kernel/linux.git, branch v4.4.72

Linux 4.4.72

2017-06-14T11:43:38+00:00

arm64: ensure extension of smp_store_release value

2017-06-14T11:16:27+00:00

commit 994870bead4ab19087a79492400a5478e2906196 upstream. When an inline assembly operand's type is narrower than the register it is allocated to, the least significant bits of the register (up to the operand type's width) are valid, and any other bits are permitted to contain any arbitrary value. This aligns with the AAPCS64 parameter passing rules. Our __smp_store_release() implementation does not account for this, and implicitly assumes that operands have been zero-extended to the width of the type being stored to. Thus, we may store unknown values to memory when the value type is narrower than the pointer type (e.g. when storing a char to a long). This patch fixes the issue by casting the value operand to the same width as the pointer operand in all cases, which ensures that the value is zero-extended as we expect. We use the same union trickery as __smp_load_acquire and {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() to avoid GCC complaining that pointers are potentially cast to narrower width integers in unreachable paths. A whitespace issue at the top of __smp_store_release() is also corrected. No changes are necessary for __smp_load_acquire(). Load instructions implicitly clear any upper bits of the register, and the compiler will only consider the least significant bits of the register as valid regardless. Fixes: 47933ad41a86 ("arch: Introduce smp_load_acquire(), smp_store_release()") Fixes: 878a84d5a8a1 ("arm64: add missing data types in smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release") Cc: # 3.14.x- Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: armv8_deprecated: ensure extension of addr

2017-06-14T11:16:27+00:00

commit 55de49f9aa17b0b2b144dd2af587177b9aadf429 upstream. Our compat swp emulation holds the compat user address in an unsigned int, which it passes to __user_swpX_asm(). When a 32-bit value is passed in a register, the upper 32 bits of the register are unknown, and we must extend the value to 64 bits before we can use it as a base address. This patch casts the address to unsigned long to ensure it has been suitably extended, avoiding the potential issue, and silencing a related warning from clang. Fixes: bd35a4adc413 ("arm64: Port SWP/SWPB emulation support from arm") Cc: # 3.19.x- Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

usercopy: Adjust tests to deal with SMAP/PAN

2017-06-14T11:16:27+00:00

commit f5f893c57e37ca730808cb2eee3820abd05e7507 upstream. Under SMAP/PAN/etc, we cannot write directly to userspace memory, so this rearranges the test bytes to get written through copy_to_user(). Additionally drops the bad copy_from_user() test that would trigger a memcpy() against userspace on failure. [arnd: the test module was added in 3.14, and this backported patch should apply cleanly on all version from 3.14 to 4.10. The original patch was in 4.11 on top of a context change I saw the bug triggered with kselftest on a 4.4.y stable kernel] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

RDMA/qib,hfi1: Fix MR reference count leak on write with immediate

2017-06-14T11:16:27+00:00

commit 1feb40067cf04ae48d65f728d62ca255c9449178 upstream. The handling of IB_RDMA_WRITE_ONLY_WITH_IMMEDIATE will leak a memory reference when a buffer cannot be allocated for returning the immediate data. The issue is that the rkey validation has already occurred and the RNR nak fails to release the reference that was fruitlessly gotten. The the peer will send the identical single packet request when its RNR timer pops. The fix is to release the held reference prior to the rnr nak exit. This is the only sequence the requires both rkey validation and the buffer allocation on the same packet. Cc: Stable # 4.7+ Tested-by: Tadeusz Struk Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: entry: improve data abort handling of tagged pointers

2017-06-14T11:16:27+00:00

commit 276e93279a630657fff4b086ba14c95955912dfa upstream. This backport has a minor difference from the upstream commit: it adds the asm-uaccess.h file, which is not present in 4.4, because 4.4 does not have commit b4b8664d291a ("arm64: don't pull uaccess.h into *.S"). Original patch description: When handling a data abort from EL0, we currently zero the top byte of the faulting address, as we assume the address is a TTBR0 address, which may contain a non-zero address tag. However, the address may be a TTBR1 address, in which case we should not zero the top byte. This patch fixes that. The effect is that the full TTBR1 address is passed to the task's signal handler (or printed out in the kernel log). When handling a data abort from EL1, we leave the faulting address intact, as we assume it's either a TTBR1 address or a TTBR0 address with tag 0x00. This is true as far as I'm aware, we don't seem to access a tagged TTBR0 address anywhere in the kernel. Regardless, it's easy to forget about address tags, and code added in the future may not always remember to remove tags from addresses before accessing them. So add tag handling to the EL1 data abort handler as well. This also makes it consistent with the EL0 data abort handler. Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0") Reviewed-by: Dave Martin Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

arm64: hw_breakpoint: fix watchpoint matching for tagged pointers

2017-06-14T11:16:27+00:00

commit 7dcd9dd8cebe9fa626af7e2358d03a37041a70fb upstream. This backport has a few small differences from the upstream commit: - The address tag is removed in watchpoint_handler() instead of get_distance_from_watchpoint(), because 4.4 does not have commit fdfeff0f9e3d ("arm64: hw_breakpoint: Handle inexact watchpoint addresses"). - A macro is backported (untagged_addr), as it is not present in 4.4. Original patch description: When we take a watchpoint exception, the address that triggered the watchpoint is found in FAR_EL1. We compare it to the address of each configured watchpoint to see which one was hit. The configured watchpoint addresses are untagged, while the address in FAR_EL1 will have an address tag if the data access was done using a tagged address. The tag needs to be removed to compare the address to the watchpoints. Currently we don't remove it, and as a result can report the wrong watchpoint as being hit (specifically, always either the highest TTBR0 watchpoint or lowest TTBR1 watchpoint). This patch removes the tag. Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0") Acked-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Make __xfs_xattr_put_listen preperly report errors.

2017-06-14T11:16:27+00:00

commit 791cc43b36eb1f88166c8505900cad1b43c7fe1a upstream. Commit 2a6fba6 "xfs: only return -errno or success from attr ->put_listent" changes the returnvalue of __xfs_xattr_put_listen to 0 in case when there is insufficient space in the buffer assuming that setting context->count to -1 would be enough, but all of the ->put_listent callers only check seen_enough. This results in a failed assertion: XFS: Assertion failed: context->count >= 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_xattr.c, line: 175 in insufficient buffer size case. This is only reproducible with at least 2 xattrs and only when the buffer gets depleted before the last one. Furthermore if buffersize is such that it is enough to hold the last xattr's name, but not enough to hold the sum of preceeding xattr names listxattr won't fail with ERANGE, but will suceed returning last xattr's name without the first character. The first character end's up overwriting data stored at (context->alist - 1). Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Cc: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

NFSv4: Don't perform cached access checks before we've OPENed the file

2017-06-14T11:16:26+00:00

commit 762674f86d0328d5dc923c966e209e1ee59663f2 upstream. Donald Buczek reports that a nfs4 client incorrectly denies execute access based on outdated file mode (missing 'x' bit). After the mode on the server is 'fixed' (chmod +x) further execution attempts continue to fail, because the nfs ACCESS call updates the access parameter but not the mode parameter or the mode in the inode. The root cause is ultimately that the VFS is calling may_open() before the NFS client has a chance to OPEN the file and hence revalidate the access and attribute caches. Al Viro suggests: >>> Make nfs_permission() relax the checks when it sees MAY_OPEN, if you know >>> that things will be caught by server anyway? >> >> That can work as long as we're guaranteed that everything that calls >> inode_permission() with MAY_OPEN on a regular file will also follow up >> with a vfs_open() or dentry_open() on success. Is this always the >> case? > > 1) in do_tmpfile(), followed by do_dentry_open() (not reachable by NFS since > it doesn't have ->tmpfile() instance anyway) > > 2) in atomic_open(), after the call of ->atomic_open() has succeeded. > > 3) in do_last(), followed on success by vfs_open() > > That's all. All calls of inode_permission() that get MAY_OPEN come from > may_open(), and there's no other callers of that puppy. Reported-by: Donald Buczek Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109771 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1451046656-26319-1-git-send-email-buczek@molgen.mpg.de Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

NFS: Ensure we revalidate attributes before using execute_ok()

2017-06-14T11:16:26+00:00

commit 5c5fc09a1157a11dbe84e6421c3e0b37d05238cb upstream. Donald Buczek reports that NFS clients can also report incorrect results for access() due to lack of revalidation of attributes before calling execute_ok(). Looking closely, it seems chdir() is afflicted with the same problem. Fix is to ensure we call nfs_revalidate_inode_rcu() or nfs_revalidate_inode() as appropriate before deciding to trust execute_ok(). Reported-by: Donald Buczek Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1451331530-3748-1-git-send-email-buczek@molgen.mpg.de Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman