summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-12-14btrfs: fix re-dirty process of tree-log nodesNaohiro Aota1-2/+3
commit 84c25448929942edacba905cecc0474e91114e7a upstream. There is a report of a transaction abort of -EAGAIN with the following script. #!/bin/sh for d in sda sdb; do mkfs.btrfs -d single -m single -f /dev/\${d} done mount /dev/sda /mnt/test mount /dev/sdb /mnt/scratch for dir in test scratch; do echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches fio --directory=/mnt/\${dir} --name=fio.\${dir} --rw=read --size=50G --bs=64m \ --numjobs=$(nproc) --time_based --ramp_time=5 --runtime=480 \ --group_reporting |& tee /dev/shm/fio.\${dir} echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches done for d in sda sdb; do umount /dev/\${d} done The stack trace is shown in below. [3310.967991] BTRFS: error (device sda) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2341: errno=-11 unknown (Error while writing out transaction) [3310.968060] BTRFS info (device sda): forced readonly [3310.968064] BTRFS warning (device sda): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. [3310.968065] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [3310.968066] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -11) [3310.968074] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 1684 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1946 btrfs_commit_transaction.cold+0x209/0x2c8 [3310.968131] CPU: 14 PID: 1684 Comm: fio Not tainted 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64 #1 [3310.968135] Hardware name: DIAWAY Tartu/Tartu, BIOS V2.01.B10 04/08/2021 [3310.968137] RIP: 0010:btrfs_commit_transaction.cold+0x209/0x2c8 [3310.968144] RSP: 0018:ffffb284ce393e10 EFLAGS: 00010282 [3310.968147] RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff973f147b0f60 RCX: 0000000000000027 [3310.968149] RDX: ffff974ecf098a08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff974ecf098a00 [3310.968150] RBP: ffff973f147b0f08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb284ce393c48 [3310.968151] R10: ffffb284ce393c40 R11: ffffffff84f47468 R12: ffff973f101bfc00 [3310.968153] R13: ffff971f20cf2000 R14: 00000000fffffff5 R15: ffff973f147b0e58 [3310.968154] FS: 00007efe65468740(0000) GS:ffff974ecf080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [3310.968157] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [3310.968158] CR2: 000055691bcbe260 CR3: 000000105cfa4001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 [3310.968160] PKRU: 55555554 [3310.968161] Call Trace: [3310.968167] ? dput+0xd4/0x300 [3310.968174] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f1/0x490 [3310.968180] __x64_sys_fsync+0x33/0x60 [3310.968185] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [3310.968190] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [3310.968194] RIP: 0033:0x7efe6557329b [3310.968200] RSP: 002b:00007ffe0236ebc0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a [3310.968203] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007efe6557329b [3310.968204] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007efe58d77010 RDI: 0000000000000006 [3310.968205] RBP: 0000000004000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007efe58d77010 [3310.968207] R10: 0000000016cacc0c R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00007efe5ce95980 [3310.968208] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007efe6447c790 R15: 0000000c80000000 [3310.968212] ---[ end trace 1a346f4d3c0d96ba ]--- [3310.968214] BTRFS: error (device sda) in cleanup_transaction:1946: errno=-11 unknown The abort occurs because of a write hole while writing out freeing tree nodes of a tree-log tree. For zoned btrfs, we re-dirty a freed tree node to ensure btrfs can write the region and does not leave a hole on write on a zoned device. The current code fails to re-dirty a node when the tree-log tree's depth is greater or equal to 2. That leads to a transaction abort with -EAGAIN. Fix the issue by properly re-dirtying a node on walking up the tree. Fixes: d3575156f662 ("btrfs: zoned: redirty released extent buffers") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/415 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-12-14btrfs: clear extent buffer uptodate when we fail to write itJosef Bacik1-0/+6
commit c2e39305299f0118298c2201f6d6cc7d3485f29e upstream. I got dmesg errors on generic/281 on our overnight fstests. Looking at the history this happens occasionally, with errors like this WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 673217 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:6848 assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50 CPU: 0 PID: 673217 Comm: kworker/u4:13 Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc2+ #469 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper RIP: 0010:assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50 RSP: 0018:ffffae598230bc60 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0017ffffc0002112 RBX: ffffebaec4100900 RCX: 0000000000001000 RDX: ffffebaec45733c7 RSI: ffffebaec4100900 RDI: ffff9fd98919f340 RBP: 0000000000000d56 R08: ffff9fd98e300000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0001207370a91c50 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000000007b0 R13: ffff9fd98919f340 R14: 0000000001500000 R15: 0000000001cb0000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9fd9fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f549fcf8940 CR3: 0000000114908004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: extent_buffer_test_bit+0x3f/0x70 free_space_test_bit+0xa6/0xc0 load_free_space_tree+0x1d6/0x430 caching_thread+0x454/0x630 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0 btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0 ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0 ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xf9/0x3a0 process_one_work+0x270/0x5a0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 kthread+0x174/0x1a0 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we're trying to read from a extent buffer page that is !PageUptodate. This happens because we will clear the page uptodate when we have an IO error, but we don't clear the extent buffer uptodate. If we do a read later and find this extent buffer we'll think its valid and not return an error, and then trip over this warning. Fix this by also clearing uptodate on the extent buffer when this happens, so that we get an error when we do a btrfs_search_slot() and find this block later. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-12-08btrfs: check-integrity: fix a warning on write caching disabled diskWang Yugui1-1/+13
[ Upstream commit a91cf0ffbc244792e0b3ecf7d0fddb2f344b461f ] When a disk has write caching disabled, we skip submission of a bio with flush and sync requests before writing the superblock, since it's not needed. However when the integrity checker is enabled, this results in reports that there are metadata blocks referred by a superblock that were not properly flushed. So don't skip the bio submission only when the integrity checker is enabled for the sake of simplicity, since this is a debug tool and not meant for use in non-debug builds. fstests/btrfs/220 trigger a check-integrity warning like the following when CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY=y and the disk with WCE=0. btrfs: attempt to write superblock which references block M @5242880 (sdb2/5242880/0) which is not flushed out of disk's write cache (block flush_gen=1, dev->flush_gen=0)! ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 28 PID: 843680 at fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c:2196 btrfsic_process_written_superblock+0x22a/0x2a0 [btrfs] CPU: 28 PID: 843680 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.15.0-0.rc5.39.el8.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision T7610/0NK70N, BIOS A18 09/11/2019 RIP: 0010:btrfsic_process_written_superblock+0x22a/0x2a0 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffb642afb47940 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: ffff8b722fc97d00 RDI: ffff8b722fc97d00 RBP: ffff8b5601c00000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000ffff7fff R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffb642afb476f8 R12: ffffffffffffffff R13: ffffb642afb47974 R14: ffff8b5499254c00 R15: 0000000000000003 FS: 00007f00a06d4080(0000) GS:ffff8b722fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fff5cff5ff0 CR3: 00000001c0c2a006 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: btrfsic_process_written_block+0x2f7/0x850 [btrfs] __btrfsic_submit_bio.part.19+0x310/0x330 [btrfs] ? bio_associate_blkg_from_css+0xa4/0x2c0 btrfsic_submit_bio+0x18/0x30 [btrfs] write_dev_supers+0x81/0x2a0 [btrfs] ? find_get_pages_range_tag+0x219/0x280 ? pagevec_lookup_range_tag+0x24/0x30 ? __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x6d/0xf0 ? __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x1e ? find_first_extent_bit+0x9b/0x160 [btrfs] ? __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x1e write_all_supers+0x1b3/0xa70 [btrfs] ? __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x1e btrfs_commit_transaction+0x59d/0xac0 [btrfs] close_ctree+0x11d/0x339 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x71/0x110 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1f0/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x46/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f009f711dfb RSP: 002b:00007fff5cff7928 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000055b68c6c9970 RCX: 00007f009f711dfb RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055b68c6c9b50 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000055b68c6ca900 R09: 00007f009f795580 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055b68c6c9b50 R13: 00007f00a04bf184 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000ffffffff ---[ end trace 2c4b82abcef9eec4 ]--- S-65536(sdb2/65536/1) --> M-1064960(sdb2/1064960/1) Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-12-08btrfs: silence lockdep when reading chunk tree during mountFilipe Manana1-5/+13
[ Upstream commit 4d9380e0da7be2351437cdac71673a9cd94e50fd ] Often some test cases like btrfs/161 trigger lockdep splats that complain about possible unsafe lock scenario due to the fact that during mount, when reading the chunk tree we end up calling blkdev_get_by_path() while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree. That produces a lockdep splat like the following: [ 3653.683975] ====================================================== [ 3653.685148] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3653.686301] 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 Not tainted [ 3653.687239] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3653.688400] mount/447465 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3653.689320] ffff8c6b0c76e528 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.691054] but task is already holding lock: [ 3653.692155] ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.693978] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3653.695510] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3653.696915] -> #3 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3653.698053] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 3653.698893] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.699988] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 3653.701205] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 3653.702234] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x32/0x70 [btrfs] [ 3653.703332] btrfs_init_new_device+0x563/0x15b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.704439] btrfs_ioctl+0x2110/0x3530 [btrfs] [ 3653.705405] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.706215] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.706990] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.708040] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3653.708994] lock_release+0x13d/0x4a0 [ 3653.709533] up_write+0x18/0x160 [ 3653.710017] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x5b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.710699] __loop_update_dio+0xbd/0x170 [loop] [ 3653.711360] lo_ioctl+0x3b1/0x8a0 [loop] [ 3653.711929] block_ioctl+0x48/0x50 [ 3653.712442] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.712991] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.713519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.714233] -> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.715026] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.715648] lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] [ 3653.716275] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0x90 [ 3653.716867] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x142/0x320 [ 3653.717537] blkdev_open+0x5e/0xa0 [ 3653.718043] do_dentry_open+0x163/0x390 [ 3653.718604] path_openat+0x3f0/0xa80 [ 3653.719128] do_filp_open+0xa9/0x150 [ 3653.719652] do_sys_openat2+0x97/0x160 [ 3653.720197] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 [ 3653.720766] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.721285] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.721986] -> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.722775] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.723348] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.723867] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.724394] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.725041] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.725614] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726332] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726999] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.727739] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.728384] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.729130] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.729676] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.730192] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.730800] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.731427] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.731970] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.732486] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.732997] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.733560] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.734080] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.734782] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3653.735784] Chain exists of: &disk->open_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-chunk-00 [ 3653.737123] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3653.737865] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3653.738435] ---- ---- [ 3653.739007] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.739449] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 3653.740193] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.740955] lock(&disk->open_mutex); [ 3653.741431] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3653.742176] 3 locks held by mount/447465: [ 3653.742739] #0: ffff8c6acf85c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#44/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xd5/0x3b0 [ 3653.744114] #1: ffffffffc0b28f70 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x59/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.745563] #2: ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.747066] stack backtrace: [ 3653.747723] CPU: 4 PID: 447465 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 [ 3653.748873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3653.750592] Call Trace: [ 3653.750967] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 3653.751526] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 3653.752136] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 3653.752748] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.753356] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.753898] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.754596] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 3653.755125] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.755729] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.756338] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.756794] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.757400] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 3653.757930] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 3653.758437] ? bd_prepare_to_claim+0x129/0x150 [ 3653.758999] ? trace_module_get+0x2b/0xd0 [ 3653.759508] ? try_module_get.part.0+0x50/0x80 [ 3653.760072] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.760661] ? devcgroup_check_permission+0xc1/0x1f0 [ 3653.761288] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.761797] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.762454] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.763055] ? clone_fs_devices+0x8f/0x170 [btrfs] [ 3653.763689] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.764370] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 [ 3653.764922] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.765493] ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0 [ 3653.766043] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.766780] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.767488] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.767979] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.768548] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.769076] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.769718] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.770381] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.771086] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.771574] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.772136] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.772673] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.773201] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.773793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.774333] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.775094] RIP: 0033:0x7f648bc45aaa This happens because through btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), which is called only during mount, ends up acquiring the mutex open_mutex of a block device while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree while other paths need to acquire other locks before locking extent buffers of the chunk tree. Since at mount time when we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() we know that we don't have other tasks running in parallel and modifying the chunk tree, we can simply skip locking of chunk tree extent buffers. So do that and move the assertion that checks the fs is not yet mounted to the top block of btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), with a comment before doing it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-25btrfs: update device path inode time instead of bd_inodeJosef Bacik1-8/+13
commit 54fde91f52f515e0b1514f0f0fa146e87a672227 upstream. Christoph pointed out that I'm updating bdev->bd_inode for the device time when we remove block devices from a btrfs file system, however this isn't actually exposed to anything. The inode we want to update is the one that's associated with the path to the device, usually on devtmpfs, so that blkid notices the difference. We still don't want to do the blkdev_open, so use kern_path() to get the path to the given device and do the update time on that inode. Fixes: 8f96a5bfa150 ("btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing") Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-25btrfs: fix memory ordering between normal and ordered work functionsNikolay Borisov1-0/+14
commit 45da9c1767ac31857df572f0a909fbe88fd5a7e9 upstream. Ordered work functions aren't guaranteed to be handled by the same thread which executed the normal work functions. The only way execution between normal/ordered functions is synchronized is via the WORK_DONE_BIT, unfortunately the used bitops don't guarantee any ordering whatsoever. This manifested as seemingly inexplicable crashes on ARM64, where async_chunk::inode is seen as non-null in async_cow_submit which causes submit_compressed_extents to be called and crash occurs because async_chunk::inode suddenly became NULL. The call trace was similar to: pc : submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0 lr : async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0 sp : ffff800015d4bc20 <registers omitted for brevity> Call trace: submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0 async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0 run_ordered_work+0xc8/0x280 btrfs_work_helper+0x98/0x250 process_one_work+0x1f0/0x4ac worker_thread+0x188/0x504 kthread+0x110/0x114 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Fix this by adding respective barrier calls which ensure that all accesses preceding setting of WORK_DONE_BIT are strictly ordered before setting the flag. At the same time add a read barrier after reading of WORK_DONE_BIT in run_ordered_work which ensures all subsequent loads would be strictly ordered after reading the bit. This in turn ensures are all accesses before WORK_DONE_BIT are going to be strictly ordered before any access that can occur in ordered_func. Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Fixes: 08a9ff326418 ("btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution based on kernel workqueue") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011928 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Tested-by: Chris Murphy <chris@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-25btrfs: make 1-bit bit-fields of scrub_page unsigned intColin Ian King1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit d08e38b62327961295be1c63b562cd46ec97cd07 ] The bitfields have_csum and io_error are currently signed which is not recommended as the representation is an implementation defined behaviour. Fix this by making the bit-fields unsigned ints. Fixes: 2c36395430b0 ("btrfs: scrub: remove the anonymous structure from scrub_page") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-21btrfs: zoned: allow preallocation for relocation inodesJohannes Thumshirn1-33/+2
commit 960a3166aed015887cd54423a6589ae4d0b65bd5 upstream Now that we use a dedicated block group and regular writes for data relocation, we can preallocate the space needed for a relocated inode, just like we do in regular mode. Essentially this reverts commit 32430c614844 ("btrfs: zoned: enable relocation on a zoned filesystem") as it is not needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-21btrfs: check for relocation inodes on zoned btrfs in should_nocowJohannes Thumshirn1-1/+9
commit 2adada886b26e998b5a624e72f0834ebfdc54cc7 upstream Prepare for allowing preallocation for relocation inodes. Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-21btrfs: zoned: use regular writes for relocationJohannes Thumshirn1-0/+11
commit e6d261e3b1f777b499ce8f535ed44dd1b69278b7 upstream Now that we have a dedicated block group for relocation, we can use REQ_OP_WRITE instead of REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND for writing out the data on relocation. Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-21btrfs: zoned: only allow one process to add pages to a relocation inodeJohannes Thumshirn1-0/+11
commit 35156d852762b58855f513b4f8bb7f32d69dc9c5 upstream Don't allow more than one process to add pages to a relocation inode on a zoned filesystem, otherwise we cannot guarantee the sequential write rule once we're filling preallocated extents on a zoned filesystem. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-21btrfs: zoned: add a dedicated data relocation block groupJohannes Thumshirn6-2/+74
commit c2707a25562343511bf9a3a6a636a16a822204eb upstream Relocation in a zoned filesystem can fail with a transaction abort with error -22 (EINVAL). This happens because the relocation code assumes that the extents we relocated the data to have the same size the source extents had and ensures this by preallocating the extents. But in a zoned filesystem we currently can't preallocate the extents as this would break the sequential write required rule. Therefore it can happen that the writeback process kicks in while we're still adding pages to a delalloc range and starts writing out dirty pages. This then creates destination extents that are smaller than the source extents, triggering the following safety check in get_new_location(): 1034 if (num_bytes != btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(leaf, fi)) { 1035 ret = -EINVAL; 1036 goto out; 1037 } Temporarily create a dedicated block group for the relocation process, so no non-relocation data writes can interfere with the relocation writes. This is needed that we can switch the relocation process on a zoned filesystem from the REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND writing we use for data to a scheme like in a non-zoned filesystem using REQ_OP_WRITE and preallocation. Fixes: 32430c614844 ("btrfs: zoned: enable relocation on a zoned filesystem") Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-21btrfs: introduce btrfs_is_data_reloc_rootJohannes Thumshirn5-15/+16
commit 37f00a6d2e9c97d6e7b5c3d47c49b714c3d0b99f upstream There are several places in our codebase where we check if a root is the root of the data reloc tree and subsequent patches will introduce more. Factor out the check into a small helper function instead of open coding it multiple times. Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-18btrfs: do not take the uuid_mutex in btrfs_rm_deviceJosef Bacik1-5/+5
[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0f14ba6124c62547a4fdc59b163d8b864e ] We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9b7d8d ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18btrfs: reflink: initialize return value to 0 in btrfs_extent_same()Sidong Yang1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 44bee215f72f13874c0e734a0712c2e3264c0108 ] Fix a warning reported by smatch that ret could be returned without initialized. The dedupe operations are supposed to to return 0 for a 0 length range but the caller does not pass olen == 0. To keep this behaviour and also fix the warning initialize ret to 0. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sidong Yang <realwakka@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-11-18btrfs: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing deviceAnand Jain1-1/+2
commit 5c78a5e7aa835c4f08a7c90fe02d19f95a776f29 upstream. In open_ctree() in btrfs_check_rw_degradable() [1], we check each block group individually if at least the minimum number of devices is available for that profile. If all the devices are available, then we don't have to check degradable. [1] open_ctree() :: 3559 if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) { Also before calling btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctee() at the line number shown below [2] we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() and down to add_missing_dev() to record number of missing devices. [2] open_ctree() :: 3454 ret = btrfs_read_chunk_tree(fs_info); btrfs_read_chunk_tree() read_one_chunk() / read_one_dev() add_missing_dev() So, check if there is any missing device before btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctree(). Also, with this the mount command could save ~16ms.[3] in the most common case, that is no device is missing. [3] 1) * 16934.96 us | btrfs_check_rw_degradable [btrfs](); CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-18btrfs: fix lost error handling when replaying directory deletesFilipe Manana1-1/+3
commit 10adb1152d957a4d570ad630f93a88bb961616c1 upstream. At replay_dir_deletes(), if find_dir_range() returns an error we break out of the main while loop and then assign a value of 0 (success) to the 'ret' variable, resulting in completely ignoring that an error happened. Fix that by jumping to the 'out' label when find_dir_range() returns an error (negative value). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-18btrfs: clear MISSING device status bit in btrfs_close_one_deviceLi Zhang1-1/+3
commit 5d03dbebba2594d2e6fbf3b5dd9060c5a835de3b upstream. Reported bug: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/389 There's a problem with scrub reporting aborted status but returning error code 0, on a filesystem with missing and readded device. Roughly these steps: - mkfs -d raid1 dev1 dev2 - fill with data - unmount - make dev1 disappear - mount -o degraded - copy more data - make dev1 appear again Running scrub afterwards reports that the command was aborted, but the system log message says the exit code was 0. It seems that the cause of the error is decrementing fs_devices->missing_devices but not clearing device->dev_state. Every time we umount filesystem, it would call close_ctree, And it would eventually involve btrfs_close_one_device to close the device, but it only decrements fs_devices->missing_devices but does not clear the device BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING bit. Worse, this bug will cause Integer Overflow, because every time umount, fs_devices->missing_devices will decrease. If fs_devices->missing_devices value hit 0, it would overflow. With added debugging: loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 1 transid 21 /dev/loop1 scanned by systemd-udevd (2311) loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 2 transid 17 /dev/loop2 scanned by systemd-udevd (2313) BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 0 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 18446744073709551615 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 18446744073709551615 If fs_devices->missing_devices is 0, next time it would be 18446744073709551615 After apply this patch, the fs_devices->missing_devices seems to be right: $ truncate -s 10g test1 $ truncate -s 10g test2 $ losetup /dev/loop1 test1 $ losetup /dev/loop2 test2 $ mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 -f $ losetup -d /dev/loop2 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ dmesg loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 1 transid 5 /dev/loop1 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863) BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 2 transid 5 /dev/loop2 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863) BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): checking UUID tree BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-12btrfs: fix lzo_decompress_bio() kmap leakageLinus Torvalds1-1/+2
commit 2cf3f8133bda2a0945cc4c70e681ecb25b52b913 upstream. Commit ccaa66c8dd27 reinstated the kmap/kunmap that had been dropped in commit 8c945d32e604 ("btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from lzo"). However, it seems to have done so incorrectly due to the change not reverting cleanly, and lzo_decompress_bio() ended up not having a matching "kunmap()" to the "kmap()" that was put back. Also, any assert that the page pointer is not NULL should be before the kmap() of said pointer, since otherwise you'd just oops in the kmap() before the assert would even trigger. I noticed this when trying to verify my btrfs merge, and things not adding up. I'm doing this fixup before re-doing my merge, because this commit needs to also be backported to 5.15 (after verification from the btrfs people). Fixes: ccaa66c8dd27 ("Revert 'btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from lzo'") Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-29Merge tag 'for-5.15-rc7-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds5-33/+72
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "Last minute fixes for crash on 32bit architectures when compression is in use. It's a regression introduced in 5.15-rc and I'd really like not let this into the final release, fixes via stable trees would add unnecessary delay. The problem is on 32bit architectures with highmem enabled, the pages for compression may need to be kmapped, while the patches removed that as we don't use GFP_HIGHMEM allocations anymore. The pages that don't come from local allocation still may be from highmem. Despite being on 32bit there's enough such ARM machines in use so it's not a marginal issue. I did full reverts of the patches one by one instead of a huge one. There's one exception for the "lzo" revert as there was an intermediate patch touching the same code to make it compatible with subpage. I can't revert that one too, so the revert in lzo.c is manual. Qu Wenruo has worked on that with me and verified the changes" * tag 'for-5.15-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from lzo" Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from zlib" Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from zstd" Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from generic helpers"
2021-10-29Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from lzo"David Sterba1-11/+25
This reverts commit 8c945d32e60427cbc0859cf7045bbe6196bb03d8. The kmaps in compression code are still needed and cause crashes on 32bit machines (ARM, x86). Reproducible eg. by running fstest btrfs/004 with enabled LZO or ZSTD compression. The revert does not apply cleanly due to changes in a6e66e6f8c1b ("btrfs: rework lzo_decompress_bio() to make it subpage compatible") that reworked the page iteration so the revert is done to be equivalent to the original code. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJCQCtT+OuemovPO7GZk8Y8=qtOObr0XTDp8jh4OHD6y84AFxw@mail.gmail.com/ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214839 Tested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-29Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from zlib"David Sterba1-11/+25
This reverts commit 696ab562e6df9fbafd6052d8ce4aafcb2ed16069. The kmaps in compression code are still needed and cause crashes on 32bit machines (ARM, x86). Reproducible eg. by running fstest btrfs/004 with enabled LZO or ZSTD compression. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJCQCtT+OuemovPO7GZk8Y8=qtOObr0XTDp8jh4OHD6y84AFxw@mail.gmail.com/ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214839 Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-29Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from zstd"David Sterba1-9/+18
This reverts commit bbaf9715f3f5b5ff0de71da91fcc34ee9c198ed8. The kmaps in compression code are still needed and cause crashes on 32bit machines (ARM, x86). Reproducible eg. by running fstest btrfs/004 with enabled LZO or ZSTD compression. Example stacktrace with ZSTD on a 32bit ARM machine: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 pgd = c4159ed3 [00000000] *pgd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 210 Comm: kworker/u2:3 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc79+ #12 Hardware name: Allwinner sun4i/sun5i Families Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_work_helper PC is at mmiocpy+0x48/0x330 LR is at ZSTD_compressStream_generic+0x15c/0x28c (mmiocpy) from [<c0629648>] (ZSTD_compressStream_generic+0x15c/0x28c) (ZSTD_compressStream_generic) from [<c06297dc>] (ZSTD_compressStream+0x64/0xa0) (ZSTD_compressStream) from [<c049444c>] (zstd_compress_pages+0x170/0x488) (zstd_compress_pages) from [<c0496798>] (btrfs_compress_pages+0x124/0x12c) (btrfs_compress_pages) from [<c043c068>] (compress_file_range+0x3c0/0x834) (compress_file_range) from [<c043c4ec>] (async_cow_start+0x10/0x28) (async_cow_start) from [<c0475c3c>] (btrfs_work_helper+0x100/0x230) (btrfs_work_helper) from [<c014ef68>] (process_one_work+0x1b4/0x418) (process_one_work) from [<c014f210>] (worker_thread+0x44/0x524) (worker_thread) from [<c0156aa4>] (kthread+0x180/0x1b0) (kthread) from [<c0100150>] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJCQCtT+OuemovPO7GZk8Y8=qtOObr0XTDp8jh4OHD6y84AFxw@mail.gmail.com/ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214839 Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-27Revert "btrfs: compression: drop kmap/kunmap from generic helpers"David Sterba2-2/+4
This reverts commit 4c2bf276b56d8d27ddbafcdf056ef3fc60ae50b0. The kmaps in compression code are still needed and cause crashes on 32bit machines (ARM, x86). Reproducible eg. by running fstest btrfs/004 with enabled LZO or ZSTD compression. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJCQCtT+OuemovPO7GZk8Y8=qtOObr0XTDp8jh4OHD6y84AFxw@mail.gmail.com/ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214839 Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-12Merge tag 'for-5.15-rc5-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds5-52/+97
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "A few more error handling fixes, stemming from code inspection, error injection or fuzzing" * tag 'for-5.15-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: fix abort logic in btrfs_replace_file_extents btrfs: check for error when looking up inode during dir entry replay btrfs: unify lookup return value when dir entry is missing btrfs: deal with errors when adding inode reference during log replay btrfs: deal with errors when replaying dir entry during log replay btrfs: deal with errors when checking if a dir entry exists during log replay btrfs: update refs for any root except tree log roots btrfs: unlock newly allocated extent buffer after error
2021-10-07btrfs: fix abort logic in btrfs_replace_file_extentsJosef Bacik1-7/+9
Error injection testing uncovered a case where we'd end up with a corrupt file system with a missing extent in the middle of a file. This occurs because the if statement to decide if we should abort is wrong. The only way we would abort in this case is if we got a ret != -EOPNOTSUPP and we called from the file clone code. However the prealloc code uses this path too. Instead we need to abort if there is an error, and the only error we _don't_ abort on is -EOPNOTSUPP and only if we came from the clone file code. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-07btrfs: check for error when looking up inode during dir entry replayFilipe Manana1-7/+7
At replay_one_name(), we are treating any error from btrfs_lookup_inode() as if the inode does not exists. Fix this by checking for an error and returning it to the caller. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-07btrfs: unify lookup return value when dir entry is missingFilipe Manana3-22/+42
btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() and btrfs_lookup_dir_item() lookup for dir entries and both are used during log replay or when updating a log tree during an unlink. However when the dir item does not exists, btrfs_lookup_dir_item() returns NULL while btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() returns PTR_ERR(-ENOENT), and if the dir item exists but there is no matching entry for a given name or index, both return NULL. This makes the call sites during log replay to be more verbose than necessary and it makes it easy to miss this slight difference. Since we don't need to distinguish between those two cases, make btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() always return NULL when there is no matching directory entry - either because there isn't any dir entry or because there is one but it does not match the given name and index. Also rename the argument 'objectid' of btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() to 'index' since it is supposed to match an index number, and the name 'objectid' is not very good because it can easily be confused with an inode number (like the inode number a dir entry points to). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-07btrfs: deal with errors when adding inode reference during log replayFilipe Manana1-2/+7
At __inode_add_ref(), we treating any error returned from btrfs_lookup_dir_item() or from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() as meaning that there is no existing directory entry in the fs/subvolume tree. This is not correct since we can get errors such as, for example, -EIO when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's btree. So fix that and return the error to the caller when it is not -ENOENT. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-07btrfs: deal with errors when replaying dir entry during log replayFilipe Manana1-1/+8
At replay_one_one(), we are treating any error returned from btrfs_lookup_dir_item() or from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() as meaning that there is no existing directory entry in the fs/subvolume tree. This is not correct since we can get errors such as, for example, -EIO when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's btree. So fix that and return the error to the caller when it is not -ENOENT. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-07btrfs: deal with errors when checking if a dir entry exists during log replayFilipe Manana1-18/+29
Currently inode_in_dir() ignores errors returned from btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() and from btrfs_lookup_dir_item(), treating any errors as if the directory entry does not exists in the fs/subvolume tree, which is obviously not correct, as we can get errors such as -EIO when reading extent buffers while searching the fs/subvolume's tree. Fix that by making inode_in_dir() return the errors and making its only caller, add_inode_ref(), deal with returned errors as well. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-07btrfs: update refs for any root except tree log rootsJosef Bacik1-2/+1
I hit a stuck relocation on btrfs/061 during my overnight testing. This turned out to be because we had left over extent entries in our extent root for a data reloc inode that no longer existed. This happened because in btrfs_drop_extents() we only update refs if we have SHAREABLE set or we are the tree_root. This regression was introduced by aeb935a45581 ("btrfs: don't set SHAREABLE flag for data reloc tree") where we stopped setting SHAREABLE for the data reloc tree. The problem here is we actually do want to update extent references for data extents in the data reloc tree, in fact we only don't want to update extent references if the file extents are in the log tree. Update this check to only skip updating references in the case of the log tree. This is relatively rare, because you have to be running scrub at the same time, which is what btrfs/061 does. The data reloc inode has its extents pre-allocated, and then we copy the extent into the pre-allocated chunks. We theoretically should never be calling btrfs_drop_extents() on a data reloc inode. The exception of course is with scrub, if our pre-allocated extent falls inside of the block group we are scrubbing, then the block group will be marked read only and we will be forced to cow that extent. This means we will call btrfs_drop_extents() on that range when we COW that file extent. This isn't really problematic if we do this, the data reloc inode requires that our extent lengths match exactly with the extent we are copying, thankfully we validate the extent is correct with get_new_location(), so if we happen to COW only part of the extent we won't link it in when we do the relocation, so we are safe from any other shenanigans that arise because of this interaction with scrub. Fixes: aeb935a45581 ("btrfs: don't set SHAREABLE flag for data reloc tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-07btrfs: unlock newly allocated extent buffer after errorQu Wenruo1-0/+1
[BUG] There is a bug report that injected ENOMEM error could leave a tree block locked while we return to user-space: BTRFS info (device loop0): enabling ssd optimizations FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0 CPU: 0 PID: 7579 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1 #16 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x8d/0xcf lib/dump_stack.c:106 fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:52 [inline] should_fail+0x13c/0x160 lib/fault-inject.c:146 should_failslab+0x5/0x10 mm/slab_common.c:1328 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.99+0x4e/0xc0 mm/slab.h:494 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3120 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3214 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x44/0x280 mm/slub.c:3219 btrfs_alloc_delayed_extent_op fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h:299 [inline] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x38c/0x670 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4833 __btrfs_cow_block+0x16f/0x7d0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x12a/0x300 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x6b0/0xee0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x80/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3905 btrfs_new_inode+0x311/0xa60 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6530 btrfs_create+0x12b/0x270 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6783 lookup_open+0x660/0x780 fs/namei.c:3282 open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3352 [inline] path_openat+0x465/0xe20 fs/namei.c:3557 do_filp_open+0xe3/0x170 fs/namei.c:3588 do_sys_openat2+0x357/0x4a0 fs/open.c:1200 do_sys_open+0x87/0xd0 fs/open.c:1216 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x34/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x46ae99 Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f46711b9c48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000078c0a0 RCX: 000000000046ae99 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000000a1 RDI: 0000000020005800 RBP: 00007f46711b9c80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000017 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000078c0a0 R15: 00007ffc129da6e0 ================================================ WARNING: lock held when returning to user space! 5.15.0-rc1 #16 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------ syz-executor/7579 is leaving the kernel with locks still held! 1 lock held by syz-executor/7579: #0: ffff888104b73da8 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x2e/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:112 [CAUSE] In btrfs_alloc_tree_block(), after btrfs_init_new_buffer(), the new extent buffer @buf is locked, but if later operations like adding delayed tree ref fail, we just free @buf without unlocking it, resulting above warning. [FIX] Unlock @buf in out_free_buf: label. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsZ9O6Zr0KK1yGn=1rQi6Crh1yeCRdTSBxx9R99L4xdn-Q@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24Merge tag 'for-5.15-rc2-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds4-5/+32
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: - regression fix for leak of transaction handle after verity rollback failure - properly reset device last error between mounts - improve one error handling case when checksumming bios - fixup confusing displayed size of space info free space * tag 'for-5.15-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: prevent __btrfs_dump_space_info() to underflow its free space btrfs: fix mount failure due to past and transient device flush error btrfs: fix transaction handle leak after verity rollback failure btrfs: replace BUG_ON() in btrfs_csum_one_bio() with proper error handling
2021-09-17btrfs: prevent __btrfs_dump_space_info() to underflow its free spaceQu Wenruo1-2/+3
It's not uncommon where __btrfs_dump_space_info() gets called under over-commit situations. In that case free space would underflow as total allocated space is not enough to handle all the over-committed space. Such underflow values can sometimes cause confusion for users enabled enospc_debug mount option, and takes some seconds for developers to convert the underflow value to signed result. Just output the free space as s64 to avoid such problem. Reported-by: Eli V <eliventer@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJtFHUSy4zgyhf-4d9T+KdJp9w=UgzC2A0V=VtmaeEpcGgm1-Q@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-17btrfs: fix mount failure due to past and transient device flush errorFilipe Manana1-0/+13
When we get an error flushing one device, during a super block commit, we record the error in the device structure, in the field 'last_flush_error'. This is used to later check if we should error out the super block commit, depending on whether the number of flush errors is greater than or equals to the maximum tolerated device failures for a raid profile. However if we get a transient device flush error, unmount the filesystem and later try to mount it, we can fail the mount because we treat that past error as critical and consider the device is missing. Even if it's very likely that the error will happen again, as it's probably due to a hardware related problem, there may be cases where the error might not happen again. One example is during testing, and a test case like the new generic/648 from fstests always triggers this. The test cases generic/019 and generic/475 also trigger this scenario, but very sporadically. When this happens we get an error like this: $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt mount: /mnt wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. $ dmesg (...) [12918.886926] BTRFS warning (device sdc): chunk 13631488 missing 1 devices, max tolerance is 0 for writable mount [12918.888293] BTRFS warning (device sdc): writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices [12918.890853] BTRFS error (device sdc): open_ctree failed The failure happens because when btrfs_check_rw_degradable() is called at mount time, or at remount from RO to RW time, is sees a non zero value in a device's ->last_flush_error attribute, and therefore considers that the device is 'missing'. Fix this by setting a device's ->last_flush_error to zero when we close a device, making sure the error is not seen on the next mount attempt. We only need to track flush errors during the current mount, so that we never commit a super block if such errors happened. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-17btrfs: fix transaction handle leak after verity rollback failureFilipe Manana1-2/+4
During a verity rollback, if we fail to update the inode or delete the orphan, we abort the transaction and return without releasing our transaction handle. Fix that by releasing the handle. Fixes: 146054090b0859 ("btrfs: initial fsverity support") Fixes: 705242538ff348 ("btrfs: verity metadata orphan items") Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-17btrfs: replace BUG_ON() in btrfs_csum_one_bio() with proper error handlingQu Wenruo1-1/+12
There is a BUG_ON() in btrfs_csum_one_bio() to catch code logic error. It has indeed caught several bugs during subpage development. But the BUG_ON() itself will bring down the whole system which is an overkill. Replace it with a WARN() and exit gracefully, so that it won't crash the whole system while we can still catch the code logic error. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-10Merge tag 'for-5.15-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds6-47/+77
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: - fix max_inline mount option limit on 64k page system - lockdep fixes: - update bdev time in a safer way - move bdev put outside of sb write section when removing device - fix possible deadlock when mounting seed/sprout filesystem - zoned mode: fix split extent accounting - minor include fixup * tag 'for-5.15-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: zoned: fix double counting of split ordered extent btrfs: fix lockdep warning while mounting sprout fs btrfs: delay blkdev_put until after the device remove btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing btrfs: use correct header for div_u64 in misc.h btrfs: fix upper limit for max_inline for page size 64K
2021-09-07btrfs: zoned: fix double counting of split ordered extentNaohiro Aota1-0/+8
btrfs_add_ordered_extent_*() add num_bytes to fs_info->ordered_bytes. Then, splitting an ordered extent will call btrfs_add_ordered_extent_*() again for split extents, leading to double counting of the region of a split extent. These leaked bytes are finally reported at unmount time as follow: BTRFS info (device dm-1): at unmount dio bytes count 364544 Fix the double counting by subtracting split extent's size from fs_info->ordered_bytes. Fixes: d22002fd37bd ("btrfs: zoned: split ordered extent when bio is sent") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: fix lockdep warning while mounting sprout fsAnand Jain1-3/+4
Following test case reproduces lockdep warning. Test case: $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1> $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1> $ mount <dev1> <mnt> $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f $ umount <mnt> $ mount <dev2> <mnt> $ umount <mnt> The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount. [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock: [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock: [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}: [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0 [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs] [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs] [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs] [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs] [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs] [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs] [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140 [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360 [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0 [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80 [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30 [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs] [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs] [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100 [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs] [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070 [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0 [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160 [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this: [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 540.744553] CPU0 CPU1 [ 540.744554] ---- ---- [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744557] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744560] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744564] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515: [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450 [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.744708] stack backtrace: [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as explained below. Two threads [1] and [2] (below) could lead to clone_fs_device(). [1] open_ctree <== mount sprout fs btrfs_read_chunk_tree() mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock read_one_dev() open_seed_devices() clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices [2] btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock btrfs_prepare_sprout() lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs uuid_mutex. So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices(). And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in clone_fs_devices(). Reported-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: delay blkdev_put until after the device removeJosef Bacik3-11/+30
When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the ->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up. Unfortunately during device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock: ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11595: #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closingJosef Bacik1-8/+10
We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 filp_open+0x2c/0x50 btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11596: #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: use correct header for div_u64 in misc.hKari Argillander1-1/+1
asm/do_div.h is for div_u64, but it is found in math64.h. This change will make compiler job easier and prevent compiler errors in situation where compiler will not find math64.h from another paths. Signed-off-by: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: fix upper limit for max_inline for page size 64KAnand Jain1-24/+24
The mount option max_inline ranges from 0 to the sectorsize (which is now equal to page size). But we parse the mount options too early and before the actual sectorsize is read from the superblock. So the upper limit of max_inline is unaware of the actual sectorsize and is limited by the temporary sectorsize 4096, even on a system where the default sectorsize is 64K. Fix this by reading the superblock sectorsize before the mount option parse. Reported-by: Alexander Tsvetkov <alexander.tsvetkov@oracle.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-02Merge tag 'ovl-update-5.15' of ↵Linus Torvalds2-2/+5
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs Pull overlayfs update from Miklos Szeredi: - Copy up immutable/append/sync/noatime attributes (Amir Goldstein) - Improve performance by enabling RCU lookup. - Misc fixes and improvements The reason this touches so many files is that the ->get_acl() method now gets a "bool rcu" argument. The ->get_acl() API was updated based on comments from Al and Linus: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAJfpeguQxpd6Wgc0Jd3ks77zcsAv_bn0q17L3VNnnmPKu11t8A@mail.gmail.com/ * tag 'ovl-update-5.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs: ovl: enable RCU'd ->get_acl() vfs: add rcu argument to ->get_acl() callback ovl: fix BUG_ON() in may_delete() when called from ovl_cleanup() ovl: use kvalloc in xattr copy-up ovl: update ctime when changing fileattr ovl: skip checking lower file's i_writecount on truncate ovl: relax lookup error on mismatch origin ftype ovl: do not set overlay.opaque for new directories ovl: add ovl_allow_offline_changes() helper ovl: disable decoding null uuid with redirect_dir ovl: consistent behavior for immutable/append-only inodes ovl: copy up sync/noatime fileattr flags ovl: pass ovl_fs to ovl_check_setxattr() fs: add generic helper for filling statx attribute flags
2021-08-31Merge tag 'iomap-5.15-merge-4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linuxLinus Torvalds1-2/+3
Pull iomap updates from Darrick Wong: "The most notable externally visible change for this cycle is the addition of support for reads to inline tail fragments of files, which was requested by the erofs developers; and a correction for a kernel memory corruption bug if the sysadmin tries to activate a swapfile with more pages than the swapfile header suggests. We also now report writeback completion errors to the file mapping correctly, instead of munging all errors into EIO. Internally, the bulk of the changes are Christoph's patchset to reduce the indirect function call count by a third to a half by converting iomap iteration from a loop pattern to a generator/consumer pattern. As an added bonus, fsdax no longer open-codes iomap apply loops. Summary: - Simplify the bio_end_page usage in the buffered IO code. - Support reading inline data at nonzero offsets for erofs. - Fix some typos and bad grammar. - Convert kmap_atomic usage in the inline data read path. - Add some extra inline data input checking. - Fix a memory corruption bug stemming from iomap_swapfile_activate trying to activate more pages than mm was expecting. - Pass errnos through the page writeback code so that writeback errors are reported correctly instead of being munged to EIO. - Replace iomap_apply with a open-coded iterator loops to reduce the number of indirect calls by a third to a half. - Refactor the fsdax code to use iomap iterators instead of the open-coded iomap_apply code that it had before. - Format file range iomap tracepoint data in hexadecimal and standardize the names used in the pretty-print string" * tag 'iomap-5.15-merge-4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux: (41 commits) iomap: standardize tracepoint formatting and storage mm/swap: consider max pages in iomap_swapfile_add_extent iomap: move loop control code to iter.c iomap: constify iomap_iter_srcmap fsdax: switch the fault handlers to use iomap_iter fsdax: factor out a dax_fault_actor() helper fsdax: factor out helpers to simplify the dax fault code iomap: rework unshare flag iomap: pass an iomap_iter to various buffered I/O helpers iomap: remove iomap_apply fsdax: switch dax_iomap_rw to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_swapfile_activate to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_seek_data to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_seek_hole to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_bmap to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_fiemap to use iomap_iter iomap: switch __iomap_dio_rw to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_page_mkwrite to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_zero_range to use iomap_iter iomap: switch iomap_file_unshare to use iomap_iter ...
2021-08-31Merge tag 'for-5.15-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds46-1375/+2638
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba: "The highlights of this round are integrations with fs-verity and idmapped mounts, the rest is usual mix of minor improvements, speedups and cleanups. There are some patches outside of btrfs, namely updating some VFS interfaces, all straightforward and acked. Features: - fs-verity support, using standard ioctls, backward compatible with read-only limitation on inodes with previously enabled fs-verity - idmapped mount support - make mount with rescue=ibadroots more tolerant to partially damaged trees - allow raid0 on a single device and raid10 on two devices, degenerate cases but might be useful as an intermediate step during conversion to other profiles - zoned mode block group auto reclaim can be disabled via sysfs knob Performance improvements: - continue readahead of node siblings even if target node is in memory, could speed up full send (on sample test +11%) - batching of delayed items can speed up creating many files - fsync/tree-log speedups - avoid unnecessary work (gains +2% throughput, -2% run time on sample load) - reduced lock contention on renames (on dbench +4% throughput, up to -30% latency) Fixes: - various zoned mode fixes - preemptive flushing threshold tuning, avoid excessive work on almost full filesystems Core: - continued subpage support, preparation for implementing remaining features like compression and defragmentation; with some limitations, write is now enabled on 64K page systems with 4K sectors, still considered experimental - no readahead on compressed reads - inline extents disabled - disabled raid56 profile conversion and mount - improved flushing logic, fixing early ENOSPC on some workloads - inode flags have been internally split to read-only and read-write incompat bit parts, used by fs-verity - new tree items for fs-verity - descriptor item - Merkle tree item - inode operations extended to be namespace-aware - cleanups and refactoring Generic code changes: - fs: new export filemap_fdatawrite_wbc - fs: removed sync_inode - block: bio_trim argument type fixups - vfs: add namespace-aware lookup" * tag 'for-5.15-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (114 commits) btrfs: reset replace target device to allocation state on close btrfs: zoned: fix ordered extent boundary calculation btrfs: do not do preemptive flushing if the majority is global rsv btrfs: reduce the preemptive flushing threshold to 90% btrfs: tree-log: check btrfs_lookup_data_extent return value btrfs: avoid unnecessarily logging directories that had no changes btrfs: allow idmapped mount btrfs: handle ACLs on idmapped mounts btrfs: allow idmapped INO_LOOKUP_USER ioctl btrfs: allow idmapped SUBVOL_SETFLAGS ioctl btrfs: allow idmapped SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL ioctls btrfs: relax restrictions for SNAP_DESTROY_V2 with subvolids btrfs: allow idmapped SNAP_DESTROY ioctls btrfs: allow idmapped SNAP_CREATE/SUBVOL_CREATE ioctls btrfs: check whether fsgid/fsuid are mapped during subvolume creation btrfs: allow idmapped permission inode op btrfs: allow idmapped setattr inode op btrfs: allow idmapped tmpfile inode op btrfs: allow idmapped symlink inode op btrfs: allow idmapped mkdir inode op ...
2021-08-26Merge tag 'for-5.14-rc7-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fix from David Sterba: "One more fix that I think qualifies for a late merge. It's a revert of a one-liner fix that meanwhile got backported to stable kernels and we got reports from users. The broken fix prevents creating compressed inline extents, which could be noticeable on space consumption. Technically it's a regression as the patch was merged in 5.14-rc1 but got propagated to several stable kernels and has higher exposure than a 'typical' development cycle bug" * tag 'for-5.14-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: Revert "btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages"
2021-08-25Revert "btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages"Qu Wenruo1-1/+1
This reverts commit f2165627319ffd33a6217275e5690b1ab5c45763. [BUG] It's no longer possible to create compressed inline extent after commit f2165627319f ("btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages"). [CAUSE] For compression code, there are several possible reasons we have a range that needs to be compressed while it's no more than one page. - Compressed inline write The data is always smaller than one sector and the test lacks the condition to properly recognize a non-inline extent. - Compressed subpage write For the incoming subpage compressed write support, we require page alignment of the delalloc range. And for 64K page size, we can compress just one page into smaller sectors. For those reasons, the requirement for the data to be more than one page is not correct, and is already causing regression for compressed inline data writeback. The idea of skipping one page to avoid wasting CPU time could be revisited in the future. [FIX] Fix it by reverting the offending commit. Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/afa2742.c084f5d6.17b6b08dffc@tnonline.net Fixes: f2165627319f ("btrfs: compression: don't try to compress if we don't have enough pages") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2025-03-19 04:34:18 +0300