kernel/linux.git/arch/powerpc/boot/dts, branch v6.6.141

powerpc: dts: add missing space before {

2023-08-24T22:39:30+00:00

Add missing whitespace between node name/label and opening {. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230705145743.292855-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org

powerpc: dts: turris1x.dts: Fix PCIe MEM size for pci2 node

2023-07-03T06:26:51+00:00

Freescale PCIe controllers on their PCIe Root Ports do not have any mappable PCI BAR allocate from PCIe MEM. Information about 1MB window on BAR0 of PCIe Root Port was misleading because Freescale PCIe controllers have at BAR0 position different register PEXCSRBAR, and kernel correctly skipts BAR0 for these Freescale PCIe Root Ports. So update comment about P2020 PCIe Root Port and decrease PCIe MEM size required for PCIe controller (pci2 node) on which is on-board xHCI controller. lspci confirms that on P2020 PCIe Root Port is no PCI BAR and /proc/iomem sees that only c0000000-c000ffff and c0010000-c0011fff ranges are used. Fixes: 54c15ec3b738 ("powerpc: dts: Add DTS file for CZ.NIC Turris 1.x routers") Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230505172818.18416-1-pali@kernel.org

powerpc: drop MPC85xx_CDS platform support

2023-06-21T04:08:53+00:00

The MPC8541/8548/8555 Configurable Development System (CDS) were the vehicle used to provide evaluation of the 1st e500-v2 CPUs around 2007. Similar to the earlier MPC83xx-MDS systems we removed, the "brains" exist on a PCI-X card, but additional connectors exist to the right of the PCI-X slot, two structural metal pins are used to provide stability in a vertical ATX mounting, and the CPU is now on a daughter-card vs. a clamped down BGA. Given the extra complexity and risk of connector damage, the 8548CDS I had access to came pre-assembled in a basic white Antec case common for that era, and I'm inclined to assume that was the default. Power was typical "Pentium4" 2005 ATX - the main 20 pin connector went to the PCI ATX form factor backplane, and the 4 pin black/yellow went to the CPU card. Like previous evaluation boards, they attempted to provide break-out connectors for as many features as possible, and that made for a fairly complex looking system. In any case, these are over 15 years old, and fairly complex systems, originally made for a small group of industry related people, and made for use where quiet fan operation wasn't important. Given that, it makes sense to remove support from them in 2023. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230620043300.197546-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

powerpc: drop MPC8540_ADS and MPC8560_ADS platform support

2023-06-21T04:08:53+00:00

Based on the revision history in the manual(s), these e500-v1 platforms were first available around 2002. Like a lot of evaluation boards, they attempted to provide break-out connectors for all possible features, and that combined with four PCI-X slots (and the age/era) meant for a considerably large board. As I recall it, from a Linux point of view, the biggest difference between 8540 and 8560 was in the UART implementation, and that is reflected in a diff of the defconfigs. In any case, these are over 20 years old, and by today's standards only have a small amount of DDR1 memory, and were not widely available. Given that, it makes sense to remove support from them in 2023. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230620043300.197546-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

powerpc: drop PowerQUICC II Family ADS platform support

2023-04-20T03:21:48+00:00

Based on documentation revision dates, this MPC82xx pq2fads system predates the MPC8272-ADS variant by about a year and only has 1/2 the amount of RAM (32MB) -- largely making it useless with a modern v6.x kernel from today. Similar to the MPC8272-ADS the pq2fads also supported other 82xx CPU variants, had 8MB flash, and like the 8272 ADS platform, was on a fairly large PCB in order to have space for breakout connectors for all features. These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for a small group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEM board designs. Given that, it makes sense to remove support today. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

powerpc: drop MPC8272_ADS platform support

2023-04-20T03:21:48+00:00

The MPC8272-ADS also supported other 82xx CPU variants, had 64MB RAM, 8MB flash, and like the 85xx ADS platforms, was on a fairly large PCB in order to have space for breakout connectors for all the features. These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for a small group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEM board designs. Given that, it makes sense to remove support today. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

powerpc: drop HPCD/MPC8610 evaluation platform support

2023-04-20T03:21:47+00:00

This evaluation platform was essentially a single core 8641 with integrated graphics/display support - in an effort to reduce chip count on kiosk and similar applications. Compared to other evaluation platforms considered for removal in other recent commits, this platform was relatively rare. Unlike all the other 10+ platforms, I couldn't find any documentation on it - just a link to downloading the 2007 era BSP in "LTIB" format as was done back then. With all that in mind, it seems prudent to remove it here in 2023. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker [mpe: Drop stale reference to MPC8610_HPCD in 86xx/Kconfig] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230225201318.3682-4-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

powerpc: drop HPC-NET/MPC8641D evaluation platform support

2023-04-20T03:21:47+00:00

There is no denying that this was an interesting platform in its day. Access to a SMP powerpc platform became a bit more obtainable for folks in the BSP industry in the 2007 era, thanks to this platform. Add to that the move to the black Antec case vs. the generic white 2005 era case of the MPC8548CDS or the retro 1950s 1/2 height horizontal case of the HPC II, and it was pretty interesting to people like myself then. However, like all the other evaluation platforms, the overall system was complex out of necessity, as it tried to showcase all possible features and use-cases. That included an AMP option, where you could run two bootloaders and two kernels over two serial consoles. Peripheral sharing got a bit more tricky when you got to the hard disk and similar. In any case we still have the same circumstance. A relatively rare and expensive evaluation platform that is now 15+ years old and not out there in large numbers in the general public. Removal in 2023 just makes sense. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230225201318.3682-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

powerpc: drop HPC II (MPC7448) evaluation platform support.

2023-04-20T03:21:47+00:00

This was an interesting platform - it was the 1st instance of a respin of earlier 130nm 74xx CPUs on 90nm and systems using MPC7448 were positioned as a rack server platform solution. Given that, the evaluation platform (at least the one I had) was shipped in a horizontal 1/2 height Antec desktop case with retro styling and colours, despite the fact the docs explicitly stated that the HPC II is not a desktop machine (noting it had no gfx or legacy PC I/O support). Historic trivia aside, this was the 1st introduction of the e600 procfam as an evolution from the earlier G4. However even with the claim to being "1st e600" it seems the 2005+ era was turning its attention to multicore support and from my memory this poor guy was quickly overshadowed by the dual core MPC8641D. All that aside, we are once again looking at 15+ year old evaluation platforms that were not widely distributed, so 2023 removal makes sense. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230225201318.3682-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com

powerpc: drop MPC832x_MDS platform support

2023-04-20T03:21:47+00:00

This final variant in the e300 family of Modular Development System (MDS) in this series was actually aimed at feature reduction - things like floating point and ethernet were removed in order to make for a lower power and lower cost system. Like all the MDS systems, it was meant as a vehicle to get the CPU out early to hardware OEMs so software and board development could take place in parallel. These were made in limited numbers and availability preference was given to partners who were planning to make their own boards. Given that the whole reason for existence was to assist in enabling new board designs [not happening for 10+ years], and that they weren't generally available, and that the hardware wasn't really hobbyist friendly even for retro computing, it makes sense to retire the support for this particular platform. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Acked-by: Li Yang [mpe: Drop stale reference to MPC832x_MDS in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://msgid.link/20230220115913.25811-5-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com