summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/fwnode.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-11-29ACPI: Add FWNODE_ACPI_STATIC fwnode typeLorenzo Pieralisi1-1/+2
On systems booting with a device tree, every struct device is associated with a struct device_node, that provides its DT firmware representation. The device node can be used in generic kernel contexts (eg IRQ translation, IOMMU streamid mapping), to retrieve the properties associated with the device and carry out kernel operations accordingly. Owing to the 1:1 relationship between the device and its device_node, the device_node can also be used as a look-up token for the device (eg looking up a device through its device_node), to retrieve the device in kernel paths where the device_node is available. On systems booting with ACPI, the same abstraction provided by the device_node is required to provide look-up functionality. The struct acpi_device, that represents firmware objects in the ACPI namespace already includes a struct fwnode_handle of type FWNODE_ACPI as their member; the same abstraction is missing though for devices that are instantiated out of static ACPI tables entries (eg ARM SMMU devices). Add a new fwnode_handle type to associate devices created out of static ACPI table entries to the respective firmware components and create a simple ACPI core layer interface to dynamically allocate and free the corresponding firmware nodes so that kernel subsystems can use it to instantiate the nodes and associate them with the respective devices. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-11-05Merge tag 'pm+acpi-4.4-rc1-1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull power management and ACPI updates from Rafael Wysocki: "Quite a new features are included this time. First off, the Collaborative Processor Performance Control interface (version 2) defined by ACPI will now be supported on ARM64 along with a cpufreq frontend for CPU performance scaling. Second, ACPI gets a new infrastructure for the early probing of IRQ chips and clock sources (along the lines of the existing similar mechanism for DT). Next, the ACPI core and the generic device properties API will now support a recently introduced hierarchical properties extension of the _DSD (Device Specific Data) ACPI device configuration object. If the ACPI platform firmware uses that extension to organize device properties in a hierarchical way, the kernel will automatically handle it and make those properties available to device drivers via the generic device properties API. It also will be possible to build the ACPICA's AML interpreter debugger into the kernel now and use that to diagnose AML-related problems more efficiently. In the future, this should make it possible to single-step AML execution and do similar things. Interesting stuff, although somewhat experimental at this point. Finally, the PM core gets a new mechanism that can be used by device drivers to distinguish between suspend-to-RAM (based on platform firmware support) and suspend-to-idle (or other variants of system suspend the platform firmware is not involved in) and possibly optimize their device suspend/resume handling accordingly. In addition to that, some existing features are re-organized quite substantially. First, the ACPI-based handling of PCI host bridges on x86 and ia64 is unified and the common code goes into the ACPI core (so as to reduce code duplication and eliminate non-essential differences between the two architectures in that area). Second, the Operating Performance Points (OPP) framework is reorganized to make the code easier to find and follow. Next, the cpufreq core's sysfs interface is reorganized to get rid of the "primary CPU" concept for configurations in which the same performance scaling settings are shared between multiple CPUs. Finally, some interfaces that aren't necessary any more are dropped from the generic power domains framework. On top of the above we have some minor extensions, cleanups and bug fixes in multiple places, as usual. Specifics: - ACPICA update to upstream revision 20150930 (Bob Moore, Lv Zheng). The most significant change is to allow the AML debugger to be built into the kernel. On top of that there is an update related to the NFIT table (the ACPI persistent memory interface) and a few fixes and cleanups. - ACPI CPPC2 (Collaborative Processor Performance Control v2) support along with a cpufreq frontend (Ashwin Chaugule). This can only be enabled on ARM64 at this point. - New ACPI infrastructure for the early probing of IRQ chips and clock sources (Marc Zyngier). - Support for a new hierarchical properties extension of the ACPI _DSD (Device Specific Data) device configuration object allowing the kernel to handle hierarchical properties (provided by the platform firmware this way) automatically and make them available to device drivers via the generic device properties interface (Rafael Wysocki). - Generic device properties API extension to obtain an index of certain string value in an array of strings, along the lines of of_property_match_string(), but working for all of the supported firmware node types, and support for the "dma-names" device property based on it (Mika Westerberg). - ACPI core fix to parse the MADT (Multiple APIC Description Table) entries in the order expected by platform firmware (and mandated by the specification) to avoid confusion on systems with more than 255 logical CPUs (Lukasz Anaczkowski). - Consolidation of the ACPI-based handling of PCI host bridges on x86 and ia64 (Jiang Liu). - ACPI core fixes to ensure that the correct IRQ number is used to represent the SCI (System Control Interrupt) in the cases when it has been re-mapped (Chen Yu). - New ACPI backlight quirk for Lenovo IdeaPad S405 (Hans de Goede). - ACPI EC driver fixes (Lv Zheng). - Assorted ACPI fixes and cleanups (Dan Carpenter, Insu Yun, Jiri Kosina, Rami Rosen, Rasmus Villemoes). - New mechanism in the PM core allowing drivers to check if the platform firmware is going to be involved in the upcoming system suspend or if it has been involved in the suspend the system is resuming from at the moment (Rafael Wysocki). This should allow drivers to optimize their suspend/resume handling in some cases and the changes include a couple of users of it (the i8042 input driver, PCI PM). - PCI PM fix to prevent runtime-suspended devices with PME enabled from being resumed during system suspend even if they aren't configured to wake up the system from sleep (Rafael Wysocki). - New mechanism to report the number of a wakeup IRQ that woke up the system from sleep last time (Alexandra Yates). - Removal of unused interfaces from the generic power domains framework and fixes related to latency measurements in that code (Ulf Hansson, Daniel Lezcano). - cpufreq core sysfs interface rework to make it handle CPUs that share performance scaling settings (represented by a common cpufreq policy object) more symmetrically (Viresh Kumar). This should help to simplify the CPU offline/online handling among other things. - cpufreq core fixes and cleanups (Viresh Kumar). - intel_pstate fixes related to the Turbo Activation Ratio (TAR) mechanism on client platforms which causes the turbo P-states range to vary depending on platform firmware settings (Srinivas Pandruvada). - intel_pstate sysfs interface fix (Prarit Bhargava). - Assorted cpufreq driver (imx, tegra20, powernv, integrator) fixes and cleanups (Bai Ping, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Shilpasri G Bhat, Luis de Bethencourt). - cpuidle mvebu driver cleanups (Russell King). - OPP (Operating Performance Points) framework code reorganization to make it more maintainable (Viresh Kumar). - Intel Broxton support for the RAPL (Running Average Power Limits) power capping driver (Amy Wiles). - Assorted power management code fixes and cleanups (Dan Carpenter, Geert Uytterhoeven, Geliang Tang, Luis de Bethencourt, Rasmus Villemoes)" * tag 'pm+acpi-4.4-rc1-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (108 commits) cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the first CPU in related_cpus cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories cpufreq: remove cpufreq_sysfs_{create|remove}_file() cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq at boot time cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() PM / Domains: Merge measurements for PM QoS device latencies PM / Domains: Don't measure ->start|stop() latency in system PM callbacks PM / clk: Fix broken build due to non-matching code and header #ifdefs ACPI / Documentation: add copy_dsdt to ACPI format options ACPI / sysfs: correctly check failing memory allocation ACPI / video: Add a quirk to force native backlight on Lenovo IdeaPad S405 ACPI / CPPC: Fix potential memory leak ACPI / CPPC: signedness bug in register_pcc_channel() ACPI / PAD: power_saving_thread() is not freezable ACPI / PM: Fix incorrect wakeup IRQ setting during suspend-to-idle ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events ACPI: Use correct IRQ when uninstalling ACPI interrupt handler cpuidle: mvebu: disable the bind/unbind attributes and use builtin_platform_driver cpuidle: mvebu: clean up multiple platform drivers ...
2015-10-13irqdomain: Add a fwnode_handle allocatorMarc Zyngier1-0/+1
In order to be able to reference an irqdomain from ACPI, we need to be able to create an identifier, which is usually a struct device_node. This device node does't really fit the ACPI infrastructure, so we cunningly allocate a new structure containing a fwnode_handle, and return that. This structure doesn't really point to a device (interrupt controllers are not "real" devices in Linux), but as we cannot really deny that they exist, we create them with a new fwnode_type (FWNODE_IRQCHIP). Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk> Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-9-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-09-15ACPI / property: Add support for data-only subnodesRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
In some cases, the information expressed via device properties is hierarchical by nature. For example, the properties of a composite device consisting of multiple semi-dependent components may need to be represented in the form of a tree of property data sets corresponding to specific components of the device. Unfortunately, using ACPI device objects for this purpose turns out to be problematic, mostly due to the assumption made by some operating systems (that platform firmware generally needs to work with) that each device object in the ACPI namespace represents a device requiring a separate driver. That assumption leads to complications which reportedly are impractically difficult to overcome and a different approach is needed for the sake of interoperability. The approach implemented here is based on extending _DSD via pointers (links) to additional ACPI objects returning data packages formatted in accordance with the _DSD formatting rules defined by Section 6.2.5 of ACPI 6. Those additional objects are referred to as data-only subnodes of the device object containing the _DSD pointing to them. The links to them need to be located in a separate section of the _DSD data package following UUID dbb8e3e6-5886-4ba6-8795-1319f52a966b referred to as the Hierarchical Data Extension UUID as defined in [1]. Each of them is represented by a package of two strings. The first string in that package (the key) is regarded as the name of the data-only subnode pointed to by the link. The second string in it (the target) is expected to hold the ACPI namespace path (possibly utilizing the usual ACPI namespace search rules) of an ACPI object evaluating to a data package extending the _DSD. The device properties initialization code follows those links, creates a struct acpi_data_node object for each of them to store the data returned by the ACPI object pointed to by it and processes those data recursively (which may lead to the creation of more struct acpi_data_node objects if the returned data package contains the Hierarchical Data Extension UUID section with more links in it). All of the struct acpi_data_node objects are present until the the ACPI device object containing the _DSD with links to them is deleted and they are deleted along with that object. [1]: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-hierarchical-data-extension-UUID-v1.pdf Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2015-04-04device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform dataRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT nor ACPI) is present for the given device. Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or an ACPI companion device object associated with it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-04device property: Make it possible to use secondary firmware nodesRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
Add a secondary pointer to struct fwnode_handle so as to make it possible for a device to have two firmware nodes associated with it at the same time, for example, an ACPI node and a node with a set of properties provided by platform initialization code. In the future that will allow device property lookup to fall back from the primary firmware node to the secondary one if the given property is not present there to make it easier to provide defaults for device properties used by device drivers. Introduce two helper routines, set_primary_fwnode() and set_secondary_fwnode() allowing callers to add a primary/secondary firmware node to the given device in such a way that (1) If there's only one firmware node for that device, it will be pointed to by the device's firmware node pointer. (2) If both the primary and secondary firmware nodes are present, the primary one will be pointed to by the device's firmware node pointer, while the secondary one will be pointed to by the primary node's secondary pointer. (3) If one of these nodes is removed (by calling one of the new nelpers with NULL as the second argument), the other one will be preserved. Make ACPI use set_primary_fwnode() for attaching its firmware nodes to devices. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-03-17driver core / ACPI: Represent ACPI companions using fwnode_handleRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+25
Now that we have struct fwnode_handle, we can use that to point to ACPI companions from struct device objects instead of pointing to struct acpi_device directly. There are two benefits from that. First, the somewhat ugly and hackish struct acpi_dev_node can be dropped and, second, the same struct fwnode_handle pointer can be used in the future to point to other (non-ACPI) firmware device node types. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>