kernel/linux.git/drivers/acpi, branch v4.19.77

ACPI / PCI: fix acpi_pci_irq_enable() memory leak

2019-10-05T11:09:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 29b49958cf73b439b17fa29e9a25210809a6c01c ] In acpi_pci_irq_enable(), 'entry' is allocated by kzalloc() in acpi_pci_irq_check_entry() (invoked from acpi_pci_irq_lookup()). However, it is not deallocated if acpi_pci_irq_valid() returns false, leading to a memory leak. To fix this issue, free 'entry' before returning 0. Fixes: e237a5518425 ("x86/ACPI/PCI: Recognize that Interrupt Line 255 means "not connected"") Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI: custom_method: fix memory leaks

2019-10-05T11:09:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 03d1571d9513369c17e6848476763ebbd10ec2cb ] In cm_write(), 'buf' is allocated through kzalloc(). In the following execution, if an error occurs, 'buf' is not deallocated, leading to memory leaks. To fix this issue, free 'buf' before returning the error. Fixes: 526b4af47f44 ("ACPI: Split out custom_method functionality into an own driver") Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI / CPPC: do not require the _PSD method

2019-10-05T11:09:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4c4cdc4c63853fee48c02e25c8605fb65a6c9924 ] According to the ACPI 6.3 specification, the _PSD method is optional when using CPPC. The underlying assumption is that each CPU can change frequency independently from all other CPUs; _PSD is provided to tell the OS that some processors can NOT do that. However, the acpi_get_psd() function returns ENODEV if there is no _PSD method present, or an ACPI error status if an error occurs when evaluating _PSD, if present. This makes _PSD mandatory when using CPPC, in violation of the specification, and only on Linux. This has forced some firmware writers to provide a dummy _PSD, even though it is irrelevant, but only because Linux requires it; other OSPMs follow the spec. We really do not want to have OS specific ACPI tables, though. So, correct acpi_get_psd() so that it does not return an error if there is no _PSD method present, but does return a failure when the method can not be executed properly. This allows _PSD to be optional as it should be. Signed-off-by: Al Stone Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI / processor: don't print errors for processorIDs == 0xff

2019-10-05T11:09:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2c2b005f549544c13ef4cfb0e4842949066889bc ] Some platforms define their processors in this manner: Device (SCK0) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0004" /* Module Device */) // _HID: Hardware ID Name (_UID, "CPUSCK0") // _UID: Unique ID Processor (CP00, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP01, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP02, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP03, 0x06, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP04, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP05, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP06, 0x05, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP07, 0x07, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP08, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP09, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0A, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} Processor (CP0B, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){} ... The processors marked as 0xff are invalid, there are only 8 of them in this case. So do not print an error on ids == 0xff, just print an info message. Actually, we could return ENODEV even on the first CPU with ID 0xff, but ACPI spec does not forbid the 0xff value to be a processor ID. Given 0xff could be a correct one, we would break working systems if we returned ENODEV. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI: video: Add new hw_changes_brightness quirk, set it on PB Easynote MZ35

2019-10-01T06:26:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4f7f96453b462b3de0fa18d18fe983960bb5ee7f ] Some machines change the brightness themselves when a brightness hotkey gets pressed, despite us telling them not to. This causes the brightness to go two steps up / down when the hotkey is pressed. This is esp. a problem on older machines with only a few brightness levels. This commit adds a new hw_changes_brightness quirk which makes acpi_video_device_notify() only call backlight_force_update(..., BACKLIGHT_UPDATE_HOTKEY) and not do anything else, notifying userspace that the brightness was changed and leaving it at that fixing the dual step problem. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204077 Reported-by: Kacper Piwiński Tested-by: Kacper Piwiński Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI/IORT: Fix off-by-one check in iort_dev_find_its_id()

2019-08-16T08:12:48+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5a46d3f71d5e5a9f82eabc682f996f1281705ac7 ] Static analysis identified that index comparison against ITS entries in iort_dev_find_its_id() is off by one. Update the comparison condition and clarify the resulting error message. Fixes: 4bf2efd26d76 ("ACPI: Add new IORT functions to support MSI domain handling") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190613065410.GB16334@mwanda/ Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Dan Carpenter Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Hanjun Guo Cc: Sudeep Holla Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Robin Murphy Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI: blacklist: fix clang warning for unused DMI table

2019-08-06T17:06:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit b80d6a42bdc97bdb6139107d6034222e9843c6e2 ] When CONFIG_DMI is disabled, we only have a tentative declaration, which causes a warning from clang: drivers/acpi/blacklist.c:20:35: error: tentative array definition assumed to have one element [-Werror] static const struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initconst; As the variable is not actually used here, hide it entirely in an #ifdef to shut up the warning. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPICA: Clear status of GPEs on first direct enable

2019-07-26T07:14:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 44758bafa53602f2581a6857bb20b55d4d8ad5b2 ] ACPI GPEs (other than the EC one) can be enabled in two situations. First, the GPEs with existing _Lxx and _Exx methods are enabled implicitly by ACPICA during system initialization. Second, the GPEs without these methods (like GPEs listed by _PRW objects for wakeup devices) need to be enabled directly by the code that is going to use them (e.g. ACPI power management or device drivers). In the former case, if the status of a given GPE is set to start with, its handler method (either _Lxx or _Exx) needs to be invoked to take care of the events (possibly) signaled before the GPE was enabled. In the latter case, however, the first caller of acpi_enable_gpe() for a given GPE should not be expected to care about any events that might be signaled through it earlier. In that case, it is better to clear the status of the GPE before enabling it, to prevent stale events from triggering unwanted actions (like spurious system resume, for example). For this reason, modify acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference() to take an additional boolean argument indicating whether or not the GPE status needs to be cleared when its reference counter changes from zero to one and make acpi_enable_gpe() pass TRUE to it through that new argument. Fixes: 18996f2db918 ("ACPICA: Events: Stop unconditionally clearing ACPI IRQs during suspend/resume") Reported-by: Furquan Shaikh Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh Tested-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI/PCI: PM: Add missing wakeup.flags.valid checks

2019-06-22T06:15:17+00:00

[ Upstream commit 9a51c6b1f9e0239a9435db036b212498a2a3b75c ] Both acpi_pci_need_resume() and acpi_dev_needs_resume() check if the current ACPI wakeup configuration of the device matches what is expected as far as system wakeup from sleep states is concerned, as reflected by the device_may_wakeup() return value for the device. However, they only should do that if wakeup.flags.valid is set for the device's ACPI companion, because otherwise the wakeup.prepare_count value for it is meaningless. Add the missing wakeup.flags.valid checks to these functions. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

pstore: Convert buf_lock to semaphore

2019-06-11T10:20:52+00:00

commit ea84b580b95521644429cc6748b6c2bf27c8b0f3 upstream. Instead of running with interrupts disabled, use a semaphore. This should make it easier for backends that may need to sleep (e.g. EFI) when performing a write: |BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched/completion.c:99 |in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 2236, name: sig-xstate-bum |Preemption disabled at: |[] pstore_dump+0x72/0x330 |CPU: 26 PID: 2236 Comm: sig-xstate-bum Tainted: G D 4.20.0-rc3 #45 |Call Trace: | dump_stack+0x4f/0x6a | ___might_sleep.cold.91+0xd3/0xe4 | __might_sleep+0x50/0x90 | wait_for_completion+0x32/0x130 | virt_efi_query_variable_info+0x14e/0x160 | efi_query_variable_store+0x51/0x1a0 | efivar_entry_set_safe+0xa3/0x1b0 | efi_pstore_write+0x109/0x140 | pstore_dump+0x11c/0x330 | kmsg_dump+0xa4/0xd0 | oops_exit+0x22/0x30 ... Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Fixes: 21b3ddd39fee ("efi: Don't use spinlocks for efi vars") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman