kernel/linux.git/arch/riscv/include/asm, branch v6.1.174

riscv: Replace function-like macro by static inline function

2026-02-11T12:37:27+00:00

commit 121f34341d396b666d8a90b24768b40e08ca0d61 upstream. The flush_icache_range() function is implemented as a "function-like macro with unused parameters", which can result in "unused variables" warnings. Replace the macro with a static inline function, as advised by Documentation/process/coding-style.rst. Fixes: 08f051eda33b ("RISC-V: Flush I$ when making a dirty page executable") Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250419111402.1660267-1-bjorn@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Ron Economos Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

riscv: compat: fix COMPAT_UTS_MACHINE definition

2026-02-06T15:44:17+00:00

commit 0ea05c4f7527a98f5946f96c829733788934311d upstream. The COMPAT_UTS_MACHINE for riscv was incorrectly defined as "riscv". Change it to "riscv32" to reflect the correct 32-bit compat name. Fixes: 06d0e3723647 ("riscv: compat: Add basic compat data type implementation") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Han Gao Reviewed-by: Guo Ren (Alibaba Damo Academy) Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260127190711.2264664-1-gaohan@iscas.ac.cn Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

RISC-V: Define pgprot_dmacoherent() for non-coherent devices

2025-10-29T13:04:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit ca525d53f994d45c8140968b571372c45f555ac1 ] The pgprot_dmacoherent() is used when allocating memory for non-coherent devices and by default pgprot_dmacoherent() is same as pgprot_noncached() unless architecture overrides it. Currently, there is no pgprot_dmacoherent() definition for RISC-V hence non-coherent device memory is being mapped as IO thereby making CPU access to such memory slow. Define pgprot_dmacoherent() to be same as pgprot_writecombine() for RISC-V so that CPU access non-coherent device memory as NOCACHE which is better than accessing it as IO. Fixes: ff689fd21cb1 ("riscv: add RISC-V Svpbmt extension support") Signed-off-by: Anup Patel Tested-by: Han Gao Tested-by: Guo Ren (Alibaba DAMO Academy) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250820152316.1012757-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

riscv: mm: Fix the out of bound issue of vmemmap address

2025-05-22T12:10:09+00:00

commit f754f27e98f88428aaf6be6e00f5cbce97f62d4b upstream. In sparse vmemmap model, the virtual address of vmemmap is calculated as: ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - (phys_ram_base >> PAGE_SHIFT)). And the struct page's va can be calculated with an offset: (vmemmap + (pfn)). However, when initializing struct pages, kernel actually starts from the first page from the same section that phys_ram_base belongs to. If the first page's physical address is not (phys_ram_base >> PAGE_SHIFT), then we get an va below VMEMMAP_START when calculating va for it's struct page. For example, if phys_ram_base starts from 0x82000000 with pfn 0x82000, the first page in the same section is actually pfn 0x80000. During init_unavailable_range(), we will initialize struct page for pfn 0x80000 with virtual address ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - 0x2000), which is below VMEMMAP_START as well as PCI_IO_END. This commit fixes this bug by introducing a new variable 'vmemmap_start_pfn' which is aligned with memory section size and using it to calculate vmemmap address instead of phys_ram_base. Fixes: a11dd49dcb93 ("riscv: Sparse-Memory/vmemmap out-of-bounds fix") Signed-off-by: Xu Lu Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti Tested-by: Björn Töpel Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241209122617.53341-1-luxu.kernel@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Li Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

riscv: Avoid fortify warning in syscall_get_arguments()

2025-04-25T08:43:54+00:00

commit adf53771a3123df99ca26e38818760fbcf5c05d0 upstream. When building with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y and W=1, there is a warning because of the memcpy() in syscall_get_arguments(): In file included from include/linux/string.h:392, from include/linux/bitmap.h:13, from include/linux/cpumask.h:12, from arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h:55, from include/linux/sched.h:13, from kernel/ptrace.c:13: In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk', inlined from 'syscall_get_arguments.isra' at arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h:66:2: include/linux/fortify-string.h:580:25: error: call to '__read_overflow2_field' declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning] 580 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors The fortified memcpy() routine enforces that the source is not overread and the destination is not overwritten if the size of either field and the size of the copy are known at compile time. The memcpy() in syscall_get_arguments() intentionally overreads from a1 to a5 in 'struct pt_regs' but this is bigger than the size of a1. Normally, this could be solved by wrapping a1 through a5 with struct_group() but there was already a struct_group() applied to these members in commit bba547810c66 ("riscv: tracing: Fix __write_overflow_field in ftrace_partial_regs()"). Just avoid memcpy() altogether and write the copying of args from regs manually, which clears up the warning at the expense of three extra lines of code. Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin Fixes: e2c0cdfba7f6 ("RISC-V: User-facing API") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250409-riscv-avoid-fortify-warning-syscall_get_arguments-v1-1-7853436d4755@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

riscv: KGDB: Do not inline arch_kgdb_breakpoint()

2025-04-25T08:43:51+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3af4bec9c1db3f003be4d5ae09b6a737e4be1612 ] The arch_kgdb_breakpoint() function defines the kgdb_compiled_break symbol using inline assembly. There's a potential issue where the compiler might inline arch_kgdb_breakpoint(), which would then define the kgdb_compiled_break symbol multiple times, leading to fail to link vmlinux.o. This isn't merely a potential compilation problem. The intent here is to determine the global symbol address of kgdb_compiled_break, and if this function is inlined multiple times, it would logically be a grave error. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4b4187c1-77e5-44b7-885f-d6826723dd9a@sifive.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5b0adf9b-2b22-43fe-ab74-68df94115b9a@ghiti.fr/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/23693e7f-4fff-40f3-a437-e06d827278a5@ghiti.fr/ Fixes: fe89bd2be866 ("riscv: Add KGDB support") Co-developed-by: Huacai Chen Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen Signed-off-by: WangYuli Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/F22359AFB6FF9FD8+20250411073222.56820-1-wangyuli@uniontech.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

riscv: ftrace: Add parentheses in macro definitions of make_call_t0 and make_call_ra

2025-04-10T12:33:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5f1a58ed91a040d4625d854f9bb3dd4995919202 ] This patch adds parentheses to parameters caller and callee of macros make_call_t0 and make_call_ra. Every existing invocation of these two macros uses a single variable for each argument, so the absence of the parentheses seems okay. However, future invocations might use more complex expressions as arguments. For example, a future invocation might look like this: make_call_t0(a - b, c, call). Without parentheses in the macro definition, the macro invocation expands to: ... unsigned int offset = (unsigned long) c - (unsigned long) a - b; ... which is clearly wrong. The use of parentheses ensures arguments are correctly evaluated and potentially saves future users of make_call_t0 and make_call_ra debugging trouble. Fixes: 6724a76cff85 ("riscv: ftrace: Reduce the detour code size to half") Signed-off-by: Juhan Jin Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_AE90AA59903A628E87E9F80E563DA5BA5508@qq.com Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

riscv/futex: sign extend compare value in atomic cmpxchg

2025-03-07T15:56:50+00:00

commit 599c44cd21f4967774e0acf58f734009be4aea9a upstream. Make sure the compare value in the lr/sc loop is sign extended to match what lr.w does. Fortunately, due to the compiler keeping the register contents sign extended anyway the lack of the explicit extension didn't result in wrong code so far, but this cannot be relied upon. Fixes: b90edb33010b ("RISC-V: Add futex support.") Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/mvmfrkv2vhz.fsf@suse.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: remove kern_addr_valid() completely

2024-11-08T15:26:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit e025ab842ec35225b1a8e163d1f311beb9e38ce9 ] Most architectures (except arm64/x86/sparc) simply return 1 for kern_addr_valid(), which is only used in read_kcore(), and it calls copy_from_kernel_nofault() which could check whether the address is a valid kernel address. So as there is no need for kern_addr_valid(), let's remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221018074014.185687-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [m68k] Acked-by: Heiko Carstens [s390] Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: Helge Deller [parisc] Acked-by: Michael Ellerman [powerpc] Acked-by: Guo Ren [csky] Acked-by: Catalin Marinas [arm64] Cc: Alexander Gordeev Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Anton Ivanov Cc: Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Christophe Leroy Cc: Chris Zankel Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: David S. Miller Cc: Dinh Nguyen Cc: Greg Ungerer Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Huacai Chen Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: James Bottomley Cc: Johannes Berg Cc: Jonas Bonn Cc: Matt Turner Cc: Max Filippov Cc: Michal Simek Cc: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Paul Walmsley Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Richard Henderson Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Rich Felker Cc: Russell King Cc: Stafford Horne Cc: Stefan Kristiansson Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Vineet Gupta Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Xuerui Wang Cc: Yoshinori Sato Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Stable-dep-of: 3d5854d75e31 ("fs/proc/kcore.c: allow translation of physical memory addresses") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

RISC-V: Don't have MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS exceed phys_addr_t

2024-10-17T13:22:15+00:00

[ Upstream commit ad380f6a0a5e82e794b45bb2eaec24ed51a56846 ] I recently ended up with a warning on some compilers along the lines of CC kernel/resource.o In file included from include/linux/ioport.h:16, from kernel/resource.c:15: kernel/resource.c: In function 'gfr_start': include/linux/minmax.h:49:37: error: conversion from 'long long unsigned int' to 'resource_size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from '17179869183' to '4294967295' [-Werror=overflow] 49 | ({ type ux = (x); type uy = (y); __cmp(op, ux, uy); }) | ^ include/linux/minmax.h:52:9: note: in expansion of macro '__cmp_once_unique' 52 | __cmp_once_unique(op, type, x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(x_), __UNIQUE_ID(y_)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/minmax.h:161:27: note: in expansion of macro '__cmp_once' 161 | #define min_t(type, x, y) __cmp_once(min, type, x, y) | ^~~~~~~~~~ kernel/resource.c:1829:23: note: in expansion of macro 'min_t' 1829 | end = min_t(resource_size_t, base->end, | ^~~~~ kernel/resource.c: In function 'gfr_continue': include/linux/minmax.h:49:37: error: conversion from 'long long unsigned int' to 'resource_size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from '17179869183' to '4294967295' [-Werror=overflow] 49 | ({ type ux = (x); type uy = (y); __cmp(op, ux, uy); }) | ^ include/linux/minmax.h:52:9: note: in expansion of macro '__cmp_once_unique' 52 | __cmp_once_unique(op, type, x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(x_), __UNIQUE_ID(y_)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/minmax.h:161:27: note: in expansion of macro '__cmp_once' 161 | #define min_t(type, x, y) __cmp_once(min, type, x, y) | ^~~~~~~~~~ kernel/resource.c:1847:24: note: in expansion of macro 'min_t' 1847 | addr <= min_t(resource_size_t, base->end, | ^~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors which looks like a real problem: our phys_addr_t is only 32 bits now, so having 34-bit masks is just going to result in overflows. Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240731162159.9235-2-palmer@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin