From 30b795df11a1a9dd7fc50c1ff4677343b67cb379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Stern Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:33:52 -0700 Subject: tools/memory-model: Improve mixed-access checking in lock.cat The code in lock.cat which checks for normal read/write accesses to spinlock variables doesn't take into account the newly added RL and RU events. Add them into the test, and move the resulting code up near the start of the file, since a violation would indicate a pretty severe conceptual error in a litmus test. Tested-by: Andrea Parri Signed-off-by: Alan Stern Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Akira Yokosawa Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Boqun Feng Cc: David Howells Cc: Jade Alglave Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luc Maranget Cc: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: parri.andrea@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526340837-12222-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- tools/memory-model/lock.cat | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/memory-model') diff --git a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat index df74de2148f6..7217cd4941a4 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat +++ b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat @@ -32,6 +32,17 @@ include "cross.cat" * LKW, LF, RL, and RU have no ordering properties. *) +(* Backward compatibility *) +let RL = try RL with emptyset +let RU = try RU with emptyset + +(* Treat RL as a kind of LF: a read with no ordering properties *) +let LF = LF | RL + +(* There should be no ordinary R or W accesses to spinlocks *) +let ALL-LOCKS = LKR | LKW | UL | LF | RU +flag ~empty [M \ IW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as mixed-lock-accesses + (* Link Lock-Reads to their RMW-partner Lock-Writes *) let lk-rmw = ([LKR] ; po-loc ; [LKW]) \ (po ; po) let rmw = rmw | lk-rmw @@ -49,20 +60,9 @@ flag ~empty LKW \ range(lk-rmw) as unpaired-LKW (* This will be allowed if we implement spin_is_locked() *) flag ~empty LKR \ domain(lk-rmw) as unpaired-LKR -(* There should be no ordinary R or W accesses to spinlocks *) -let ALL-LOCKS = LKR | LKW | UL | LF -flag ~empty [M \ IW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as mixed-lock-accesses - (* The final value of a spinlock should not be tested *) flag ~empty [FW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as lock-final -(* Backward compatibility *) -let RL = try RL with emptyset -let RU = try RU with emptyset - -(* Treat RL as a kind of LF: a read with no ordering properties *) -let LF = LF | RL - (* * Put lock operations in their appropriate classes, but leave UL out of W * until after the co relation has been generated. -- cgit v1.2.3