summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-05-30treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 174Thomas Gleixner1-9/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 655 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070034.575739538@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-01-17dma-buf: Fix kerneldoc comment for struct dma_fence_arrayJonathan Corbet1-0/+1
The kerneldoc comment for struct dma_fence_array lacks a description of the "work" member, leading to this docs-build warning: ./include/linux/dma-fence-array.h:54: warning: Function parameter or member 'work' not described in 'dma_fence_array' Add a description and make the warning go away. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190116153436.3b244cda@lwn.net
2017-11-21dma-buf/fence: Fix lock inversion within dma-fence-arrayChris Wilson1-0/+3
Ages ago Rob Clark noted, "Currently with fence-array, we have a potential deadlock situation. If we fence_add_callback() on an array-fence, the array-fence's lock is acquired first, and in it's ->enable_signaling() callback, it will install cbs on it's array-member fences, so the array-member's lock is acquired second. But in the signal path, the array-member's lock is acquired first, and the array-fence's lock acquired second." Rob proposed either extensive changes to dma-fence to unnest the fence-array signaling, or to defer the signaling onto a workqueue. This is a more refined version of the later, that should keep the latency of the fence signaling to a minimum by using an irq-work, which is executed asap. Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> References: 1476635975-21981-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114162719.30958-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2017-03-17dma-fence: add dma_fence_match_context helperPhilipp Zabel1-0/+2
Add a helper to check if all fences in a fence array are from a given context. For convenience, the function can also handle being given a non-array fence. Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1489768492-25190-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de
2016-10-25dma-buf: Rename struct fence to dma_fenceChris Wilson1-0/+86
I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA operations to make room. A consensus was reached in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it remains a good thing! (v2...: rebase, rerun spatch) v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke. v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel coccinelle script: @@ @@ - struct fence + struct dma_fence @@ @@ - struct fence_ops + struct dma_fence_ops @@ @@ - struct fence_cb + struct dma_fence_cb @@ @@ - struct fence_array + struct dma_fence_array @@ @@ - enum fence_flag_bits + enum dma_fence_flag_bits @@ @@ ( - fence_init + dma_fence_init | - fence_release + dma_fence_release | - fence_free + dma_fence_free | - fence_get + dma_fence_get | - fence_get_rcu + dma_fence_get_rcu | - fence_put + dma_fence_put | - fence_signal + dma_fence_signal | - fence_signal_locked + dma_fence_signal_locked | - fence_default_wait + dma_fence_default_wait | - fence_add_callback + dma_fence_add_callback | - fence_remove_callback + dma_fence_remove_callback | - fence_enable_sw_signaling + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling | - fence_is_signaled_locked + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked | - fence_is_signaled + dma_fence_is_signaled | - fence_is_later + dma_fence_is_later | - fence_later + dma_fence_later | - fence_wait_timeout + dma_fence_wait_timeout | - fence_wait_any_timeout + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout | - fence_wait + dma_fence_wait | - fence_context_alloc + dma_fence_context_alloc | - fence_array_create + dma_fence_array_create | - to_fence_array + to_dma_fence_array | - fence_is_array + dma_fence_is_array | - trace_fence_emit + trace_dma_fence_emit | - FENCE_TRACE + DMA_FENCE_TRACE | - FENCE_WARN + DMA_FENCE_WARN | - FENCE_ERR + DMA_FENCE_ERR ) ( ... ) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk