<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/linux.git/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/setup.h, branch v7.1</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v7.1</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v7.1'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2026-04-05T00:42:44+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>riscv: increase COMMAND_LINE_SIZE value to 2048</title>
<updated>2026-04-05T00:42:44+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Austin Kim</name>
<email>austin.kim@lge.com</email>
</author>
<published>2026-04-04T01:28:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=580e626dd0304b4cafb2a5d21c6f0401b44f0ffb'/>
<id>urn:sha1:580e626dd0304b4cafb2a5d21c6f0401b44f0ffb</id>
<content type='text'>
SoC people may send many parameters to configure the drivers via kernel
command line. If COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is not enough, they may go through
unexpected error.

To avoid the potential pain, we had better increase COMMAND_LINE_SIZE.

Signed-off-by: Austin Kim &lt;austin.kim@lge.com&gt;
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aW3gFmOlA/Z4kmfJ@adminpc-PowerEdge-R7525
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley &lt;pjw@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>riscv: Bump COMMAND_LINE_SIZE value to 1024</title>
<updated>2023-03-02T02:35:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Alexandre Ghiti</name>
<email>alex@ghiti.fr</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-16T19:34:20+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=61fc1ee8be26bc192d691932b0a67eabee45d12f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:61fc1ee8be26bc192d691932b0a67eabee45d12f</id>
<content type='text'>
Increase COMMAND_LINE_SIZE as the current default value is too low
for syzbot kernel command line.

There has been considerable discussion on this patch that has led to a
larger patch set removing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from the uapi headers on all
ports.  That's not quite done yet, but it's gotten far enough we're
confident this is not a uABI change so this is safe.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov &lt;dvyukov@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti &lt;alex@ghiti.fr&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316193420.904-1-alex@ghiti.fr
[Palmer: it's not uabi]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/874b8076-b0d1-4aaa-bcd8-05d523060152@app.fastmail.com/#t
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt &lt;palmer@rivosinc.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
