kernel/linux.git, branch v6.1.110

Linux 6.1.110

2024-09-12T09:10:30+00:00

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240910092557.876094467@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Florian Fainelli Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso Tested-by: Mark Brown Tested-by: Shuah Khan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911130536.697107864@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Florian Fainelli Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Tested-by: Mark Brown Tested-by: Ron Economos Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Tested-by: Jon Hunter Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: add feature flag for expire-only

2024-09-12T09:10:30+00:00

commit 5cadfbd5a11e5495cac217534c5f788168b1afd7 upstream. Add an init flag idicating whether the FUSE_EXPIRE_ONLY flag of FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_ENTRY is effective. This is needed for backports of this feature, otherwise the server could just check the protocol version. Fixes: 4f8d37020e1f ("fuse: add "expire only" mode to FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_ENTRY") Cc: # v6.2 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

regulator: of: fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check in of_regulator_bulk_get_all()

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

commit c957387c402a1a213102e38f92b800d7909a728d upstream. The regulator_get() function never returns NULL. It returns error pointers. Fixes: 27b9ecc7a9ba ("regulator: Add of_regulator_bulk_get_all") Signed-off-by: Peng Wu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221122082242.82937-1-wupeng58@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

commit 9972605a238339b85bd16b084eed5f18414d22db upstream. Commit 73f576c04b94 ("mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs") decoupled the memcg IDs from the CSS ID space to fix the cgroup creation failures. It introduced IDR to maintain the memcg ID space. The IDR depends on external synchronization mechanisms for modifications. For the mem_cgroup_idr, the idr_alloc() and idr_replace() happen within css callback and thus are protected through cgroup_mutex from concurrent modifications. However idr_remove() for mem_cgroup_idr was not protected against concurrency and can be run concurrently for different memcgs when they hit their refcnt to zero. Fix that. We have been seeing list_lru based kernel crashes at a low frequency in our fleet for a long time. These crashes were in different part of list_lru code including list_lru_add(), list_lru_del() and reparenting code. Upon further inspection, it looked like for a given object (dentry and inode), the super_block's list_lru didn't have list_lru_one for the memcg of that object. The initial suspicions were either the object is not allocated through kmem_cache_alloc_lru() or somehow memcg_list_lru_alloc() failed to allocate list_lru_one() for a memcg but returned success. No evidence were found for these cases. Looking more deeply, we started seeing situations where valid memcg's id is not present in mem_cgroup_idr and in some cases multiple valid memcgs have same id and mem_cgroup_idr is pointing to one of them. So, the most reasonable explanation is that these situations can happen due to race between multiple idr_remove() calls or race between idr_alloc()/idr_replace() and idr_remove(). These races are causing multiple memcgs to acquire the same ID and then offlining of one of them would cleanup list_lrus on the system for all of them. Later access from other memcgs to the list_lru cause crashes due to missing list_lru_one. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240802235822.1830976-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev Fixes: 73f576c04b94 ("mm: memcontrol: fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs") Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt Acked-by: Muchun Song Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [ Adapted over commit 6f0df8e16eb5 ("memcontrol: ensure memcg acquired by id is properly set up") not in the tree ] Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Silence a warning in btf_type_id_size()

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

commit e6c2f594ed961273479505b42040782820190305 upstream. syzbot reported a warning in [1] with the following stacktrace: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5005 at kernel/bpf/btf.c:1988 btf_type_id_size+0x2d9/0x9d0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:1988 ... RIP: 0010:btf_type_id_size+0x2d9/0x9d0 kernel/bpf/btf.c:1988 ... Call Trace: map_check_btf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1024 [inline] map_create+0x1157/0x1860 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1198 __sys_bpf+0x127f/0x5420 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5040 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5162 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5160 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x79/0xc0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5160 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd With the following btf [1] DECL_TAG 'a' type_id=4 component_idx=-1 [2] PTR '(anon)' type_id=0 [3] TYPE_TAG 'a' type_id=2 [4] VAR 'a' type_id=3, linkage=static and when the bpf_attr.btf_key_type_id = 1 (DECL_TAG), the following WARN_ON_ONCE in btf_type_id_size() is triggered: if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!btf_type_is_modifier(size_type) && !btf_type_is_var(size_type))) return NULL; Note that 'return NULL' is the correct behavior as we don't want a DECL_TAG type to be used as a btf_{key,value}_type_id even for the case like 'DECL_TAG -> STRUCT'. So there is no correctness issue here, we just want to silence warning. To silence the warning, I added DECL_TAG as one of kinds in btf_type_nosize() which will cause btf_type_id_size() returning NULL earlier without the warning. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000e0df8d05fc75ba86@google.com/ Reported-by: syzbot+958967f249155967d42a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530205029.264910-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Diogo Jahchan Koike Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

commit cd9253c23aedd61eb5ff11f37a36247cd46faf86 upstream. If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a race where we can end up either: 1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode's lock, triggering an assertion failures when assertions are enabled; 2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed. The race happens like this: 1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT; 2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example; 3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes, while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor. 4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread doing fsyncs; 5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the file's private to an on stack allocated private with the member 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true; 6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there's a private structure associated to the file which has 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true, so it skips locking the inode's VFS lock; 7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file's private to NULL since it had no prior private and our private was stack allocated. Then it unlocks the inode's VFS lock; 8) Task B enters btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging(), then the assertion that checks the inode's VFS lock is held fails, since task B never locked it and task A has already unlocked it. The stack trace produced is the following: assertion failed: inode_is_locked(&inode->vfs_inode), in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 9 PID: 5072 Comm: worker Tainted: G U OE 6.10.5-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 69f48d427608e1c09e60ea24c6c55e2ca1b049e8 Hardware name: Acer Predator PH315-52/Covini_CFS, BIOS V1.12 07/28/2020 RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs] Code: 50 d6 86 c0 e8 (...) RSP: 0018:ffff9e4a03dcfc78 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff9078a9868e98 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff907dce4a7800 RDI: ffff907dce4a7800 RBP: ffff907805518800 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff9e4a03dcfb38 R10: ffff9e4a03dcfb30 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff907684ae7800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff90774646b600 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f04b96006c0(0000) GS:ffff907dce480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f32acbfc000 CR3: 00000001fd4fa005 CR4: 00000000003726f0 Call Trace: ? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x24 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] btrfs_sync_file+0x21a/0x4d0 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? __seccomp_filter+0x31d/0x4f0 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160 ? do_futex+0xcb/0x190 ? __x64_sys_futex+0x10e/0x1d0 ? switch_fpu_return+0x4f/0xd0 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Another problem here is if task B grabs the private pointer and then uses it after task A has finished, since the private was allocated in the stack of task A, it results in some invalid memory access with a hard to predict result. This issue, triggering the assertion, was observed with QEMU workloads by two users in the Link tags below. Fix this by not relying on a file's private to pass information to fsync that it should skip locking the inode and instead pass this information through a special value stored in current->journal_info. This is safe because in the relevant section of the direct IO write path we are not holding a transaction handle, so current->journal_info is NULL. The following C program triggers the issue: $ cat repro.c /* Get the O_DIRECT definition. */ #ifndef _GNU_SOURCE #define _GNU_SOURCE #endif #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include static int fd; static ssize_t do_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count, off_t offset) { while (count > 0) { ssize_t ret; ret = pwrite(fd, buf, count, offset); if (ret < 0) { if (errno == EINTR) continue; return ret; } count -= ret; buf += ret; } return 0; } static void *fsync_loop(void *arg) { while (1) { int ret; ret = fsync(fd); if (ret != 0) { perror("Fsync failed"); exit(6); } } } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { long pagesize; void *write_buf; pthread_t fsyncer; int ret; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Use: %s \n", argv[0]); return 1; } fd = open(argv[1], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_DIRECT, 0666); if (fd == -1) { perror("Failed to open/create file"); return 1; } pagesize = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); if (pagesize == -1) { perror("Failed to get page size"); return 2; } ret = posix_memalign(&write_buf, pagesize, pagesize); if (ret) { perror("Failed to allocate buffer"); return 3; } ret = pthread_create(&fsyncer, NULL, fsync_loop, NULL); if (ret != 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Failed to create writer thread: %d\n", ret); return 4; } while (1) { ret = do_write(fd, write_buf, pagesize, 0); if (ret != 0) { perror("Write failed"); exit(5); } } return 0; } $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi $ mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi $ timeout 10 ./repro /mnt/sdi/foo Usually the race is triggered within less than 1 second. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Reported-by: Paulo Dias Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219187 Reported-by: Andreas Jahn Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219199 Reported-by: syzbot+4704b3cc972bd76024f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000044ff540620d7dee2@google.com/ Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/mm: Fix PTI for i386 some more

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

commit c48b5a4cf3125adb679e28ef093f66ff81368d05 upstream. So it turns out that we have to do two passes of pti_clone_entry_text(), once before initcalls, such that device and late initcalls can use user-mode-helper / modprobe and once after free_initmem() / mark_readonly(). Now obviously mark_readonly() can cause PMD splits, and pti_clone_pgtable() doesn't like that much. Allow the late clone to split PMDs so that pagetables stay in sync. [peterz: Changelog and comments] Reported-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240806184843.GX37996@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ublk_drv: fix NULL pointer dereference in ublk_ctrl_start_recovery()

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit e58f5142f88320a5b1449f96a146f2f24615c5c7 ] When two UBLK_CMD_START_USER_RECOVERY commands are submitted, the first one sets 'ubq->ubq_daemon' to NULL, and the second one triggers WARN in ublk_queue_reinit() and subsequently a NULL pointer dereference issue. Fix it by adding the check in ublk_ctrl_start_recovery() and return immediately in case of zero 'ub->nr_queues_ready'. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028 RIP: 0010:ublk_ctrl_start_recovery.constprop.0+0x82/0x180 Call Trace: ? __die+0x20/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x75/0x170 ? exc_page_fault+0x64/0x140 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? ublk_ctrl_start_recovery.constprop.0+0x82/0x180 ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd+0x4f7/0x6c0 ? pick_next_task_idle+0x26/0x40 io_uring_cmd+0x9a/0x1b0 io_issue_sqe+0x193/0x3f0 io_wq_submit_work+0x9b/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x165/0x360 io_wq_worker+0xcb/0x2f0 ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x203/0x290 ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x203/0x290 ? __pfx_io_wq_worker+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? __pfx_io_wq_worker+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Fixes: c732a852b419 ("ublk_drv: add START_USER_RECOVERY and END_USER_RECOVERY support") Reported-and-tested-by: Changhui Zhong Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGVVp+UvLiS+bhNXV-h2icwX1dyybbYHeQUuH7RYqUvMQf6N3w@mail.gmail.com Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Signed-off-by: Li Nan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904031348.4139545-1-ming.lei@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

gpio: modepin: Enable module autoloading

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit a5135526426df5319d5f4bcd15ae57c45a97714b ] Add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(), so modules could be properly autoloaded based on the alias from of_device_id table. Fixes: 7687a5b0ee93 ("gpio: modepin: Add driver support for modepin GPIO controller") Signed-off-by: Liao Chen Reviewed-by: Michal Simek Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240902115848.904227-1-liaochen4@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

gpio: rockchip: fix OF node leak in probe()

2024-09-12T09:10:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit adad2e460e505a556f5ea6f0dc16fe95e62d5d76 ] Driver code is leaking OF node reference from of_get_parent() in probe(). Fixes: 936ee2675eee ("gpio/rockchip: add driver for rockchip gpio") Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826150832.65657-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin