kernel/linux.git/drivers/cpufreq, branch v5.4.50

cpufreq: Fix up cpufreq_boost_set_sw()

2020-06-17T14:40:33+00:00

commit 552abb884e97d26589964e5a8c7e736f852f95f0 upstream. After commit 18c49926c4bf ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints") the return value of freq_qos_update_request(), that can be 1, passed by cpufreq_boost_set_sw() to its caller sometimes confuses the latter, which only expects to see 0 or negative error codes, so notice that cpufreq_boost_set_sw() can return an error code (which should not be -EINVAL for that matter) as soon as the first policy without a frequency table is found (because either all policies have a frequency table or none of them have it) and rework it to meet its caller's expectations. Fixes: 18c49926c4bf ("cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints") Reported-by: Serge Semin Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Cc: 5.3+ # 5.3+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: intel_pstate: Only mention the BIOS disabling turbo mode once

2020-05-20T06:20:14+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8c539776ac83c0857395e1ccc9c6b516521a2d32 ] Make a note of the first time we discover the turbo mode has been disabled by the BIOS, as otherwise we complain every time we try to update the mode. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: powernv: Fix use-after-free

2020-04-17T08:50:22+00:00

commit d0a72efac89d1c35ac55197895201b7b94c5e6ef upstream. The cpufreq driver has a use-after-free that we can hit if: a) There's an OCC message pending when the notifier is registered, and b) The cpufreq driver fails to register with the core. When a) occurs the notifier schedules a workqueue item to handle the message. The backing work_struct is located on chips[].throttle and when b) happens we clean up by freeing the array. Once we get to the (now free) queued item and the kernel crashes. Fixes: c5e29ea7ac14 ("cpufreq: powernv: Fix bugs in powernv_cpufreq_{init/exit}") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6+ Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200206062622.28235-1-oohall@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: imx6q: fix error handling

2020-04-17T08:50:03+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3646f50a3838c5949a89ecbdb868497cdc05b8fd ] When speed checking failed, direclty jumping to put_node label is not correct. Need jump to out_free_opp to avoid resources leak. Fixes: 2733fb0d0699 ("cpufreq: imx6q: read OCOTP through nvmem for imx6ul/imx6ull") Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: imx6q: Fixes unwanted cpu overclocking on i.MX6ULL

2020-04-17T08:50:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 36eb7dc1bd42fe5f850329c893768ff89b696fba ] imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading is called for both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL. Since the i.MX6ULL was introduced to a separate ocotp compatible node later, it is possible that the i.MX6ULL has also dtbs with "fsl,imx6ull-ocotp". On a system without nvmem-cell speed grade a missing check on this node causes a driver fail without considering the cpu speed grade. This patch prevents unwanted cpu overclocking on i.MX6ULL with compatible node "fsl,imx6ull-ocotp" in old dtbs without nvmem-cell speed grade. Fixes: 2733fb0d0699 ("cpufreq: imx6q: read OCOTP through nvmem for imx6ul/imx6ull") Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Fix policy initialization for internal governor drivers

2020-03-05T15:43:44+00:00

commit f5739cb0b56590d68d8df8a44659893b6d0084c3 upstream. Before commit 1e4f63aecb53 ("cpufreq: Avoid creating excessively large stack frames") the initial value of the policy field in struct cpufreq_policy set by the driver's ->init() callback was implicitly passed from cpufreq_init_policy() to cpufreq_set_policy() if the default governor was neither "performance" nor "powersave". After that commit, however, cpufreq_init_policy() must take that case into consideration explicitly and handle it as appropriate, so make that happen. Fixes: 1e4f63aecb53 ("cpufreq: Avoid creating excessively large stack frames") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/39fb762880c27da110086741315ca8b111d781cd.camel@gmail.com/ Reported-by: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: 5.4+ # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: Avoid creating excessively large stack frames

2020-02-11T12:35:25+00:00

commit 1e4f63aecb53e48468661e922fc2fa3b83e55722 upstream. In the process of modifying a cpufreq policy, the cpufreq core makes a copy of it including all of the internals which is stored on the CPU stack. Because struct cpufreq_policy is relatively large, this may cause the size of the stack frame to exceed the 2 KB limit and so the GCC complains when -Wframe-larger-than= is used. In fact, it is not necessary to copy the entire policy structure in order to modify it, however. First, because cpufreq_set_policy() obtains the min and max policy limits from frequency QoS now, it is not necessary to pass the limits to it from the callers. The only things that need to be passed to it from there are the new governor pointer or (if there is a built-in governor in the driver) the "policy" value representing the governor choice. They both can be passed as individual arguments, though, so make cpufreq_set_policy() take them this way and rework its callers accordingly. This avoids making copies of cpufreq policies in the callers of cpufreq_set_policy(). Second, cpufreq_set_policy() still needs to pass the new policy data to the ->verify() callback of the cpufreq driver whose task is to sanitize the min and max policy limits. It still does not need to make a full copy of struct cpufreq_policy for this purpose, but it needs to pass a few items from it to the driver in case they are needed (different drivers have different needs in that respect and all of them have to be covered). For this reason, introduce struct cpufreq_policy_data to hold copies of the members of struct cpufreq_policy used by the existing ->verify() driver callbacks and pass a pointer to a temporary structure of that type to ->verify() (instead of passing a pointer to full struct cpufreq_policy to it). While at it, notice that intel_pstate and longrun don't really need to verify the "policy" value in struct cpufreq_policy, so drop those check from them to avoid copying "policy" into struct cpufreq_policy_data (which allows it to be slightly smaller). Also while at it fix up white space in a couple of places and make cpufreq_set_policy() static (as it can be so). Fixes: 3000ce3c52f8 ("cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAMuHMdX6-jb1W8uC2_237m8ctCpsnGp=JCxqt8pCWVqNXHmkVg@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: kbuild test robot Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: 5.4+ # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: Register drivers only after CPU devices have been registered

2019-12-31T15:45:26+00:00

[ Upstream commit 46770be0cf94149ca48be87719bda1d951066644 ] The cpufreq core heavily depends on the availability of the struct device for CPUs and if they aren't available at the time cpufreq driver is registered, we will never succeed in making cpufreq work. This happens due to following sequence of events: - cpufreq_register_driver() - subsys_interface_register() - return 0; //successful registration of driver ... at a later point of time - register_cpu(); - device_register(); - bus_probe_device(); - sif->add_dev(); - cpufreq_add_dev(); - get_cpu_device(); //FAILS - per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev; //used by get_cpu_device() - return 0; //CPU registered successfully Because the per-cpu variable cpu_sys_devices is set only after the CPU device is regsitered, cpufreq will never be able to get it when cpufreq_add_dev() is called. This patch avoids this failure by making sure device structure of at least CPU0 is available when the cpufreq driver is registered, else return -EPROBE_DEFER. Reported-by: Bjorn Andersson Co-developed-by: Amit Kucheria Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Tested-by: Amit Kucheria Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: sun50i: Fix CPU speed bin detection

2019-12-31T15:44:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit c23734487fb44ee16c1b007ba72d793c085e4ec4 ] I have observed failures to boot on Orange Pi 3, because this driver determined that my SoC is from the normal bin, but my SoC only works reliably with the OPP values for the slowest bin. By querying H6 owners, it was found that e-fuse values found in the wild are in the range of 1-3, value of 7 was not reported, yet. From this and from unused defines in BSP code, it can be assumed that meaning of efuse values on H6 actually is: - 1 = slowest bin - 2 = normal bin - 3 = fastest bin Vendor code actually treats 0 and 2 as invalid efuse values, but later treats all invalid values as a normal bin. This looks like a mistake in bin detection code, that was plastered over by a hack in cpufreq code, so let's not repeat it here. It probably only works because there are no SoCs in the wild with efuse value of 0, and fast bin SoCs are made to use normal bin OPP tables, which is also safe. Let's play it safe and interpret 0 as the slowest bin, but fix detection of other bins to match this research. More research will be done before actual OPP tables are merged. Fixes: f328584f7bff ("cpufreq: Add sun50i nvmem based CPU scaling driver") Acked-by: Maxime Ripard Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: powernv: fix stack bloat and hard limit on number of CPUs

2019-12-17T18:56:26+00:00

commit db0d32d84031188443e25edbd50a71a6e7ac5d1d upstream. The following build warning occurred on powerpc 64-bit builds: drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c: In function 'init_chip_info': drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:1070:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] This is with a cross-compiler based on gcc 8.1.0, which I got from: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/8.1.0/ The warning is due to putting 1024 bytes on the stack: unsigned int chip[256]; ...and it's also undesirable to have a hard limit on the number of CPUs here. Fix both problems by dynamically allocating based on num_possible_cpus, as recommended by Michael Ellerman. Fixes: 053819e0bf840 ("cpufreq: powernv: Handle throttling due to Pmax capping at chip level") Signed-off-by: John Hubbard Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Cc: 4.10+ # 4.10+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman