From 89d0cf01c0aa9e8241cc3703a359ecd6abf3c28a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:05:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] invert irq/migration.c brach prediction
If you get to that point in the code it means that desc->move_irq is set,
pending_irq_cpumask[irq] and cpu_online_map should have a value. Still
pretty good chance anding those two you'll still have a value. So these
two branch predictors should be inverted.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---
kernel/irq/migration.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(limited to 'kernel/irq')
diff --git a/kernel/irq/migration.c b/kernel/irq/migration.c
index 134f9f2e0e39..a12d00eb5e7c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/migration.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/migration.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void move_native_irq(int irq)
desc->move_irq = 0;
- if (likely(cpus_empty(pending_irq_cpumask[irq])))
+ if (unlikely(cpus_empty(pending_irq_cpumask[irq])))
return;
if (!desc->handler->set_affinity)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ void move_native_irq(int irq)
* cause some ioapics to mal-function.
* Being paranoid i guess!
*/
- if (unlikely(!cpus_empty(tmp))) {
+ if (likely(!cpus_empty(tmp))) {
if (likely(!(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED)))
desc->handler->disable(irq);
--
cgit v1.2.3