesce(0) if array is already suspended, otherwise in level_store, the array is writable after mddev_detach in below part though the intention is to make array writable after resume. mddev_suspend(mddev); mddev_detach(mddev); ... mddev_resume(mddev); And it also causes calltrace as follows in [1]. [48005.653834] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 45380 at kernel/kthread.c:510 kthread_park+0x77/0x90 [...] [48005.653976] CPU: 1 PID: 45380 Comm: mdadm Tainted: G OE 5.4.10-arch1-1 #1 [48005.653979] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./J4105-ITX, BIOS P1.40 08/06/2018 [48005.653984] RIP: 0010:kthread_park+0x77/0x90 [48005.654015] Call Trace: [48005.654039] r5l_quiesce+0x3c/0x70 [raid456] [48005.654052] raid5_quiesce+0x228/0x2e0 [raid456] [48005.654073] mddev_detach+0x30/0x70 [md_mod] [48005.654090] level_store+0x202/0x670 [md_mod] [48005.654099] ? security_capable+0x40/0x60 [48005.654114] md_attr_store+0x7b/0xc0 [md_mod] [48005.654123] kernfs_fop_write+0xce/0x1b0 [48005.654132] vfs_write+0xb6/0x1a0 [48005.654138] ksys_write+0x67/0xe0 [48005.654146] do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x140 [48005.654155] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [48005.654161] RIP: 0033:0x7fa0c8737497 [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206161 Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 2020-01-04T18:18:34+00:00 Yufen Yu yuyufen@huawei.com 2019-12-10T07:01:29+00:00 urn:sha1:33ecb96148d61defc779bf4df47ba0d6e02129a4 [ Upstream commit 3b7436cc9449d5ff7fa1c1fd5bc3edb6402ff5b8 ] For super_90_load, we need to make sure 'desc_nr' less than MD_SB_DISKS, avoiding invalid memory access of 'sb->disks'. Fixes: 228fc7d76db6 ("md: avoid invalid memory access for array sb->dev_roles") Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 2019-12-31T15:46:02+00:00 Yufen Yu yuyufen@huawei.com 2019-10-30T10:47:02+00:00 urn:sha1:9e3175ea2303dfa425d29b7ed3395f8aa490f7c8 [ Upstream commit 228fc7d76db68732677230a3c64337908fd298e3 ] we need to gurantee 'desc_nr' valid before access array of sb->dev_roles. In addition, we should avoid .load_super always return '0' when level is LEVEL_MULTIPATH, which is not expected. Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1487373 ("Memory - illegal accesses") Fixes: 6a5cb53aaa4e ("md: no longer compare spare disk superblock events in super_load") Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 2019-12-31T15:44:19+00:00 Yufen Yu yuyufen@huawei.com 2019-10-16T08:00:03+00:00 urn:sha1:696b50bbf68df5afc0e6e7a3f2325a9bc61f811f [ Upstream commit 6a5cb53aaa4ef515ddeffa04ce18b771121127b4 ] We have a test case as follow: mdadm -CR /dev/md1 -l 1 -n 4 /dev/sd[a-d] \ --assume-clean --bitmap=internal mdadm -S /dev/md1 mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[b-c] --run --force mdadm --zero /dev/sda mdadm /dev/md1 -a /dev/sda echo offline > /sys/block/sdc/device/state echo offline > /sys/block/sdb/device/state sleep 5 mdadm -S /dev/md1 echo running > /sys/block/sdb/device/state echo running > /sys/block/sdc/device/state mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[a-c] --run --force When we readd /dev/sda to the array, it started to do recovery. After offline the other two disks in md1, the recovery have been interrupted and superblock update info cannot be written to the offline disks. While the spare disk (/dev/sda) can continue to update superblock info. After stopping the array and assemble it, we found the array run fail, with the follow kernel message: [ 172.986064] md: kicking non-fresh sdb from array! [ 173.004210] md: kicking non-fresh sdc from array! [ 173.022383] md/raid1:md1: active with 0 out of 4 mirrors [ 173.022406] md1: failed to create bitmap (-5) [ 173.023466] md: md1 stopped. Since both sdb and sdc have the value of 'sb->events' smaller than that in sda, they have been kicked from the array. However, the only remained disk sda is in 'spare' state before stop and it cannot be added to conf->mirrors[] array. In the end, raid array assemble and run fail. In fact, we can use the older disk sdb or sdc to assemble the array. That means we should not choose the 'spare' disk as the fresh disk in analyze_sbs(). To fix the problem, we do not compare superblock events when it is a spare disk, as same as validate_super. Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>