summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/crypto/policy.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-07-22fscrypt: use smp_load_acquire() for ->i_crypt_infoEric Biggers1-2/+2
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also involves initializing a static or global variable, for example. fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto. So by using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal implementation details of these other kernel subsystems. Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead. (Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.) Fixes: e37a784d8b6a ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-21fscrypt: restrict IV_INO_LBLK_* to AES-256-XTSEric Biggers1-0/+14
IV_INO_LBLK_* exist only because of hardware limitations, and currently the only known use case for them involves AES-256-XTS. Therefore, for now only allow them in combination with AES-256-XTS. This way we don't have to worry about them being combined with other encryption modes. (To be clear, combining IV_INO_LBLK_* with other encryption modes *should* work just fine. It's just not being tested, so we can't be 100% sure it works. So with no known use case, it's best to disallow it for now, just like we don't allow other weird combinations like AES-256-XTS contents encryption with Adiantum filenames encryption.) This can be relaxed later if a use case for other combinations arises. Fixes: b103fb7653ff ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies") Fixes: e3b1078bedd3 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721181012.39308-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-21fscrypt: rename FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZEEric Biggers1-1/+1
The name "FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE" is a bit outdated since due to the addition of FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY, the file nonce may now be used as a tweak instead of for key derivation. Also, we're now prefixing the fscrypt constants with "FSCRYPT_" instead of "FS_". Therefore, rename this constant to FSCRYPT_FILE_NONCE_SIZE. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708215722.147154-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-19fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policiesEric Biggers1-14/+37
The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not applicable, but an encryption format which uses one key per policy and permits the moving of encrypted file contents (as f2fs's garbage collector requires) is still desirable. To support such hardware, add a new encryption format IV_INO_LBLK_32 that makes the best use of the 32 bits: the IV is set to 'SipHash-2-4(inode_number) + file_logical_block_number mod 2^32', where the SipHash key is derived from the fscrypt master key. We hash only the inode number and not also the block number, because we need to maintain contiguity of DUNs to merge bios. Unlike with IV_INO_LBLK_64, with this format IV reuse is possible; this is unavoidable given the size of the DUN. This means this format should only be used where the requirements of the first paragraph apply. However, the hash spreads out the IVs in the whole usable range, and the use of a keyed hash makes it difficult for an attacker to determine which files use which IVs. Besides the above differences, this flag works like IV_INO_LBLK_64 in that on ext4 it is only allowed if the stable_inodes feature has been enabled to prevent inode numbers and the filesystem UUID from changing. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515204141.251098-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-19fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by defaultEric Biggers1-1/+1
Since v1 encryption policies are deprecated, make test_dummy_encryption test v2 policies by default. Note that this causes ext4/023 and ext4/028 to start failing due to known bugs in those tests (see previous commit). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-19fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2Eric Biggers1-0/+125
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2. Therefore, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies. To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2. To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy fscrypt_context rather than using mount flags. To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow test_dummy_encryption to be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.) Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the fscrypt_context from 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-13fscrypt: fix all kerneldoc warningsEric Biggers1-4/+15
Fix all kerneldoc warnings in fs/crypto/ and include/linux/fscrypt.h. Most of these were due to missing documentation for function parameters. Detected with: scripts/kernel-doc -v -none fs/crypto/*.{c,h} include/linux/fscrypt.h This cleanup makes it possible to check new patches for kerneldoc warnings without having to filter out all the existing ones. For consistency, also adjust some function "brief descriptions" to include the parentheses and to wrap at 80 characters. (The latter matches the checkpatch expectation.) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-03-20fscrypt: add FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE ioctlEric Biggers1-1/+20
Add an ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE which retrieves the nonce from an encrypted file or directory. The nonce is the 16-byte random value stored in the inode's encryption xattr. It is normally used together with the master key to derive the inode's actual encryption key. The nonces are needed by automated tests that verify the correctness of the ciphertext on-disk. Except for the IV_INO_LBLK_64 case, there's no way to replicate a file's ciphertext without knowing that file's nonce. The nonces aren't secret, and the existing ciphertext verification tests in xfstests retrieve them from disk using debugfs or dump.f2fs. But in environments that lack these debugging tools, getting the nonces by manually parsing the filesystem structure would be very hard. To make this important type of testing much easier, let's just add an ioctl that retrieves the nonce. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200314205052.93294-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-01-23fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefoldingDaniel Rosenberg1-0/+7
Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy, it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However, v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys. Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy. Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com> [EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: move fscrypt_valid_enc_modes() to policy.cEric Biggers1-0/+17
fscrypt_valid_enc_modes() is only used by policy.c, so move it to there. Also adjust the order of the checks to be more natural, matching the numerical order of the constants and also keeping AES-256 (the recommended default) first in the list. No change in behavior. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: check for appropriate use of DIRECT_KEY flag earlierEric Biggers1-0/+30
FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY is currently only allowed with Adiantum encryption. But FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY allowed it in combination with other encryption modes, and an error wasn't reported until later when the encrypted directory was actually used. Fix it to report the error earlier by validating the correct use of the DIRECT_KEY flag in fscrypt_supported_policy(), similar to how we validate the IV_INO_LBLK_64 flag. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-12-31fscrypt: split up fscrypt_supported_policy() by policy versionEric Biggers1-57/+59
Make fscrypt_supported_policy() call new functions fscrypt_supported_v1_policy() and fscrypt_supported_v2_policy(), to reduce the indentation level and make the code easier to read. Also adjust the function comment to mention that whether the encryption policy is supported can also depend on the inode. No change in behavior. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-11-06fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policiesEric Biggers1-1/+40
Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-13fscrypt: require that key be added when setting a v2 encryption policyEric Biggers1-1/+13
By looking up the master keys in a filesystem-level keyring rather than in the calling processes' key hierarchy, it becomes possible for a user to set an encryption policy which refers to some key they don't actually know, then encrypt their files using that key. Cryptographically this isn't much of a problem, but the semantics of this would be a bit weird. Thus, enforce that a v2 encryption policy can only be set if the user has previously added the key, or has capable(CAP_FOWNER). We tolerate that this problem will continue to exist for v1 encryption policies, however; there is no way around that. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-13fscrypt: v2 encryption policy supportEric Biggers1-105/+317
Add a new fscrypt policy version, "v2". It has the following changes from the original policy version, which we call "v1" (*): - Master keys (the user-provided encryption keys) are only ever used as input to HKDF-SHA512. This is more flexible and less error-prone, and it avoids the quirks and limitations of the AES-128-ECB based KDF. Three classes of cryptographically isolated subkeys are defined: - Per-file keys, like used in v1 policies except for the new KDF. - Per-mode keys. These implement the semantics of the DIRECT_KEY flag, which for v1 policies made the master key be used directly. These are also planned to be used for inline encryption when support for it is added. - Key identifiers (see below). - Each master key is identified by a 16-byte master_key_identifier, which is derived from the key itself using HKDF-SHA512. This prevents users from associating the wrong key with an encrypted file or directory. This was easily possible with v1 policies, which identified the key by an arbitrary 8-byte master_key_descriptor. - The key must be provided in the filesystem-level keyring, not in a process-subscribed keyring. The following UAPI additions are made: - The existing ioctl FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY can now be passed a fscrypt_policy_v2 to set a v2 encryption policy. It's disambiguated from fscrypt_policy/fscrypt_policy_v1 by the version code prefix. - A new ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX is added. It allows getting the v1 or v2 encryption policy of an encrypted file or directory. The existing FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl could not be used because it did not have a way for userspace to indicate which policy structure is expected. The new ioctl includes a size field, so it is extensible to future fscrypt policy versions. - The ioctls FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY, FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY, and FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS now support managing keys for v2 encryption policies. Such keys are kept logically separate from keys for v1 encryption policies, and are identified by 'identifier' rather than by 'descriptor'. The 'identifier' need not be provided when adding a key, since the kernel will calculate it anyway. This patch temporarily keeps adding/removing v2 policy keys behind the same permission check done for adding/removing v1 policy keys: capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN). However, the next patch will carefully take advantage of the cryptographically secure master_key_identifier to allow non-root users to add/remove v2 policy keys, thus providing a full replacement for v1 policies. (*) Actually, in the API fscrypt_policy::version is 0 while on-disk fscrypt_context::format is 1. But I believe it makes the most sense to advance both to '2' to have them be in sync, and to consider the numbering to start at 1 except for the API quirk. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-13fscrypt: use FSCRYPT_* definitions, not FS_*Eric Biggers1-7/+7
Update fs/crypto/ to use the new names for the UAPI constants rather than the old names, then make the old definitions conditional on !__KERNEL__. Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-05-28fscrypt: don't set policy for a dead directoryHongjie Fang1-0/+2
The directory may have been removed when entering fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(). If so, the empty_dir() check will return error for ext4 file system. ext4_rmdir() sets i_size = 0, then ext4_empty_dir() reports an error because 'inode->i_size < EXT4_DIR_REC_LEN(1) + EXT4_DIR_REC_LEN(2)'. If the fs is mounted with errors=panic, it will trigger a panic issue. Add the check IS_DEADDIR() to fix this problem. Fixes: 9bd8212f981e ("ext4 crypto: add encryption policy and password salt support") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.1+ Signed-off-by: Hongjie Fang <hongjiefang@asrmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-04-17fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_infoEric Biggers1-3/+3
->i_crypt_info starts out NULL and may later be locklessly set to a non-NULL value by the cmpxchg() in fscrypt_get_encryption_info(). But ->i_crypt_info is used directly, which technically is incorrect. It's a data race, and it doesn't include the data dependency barrier needed to safely dereference the pointer on at least one architecture. Fix this by using READ_ONCE() instead. Note: we don't need to use smp_load_acquire(), since dereferencing the pointer only requires a data dependency barrier, which is already included in READ_ONCE(). We also don't need READ_ONCE() in places where ->i_crypt_info is unconditionally dereferenced, since it must have already been checked. Also downgrade the cmpxchg() to cmpxchg_release(), since RELEASE semantics are sufficient on the write side. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-01-24fscrypt: return -EXDEV for incompatible rename or link into encrypted dirEric Biggers1-2/+1
Currently, trying to rename or link a regular file, directory, or symlink into an encrypted directory fails with EPERM when the source file is unencrypted or is encrypted with a different encryption policy, and is on the same mountpoint. It is correct for the operation to fail, but the choice of EPERM breaks tools like 'mv' that know to copy rather than rename if they see EXDEV, but don't know what to do with EPERM. Our original motivation for EPERM was to encourage users to securely handle their data. Encrypting files by "moving" them into an encrypted directory can be insecure because the unencrypted data may remain in free space on disk, where it can later be recovered by an attacker. It's much better to encrypt the data from the start, or at least try to securely delete the source data e.g. using the 'shred' program. However, the current behavior hasn't been effective at achieving its goal because users tend to be confused, hack around it, and complain; see e.g. https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/76. And in some cases it's actually inconsistent or unnecessary. For example, 'mv'-ing files between differently encrypted directories doesn't work even in cases where it can be secure, such as when in userspace the same passphrase protects both directories. Yet, you *can* already 'mv' unencrypted files into an encrypted directory if the source files are on a different mountpoint, even though doing so is often insecure. There are probably better ways to teach users to securely handle their files. For example, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool could provide a command that migrates unencrypted files into an encrypted directory, acting like 'shred' on the source files and providing appropriate warnings depending on the type of the source filesystem and disk. Receiving errors on unimportant files might also force some users to disable encryption, thus making the behavior counterproductive. It's desirable to make encryption as unobtrusive as possible. Therefore, change the error code from EPERM to EXDEV so that tools looking for EXDEV will fall back to a copy. This, of course, doesn't prevent users from still doing the right things to securely manage their files. Note that this also matches the behavior when a file is renamed between two project quota hierarchies; so there's precedent for using EXDEV for things other than mountpoints. xfstests generic/398 will require an update with this change. [Rewritten from an earlier patch series by Michael Halcrow.] Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-01-06fscrypt: add Adiantum supportEric Biggers1-2/+3
Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt. Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound. It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS. See the paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. Also see commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support"). On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and the NH hash function. These algorithms are fast even on processors without dedicated crypto instructions. Adiantum makes it feasible to enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted. On ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster. In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and names. With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information. Adiantum does not have this problem. Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode. This configuration saves memory and improves performance. A new fscrypt policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-11-14Merge tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-3/+3
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/fscrypt Pull fscrypt updates from Ted Ts'o: "Lots of cleanups, mostly courtesy by Eric Biggers" * tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/fscrypt: fscrypt: lock mutex before checking for bounce page pool fscrypt: add a documentation file for filesystem-level encryption ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_setattr() ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_lookup() ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_rename() ext4: switch to fscrypt_prepare_link() ext4: switch to fscrypt_file_open() fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_setattr() fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup() fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_rename() fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_link() fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_file_open() fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_require_key() fscrypt: remove unneeded empty fscrypt_operations structs fscrypt: remove ->is_encrypted() fscrypt: switch from ->is_encrypted() to IS_ENCRYPTED() fs, fscrypt: add an S_ENCRYPTED inode flag fscrypt: clean up include file mess
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman1-0/+1
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-10-19fscrypt: switch from ->is_encrypted() to IS_ENCRYPTED()Eric Biggers1-3/+3
IS_ENCRYPTED() now gives the same information as i_sb->s_cop->is_encrypted() but is more efficient, since IS_ENCRYPTED() is just a simple flag check. Prepare to remove ->is_encrypted() by switching all callers to IS_ENCRYPTED(). Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-07-09Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "The first major feature for ext4 this merge window is the largedir feature, which allows ext4 directories to support over 2 billion directory entries (assuming ~64 byte file names; in practice, users will run into practical performance limits first.) This feature was originally written by the Lustre team, and credit goes to Artem Blagodarenko from Seagate for getting this feature upstream. The second major major feature allows ext4 to support extended attribute values up to 64k. This feature was also originally from Lustre, and has been enhanced by Tahsin Erdogan from Google with a deduplication feature so that if multiple files have the same xattr value (for example, Windows ACL's stored by Samba), only one copy will be stored on disk for encoding and caching efficiency. We also have the usual set of bug fixes, cleanups, and optimizations" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (47 commits) ext4: fix spelling mistake: "prellocated" -> "preallocated" ext4: fix __ext4_new_inode() journal credits calculation ext4: skip ext4_init_security() and encryption on ea_inodes fs: generic_block_bmap(): initialize all of the fields in the temp bh ext4: change fast symlink test to not rely on i_blocks ext4: require key for truncate(2) of encrypted file ext4: don't bother checking for encryption key in ->mmap() ext4: check return value of kstrtoull correctly in reserved_clusters_store ext4: fix off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems ext4: return EFSBADCRC if a bad checksum error is found in ext4_find_entry() ext4: return EIO on read error in ext4_find_entry ext4: forbid encrypting root directory ext4: send parallel discards on commit completions ext4: avoid unnecessary stalls in ext4_evict_inode() ext4: add nombcache mount option ext4: strong binding of xattr inode references ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for removes ext4: reserve space for xattr entries/names quota: add get_inode_usage callback to transfer multi-inode charges ext4: xattr inode deduplication ...
2017-07-06ext4: fix __ext4_new_inode() journal credits calculationTahsin Erdogan1-0/+1
ea_inode feature allows creating extended attributes that are up to 64k in size. Update __ext4_new_inode() to pick increased credit limits. To avoid overallocating too many journal credits, update __ext4_xattr_set_credits() to make a distinction between xattr create vs update. This helps __ext4_new_inode() because all attributes are known to be new, so we can save credits that are normally needed to delete old values. Also, have fscrypt specify its maximum context size so that we don't end up allocating credits for 64k size. Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-06-24fscrypt: add support for AES-128-CBCDaniel Walter1-6/+2
fscrypt provides facilities to use different encryption algorithms which are selectable by userspace when setting the encryption policy. Currently, only AES-256-XTS for file contents and AES-256-CBC-CTS for file names are implemented. This is a clear case of kernel offers the mechanism and userspace selects a policy. Similar to what dm-crypt and ecryptfs have. This patch adds support for using AES-128-CBC for file contents and AES-128-CBC-CTS for file name encryption. To mitigate watermarking attacks, IVs are generated using the ESSIV algorithm. While AES-CBC is actually slightly less secure than AES-XTS from a security point of view, there is more widespread hardware support. Using AES-CBC gives us the acceptable performance while still providing a moderate level of security for persistent storage. Especially low-powered embedded devices with crypto accelerators such as CAAM or CESA often only support AES-CBC. Since using AES-CBC over AES-XTS is basically thought of a last resort, we use AES-128-CBC over AES-256-CBC since it has less encryption rounds and yields noticeable better performance starting from a file size of just a few kB. Signed-off-by: Daniel Walter <dwalter@sigma-star.at> [david@sigma-star.at: addressed review comments] Signed-off-by: David Gstir <david@sigma-star.at> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-05-04fscrypt: fix context consistency check when key(s) unavailableEric Biggers1-19/+68
To mitigate some types of offline attacks, filesystem encryption is designed to enforce that all files in an encrypted directory tree use the same encryption policy (i.e. the same encryption context excluding the nonce). However, the fscrypt_has_permitted_context() function which enforces this relies on comparing struct fscrypt_info's, which are only available when we have the encryption keys. This can cause two incorrect behaviors: 1. If we have the parent directory's key but not the child's key, or vice versa, then fscrypt_has_permitted_context() returned false, causing applications to see EPERM or ENOKEY. This is incorrect if the encryption contexts are in fact consistent. Although we'd normally have either both keys or neither key in that case since the master_key_descriptors would be the same, this is not guaranteed because keys can be added or removed from keyrings at any time. 2. If we have neither the parent's key nor the child's key, then fscrypt_has_permitted_context() returned true, causing applications to see no error (or else an error for some other reason). This is incorrect if the encryption contexts are in fact inconsistent, since in that case we should deny access. To fix this, retrieve and compare the fscrypt_contexts if we are unable to set up both fscrypt_infos. While this slightly hurts performance when accessing an encrypted directory tree without the key, this isn't a case we really need to be optimizing for; access *with* the key is much more important. Furthermore, the performance hit is barely noticeable given that we are already retrieving the fscrypt_context and doing two keyring searches in fscrypt_get_encryption_info(). If we ever actually wanted to optimize this case we might start by caching the fscrypt_contexts. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0+ Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-04-30fscrypt: remove unnecessary checks for NULL operationsEric Biggers1-10/+1
The functions in fs/crypto/*.c are only called by filesystems configured with encryption support. Since the ->get_context(), ->set_context(), and ->empty_dir() operations are always provided in that case (and must be, otherwise there would be no way to get/set encryption policies, or in the case of ->get_context() even access encrypted files at all), there is no need to check for these operations being NULL and we can remove these unneeded checks. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-03-15fscrypt: eliminate ->prepare_context() operationEric Biggers1-7/+0
The only use of the ->prepare_context() fscrypt operation was to allow ext4 to evict inline data from the inode before ->set_context(). However, there is no reason why this cannot be done as simply the first step in ->set_context(), and in fact it makes more sense to do it that way because then the policy modes and flags get validated before any real work is done. Therefore, merge ext4_prepare_context() into ext4_set_context(), and remove ->prepare_context(). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-02fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption require a keyring keyTheodore Ts'o1-15/+7
Currently, the test_dummy_encryption ext4 mount option, which exists only to test encrypted I/O paths with xfstests, overrides all per-inode encryption keys with a fixed key. This change minimizes test_dummy_encryption-specific code path changes by supplying a fake context for directories which are not encrypted for use when creating new directories, files, or symlinks. This allows us to properly exercise the keyring lookup, derivation, and context inheritance code paths. Before mounting a file system using test_dummy_encryption, userspace must execute the following shell commands: mode='\x00\x00\x00\x00' raw="$(printf ""\\\\x%02x"" $(seq 0 63))" if lscpu | grep "Byte Order" | grep -q Little ; then size='\x40\x00\x00\x00' else size='\x00\x00\x00\x40' fi key="${mode}${raw}${size}" keyctl new_session echo -n -e "${key}" | keyctl padd logon fscrypt:4242424242424242 @s Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-01fscrypt: pass up error codes from ->get_context()Eric Biggers1-31/+23
It was possible for the ->get_context() operation to fail with a specific error code, which was then not returned to the caller of FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY or FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY. Make sure to pass through these error codes. Also reorganize the code so that ->get_context() only needs to be called one time when setting an encryption policy, and handle contexts of unrecognized sizes more appropriately. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-01fscrypt: remove user-triggerable warning messagesEric Biggers1-13/+2
Several warning messages were not rate limited and were user-triggerable from FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY. These shouldn't really have been there in the first place, but either way they aren't as useful now that the error codes have been improved. So just remove them. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-01fscrypt: use EEXIST when file already uses different policyEric Biggers1-1/+1
As part of an effort to clean up fscrypt-related error codes, make FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY fail with EEXIST when the file already uses a different encryption policy. This is more descriptive than EINVAL, which was ambiguous with some of the other error cases. I am not aware of any users who might be relying on the previous error code of EINVAL, which was never documented anywhere. This failure case will be exercised by an xfstest. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2017-01-01fscrypt: use ENOTDIR when setting encryption policy on nondirectoryEric Biggers1-1/+1
As part of an effort to clean up fscrypt-related error codes, make FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY fail with ENOTDIR when the file descriptor does not refer to a directory. This is more descriptive than EINVAL, which was ambiguous with some of the other error cases. I am not aware of any users who might be relying on the previous error code of EINVAL, which was never documented anywhere, and in some buggy kernels did not exist at all as the S_ISDIR() check was missing. This failure case will be exercised by an xfstest. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2016-12-31fscrypt: fix renaming and linking special filesEric Biggers1-0/+5
Attempting to link a device node, named pipe, or socket file into an encrypted directory through rename(2) or link(2) always failed with EPERM. This happened because fscrypt_has_permitted_context() saw that the file was unencrypted and forbid creating the link. This behavior was unexpected because such files are never encrypted; only regular files, directories, and symlinks can be encrypted. To fix this, make fscrypt_has_permitted_context() always return true on special files. This will be covered by a test in my encryption xfstests patchset. Fixes: 9bd8212f981e ("ext4 crypto: add encryption policy and password salt support") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2016-12-12fscrypt: move non-public structures and constants to fscrypt_private.hTheodore Ts'o1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2016-12-12fscrypto: move ioctl processing more fully into common codeEric Biggers1-13/+21
Multiple bugs were recently fixed in the "set encryption policy" ioctl. To make it clear that fscrypt_process_policy() and fscrypt_get_policy() implement ioctls and therefore their implementations must take standard security and correctness precautions, rename them to fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy() and fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy(). Make the latter take in a struct file * to make it consistent with the former. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2016-10-15fscrypto: lock inode while setting encryption policyEric Biggers1-0/+4
i_rwsem needs to be acquired while setting an encryption policy so that concurrent calls to FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY are correctly serialized (especially the ->get_context() + ->set_context() pair), and so that new files cannot be created in the directory during or after the ->empty_dir() check. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2016-09-10fscrypto: require write access to mount to set encryption policyEric Biggers1-13/+25
Since setting an encryption policy requires writing metadata to the filesystem, it should be guarded by mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write. Otherwise, a user could cause a write to a frozen or readonly filesystem. This was handled correctly by f2fs but not by ext4. Make fscrypt_process_policy() handle it rather than relying on the filesystem to get it right. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1+; check fs/{ext4,f2fs} Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
2016-09-10fscrypto: only allow setting encryption policy on directoriesEric Biggers1-0/+2
The FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl allowed setting an encryption policy on nondirectory files. This was unintentional, and in the case of nonempty regular files did not behave as expected because existing data was not actually encrypted by the ioctl. In the case of ext4, the user could also trigger filesystem errors in ->empty_dir(), e.g. due to mismatched "directory" checksums when the kernel incorrectly tried to interpret a regular file as a directory. This bug affected ext4 with kernels v4.8-rc1 or later and f2fs with kernels v4.6 and later. It appears that older kernels only permitted directories and that the check was accidentally lost during the refactoring to share the file encryption code between ext4 and f2fs. This patch restores the !S_ISDIR() check that was present in older kernels. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2016-09-10fscrypto: add authorization check for setting encryption policyEric Biggers1-0/+3
On an ext4 or f2fs filesystem with file encryption supported, a user could set an encryption policy on any empty directory(*) to which they had readonly access. This is obviously problematic, since such a directory might be owned by another user and the new encryption policy would prevent that other user from creating files in their own directory (for example). Fix this by requiring inode_owner_or_capable() permission to set an encryption policy. This means that either the caller must own the file, or the caller must have the capability CAP_FOWNER. (*) Or also on any regular file, for f2fs v4.6 and later and ext4 v4.8-rc1 and later; a separate bug fix is coming for that. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1+; check fs/{ext4,f2fs} Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2016-03-18fs crypto: move per-file encryption from f2fs tree to fs/cryptoJaegeuk Kim1-0/+229
This patch adds the renamed functions moved from the f2fs crypto files. 1. definitions for per-file encryption used by ext4 and f2fs. 2. crypto.c for encrypt/decrypt functions a. IO preparation: - fscrypt_get_ctx / fscrypt_release_ctx b. before IOs: - fscrypt_encrypt_page - fscrypt_decrypt_page - fscrypt_zeroout_range c. after IOs: - fscrypt_decrypt_bio_pages - fscrypt_pullback_bio_page - fscrypt_restore_control_page 3. policy.c supporting context management. a. For ioctls: - fscrypt_process_policy - fscrypt_get_policy b. For context permission - fscrypt_has_permitted_context - fscrypt_inherit_context 4. keyinfo.c to handle permissions - fscrypt_get_encryption_info - fscrypt_free_encryption_info 5. fname.c to support filename encryption a. general wrapper functions - fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr - fscrypt_fname_usr_to_disk - fscrypt_setup_filename - fscrypt_free_filename b. specific filename handling functions - fscrypt_fname_alloc_buffer - fscrypt_fname_free_buffer 6. Makefile and Kconfig Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ildar Muslukhov <ildarm@google.com> Signed-off-by: Uday Savagaonkar <savagaon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>