kernel/linux.git/Documentation/process/index.rst, branch v6.6.131

Merge tag 'docs-6.4' of git://git.lwn.net/linux

2023-04-24T19:35:49+00:00

Pull documentation updates from Jonathan Corbet: "Commit volume in documentation is relatively low this time, but there is still a fair amount going on, including: - Reorganize the architecture-specific documentation under Documentation/arch This makes the structure match the source directory and helps to clean up the mess that is the top-level Documentation directory a bit. This work creates the new directory and moves x86 and most of the less-active architectures there. The current plan is to move the rest of the architectures in 6.5, with the patches going through the appropriate subsystem trees. - Some more Spanish translations and maintenance of the Italian translation - A new "Kernel contribution maturity model" document from Ted - A new tutorial on quickly building a trimmed kernel from Thorsten Plus the usual set of updates and fixes" * tag 'docs-6.4' of git://git.lwn.net/linux: (47 commits) media: Adjust column width for pdfdocs media: Fix building pdfdocs docs: clk: add documentation to log which clocks have been disabled docs: trace: Fix typo in ftrace.rst Documentation/process: always CC responsible lists docs: kmemleak: adjust to config renaming ELF: document some de-facto PT_* ABI quirks Documentation: arm: remove stih415/stih416 related entries docs: turn off "smart quotes" in the HTML build Documentation: firmware: Clarify firmware path usage docs/mm: Physical Memory: Fix grammar Documentation: Add document for false sharing dma-api-howto: typo fix docs: move m68k architecture documentation under Documentation/arch/ docs: move parisc documentation under Documentation/arch/ docs: move ia64 architecture docs under Documentation/arch/ docs: Move arc architecture docs under Documentation/arch/ docs: move nios2 documentation under Documentation/arch/ docs: move openrisc documentation under Documentation/arch/ docs: move superh documentation under Documentation/arch/ ...

Documentation/process: Add Linux Kernel Contribution Maturity Model

2023-03-14T18:22:59+00:00

As a follow-up to a discussion at the 2021 Maintainer's Summit on the topic of maintainer recruitment and retention, the TAB took on the task of creating a document which to help companies and other organizations to grow in their ability to engage with the Linux Kernel development community, using the Maturity Model[2] framework. The goal is to encourage, in a management-friendly way, companies to allow their engineers to contribute with the upstream Linux Kernel development community, so we can grow the "talent pipeline" for contributors to become respected leaders, and eventually kernel maintainers. [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/870581/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maturity_model Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Co-developed-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Co-developed-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) Acked-by: Dave Hansen Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308190403.2157046-1-tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

Documentation/security-bugs: move from admin-guide/ to process/

2023-03-12T14:56:43+00:00

Jiri Kosina, Jonathan Corbet, and Willy Tarreau all expressed a desire to move this document under process/. Create a new section for security issues in the index and group it with embargoed-hardware-issues. I'm doing this at the start of the series to make all the subsequent changes show up in 'git blame'. Existing references were updated using: git grep -l security-bugs ':!Documentation/translations/' | xargs sed -i 's|admin-guide/security-bugs|process/security-bugs|g' git grep -l security-bugs Documentation/translations/ | xargs sed -i 's|Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs|Documentation/process/security-bugs|g' git grep -l security-bugs Documentation/translations/ | xargs sed -i '/Original:/s|\.\./admin-guide/security-bugs|\.\./process/security-bugs|g' Notably, the page is not moved in the translations (due to my lack of knowledge of these languages), but the translations have been updated to point to the new location of the original document where these references exist. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nycvar.YFH.7.76.2206062326230.10851@cbobk.fhfr.pm/ Suggested-by: Jiri Kosina Cc: Alex Shi Cc: Yanteng Si Cc: Hu Haowen Cc: Federico Vaga Cc: Tsugikazu Shibata Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Jeimi Lee Cc: Carlos Bilbao Cc: Akira Yokosawa Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum Acked-by: Carlos Bilbao Reviewed-by: Yanteng Si Reviewed-by: Akira Yokosawa Acked-by: Federico Vaga Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230305220010.20895-2-vegard.nossum@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

docs: promote the title of process/index.rst

2022-09-29T18:55:05+00:00

...otherwise Sphinx won't cooperate when trying to list it explicitly in the top-level index.rst file Reviewed-by: David Vernet Acked-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220927160559.97154-2-corbet@lwn.net Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

docs: process: remove outdated submitting-drivers.rst

2022-07-14T21:03:57+00:00

Commit 31b24bee3357 ("docs: add a warning to submitting-drivers.rst") in October 2016 already warns "This (...) should maybe just be deleted, but I'm not quite ready to do that yet". Maybe, six years ago, we were not ready but let us remove old content for the better now and structure and maintain less content in the kernel documentation with a better result. Drop this already outdated document and adjust all textual references. Here is an argument why deleting the content will not remove any useful information to the existing kernel documentation, individually broken down for each section. Section "Allocating Device Numbers" refers to https://www.lanana.org/, and then refers to Documentation/admin-guide/devices.rst. However, the devices.rst clearly states: "The version of this document at lanana.org is no longer maintained." Everything needed for submitting drivers is already stated in devices.rst and the reference to https://www.lanana.org/ is outdated, and should be just deleted. Section "Who To Submit Drivers To" is all about Linux 2.0 - 2.6, before the new release version scheme; the mentioned developers are still around, but actually not the first developers to contact anymore. Section "What Criteria Determine Acceptance" has a few bullet points: Licensing and Copyright is well-covered in process/kernel-license.rst. Interfaces, Code, Portability, Clarity state some obvious things about ensuring kernel code quality. Control suggests to add a MAINTAINERS entry, which is already mentioned in 6.Followthrough.rst: "... added yourself to the MAINTAINERS file..." PM support states a bit about implementing and testing power management of a driver, it remains an open question where to place that in the process documents. Driver developers interested in power management will find the corresponding part on power management in the kernel documentation anyway. In section "What Criteria Do Not Determine Acceptance", the points Vendor and Author states something basic consequence of the kernel being an open-source community software development. Probably no need to mention it nowadays. Section "Resources" lists resources that are also mentioned elsewhere more central. - Linux kernel tree and mailing list is mentioned in many places. - https://lwn.net/Kernel/LDD3/ is mentioned in Documentation/process/kernel-docs.rst. - https://lwn.net/ is mentioned in: - Documentation/process/8.Conclusion.rst - Documentation/process/kernel-docs.rst - https://kernelnewbies.org/ is mentioned in: - Documentation/process/8.Conclusion.rst - Documentation/process/kernel-docs.rst - http://www.linux-usb.org/ is mentioned in Documentation/driver-api/usb/usb.rst - https://landley.net/kdocs/ols/2002/ols2002-pages-545-555.pdf is mentioned in Documentation/process/kernel-docs.rst - https://kernelnewbies.org/KernelJanitors is mentioned in Documentation/process/howto.rst - https://git-scm.com/ is mentioned in - Documentation/process/2.Process.rst - Documentation/process/7.AdvancedTopics.rst - Documentation/process/howto.rst Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704122537.3407-7-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

Documentation/process: Add Researcher Guidelines

2022-03-09T23:19:23+00:00

As a follow-up to the UMN incident[1], the TAB took the responsibility to document Researcher Guidelines so there would be a common place to point for describing our expectations as a developer community. Document best practices researchers should follow to participate successfully with the Linux developer community. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202105051005.49BFABCE@keescook/ Co-developed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Co-developed-by: Jonathan Corbet Co-developed-by: Stefano Zacchiroli Signed-off-by: Stefano Zacchiroli Co-developed-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Acked-by: Steve Rostedt Acked-by: Laura Abbott Reviewed-by: Julia Lawall Reviewed-by: Wenwen Wang Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304181418.1692016-1-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

docs: add two documents about regression handling

2022-02-24T19:57:25+00:00

Create two documents explaining various aspects around regression handling and tracking; one is aimed at users, the other targets developers. The texts among others describes the first rule of Linux kernel development and what it means in practice. They also explain what a regression actually is and how to report one properly. Both texts additionally provide a brief introduction to the bot the kernel's regression tracker uses to facilitate the work, but mention the use is optional. To sum things up, provide a few quotes from Linus in the document for developers to show how serious we take regressions. Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/34e56d3588f22d7e0b4d635ef9c9c3b33ca4ac04.1644994117.git.linux@leemhuis.info Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

Documentation/process: Add maintainer handbooks section

2021-09-14T20:46:49+00:00

General rules for patch submission, coding style and related details are available, but most subsystems have their subsystem-specific extra rules which differ or go beyond the common rules. Mark suggested to add a subsystem/maintainer handbook section, where subsystem maintainers can explain their specific quirks. Add the section and link to it from the submitting-patches document. [ bp: Add a SPDX identifier. ] Suggested-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107171149.074948887@linutronix.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913153942.15251-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

docs: process/index.rst: Fix reference to nonexistent document

2020-07-23T20:26:12+00:00

Fix the following warning: WARNING: toctree contains reference to nonexistent document 'process/unaligned-memory-access' The path to the document was wrong. Signed-off-by: Daniel W. S. Almeida Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200718165107.625847-5-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

docs: sysctl/kernel: document unaligned controls

2020-05-26T00:59:59+00:00

This documents ignore-unaligned-usertrap, unaligned-dump-stack, and unaligned-trap, based on arch/arc/kernel/unaligned.c, arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c, and arch/parisc/kernel/unaligned.c. While we're at it, integrate unaligned-memory-access.txt into the docs tree. Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515212443.5012-1-steve@sk2.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet