kernel/linux.git/drivers/md/bcache/super.c, branch v5.2.16

Revert "bcache: set CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE in bch_cached_dev_error()"

2019-07-26T07:10:51+00:00

commit 695277f16b3a102fcc22c97fdf2de77c7b19f0b3 upstream. This reverts commit 6147305c73e4511ca1a975b766b97a779d442567. Although this patch helps the failed bcache device to stop faster when too many I/O errors detected on corresponding cached device, setting CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE bit to cache set c->flags was not a good idea. This operation will disable all I/Os on cache set, which means other attached bcache devices won't work neither. Without this patch, the failed bcache device can also be stopped eventually if internal I/O accomplished (e.g. writeback). Therefore here I revert it. Fixes: 6147305c73e4 ("bcache: set CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE in bch_cached_dev_error()") Reported-by: Yong Li Signed-off-by: Coly Li Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: fix potential deadlock in cached_def_free()

2019-07-26T07:10:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7e865eba00a3df2dc8c4746173a8ca1c1c7f042e ] When enable lockdep and reboot system with a writeback mode bcache device, the following potential deadlock warning is reported by lockdep engine. [ 101.536569][ T401] kworker/2:2/401 is trying to acquire lock: [ 101.538575][ T401] 00000000bbf6e6c7 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0 [ 101.542054][ T401] [ 101.542054][ T401] but task is already holding lock: [ 101.544587][ T401] 00000000f5f305b3 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640 [ 101.548386][ T401] [ 101.548386][ T401] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 101.548386][ T401] [ 101.551874][ T401] [ 101.551874][ T401] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 101.555000][ T401] [ 101.555000][ T401] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}: [ 101.557860][ T401] process_one_work+0x277/0x640 [ 101.559661][ T401] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0 [ 101.561340][ T401] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 101.562963][ T401] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 101.564718][ T401] [ 101.564718][ T401] -> #0 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}: [ 101.567701][ T401] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0 [ 101.569651][ T401] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0 [ 101.571494][ T401] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180 [ 101.573234][ T401] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250 [ 101.575109][ T401] cached_dev_free+0x44/0x120 [bcache] [ 101.577304][ T401] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640 [ 101.579357][ T401] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0 [ 101.581055][ T401] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 101.582709][ T401] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 101.584592][ T401] [ 101.584592][ T401] other info that might help us debug this: [ 101.584592][ T401] [ 101.588355][ T401] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 101.588355][ T401] [ 101.590974][ T401] CPU0 CPU1 [ 101.592889][ T401] ---- ---- [ 101.594743][ T401] lock((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2); [ 101.596785][ T401] lock((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq); [ 101.600072][ T401] lock((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2); [ 101.602971][ T401] lock((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq); [ 101.605255][ T401] [ 101.605255][ T401] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 101.605255][ T401] [ 101.608310][ T401] 2 locks held by kworker/2:2/401: [ 101.610208][ T401] #0: 00000000cf2c7d17 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640 [ 101.613709][ T401] #1: 00000000f5f305b3 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640 [ 101.617480][ T401] [ 101.617480][ T401] stack backtrace: [ 101.619539][ T401] CPU: 2 PID: 401 Comm: kworker/2:2 Tainted: G W 5.2.0-rc4-lp151.20-default+ #1 [ 101.623225][ T401] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/13/2018 [ 101.627210][ T401] Workqueue: events cached_dev_free [bcache] [ 101.629239][ T401] Call Trace: [ 101.630360][ T401] dump_stack+0x85/0xcb [ 101.631777][ T401] print_circular_bug+0x19a/0x1f0 [ 101.633485][ T401] __lock_acquire+0x16cd/0x1850 [ 101.635184][ T401] ? __lock_acquire+0x6a8/0x1850 [ 101.636863][ T401] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0 [ 101.638421][ T401] ? find_held_lock+0x34/0xa0 [ 101.640015][ T401] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0 [ 101.641513][ T401] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0 [ 101.643248][ T401] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0 [ 101.644832][ T401] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0 [ 101.646476][ T401] ? drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180 [ 101.648303][ T401] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180 [ 101.649867][ T401] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250 [ 101.651503][ T401] cached_dev_free+0x44/0x120 [bcache] [ 101.653328][ T401] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640 [ 101.655029][ T401] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0 [ 101.656693][ T401] ? process_one_work+0x640/0x640 [ 101.658501][ T401] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 101.660012][ T401] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 101.661985][ T401] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 101.691318][ T401] bcache: bcache_device_free() bcache0 stopped Here is how the above potential deadlock may happen in reboot/shutdown code path, 1) bcache_reboot() is called firstly in the reboot/shutdown code path, then in bcache_reboot(), bcache_device_stop() is called. 2) bcache_device_stop() sets BCACHE_DEV_CLOSING on d->falgs, then call closure_queue(&d->cl) to invoke cached_dev_flush(). And in turn cached_dev_flush() calls cached_dev_free() via closure_at() 3) In cached_dev_free(), after stopped writebach kthread dc->writeback_thread, the kwork dc->writeback_write_wq is stopping by destroy_workqueue(). 4) Inside destroy_workqueue(), drain_workqueue() is called. Inside drain_workqueue(), flush_workqueue() is called. Then wq->lockdep_map is acquired by lock_map_acquire() in flush_workqueue(). After the lock acquired the rest part of flush_workqueue() just wait for the workqueue to complete. 5) Now we look back at writeback thread routine bch_writeback_thread(), in the main while-loop, write_dirty() is called via continue_at() in read_dirty_submit(), which is called via continue_at() in while-loop level called function read_dirty(). Inside write_dirty() it may be re-called on workqueeu dc->writeback_write_wq via continue_at(). It means when the writeback kthread is stopped in cached_dev_free() there might be still one kworker queued on dc->writeback_write_wq to execute write_dirty() again. 6) Now this kworker is scheduled on dc->writeback_write_wq to run by process_one_work() (which is called by worker_thread()). Before calling the kwork routine, wq->lockdep_map is acquired. 7) But wq->lockdep_map is acquired already in step 4), so a A-A lock (lockdep terminology) scenario happens. Indeed on multiple cores syatem, the above deadlock is very rare to happen, just as the code comments in process_one_work() says, 2263 * AFAICT there is no possible deadlock scenario between the 2264 * flush_work() and complete() primitives (except for single-threaded 2265 * workqueues), so hiding them isn't a problem. But it is still good to fix such lockdep warning, even no one running bcache on single core system. The fix is simple. This patch solves the above potential deadlock by, - Do not destroy workqueue dc->writeback_write_wq in cached_dev_free(). - Flush and destroy dc->writeback_write_wq in writebach kthread routine bch_writeback_thread(), where after quit the thread main while-loop and before cached_dev_put() is called. By this fix, dc->writeback_write_wq will be stopped and destroy before the writeback kthread stopped, so the chance for a A-A locking on wq->lockdep_map is disappeared, such A-A deadlock won't happen any more. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: avoid a deadlock in bcache_reboot()

2019-07-26T07:10:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit a59ff6ccc2bf2e2934b31bbf734f0bc04b5ec78a ] It is quite frequently to observe deadlock in bcache_reboot() happens and hang the system reboot process. The reason is, in bcache_reboot() when calling bch_cache_set_stop() and bcache_device_stop() the mutex bch_register_lock is held. But in the process to stop cache set and bcache device, bch_register_lock will be acquired again. If this mutex is held here, deadlock will happen inside the stopping process. The aftermath of the deadlock is, whole system reboot gets hung. The fix is to avoid holding bch_register_lock for the following loops in bcache_reboot(), list_for_each_entry_safe(c, tc, &bch_cache_sets, list) bch_cache_set_stop(c); list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tdc, &uncached_devices, list) bcache_device_stop(&dc->disk); A module range variable 'bcache_is_reboot' is added, it sets to true in bcache_reboot(). In register_bcache(), if bcache_is_reboot is checked to be true, reject the registration by returning -EBUSY immediately. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: check c->gc_thread by IS_ERR_OR_NULL in cache_set_flush()

2019-07-26T07:10:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit b387e9b58679c60f5b1e4313939bd4878204fc37 ] When system memory is in heavy pressure, bch_gc_thread_start() from run_cache_set() may fail due to out of memory. In such condition, c->gc_thread is assigned to -ENOMEM, not NULL pointer. Then in following failure code path bch_cache_set_error(), when cache_set_flush() gets called, the code piece to stop c->gc_thread is broken, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(c->gc_thread)) kthread_stop(c->gc_thread); And KASAN catches such NULL pointer deference problem, with the warning information: [ 561.207881] ================================================================== [ 561.207900] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in kthread_stop+0x3b/0x440 [ 561.207904] Write of size 4 at addr 000000000000001c by task kworker/15:1/313 [ 561.207913] CPU: 15 PID: 313 Comm: kworker/15:1 Tainted: G W 5.0.0-vanilla+ #3 [ 561.207916] Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650 -[7X05CTO1WW]-/-[7X05CTO1WW]-, BIOS -[IVE136T-2.10]- 03/22/2019 [ 561.207935] Workqueue: events cache_set_flush [bcache] [ 561.207940] Call Trace: [ 561.207948] dump_stack+0x9a/0xeb [ 561.207955] ? kthread_stop+0x3b/0x440 [ 561.207960] ? kthread_stop+0x3b/0x440 [ 561.207965] kasan_report+0x176/0x192 [ 561.207973] ? kthread_stop+0x3b/0x440 [ 561.207981] kthread_stop+0x3b/0x440 [ 561.207995] cache_set_flush+0xd4/0x6d0 [bcache] [ 561.208008] process_one_work+0x856/0x1620 [ 561.208015] ? find_held_lock+0x39/0x1d0 [ 561.208028] ? drain_workqueue+0x380/0x380 [ 561.208048] worker_thread+0x87/0xb80 [ 561.208058] ? __kthread_parkme+0xb6/0x180 [ 561.208067] ? process_one_work+0x1620/0x1620 [ 561.208072] kthread+0x326/0x3e0 [ 561.208079] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 [ 561.208090] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 561.208110] ================================================================== [ 561.208113] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint [ 561.208115] irq event stamp: 11800231 [ 561.208126] hardirqs last enabled at (11800231): [] do_syscall_64+0x18/0x410 [ 561.208127] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c [ 561.208129] #PF error: [WRITE] [ 561.312253] hardirqs last disabled at (11800230): [] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 561.312259] softirqs last enabled at (11799832): [] __do_softirq+0x5c7/0x8c3 [ 561.405975] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 561.442494] softirqs last disabled at (11799821): [] irq_exit+0x1ac/0x1e0 [ 561.791359] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 561.791362] CPU: 15 PID: 313 Comm: kworker/15:1 Tainted: G B W 5.0.0-vanilla+ #3 [ 561.791363] Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650 -[7X05CTO1WW]-/-[7X05CTO1WW]-, BIOS -[IVE136T-2.10]- 03/22/2019 [ 561.791371] Workqueue: events cache_set_flush [bcache] [ 561.791374] RIP: 0010:kthread_stop+0x3b/0x440 [ 561.791376] Code: 00 00 65 8b 05 26 d5 e0 7c 89 c0 48 0f a3 05 ec aa df 02 0f 82 dc 02 00 00 4c 8d 63 20 be 04 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 65 c5 53 00 ff 43 20 48 8d 7b 24 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 [ 561.791377] RSP: 0018:ffff88872fc8fd10 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 561.838895] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 561.838916] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 561.838934] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 561.838948] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 561.838966] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 561.838979] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 561.838996] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 563.067028] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: fffffffffffffffc RCX: ffffffff832dd314 [ 563.067030] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000297 [ 563.067032] RBP: ffff88872fc8fe88 R08: fffffbfff0b8213d R09: fffffbfff0b8213d [ 563.067034] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: fffffbfff0b8213c R12: 000000000000001c [ 563.408618] R13: ffff88dc61cc0f68 R14: ffff888102b94900 R15: ffff88dc61cc0f68 [ 563.408620] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888f7dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 563.408622] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 563.408623] CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000000f48a1a004 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [ 563.408625] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 563.408627] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 563.904795] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 563.915796] PKRU: 55555554 [ 563.915797] Call Trace: [ 563.915807] cache_set_flush+0xd4/0x6d0 [bcache] [ 563.915812] process_one_work+0x856/0x1620 [ 564.001226] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 564.033563] ? find_held_lock+0x39/0x1d0 [ 564.033567] ? drain_workqueue+0x380/0x380 [ 564.033574] worker_thread+0x87/0xb80 [ 564.062823] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 564.118042] ? __kthread_parkme+0xb6/0x180 [ 564.118046] ? process_one_work+0x1620/0x1620 [ 564.118048] kthread+0x326/0x3e0 [ 564.118050] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 [ 564.167066] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 564.252441] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 564.252447] Modules linked in: msr rpcrdma sunrpc rdma_ucm ib_iser ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib i40iw configfs iw_cm ib_cm libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi mlx4_ib ib_uverbs mlx4_en ib_core nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 vfat fat intel_rapl skx_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel ses raid0 aesni_intel cdc_ether enclosure usbnet ipmi_ssif joydev aes_x86_64 i40e scsi_transport_sas mii bcache md_mod crypto_simd mei_me ioatdma crc64 ptp cryptd pcspkr i2c_i801 mlx4_core glue_helper pps_core mei lpc_ich dca wmi ipmi_si ipmi_devintf nd_pmem dax_pmem nd_btt ipmi_msghandler device_dax pcc_cpufreq button hid_generic usbhid mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect xhci_pci sysimgblt fb_sys_fops xhci_hcd ttm megaraid_sas drm usbcore nfit libnvdimm sg dm_multipath dm_mod scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua efivarfs [ 564.299390] bcache: bch_count_io_errors() nvme0n1: IO error on writing btree. [ 564.348360] CR2: 000000000000001c [ 564.348362] ---[ end trace b7f0e5cc7b2103b0 ]--- Therefore, it is not enough to only check whether c->gc_thread is NULL, we should use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to check both NULL pointer and error value. This patch changes the above buggy code piece in this way, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(c->gc_thread)) kthread_stop(c->gc_thread); Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: acquire bch_register_lock later in cached_dev_free()

2019-07-26T07:10:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit 80265d8dfd77792e133793cef44a21323aac2908 ] When enable lockdep engine, a lockdep warning can be observed when reboot or shutdown system, [ 3142.764557][ T1] bcache: bcache_reboot() Stopping all devices: [ 3142.776265][ T2649] [ 3142.777159][ T2649] ====================================================== [ 3142.780039][ T2649] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3142.782869][ T2649] 5.2.0-rc4-lp151.20-default+ #1 Tainted: G W [ 3142.785684][ T2649] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3142.788479][ T2649] kworker/3:67/2649 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3142.790738][ T2649] 00000000aaf02291 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0 [ 3142.794678][ T2649] [ 3142.794678][ T2649] but task is already holding lock: [ 3142.797402][ T2649] 000000004fcf89c5 (&bch_register_lock){+.+.}, at: cached_dev_free+0x17/0x120 [bcache] [ 3142.801462][ T2649] [ 3142.801462][ T2649] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3142.801462][ T2649] [ 3142.805277][ T2649] [ 3142.805277][ T2649] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3142.808902][ T2649] [ 3142.808902][ T2649] -> #2 (&bch_register_lock){+.+.}: [ 3142.812396][ T2649] __mutex_lock+0x7a/0x9d0 [ 3142.814184][ T2649] cached_dev_free+0x17/0x120 [bcache] [ 3142.816415][ T2649] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640 [ 3142.818413][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0 [ 3142.820276][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 3142.822061][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 3142.823965][ T2649] [ 3142.823965][ T2649] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}: [ 3142.827244][ T2649] process_one_work+0x277/0x640 [ 3142.829160][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0 [ 3142.830958][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 3142.832674][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 3142.834915][ T2649] [ 3142.834915][ T2649] -> #0 ((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq){+.+.}: [ 3142.838121][ T2649] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0 [ 3142.840025][ T2649] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0 [ 3142.842035][ T2649] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180 [ 3142.844042][ T2649] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250 [ 3142.846142][ T2649] cached_dev_free+0x52/0x120 [bcache] [ 3142.848530][ T2649] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640 [ 3142.850663][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0 [ 3142.852464][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 3142.854106][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 3142.855880][ T2649] [ 3142.855880][ T2649] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3142.855880][ T2649] [ 3142.859663][ T2649] Chain exists of: [ 3142.859663][ T2649] (wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq --> (work_completion)(&cl->work)#2 --> &bch_register_lock [ 3142.859663][ T2649] [ 3142.865424][ T2649] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3142.865424][ T2649] [ 3142.868022][ T2649] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3142.869885][ T2649] ---- ---- [ 3142.871751][ T2649] lock(&bch_register_lock); [ 3142.873379][ T2649] lock((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2); [ 3142.876399][ T2649] lock(&bch_register_lock); [ 3142.879727][ T2649] lock((wq_completion)bcache_writeback_wq); [ 3142.882064][ T2649] [ 3142.882064][ T2649] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3142.882064][ T2649] [ 3142.885060][ T2649] 3 locks held by kworker/3:67/2649: [ 3142.887245][ T2649] #0: 00000000e774cdd0 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640 [ 3142.890815][ T2649] #1: 00000000f7df89da ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#2){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x21e/0x640 [ 3142.894884][ T2649] #2: 000000004fcf89c5 (&bch_register_lock){+.+.}, at: cached_dev_free+0x17/0x120 [bcache] [ 3142.898797][ T2649] [ 3142.898797][ T2649] stack backtrace: [ 3142.900961][ T2649] CPU: 3 PID: 2649 Comm: kworker/3:67 Tainted: G W 5.2.0-rc4-lp151.20-default+ #1 [ 3142.904789][ T2649] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/13/2018 [ 3142.909168][ T2649] Workqueue: events cached_dev_free [bcache] [ 3142.911422][ T2649] Call Trace: [ 3142.912656][ T2649] dump_stack+0x85/0xcb [ 3142.914181][ T2649] print_circular_bug+0x19a/0x1f0 [ 3142.916193][ T2649] __lock_acquire+0x16cd/0x1850 [ 3142.917936][ T2649] ? __lock_acquire+0x6a8/0x1850 [ 3142.919704][ T2649] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0 [ 3142.921335][ T2649] ? find_held_lock+0x34/0xa0 [ 3142.923052][ T2649] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0 [ 3142.924635][ T2649] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0 [ 3142.926375][ T2649] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4c0 [ 3142.928047][ T2649] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4c0 [ 3142.929824][ T2649] ? drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180 [ 3142.931686][ T2649] drain_workqueue+0xa9/0x180 [ 3142.933534][ T2649] destroy_workqueue+0x17/0x250 [ 3142.935787][ T2649] cached_dev_free+0x52/0x120 [bcache] [ 3142.937795][ T2649] process_one_work+0x2a4/0x640 [ 3142.939803][ T2649] worker_thread+0x39/0x3f0 [ 3142.941487][ T2649] ? process_one_work+0x640/0x640 [ 3142.943389][ T2649] kthread+0x125/0x140 [ 3142.944894][ T2649] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 3142.947744][ T2649] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 3142.970358][ T2649] bcache: bcache_device_free() bcache0 stopped Here is how the deadlock happens. 1) bcache_reboot() calls bcache_device_stop(), then inside bcache_device_stop() BCACHE_DEV_CLOSING bit is set on d->flags. Then closure_queue(&d->cl) is called to invoke cached_dev_flush(). 2) In cached_dev_flush(), cached_dev_free() is called by continu_at(). 3) In cached_dev_free(), when stopping the writeback kthread of the cached device by kthread_stop(), dc->writeback_thread will be waken up to quite the kthread while-loop, then cached_dev_put() is called in bch_writeback_thread(). 4) Calling cached_dev_put() in writeback kthread may drop dc->count to 0, then dc->detach kworker is scheduled, which is initialized as cached_dev_detach_finish(). 5) Inside cached_dev_detach_finish(), the last line of code is to call closure_put(&dc->disk.cl), which drops the last reference counter of closrure dc->disk.cl, then the callback cached_dev_flush() gets called. Now cached_dev_flush() is called for second time in the code path, the first time is in step 2). And again bch_register_lock will be acquired again, and a A-A lock (lockdep terminology) is happening. The root cause of the above A-A lock is in cached_dev_free(), mutex bch_register_lock is held before stopping writeback kthread and other kworkers. Fortunately now we have variable 'bcache_is_reboot', which may prevent device registration or unregistration during reboot/shutdown time, so it is unncessary to hold bch_register_lock such early now. This is how this patch fixes the reboot/shutdown time A-A lock issue: After moving mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock) to a later location where before atomic_read(&dc->running) in cached_dev_free(), such A-A lock problem can be solved without any reboot time registration race. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: remove redundant LIST_HEAD(journal) from run_cache_set()

2019-04-30T14:20:46+00:00

Commit 95f18c9d1310 ("bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set") forgets to remove the original define of LIST_HEAD(journal), which makes the change no take effect. This patch removes redundant variable LIST_HEAD(journal) from run_cache_set(), to make Shenghui's fix working. Fixes: 95f18c9d1310 ("bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set") Reported-by: Juha Aatrokoski Cc: Shenghui Wang Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set

2019-04-24T16:56:29+00:00

In the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set(), LIST_HEAD(journal) is used to collect journal_replay(s) and filled by bch_journal_read(). If all goes well, bch_journal_replay() will release the list of jounal_replay(s) at the end of the branch. If something goes wrong, code flow will jump to the label "err:" and leave the list unreleased. This patch will release the list of journal_replay(s) in the case of error detected. v1 -> v2: * Move the release code to the location after label 'err:' to simply the change. Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: improve bcache_reboot()

2019-04-24T16:56:28+00:00

This patch tries to release mutex bch_register_lock early, to give chance to stop cache set and bcache device early. This patch also expends time out of stopping all bcache device from 2 seconds to 10 seconds, because stopping writeback rate update worker may delay for 5 seconds, 2 seconds is not enough. After this patch applied, stopping bcache devices during system reboot or shutdown is very hard to be observed any more. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: add comments for closure_fn to be called in closure_queue()

2019-04-24T16:56:28+00:00

Add code comments to explain which call back function might be called for the closure_queue(). This is an effort to make code to be more understandable for readers. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: Add comments for blkdev_put() in registration code path

2019-04-24T16:56:28+00:00

Add comments to explain why in register_bcache() blkdev_put() won't be called in two location. Add comments to explain why blkdev_put() must be called in register_cache() when cache_alloc() failed. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe