kernel/linux.git/drivers/block/loop.c, branch v4.19.39

loop: do not print warn message if partition scan is successful

2019-05-02T07:58:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit 40853d6fc619a6fd3d3177c3973a2eac9b598a80 ] Do not print warn message when the partition scan returns 0. Fixes: d57f3374ba48 ("loop: Move special partition reread handling in loop_clr_fd()") Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

loop: set GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part()

2019-04-05T20:33:03+00:00

[ Upstream commit 758a58d0bc67457f1215321a536226654a830eeb ] Commit 0da03cab87e6 ("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()") moves blkdev_reread_part() out of the loop_ctl_mutex. However, GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN is set before __blkdev_reread_part(). As a result, __blkdev_reread_part() will fail the check of GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN and will not rescan the loop device to delete all partitions. Below are steps to reproduce the issue: step1 # dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.raw bs=1M count=100 step2 # losetup -P /dev/loop0 tmp.raw step3 # parted /dev/loop0 mklabel gpt step4 # parted -a none -s /dev/loop0 mkpart primary 64s 1 step5 # losetup -d /dev/loop0 Step5 will not be able to delete /dev/loop0p1 (introduced by step4) and there is below kernel warning message: [ 464.414043] __loop_clr_fd: partition scan of loop0 failed (rc=-22) This patch sets GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part(). Fixes: 0da03cab87e6 ("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()") Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

loop: access lo_backing_file only when the loop device is Lo_bound

2019-03-27T05:14:42+00:00

commit f7c8a4120eedf24c36090b7542b179ff7a649219 upstream. Commit 758a58d0bc67 ("loop: set GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part()") separates "lo->lo_backing_file = NULL" and "lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound" into different critical regions protected by loop_ctl_mutex. However, there is below race that the NULL lo->lo_backing_file would be accessed when the backend of a loop is another loop device, e.g., loop0's backend is a file, while loop1's backend is loop0. loop0's backend is file loop1's backend is loop0 __loop_clr_fd() mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); lo->lo_backing_file = NULL; --> set to NULL mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); loop_set_fd() mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex); loop_validate_file() f = l->lo_backing_file; --> NULL access if loop0 is not Lo_unbound mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound; mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); lo->lo_backing_file should be accessed only when the loop device is Lo_bound. In fact, the problem has been introduced already in commit 7ccd0791d985 ("loop: Push loop_ctl_mutex down into loop_clr_fd()") after which loop_validate_file() could see devices in Lo_rundown state with which it did not count. It was harmless at that point but still. Fixes: 7ccd0791d985 ("loop: Push loop_ctl_mutex down into loop_clr_fd()") Reported-by: syzbot+9bdc1adc1c55e7fe765b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: drop caches if offset or block_size are changed

2019-01-22T20:40:38+00:00

commit 5db470e229e22b7eda6e23b5566e532c96fb5bc3 upstream. If we don't drop caches used in old offset or block_size, we can get old data from new offset/block_size, which gives unexpected data to user. For example, Martijn found a loopback bug in the below scenario. 1) LOOP_SET_FD loads first two pages on loop file 2) LOOP_SET_STATUS64 changes the offset on the loop file 3) mount is failed due to the cached pages having wrong superblock Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Martijn Coenen Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Fix double mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex) in loop_control_ioctl()

2019-01-22T20:40:38+00:00

commit 628bd85947091830a8c4872adfd5ed1d515a9cf2 upstream. Commit 0a42e99b58a20883 ("loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex") forgot to remove mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex) from loop_control_ioctl() when replacing loop_index_mutex with loop_ctl_mutex. Fixes: 0a42e99b58a20883 ("loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex") Reported-by: syzbot Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Get rid of 'nested' acquisition of loop_ctl_mutex

2019-01-22T20:40:38+00:00

commit c28445fa06a3a54e06938559b9514c5a7f01c90f upstream. The nested acquisition of loop_ctl_mutex (->lo_ctl_mutex back then) has been introduced by commit f028f3b2f987e "loop: fix circular locking in loop_clr_fd()" to fix lockdep complains about bd_mutex being acquired after lo_ctl_mutex during partition rereading. Now that these are properly fixed, let's stop fooling lockdep. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Avoid circular locking dependency between loop_ctl_mutex and bd_mutex

2019-01-22T20:40:38+00:00

commit 1dded9acf6dc9a34cd27fcf8815507e4e65b3c4f upstream. Code in loop_change_fd() drops reference to the old file (and also the new file in a failure case) under loop_ctl_mutex. Similarly to a situation in loop_set_fd() this can create a circular locking dependency if this was the last reference holding the file open. Delay dropping of the file reference until we have released loop_ctl_mutex. Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()

2019-01-22T20:40:37+00:00

commit 0da03cab87e6323ff2e05b14bc7d5c6fcc531efd upstream. Calling blkdev_reread_part() under loop_ctl_mutex causes lockdep to complain about circular lock dependency between bdev->bd_mutex and lo->lo_ctl_mutex. The problem is that on loop device open or close lo_open() and lo_release() get called with bdev->bd_mutex held and they need to acquire loop_ctl_mutex. OTOH when loop_reread_partitions() is called with loop_ctl_mutex held, it will call blkdev_reread_part() which acquires bdev->bd_mutex. See syzbot report for details [1]. Move call to blkdev_reread_part() in __loop_clr_fd() from under loop_ctl_mutex to finish fixing of the lockdep warning and the possible deadlock. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d1588 Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Move loop_reread_partitions() out of loop_ctl_mutex

2019-01-22T20:40:37+00:00

commit 85b0a54a82e4fbceeb1aebb7cb6909edd1a24668 upstream. Calling loop_reread_partitions() under loop_ctl_mutex causes lockdep to complain about circular lock dependency between bdev->bd_mutex and lo->lo_ctl_mutex. The problem is that on loop device open or close lo_open() and lo_release() get called with bdev->bd_mutex held and they need to acquire loop_ctl_mutex. OTOH when loop_reread_partitions() is called with loop_ctl_mutex held, it will call blkdev_reread_part() which acquires bdev->bd_mutex. See syzbot report for details [1]. Move all calls of loop_rescan_partitions() out of loop_ctl_mutex to avoid lockdep warning and fix deadlock possibility. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d1588 Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Move special partition reread handling in loop_clr_fd()

2019-01-22T20:40:37+00:00

commit d57f3374ba4817f7c8d26fae8a13d20ac8d31b92 upstream. The call of __blkdev_reread_part() from loop_reread_partition() happens only when we need to invalidate partitions from loop_release(). Thus move a detection for this into loop_clr_fd() and simplify loop_reread_partition(). This makes loop_reread_partition() safe to use without loop_ctl_mutex because we use only lo->lo_number and lo->lo_file_name in case of error for reporting purposes (thus possibly reporting outdate information is not a big deal) and we are safe from 'lo' going away under us by elevated lo->lo_refcnt. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman