summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ubifs/master.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2011-05-13UBIFS: introduce a separate structure for budgeting infoArtem Bityutskiy1-4/+4
This patch separates out all the budgeting-related information from 'struct ubifs_info' to 'struct ubifs_budg_info'. This way the code looks a bit cleaner. However, the main driver for this is that we want to save budgeting information and print it later, so a separate data structure for this is helpful. This patch is a preparation for the further debugging output improvements. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2010-09-19UBIFS: introduce new flags for RO mountsArtem Bityutskiy1-1/+1
Commit 2fde99cb55fb9d9b88180512a5e8a5d939d27fec "UBIFS: mark VFS SB RO too" introduced regression. This commit made UBIFS set the 'MS_RDONLY' flag in the VFS superblock when it switches to R/O mode due to an error. This was done to make VFS show the R/O UBIFS flag in /proc/mounts. However, several places in UBIFS relied on the 'MS_RDONLY' flag and assume this flag can only change when we re-mount. For example, 'ubifs_put_super()'. This patch introduces new UBIFS flag - 'c->ro_mount' which changes only when we re-mount, and preserves the way UBIFS was originally mounted (R/W or R/O). This allows us to de-initialize UBIFS cleanly in 'ubifs_put_super()'. This patch also changes all 'ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media)' assertions to 'ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media && !c->ro_mount)', because we never should write anything if the FS was mounter R/O. All the places where we test for 'MS_RDONLY' flag in the VFS SB were changed and now we test the 'c->ro_mount' flag instead, because it preserves the original UBIFS mount type, unlike the 'MS_RDONLY' flag. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2010-09-17UBIFS: introduce new flag for RO due to errorsArtem Bityutskiy1-1/+2
The R/O state may have various reasons: 1. The UBI volume is R/O 2. The FS is mounted R/O 3. The FS switched to R/O mode because of an error However, in UBIFS we have only one variable which represents cases 1 and 3 - 'c->ro_media'. Indeed, we set this to 1 if we switch to R/O mode due to an error, and then we test it in many places to make sure that we stop writing as soon as the error happens. But this is very unclean. One consequence of this, for example, is that in 'ubifs_remount_fs()' we use 'c->ro_media' to check whether we are in R/O mode because on an error, and we print a message in this case. However, if we are in R/O mode because the media is R/O, our message is bogus. This patch introduces new flag - 'c->ro_error' which is set when we switch to R/O mode because of an error. It also changes all "if (c->ro_media)" checks to "if (c->ro_error)" checks, because this is what the checks actually mean. We do not need to check for 'c->ro_media' because if the UBI volume is in R/O mode, we do not allow R/W mounting, and now writes can happen. This is guaranteed by VFS. But it is good to double-check this, so this patch also adds many "ubifs_assert(!c->ro_media)" checks. In the 'ubifs_remount_fs()' function this patch makes a bit more changes - it fixes the error messages as well. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2009-09-10UBIFS: check ubifs_scan error codes betterArtem Bityutskiy1-4/+12
The 'ubifs_scan()' function returns -EUCLEAN if something is corrupted and recovery is needed, otherwise it returns other error codes. However, in few places UBIFS does not check the error codes and runs recovery. This patch changes this behavior and makes UBIFS start recovery only on -EUCLEAN errors. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
2009-09-10UBIFS: do not print scary error messages needlesslyArtem Bityutskiy1-2/+2
At the moment UBIFS print large and scary error messages and flash dumps in case of nearly any corruption, even if it is a recoverable corruption. For example, if the master node is corrupted, ubifs_scan() prints error dumps, then UBIFS recovers just fine and goes on. This patch makes UBIFS print scary error messages only in real cases, which are not recoverable. It adds 'quiet' argument to the 'ubifs_scan()' function, so the caller may ask 'ubi_scan()' not to print error messages if the caller is able to do recovery. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
2009-01-29UBIFS: return sensible error codesArtem Bityutskiy1-1/+1
When mounting/re-mounting, UBIFS returns EINVAL even if the ENOSPC or EROFS codes are are much better, just because we have not found references to ENOSPC/EROFS in mount (2) man pages. This patch changes this behaviour and makes UBIFS return real error code, because: 1. It is just less confusing and more logical 2. mount is not described in SuSv3, so it seems to be not really well-standartized 3. we do not cover all cases, and any random undocumented in man pages error code may be returned anyway Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
2008-07-15UBIFS: add new flash file systemArtem Bityutskiy1-0/+387
This is a new flash file system. See http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>