BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git - Intel OpenBMC Linux kernel source tree (mirror)

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2018-05-15	samples: bpf: include bpf/bpf.h instead of local libbpf.h	Jakub Kicinski	1	-1/+1
	There are two files in the tree called libbpf.h which is becoming problematic. Most samples don't actually need the local libbpf.h they simply include it to get to bpf/bpf.h. Include bpf/bpf.h directly instead. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-03-28	samples/bpf: raw tracepoint test	Alexei Starovoitov	1	-0/+12
	add empty raw_tracepoint bpf program to test overhead similar to kprobe and traditional tracepoint tests Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2016-04-08	samples/bpf: add tracepoint vs kprobe performance tests	Alexei Starovoitov	1	-0/+162
	the first microbenchmark does fd=open("/proc/self/comm"); for() { write(fd, "test"); } and on 4 cpus in parallel: writes per sec base (no tracepoints, no kprobes) 930k with kprobe at __set_task_comm() 420k with tracepoint at task:task_rename 730k For kprobe + full bpf program manully fetches oldcomm, newcomm via bpf_probe_read. For tracepint bpf program does nothing, since arguments are copied by tracepoint. 2nd microbenchmark does: fd=open("/dev/urandom"); for() { read(fd, buf); } and on 4 cpus in parallel: reads per sec base (no tracepoints, no kprobes) 300k with kprobe at urandom_read() 279k with tracepoint at random:urandom_read 290k bpf progs attached to kprobe and tracepoint are noop. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>