kernel/linux.git/drivers/hid/bpf/Makefile, branch v6.19.12

HID: bpf: remove tracing HID-BPF capability

2024-06-14T09:20:20+00:00

We can now rely on struct_ops as we cleared the users in-tree. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-8-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires

HID: bpf: implement HID-BPF through bpf_struct_ops

2024-06-14T09:20:16+00:00

We do this implementation in several steps to not have the CI failing: - first (this patch), we add struct_ops while keeping the existing infra available - then we change the selftests, the examples and the existing in-tree HID-BPF programs - then we remove the existing trace points making old HID-BPF obsolete There are a few advantages of struct_ops over tracing: - compatibility with sleepable programs (for hid_hw_raw_request() in a later patch) - a lot simpler in the kernel: it's a simple rcu protected list - we can add more parameters to the function called without much trouble - the "attach" is now generic through BPF-core: the caller just needs to set hid_id and flags before calling __load(). - all the BPF tough part is not handled in BPF-core through generic processing - hid_bpf_ctx is now only writable where it needs be Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-3-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires

HID: initial BPF implementation

2022-11-15T15:28:28+00:00

Declare an entry point that can use fmod_ret BPF programs, and also an API to access and change the incoming data. A simpler implementation would consist in just calling hid_bpf_device_event() for any incoming event and let users deal with the fact that they will be called for any event of any device. The goal of HID-BPF is to partially replace drivers, so this situation can be problematic because we might have programs which will step on each other toes. For that, we add a new API hid_bpf_attach_prog() that can be called from a syscall and we manually deal with a jump table in hid-bpf. Whenever we add a program to the jump table (in other words, when we attach a program to a HID device), we keep the number of time we added this program in the jump table so we can release it whenever there are no other users. HID devices have an RCU protected list of available programs in the jump table, and those programs are called one after the other thanks to bpf_tail_call(). To achieve the detection of users losing their fds on the programs we attached, we add 2 tracing facilities on bpf_prog_release() (for when a fd is closed) and bpf_free_inode() (for when a pinned program gets unpinned). Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina