| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length
correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than
a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a
linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation
is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct
to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the
range to trim.
While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating
what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual
ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free
space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is
trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data.
Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the
appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats
for calculations.
Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually
find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <=
lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the
largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest
extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we
don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move
one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use
a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless
of the fact we don't get an exact match on it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
|
|
When finding the longest extent in an AG, we read the value directly
out of the AGF buffer without endian conversion. This will give an
incorrect length, resulting in FITRIM operations potentially not
trimming everything that it should.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
|
|
In xfs_ioc_trim it is possible that computing the last allocation group
to discard might overflow for big start & len values, because the result
might be bigger then xfs_agnumber_t which is 32 bit long. Fix this by not
allowing the start and end block of the range to be beyond the end of the
file system.
Note that if the start is beyond the end of the file system we have to
return -EINVAL, but in the "end" case we have to truncate it to the fs
size.
Also introduce "end" variable, rather than using start+len which which
might be more confusing to get right as this bug shows.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
|
|
Use the move from Linux 2.6 to Linux 3.x as an excuse to kill the
annoying subdirectories in the XFS source code. Besides the large
amount of file rename the only changes are to the Makefile, a few
files including headers with the subdirectory prefix, and the binary
sysctl compat code that includes a header under fs/xfs/ from
kernel/.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
|
