kernel/linux.git/drivers/gpu, branch v6.6.25

drm/amdgpu: fix use-after-free bug

2024-04-03T13:29:04+00:00

commit 22207fd5c80177b860279653d017474b2812af5e upstream. The bug can be triggered by sending a single amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl to the AMDGPU DRM driver on any ASICs with an invalid address and size. The bug was reported by Joonkyo Jung . For example the following code: static void Syzkaller1(int fd) { struct drm_amdgpu_gem_userptr arg; int ret; arg.addr = 0xffffffffffff0000; arg.size = 0x80000000; /*2 Gb*/ arg.flags = 0x7; ret = drmIoctl(fd, 0xc1186451/*amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl*/, &arg); } Due to the address and size are not valid there is a failure in amdgpu_hmm_register->mmu_interval_notifier_insert->__mmu_interval_notifier_insert-> check_shl_overflow, but we even the amdgpu_hmm_register failure we still call amdgpu_hmm_unregister into amdgpu_gem_object_free which causes access to a bad address. The following stack is below when the issue is reproduced when Kazan is enabled: [ +0.000014] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI), BIOS 1401 12/03/2020 [ +0.000009] RIP: 0010:mmu_interval_notifier_remove+0x327/0x340 [ +0.000017] Code: ff ff 49 89 44 24 08 48 b8 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad de 4c 89 f7 49 89 47 40 48 83 c0 22 49 89 47 48 e8 ce d1 2d 01 e9 32 ff ff ff <0f> 0b e9 16 ff ff ff 4c 89 ef e8 fa 14 b3 ff e9 36 ff ff ff e8 80 [ +0.000014] RSP: 0018:ffffc90002657988 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ +0.000013] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff920004caf35 RCX: ffffffff8160565b [ +0.000011] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff8881a9f78260 [ +0.000010] RBP: ffffc90002657a70 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff520004caf25 [ +0.000010] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff8161d1d6 R12: ffff88810e988c00 [ +0.000010] R13: ffff888126fb5a00 R14: ffff88810e988c0c R15: ffff8881a9f78260 [ +0.000011] FS: 00007ff9ec848540(0000) GS:ffff8883cc880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000012] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000010] CR2: 000055b3f7e14328 CR3: 00000001b5770000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 [ +0.000010] Call Trace: [ +0.000006] [ +0.000007] ? show_regs+0x6a/0x80 [ +0.000018] ? __warn+0xa5/0x1b0 [ +0.000019] ? mmu_interval_notifier_remove+0x327/0x340 [ +0.000018] ? report_bug+0x24a/0x290 [ +0.000022] ? handle_bug+0x46/0x90 [ +0.000015] ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x50 [ +0.000016] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 [ +0.000017] ? kasan_save_stack+0x26/0x50 [ +0.000017] ? mmu_interval_notifier_remove+0x23b/0x340 [ +0.000019] ? mmu_interval_notifier_remove+0x327/0x340 [ +0.000019] ? mmu_interval_notifier_remove+0x23b/0x340 [ +0.000020] ? __pfx_mmu_interval_notifier_remove+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000017] ? kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1e/0x30 [ +0.000018] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000014] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0xb1/0xc0 [ +0.000018] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000013] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ +0.000020] amdgpu_hmm_unregister+0x34/0x50 [amdgpu] [ +0.004695] amdgpu_gem_object_free+0x66/0xa0 [amdgpu] [ +0.004534] ? __pfx_amdgpu_gem_object_free+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ +0.004291] ? do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xe0 [ +0.000023] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000017] drm_gem_object_free+0x3b/0x50 [drm] [ +0.000489] amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl+0x306/0x500 [amdgpu] [ +0.004295] ? __pfx_amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ +0.004270] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000014] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 [ +0.000015] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000013] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0 [ +0.000020] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000014] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20 [ +0.000022] ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0x17b/0x1f0 [drm] [ +0.000496] ? __pfx_amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ +0.004272] ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0x190/0x1f0 [drm] [ +0.000492] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x140/0x1f0 [drm] [ +0.000497] ? __pfx_amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ +0.004297] ? __pfx_drm_ioctl_kernel+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000489] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000011] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [ +0.000016] drm_ioctl+0x3da/0x730 [drm] [ +0.000475] ? __pfx_amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ +0.004293] ? __pfx_drm_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000506] ? __pfx_rpm_resume+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000016] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000011] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [ +0.000010] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000011] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x99/0x100 [ +0.000015] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000014] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000013] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000011] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000011] ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xc0 [ +0.000013] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000010] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x27/0x50 [ +0.000019] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x7e/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ +0.004272] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xcd/0x110 [ +0.000020] do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xe0 [ +0.000021] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ +0.000015] RIP: 0033:0x7ff9ed31a94f [ +0.000012] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <41> 89 c0 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1f 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 [ +0.000013] RSP: 002b:00007fff25f66790 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ +0.000016] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b3f7e133e0 RCX: 00007ff9ed31a94f [ +0.000012] RDX: 000055b3f7e133e0 RSI: 00000000c1186451 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ +0.000010] RBP: 00000000c1186451 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000009] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff25f66ca8 [ +0.000009] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 000055b3f7021ba8 R15: 00007ff9ed7af040 [ +0.000024] [ +0.000007] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- v2: Consolidate any error handling into amdgpu_hmm_register which applied to kfd_bo also. (Christian) v3: Improve syntax and comment (Christian) Cc: Christian Koenig Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: Felix Kuehling Cc: Joonkyo Jung Cc: Dokyung Song Cc: Cc: Signed-off-by: Vitaly Prosyak Reviewed-by: Christian König Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amd/display: Clear OPTC mem select on disable

2024-04-03T13:28:58+00:00

[ Upstream commit b4e05bb1dec53fe28c3c88425aded824498666e5 ] [Why] Not clearing the memory select bits prior to OPTC disable can cause DSC corruption issues when attempting to reuse a memory instance for another OPTC that enables ODM. [How] Clear the memory select bits prior to disabling an OPTC. Cc: Mario Limonciello Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu Acked-by: Alex Hung Signed-off-by: Ilya Bakoulin Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amd/display: Disconnect phantom pipe OPP from OPTC being disabled

2024-04-03T13:28:58+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7bdbfb4e36e34eb788e44f27666bf0a2b3b90803 ] [Why] If an OPP is used for a different OPTC without first being disconnected from the previous OPTC, unexpected behaviour can occur. This also applies to phantom pipes, which is what the current logic missed. [How] Disconnect OPPs from OPTC for phantom pipes before disabling OTG master. Also move the disconnection to before the OTG master disable, since the register is double buffered. Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira Signed-off-by: George Shen Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Stable-dep-of: b4e05bb1dec5 ("drm/amd/display: Clear OPTC mem select on disable") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amd/display: Fix hang/underflow when transitioning to ODM4:1

2024-04-03T13:28:58+00:00

[ Upstream commit e7b2b108cdeab76a7e7324459e50b0c1214c0386 ] [Why] Under some circumstances, disabling an OPTC and attempting to reclaim its OPP(s) for a different OPTC could cause a hang/underflow due to OPPs not being properly disconnected from the disabled OPTC. [How] Ensure that all OPPs are unassigned from an OPTC when it gets disabled. Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee Acked-by: Wayne Lin Signed-off-by: Ilya Bakoulin Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Stable-dep-of: b4e05bb1dec5 ("drm/amd/display: Clear OPTC mem select on disable") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/i915/gt: Reset queue_priority_hint on parking

2024-04-03T13:28:57+00:00

commit 4a3859ea5240365d21f6053ee219bb240d520895 upstream. Originally, with strict in order execution, we could complete execution only when the queue was empty. Preempt-to-busy allows replacement of an active request that may complete before the preemption is processed by HW. If that happens, the request is retired from the queue, but the queue_priority_hint remains set, preventing direct submission until after the next CS interrupt is processed. This preempt-to-busy race can be triggered by the heartbeat, which will also act as the power-management barrier and upon completion allow us to idle the HW. We may process the completion of the heartbeat, and begin parking the engine before the CS event that restores the queue_priority_hint, causing us to fail the assertion that it is MIN. <3>[ 166.210729] __engine_park:283 GEM_BUG_ON(engine->sched_engine->queue_priority_hint != (-((int)(~0U >> 1)) - 1)) <0>[ 166.210781] Dumping ftrace buffer: <0>[ 166.210795] --------------------------------- ... <0>[ 167.302811] drm_fdin-1097 2..s1. 165741070us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: promote { ccid:20 1217:2 prio 0 } <0>[ 167.302861] drm_fdin-1097 2d.s2. 165741072us : execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: preempting last=1217:2, prio=0, hint=2147483646 <0>[ 167.302928] drm_fdin-1097 2d.s2. 165741072us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 1217:2, current 0 <0>[ 167.302992] drm_fdin-1097 2d.s2. 165741073us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 3:4660, current 4659 <0>[ 167.303044] drm_fdin-1097 2d.s1. 165741076us : execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: context:3 schedule-in, ccid:40 <0>[ 167.303095] drm_fdin-1097 2d.s1. 165741077us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: submit { ccid:40 3:4660* prio 2147483646 } <0>[ 167.303159] kworker/-89 11..... 165741139us : i915_request_retire.part.0: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence c90:2, current 2 <0>[ 167.303208] kworker/-89 11..... 165741148us : __intel_context_do_unpin: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: context:c90 unpin <0>[ 167.303272] kworker/-89 11..... 165741159us : i915_request_retire.part.0: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 1217:2, current 2 <0>[ 167.303321] kworker/-89 11..... 165741166us : __intel_context_do_unpin: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: context:1217 unpin <0>[ 167.303384] kworker/-89 11..... 165741170us : i915_request_retire.part.0: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 3:4660, current 4660 <0>[ 167.303434] kworker/-89 11d..1. 165741172us : __intel_context_retire: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: context:1216 retire runtime: { total:56028ns, avg:56028ns } <0>[ 167.303484] kworker/-89 11..... 165741198us : __engine_park: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: parked <0>[ 167.303534] -0 5d.H3. 165741207us : execlists_irq_handler: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: semaphore yield: 00000040 <0>[ 167.303583] kworker/-89 11..... 165741397us : __intel_context_retire: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: context:1217 retire runtime: { total:325575ns, avg:0ns } <0>[ 167.303756] kworker/-89 11..... 165741777us : __intel_context_retire: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: context:c90 retire runtime: { total:0ns, avg:0ns } <0>[ 167.303806] kworker/-89 11..... 165742017us : __engine_park: __engine_park:283 GEM_BUG_ON(engine->sched_engine->queue_priority_hint != (-((int)(~0U >> 1)) - 1)) <0>[ 167.303811] --------------------------------- <4>[ 167.304722] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[ 167.304725] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c:283! <4>[ 167.304731] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI <4>[ 167.304734] CPU: 11 PID: 89 Comm: kworker/11:1 Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2-CI_DRM_14193-gc655e0fd2804+ #1 <4>[ 167.304736] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Rocket Lake Client Platform/RocketLake S UDIMM 6L RVP, BIOS RKLSFWI1.R00.3173.A03.2204210138 04/21/2022 <4>[ 167.304738] Workqueue: i915-unordered retire_work_handler [i915] <4>[ 167.304839] RIP: 0010:__engine_park+0x3fd/0x680 [i915] <4>[ 167.304937] Code: 00 48 c7 c2 b0 e5 86 a0 48 8d 3d 00 00 00 00 e8 79 48 d4 e0 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 ef 0a d4 e0 31 f6 bf 09 00 00 00 e8 03 49 c0 e0 <0f> 0b 0f 0b be 01 00 00 00 e8 f5 61 fd ff 31 c0 e9 34 fd ff ff 48 <4>[ 167.304940] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000059fce0 EFLAGS: 00010246 <4>[ 167.304942] RAX: 0000000000000200 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000006 <4>[ 167.304944] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009 <4>[ 167.304946] RBP: ffff8881330ca1b0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 <4>[ 167.304947] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8881330ca000 <4>[ 167.304948] R13: ffff888110f02aa0 R14: ffff88812d1d0205 R15: ffff88811277d4f0 <4>[ 167.304950] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88844f780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4>[ 167.304952] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4>[ 167.304953] CR2: 00007fc362200c40 CR3: 000000013306e003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 <4>[ 167.304955] PKRU: 55555554 <4>[ 167.304957] Call Trace: <4>[ 167.304958] <4>[ 167.305573] ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x1d/0x80 [i915] <4>[ 167.305685] i915_request_retire.part.0+0x34f/0x600 [i915] <4>[ 167.305800] retire_requests+0x51/0x80 [i915] <4>[ 167.305892] intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout+0x27f/0x700 [i915] <4>[ 167.305985] process_scheduled_works+0x2db/0x530 <4>[ 167.305990] worker_thread+0x18c/0x350 <4>[ 167.305993] kthread+0xfe/0x130 <4>[ 167.305997] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 <4>[ 167.306001] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 <4>[ 167.306004] It is necessary for the queue_priority_hint to be lower than the next request submission upon waking up, as we rely on the hint to decide when to kick the tasklet to submit that first request. Fixes: 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/10154 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: # v5.4+ Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240318135906.716055-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com (cherry picked from commit 98850e96cf811dc2d0a7d0af491caff9f5d49c1e) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/i915: Do not match JSL in ehl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed()

2024-04-03T13:28:57+00:00

commit e41d769f1a7a1dc533c35ef7b366be3dbf432a1c upstream. Since commit 0c65dc062611 ("drm/i915/jsl: s/JSL/JASPERLAKE for platform/subplatform defines"), boot freezes on a Jasper Lake tablet (Librem 11), usually with graphical corruption on the eDP display, but sometimes just a black screen. This commit was included in 6.6 and later. That commit was intended to refactor EHL and JSL macros, but the change to ehl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed() started matching JSL incorrectly when it was only intended to match EHL. It replaced: return ((IS_PLATFORM(i915, INTEL_ELKHARTLAKE) && IS_JSL_EHL_DISPLAY_STEP(i915, STEP_B0, STEP_FOREVER)) || with: return (((IS_ELKHARTLAKE(i915) || IS_JASPERLAKE(i915)) && IS_DISPLAY_STEP(i915, STEP_B0, STEP_FOREVER)) || Remove IS_JASPERLAKE() to fix the regression. Signed-off-by: Jonathon Hall Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0c65dc062611 ("drm/i915/jsl: s/JSL/JASPERLAKE for platform/subplatform defines") Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240313135424.3731410-1-jonathon.hall@puri.sm Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula (cherry picked from commit 1ef48859317b2a77672dea8682df133abf9c44ed) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/i915/dsi: Go back to the previous INIT_OTP/DISPLAY_ON order, mostly

2024-04-03T13:28:57+00:00

commit 18846627ef1210dcd55d65342b055ea97a46ffff upstream. Reinstate commit 88b065943cb5 ("drm/i915/dsi: Do display on sequence later on icl+"), for the most part. Turns out some machines (eg. Chuwi Minibook X) really do need that updated order. It is also the order the Windows driver uses. However we can't just undo the revert since that would again break Lenovo 82TQ. After staring at the VBT sequences for both machines I've concluded that the Lenovo 82TQ sequences look somewhat broken: - INIT_OTP is not present at all - what should be in INIT_OTP is found in DISPLAY_ON - what should be in DISPLAY_ON is found in BACKLIGHT_ON (along with the actual backlight stuff) The Chuwi Minibook X on the other hand has a full complement of sequences in its VBT. So let's try to deal with the broken sequences in the Lenovo 82TQ VBT by simply swapping the (non-existent) INIT_OTP sequence with the DISPLAY_ON sequence. Thus we execute DISPLAY_ON when intending to execute INIT_OTP, and execute nothing at all when intending to execute DISPLAY_ON. That should be 100% equivalent to the revert, for such broken VBTs. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6992eb815d08 ("Revert "drm/i915/dsi: Do display on sequence later on icl+"") References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10071 Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10334 Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240305083659.8396-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Jani Nikula (cherry picked from commit 94ae4612ea336bfc3c12b3fc68467c6711a4f39b) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/i915/bios: Tolerate devdata==NULL in intel_bios_encoder_supports_dp_dual_mode()

2024-04-03T13:28:57+00:00

commit 32e39bab59934bfd3f37097d4dd85ac5eb0fd549 upstream. If we have no VBT, or the VBT didn't declare the encoder in question, we won't have the 'devdata' for the encoder. Instead of oopsing just bail early. We won't be able to tell whether the port is DP++ or not, but so be it. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10464 Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240319092443.15769-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula (cherry picked from commit 26410896206342c8a80d2b027923e9ee7d33b733) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

2024-04-03T13:28:57+00:00

commit b212b79768ccde74429f872c37618c543fa11333 upstream. In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion: <4> [197.079335] ====================================================== <4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted <4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350 <4> [197.116939] but task is already holding lock: <4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915] <4> [197.131543] which lock already depends on the new lock. ... <4> [197.507922] Chain exists of: fs_reclaim --> >->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock <4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1 <4> [197.528916] ---- ---- <4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock); <4> [197.537237] lock(>->reset.mutex); <4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock); <4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim); ... <4> [197.632548] Call Trace: <4> [197.634990] <4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0 <4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180 <4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0 <4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300 <4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0 <4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0 <4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350 <4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0 <4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0 <4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60 <4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0 <4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50 <4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120 <4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0 <4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30 <4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90 <4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110 <4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70 <4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730 <4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730 <4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730 <4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730 <4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90 <4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915] <4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915] <4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915] <4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120 <4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60 <4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100 Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar lock inversion can happen. v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter), - instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is held, - use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c source file (Rodrigo). Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware") Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Guenter Roeck Cc: # v6.5+ Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com (cherry picked from commit 71b218771426ea84c0e0148a2b7ac52c1f76e792) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs

2024-04-03T13:28:57+00:00

commit 8678b1060ae2b75feb60b87e5b75e17374e3c1c5 upstream. An errant disk backup on my desktop got into debugfs and triggered the following deadlock scenario in the amdgpu debugfs files. The machine also hard-resets immediately after those lines are printed (although I wasn't able to reproduce that part when reading by hand): [ 1318.016074][ T1082] ====================================================== [ 1318.016607][ T1082] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 1318.017107][ T1082] 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 Not tainted [ 1318.017598][ T1082] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 1318.018096][ T1082] tar/1082 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1318.018585][ T1082] ffff98c44175d6a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x40/0x80 [ 1318.019084][ T1082] [ 1318.019084][ T1082] but task is already holding lock: [ 1318.020052][ T1082] ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 1318.023083][ T1082] [ 1318.023083][ T1082] -> #2 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 1318.024114][ T1082] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xe0/0x12f0 [ 1318.024639][ T1082] ww_mutex_lock+0x32/0x90 [ 1318.025161][ T1082] dma_resv_lockdep+0x18a/0x330 [ 1318.025683][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.026210][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.026728][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.027242][ T1082] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.027759][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1318.028281][ T1082] [ 1318.028281][ T1082] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 1318.029297][ T1082] dma_resv_lockdep+0x16c/0x330 [ 1318.029790][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.030263][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.030722][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.031168][ T1082] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.031598][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1318.032011][ T1082] [ 1318.032011][ T1082] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 1318.032778][ T1082] __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680 [ 1318.033141][ T1082] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0 [ 1318.033487][ T1082] __might_fault+0x58/0x80 [ 1318.033814][ T1082] amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.034181][ T1082] full_proxy_read+0x55/0x80 [ 1318.034487][ T1082] vfs_read+0xa7/0x360 [ 1318.034788][ T1082] ksys_read+0x70/0xf0 [ 1318.035085][ T1082] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180 [ 1318.035375][ T1082] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [ 1318.035664][ T1082] [ 1318.035664][ T1082] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1318.035664][ T1082] [ 1318.036487][ T1082] Chain exists of: [ 1318.036487][ T1082] &mm->mmap_lock --> reservation_ww_class_acquire --> reservation_ww_class_mutex [ 1318.036487][ T1082] [ 1318.037310][ T1082] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1318.037310][ T1082] [ 1318.037838][ T1082] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1318.038101][ T1082] ---- ---- [ 1318.038350][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 1318.038590][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire); [ 1318.038839][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 1318.039083][ T1082] rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.039328][ T1082] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.040029][ T1082] 1 lock held by tar/1082: [ 1318.040259][ T1082] #0: ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] stack backtrace: [ 1318.041053][ T1082] CPU: 22 PID: 1082 Comm: tar Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 3316c85d50e282c5643b075d1f01a4f6365e39c2 [ 1318.041329][ T1082] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B650 AORUS PRO AX/B650 AORUS PRO AX, BIOS F20 12/14/2023 [ 1318.041614][ T1082] Call Trace: [ 1318.041895][ T1082] [ 1318.042175][ T1082] dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 [ 1318.042460][ T1082] check_noncircular+0x145/0x160 [ 1318.042743][ T1082] __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680 [ 1318.043022][ T1082] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0 [ 1318.043301][ T1082] ? __might_fault+0x40/0x80 [ 1318.043580][ T1082] ? __might_fault+0x40/0x80 [ 1318.043856][ T1082] __might_fault+0x58/0x80 [ 1318.044131][ T1082] ? __might_fault+0x40/0x80 [ 1318.044408][ T1082] amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu 8fe2afaa910cbd7654c8cab23563a94d6caebaab] [ 1318.044749][ T1082] full_proxy_read+0x55/0x80 [ 1318.045042][ T1082] vfs_read+0xa7/0x360 [ 1318.045333][ T1082] ksys_read+0x70/0xf0 [ 1318.045623][ T1082] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180 [ 1318.045913][ T1082] ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180 [ 1318.046201][ T1082] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 1318.046487][ T1082] ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180 [ 1318.046773][ T1082] ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180 [ 1318.047057][ T1082] ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180 [ 1318.047337][ T1082] ? do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x180 [ 1318.047611][ T1082] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [ 1318.047887][ T1082] RIP: 0033:0x7f480b70a39d [ 1318.048162][ T1082] Code: 91 ba 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb b2 e8 18 a3 01 00 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 80 3d a9 3c 0e 00 00 74 17 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 5b c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 53 48 83 [ 1318.048769][ T1082] RSP: 002b:00007ffde77f5c68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 [ 1318.049083][ T1082] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000800 RCX: 00007f480b70a39d [ 1318.049392][ T1082] RDX: 0000000000000800 RSI: 000055c9f2120c00 RDI: 0000000000000008 [ 1318.049703][ T1082] RBP: 0000000000000800 R08: 000055c9f2120a94 R09: 0000000000000007 [ 1318.050011][ T1082] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055c9f2120c00 [ 1318.050324][ T1082] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000000008 R15: 0000000000000800 [ 1318.050638][ T1082] amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read() holds a reservation when it calls put_user(), which may fault and acquire the mmap_sem. This violates the established locking order. Bounce the mqd data through a kernel buffer to get put_user() out of the illegal section. Fixes: 445d85e3c1df ("drm/amdgpu: add debugfs interface for reading MQDs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.5+ Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman