kernel/linux.git/drivers/ata, branch v6.12.80

ata: libata-scsi: report correct sense field pointer in ata_scsiop_maint_in()

2026-03-25T10:08:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit e6d7eba23b666d85cacee0643be280d6ce1ebffc ] Commit 4ab7bb976343 ("ata: libata-scsi: Refactor ata_scsiop_maint_in()") modified ata_scsiop_maint_in() to directly call ata_scsi_set_invalid_field() to set the field pointer of the sense data of a failed MAINTENANCE IN command. However, in the case of an invalid command format, the sense data field incorrectly indicates byte 1 of the CDB. Fix this to indicate byte 2 of the command. Reported-by: Guenter Roeck Fixes: 4ab7bb976343 ("ata: libata-scsi: Refactor ata_scsiop_maint_in()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-scsi: Return residual for emulated SCSI commands

2026-03-25T10:08:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5251ae224d8d3caa21b28d12408062b6e75cffad ] The function ata_scsi_rbuf_fill() used to fill the reply buffer of emulated SCSI commands always copies the ATA reply buffer (ata_scsi_rbuf) up to the size of the SCSI command buffer (the transfer length for the command), even if the reply is shorter than the SCSI command buffer. This leads to issuers of the SCSI command to always get a result without any residual (resid is always 0) despite the potentially shorter reply for the command. Modify all fill actors used by ata_scsi_rbuf_fill() to return the number of bytes filled for the reply and 0 in case of error. Using this value, add a call to scsi_set_resid() in ata_scsi_rbuf_fill() to set the correct residual for the SCSI command when the reply length is shorter than the command buffer. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241022024537.251905-7-dlemoal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Stable-dep-of: e6d7eba23b66 ("ata: libata-scsi: report correct sense field pointer in ata_scsiop_maint_in()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-core: disable LPM on ADATA SU680 SSD

2026-03-25T10:08:48+00:00

commit ce5ae93d1a216680460040c7c0465a6e3b629dec upstream. ADATA SU680 SSDs suffer from NCQ read and write commands timeouts or bus errors when link power management (LPM) is enabled. Flag these devices with the ATA_QUIRK_NOLPM quirk to prevent the use of LPM and avoid these command failures. Reported-by: Mohammad Khaled Bayan Closes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-6.17/+bug/2144060 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Mohammad-Khaled Bayan Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-core: Disable LPM on ST1000DM010-2EP102

2026-03-25T10:08:36+00:00

commit b3b1d3ae1d87bc9398fb715c945968bf4c75a09a upstream. According to a user report, the ST1000DM010-2EP102 has problems with LPM, causing random system freezes. The drive belongs to the same BarraCuda family as the ST2000DM008-2FR102 which has the same issue. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 7627a0edef54 ("ata: ahci: Drop low power policy board type") Reported-by: Filippo Baiamonte Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 Signed-off-by: Maximilian Pezzullo Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-core: Add BRIDGE_OK quirk for QEMU drives

2026-03-25T10:08:31+00:00

commit b92b0075ee1870f78f59ab1f7da7dbfdd718ad7a upstream. Currently, whenever you boot with a QEMU drive over an AHCI interface, you get: [ 1.632121] ata1.00: applying bridge limits This happens due to the kernel not believing the given drive is SATA, since word 93 of IDENTIFY (ATA_ID_HW_CONFIG) is non-zero. The result is a pretty severe limit in max_hw_sectors_kb, which limits our IO sizes. QEMU has set word 93 erroneously for SATA drives but does not, in any way, emulate any of these real hardware details. There is no PATA drive and no SATA cable. As such, add a BRIDGE_OK quirk for QEMU HARDDISK. Special care is taken to limit this quirk to "2.5+", to allow for fixed future versions. This results in the max_hw_sectors being limited solely by the controller interface's limits. Which, for AHCI controllers, takes it from 128KB to 32767KB. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-eh: Fix detection of deferred qc timeouts

2026-03-13T16:20:49+00:00

commit ee0e6e69a772d601e152e5368a1da25d656122a8 upstream. If the ata_qc_for_each_raw() loop finishes without finding a matching SCSI command for any QC, the variable qc will hold a pointer to the last element examined, which has the tag i == ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1. This qc can match the port deferred QC (ap->deferred_qc). If that happens, the condition qc == ap->deferred_qc evaluates to true despite the loop not breaking with a match on the SCSI command for this QC. In that case, the error handler mistakenly intercepts a command that has not been issued yet and that has not timed out, and thus erroneously returning a timeout error. Fix the problem by checking for i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE in addition to qc == ap->deferred_qc. The problem was found by an experimental code review agent based on gemini-3.1-pro while reviewing backports into v6.18.y. Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro Fixes: eddb98ad9364 ("ata: libata-eh: correctly handle deferred qc timeouts") Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck [cassel: modified commit log as suggested by Damien] Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata: cancel pending work after clearing deferred_qc

2026-03-13T16:20:49+00:00

commit aac9b27f7c1f2b2cf7f50a9ca633ecbbcaf22af9 upstream. Syzbot reported a WARN_ON() in ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work(), caused by ap->ops->qc_defer() returning non-zero before issuing the deferred qc. ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() is called during each command completion. This function will check if there is a deferred QC, and if ap->ops->qc_defer() returns zero, meaning that it is possible to queue the deferred qc at this time (without being deferred), then it will queue the work which will issue the deferred qc. Once the work get to run, which can potentially be a very long time after the work was scheduled, there is a WARN_ON() if ap->ops->qc_defer() returns non-zero. While we hold the ap->lock both when assigning and clearing deferred_qc, and the work itself holds the ap->lock, the code currently does not cancel the work after clearing the deferred qc. This means that the following scenario can happen: 1) One or several NCQ commands are queued. 2) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap->deferred_qc. 3) Last NCQ command gets completed, work is queued to issue the deferred qc. 4) Timeout or error happens, ap->deferred_qc is cleared. The queued work is currently NOT canceled. 5) Port is reset. 6) One or several NCQ commands are queued. 7) A non-NCQ command is queued, gets stored in ap->deferred_qc. 8) Work is finally run. Yet at this time, there is still NCQ commands in flight. The work in 8) really belongs to the non-NCQ command in 2), not to the non-NCQ command in 7). The reason why the work is executed when it is not supposed to, is because it was never canceled when ap->deferred_qc was cleared in 4). Thus, ensure that we always cancel the work after clearing ap->deferred_qc. Another potential fix would have been to let ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work() do nothing if ap->ops->qc_defer() returns non-zero. However, canceling the work when clearing ap->deferred_qc seems slightly more logical, as we hold the ap->lock when clearing ap->deferred_qc, so we know that the work cannot be holding the lock. (The function could be waiting for the lock, but that is okay since it will do nothing if ap->deferred_qc is not set.) Reported-by: syzbot+bcaf842a1e8ead8dfb89@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 0ea84089dbf6 ("ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation") Fixes: eddb98ad9364 ("ata: libata-eh: correctly handle deferred qc timeouts") Reviewed-by: Igor Pylypiv Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-eh: correctly handle deferred qc timeouts

2026-03-13T16:20:49+00:00

commit eddb98ad9364b4e778768785d46cfab04ce52100 upstream. A deferred qc may timeout while waiting for the device queue to drain to be submitted. In such case, since the qc is not active, ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler() ends up calling scsi_eh_finish_cmd(), which frees the qc. But as the port deferred_qc field still references this finished/freed qc, the deferred qc work may eventually attempt to call ata_qc_issue() against this invalid qc, leading to errors such as reported by UBSAN (syzbot run): UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5166:24 shift exponent 4210818301 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int' ... Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190 lib/dump_stack.c:120 ubsan_epilogue+0xa/0x30 lib/ubsan.c:233 __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x279/0x2a0 lib/ubsan.c:494 ata_qc_issue.cold+0x38/0x9f drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5166 ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work+0x154/0x1f0 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c:1679 process_one_work+0x9d7/0x1920 kernel/workqueue.c:3275 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3358 [inline] worker_thread+0x5da/0xe40 kernel/workqueue.c:3439 kthread+0x370/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:467 ret_from_fork+0x754/0xd80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 Fix this by checking if the qc of a timed out SCSI command is a deferred one, and in such case, clear the port deferred_qc field and finish the SCSI command with DID_TIME_OUT. Reported-by: syzbot+1f77b8ca15336fff21ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 0ea84089dbf6 ("ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation") Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Reviewed-by: Igor Pylypiv Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-core: fix cancellation of a port deferred qc work

2026-03-13T16:20:49+00:00

commit 55db009926634b20955bd8abbee921adbc8d2cb4 upstream. cancel_work_sync() is a sleeping function so it cannot be called with the spin lock of a port being held. Move the call to this function in ata_port_detach() after EH completes, with the port lock released, together with other work cancellation calls. Fixes: 0ea84089dbf6 ("ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation") Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Reviewed-by: Igor Pylypiv Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation

2026-03-13T16:20:23+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0ea84089dbf62a92dc7889c79e6b18fc89260808 ] When a non-NCQ command is issued while NCQ commands are being executed, ata_scsi_qc_issue() indicates to the SCSI layer that the command issuing should be deferred by returning SCSI_MLQUEUE_XXX_BUSY. This command deferring is correct and as mandated by the ACS specifications since NCQ and non-NCQ commands cannot be mixed. However, in the case of a host adapter using multiple submission queues, when the target device is under a constant load of NCQ commands, there are no guarantees that requeueing the non-NCQ command will be executed later and it may be deferred again repeatedly as other submission queues can constantly issue NCQ commands from different CPUs ahead of the non-NCQ command. This can lead to very long delays for the execution of non-NCQ commands, and even complete starvation for these commands in the worst case scenario. Since the block layer and the SCSI layer do not distinguish between queueable (NCQ) and non queueable (non-NCQ) commands, libata-scsi SAT implementation must ensure forward progress for non-NCQ commands in the presence of NCQ command traffic. This is similar to what SAS HBAs with a hardware/firmware based SAT implementation do. Implement such forward progress guarantee by limiting requeueing of non-NCQ commands from ata_scsi_qc_issue(): when a non-NCQ command is received and NCQ commands are in-flight, do not force a requeue of the non-NCQ command by returning SCSI_MLQUEUE_XXX_BUSY and instead return 0 to indicate that the command was accepted but hold on to the qc using the new deferred_qc field of struct ata_port. This deferred qc will be issued using the work item deferred_qc_work running the function ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work() once all in-flight commands complete, which is checked with the port qc_defer() callback return value indicating that no further delay is necessary. This check is done using the helper function ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() which is called from ata_scsi_qc_complete(). This thus excludes this mechanism from all internal non-NCQ commands issued by ATA EH. When a port deferred_qc is non NULL, that is, the port has a command waiting for the device queue to drain, the issuing of all incoming commands (both NCQ and non-NCQ) is deferred using the regular busy mechanism. This simplifies the code and also avoids potential denial of service problems if a user issues too many non-NCQ commands. Finally, whenever ata EH is scheduled, regardless of the reason, a deferred qc is always requeued so that it can be retried once EH completes. This is done by calling the function ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc() from ata_eh_set_pending(). This avoids the need for any special processing for the deferred qc in case of NCQ error, link or device reset, or device timeout. Reported-by: Xingui Yang Reported-by: Igor Pylypiv Fixes: bdb01301f3ea ("scsi: Add host and host template flag 'host_tagset'") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen Reviewed-by: John Garry Tested-by: Igor Pylypiv Tested-by: Xingui Yang Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin