summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-10-25Btrfs: fix regression running delayed references when using qgroupsFilipe Manana1-9/+7
In the kernel 4.2 merge window we had a big changes to the implementation of delayed references and qgroups which made the no_quota field of delayed references not used anymore. More specifically the no_quota field is not used anymore as of: commit 0ed4792af0e8 ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented qgroup mechanism.") Leaving the no_quota field actually prevents delayed references from getting merged, which in turn cause the following BUG_ON(), at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, to be hit when qgroups are enabled: static int run_delayed_tree_ref(...) { (...) BUG_ON(node->ref_mod != 1); (...) } This happens on a scenario like the following: 1) Ref1 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added. 2) Ref2 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added. It's not merged with Ref1 because Ref1->no_quota != Ref2->no_quota. 3) Ref3 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added. It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref2 is incompatible due to Ref2->no_quota != Ref3->no_quota. 4) Ref4 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added. It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref3 is incompatible due to Ref3->no_quota != Ref4->no_quota. 5) We run delayed references, trigger merging of delayed references, through __btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> btrfs_merge_delayed_refs(). 6) Ref1 and Ref3 are merged as Ref1->no_quota = Ref3->no_quota and all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref1 gets a ref_mod value of 2. 7) Ref2 and Ref4 are merged as Ref2->no_quota = Ref4->no_quota and all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref2 gets a ref_mod value of 2. 8) Ref1 and Ref2 aren't merged, because they have different values for their no_quota field. 9) Delayed reference Ref1 is picked for running (select_delayed_ref() always prefers references with an action == BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF). So run_delayed_tree_ref() is called for Ref1 which triggers the BUG_ON because Ref1->red_mod != 1 (equals 2). So fix this by removing the no_quota field, as it's not used anymore as of commit 0ed4792af0e8 ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented qgroup mechanism."). The use of no_quota was also buggy in at least two places: 1) At delayed-refs.c:btrfs_add_delayed_tree_ref() - we were setting no_quota to 0 instead of 1 when the following condition was true: is_fstree(ref_root) || !fs_info->quota_enabled 2) At extent-tree.c:__btrfs_inc_extent_ref() - we were attempting to reset a node's no_quota when the condition "!is_fstree(root_objectid) || !root->fs_info->quota_enabled" was true but we did it only in an unused local stack variable, that is, we never reset the no_quota value in the node itself. This fixes the remainder of problems several people have been having when running delayed references, mostly while a balance is running in parallel, on a 4.2+ kernel. Very special thanks to Stéphane Lesimple for helping debugging this issue and testing this fix on his multi terabyte filesystem (which took more than one day to balance alone, plus fsck, etc). Also, this fixes deadlock issue when using the clone ioctl with qgroups enabled, as reported by Elias Probst in the mailing list. The deadlock happens because after calling btrfs_insert_empty_item we have our path holding a write lock on a leaf of the fs/subvol tree and then before releasing the path we called check_ref() which did backref walking, when qgroups are enabled, and tried to read lock the same leaf. The trace for this case is the following: INFO: task systemd-nspawn:6095 blocked for more than 120 seconds. (...) Call Trace: [<ffffffff86999201>] schedule+0x74/0x83 [<ffffffff863ef64c>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xc0/0xea [<ffffffff86137ed7>] ? wait_woken+0x74/0x74 [<ffffffff8639f0a7>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x51a/0x810 [<ffffffff863a129b>] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0xdf/0x3ce [<ffffffff86413a00>] ? ulist_add_merge+0x1b/0x127 [<ffffffff86411688>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x62a/0x667 [<ffffffff863ef546>] ? btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw+0x78/0xbe [<ffffffff864122d3>] find_parent_nodes+0xaf3/0xfc6 [<ffffffff86412838>] __btrfs_find_all_roots+0x92/0xf0 [<ffffffff864128f2>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x45/0x65 [<ffffffff8639a75b>] ? btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq+0x2b/0x88 [<ffffffff863e852e>] check_ref+0x64/0xc4 [<ffffffff863e9e01>] btrfs_clone+0x66e/0xb5d [<ffffffff863ea77f>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x48f/0x5bb [<ffffffff86048a68>] ? native_sched_clock+0x28/0x77 [<ffffffff863ed9b0>] btrfs_ioctl+0xabc/0x25cb (...) The problem goes away by eleminating check_ref(), which no longer is needed as its purpose was to get a value for the no_quota field of a delayed reference (this patch removes the no_quota field as mentioned earlier). Reported-by: Stéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr> Tested-by: Stéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr> Reported-by: Elias Probst <mail@eliasprobst.eu> Reported-by: Peter Becker <floyd.net@gmail.com> Reported-by: Malte Schröder <malte@tnxip.de> Reported-by: Derek Dongray <derek@valedon.co.uk> Reported-by: Erkki Seppala <flux-btrfs@inside.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.2+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
2015-10-22btrfs: qgroup: Cleanup old inaccurate facilitiesQu Wenruo1-4/+4
Cleanup the old facilities which use old btrfs_qgroup_reserve() function call, replace them with the newer version, and remove the "__" prefix in them. Also, make btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free() functions private, as they are now only used inside qgroup codes. Now, the whole btrfs qgroup is swithed to use the new reserve facilities. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-10-22btrfs: extent-tree: Switch to new check_data_free_space and ↵Qu Wenruo1-4/+4
free_reserved_data_space Use new reserve/free for buffered write and inode cache. For buffered write case, as nodatacow write won't increase quota account, so unlike old behavior which does reserve before check nocow, now we check nocow first and then only reserve data if we can't do nocow write. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-09-29Btrfs: consolidate btrfs_error() to btrfs_std_error()Anand Jain1-1/+1
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together. And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other is to log the error, so don't closely name them. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-08-09btrfs: Remove unnecessary variants in relocation.cZhaolei1-8/+5
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup and make kernel stack happy. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09btrfs: Cleanup: Remove objectid's init-value in create_reloc_inode()Zhaolei1-1/+1
objectid's init-value is not used in any case, remove it. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09btrfs: Error handle for get_ref_objectid_v0() in relocate_block_group()Zhaolei1-0/+4
We need error checking code for get_ref_objectid_v0() in relocate_block_group(), to avoid unpredictable result, especially for accessing uninitialized value(when function failed) after this line. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09btrfs: Use ref_cnt for set_block_group_ro()Zhaolei1-8/+6
More than one code call set_block_group_ro() and restore rw in fail. Old code use bool bit to save blockgroup's ro state, it can not support parallel case(it is confirmd exist in my debug log). This patch use ref count to store ro state, and rename set_block_group_ro/set_block_group_rw to inc_block_group_ro/dec_block_group_ro. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-07-02Btrfs: fix wrong check for btrfs_force_chunk_alloc()Shilong Wang1-1/+1
btrfs_force_chunk_alloc() return 1 for allocation chunk successfully. This problem exists since commit c87f08ca4. With this patch, we might fix some enospc problems for balances. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-03Btrfs: fix up read_tree_block to return proper errorLiu Bo1-5/+14
The return value of read_tree_block() can confuse callers as it always returns NULL for either -ENOMEM or -EIO, so it's likely that callers parse it to a wrong error, for instance, in btrfs_read_tree_root(). This fixes the above issue. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-04-13btrfs: qgroup: do a reservation in a higher level.Dongsheng Yang1-1/+1
There are two problems in qgroup: a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K, qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup is not available to user. b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it, it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup. The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to write and release it in transaction committed. In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account when the data is written in commit_transaction(). Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-04-11Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout outside critical section in commitChris Mason1-3/+6
We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write the free space cache. In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do this while no other writers are allowed in the commit. If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs trying to change the filesystem. This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit. We'll still have to redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work out of the way without blocking the entire FS. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-12-12btrfs: sink blocksize parameter to tree_block_processedDavid Sterba1-4/+5
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-12-12btrfs: sink blocksize parameter to readahead_tree_blockDavid Sterba1-2/+1
All callers pass nodesize. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-04Merge branch 'cleanup/blocksize-diet-part1' of ↵Chris Mason1-22/+6
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus
2014-10-04Merge branch 'cleanup/misc-for-3.18' of ↵Chris Mason1-2/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Conflicts: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
2014-10-04Btrfs: fix build_backref_tree issue with multiple shared blocksJosef Bacik1-1/+4
Marc Merlin sent me a broken fs image months ago where it would blow up in the upper->checked BUG_ON() in build_backref_tree. This is because we had a scenario like this block a -- level 4 (not shared) | block b -- level 3 (reloc block, shared) | block c -- level 2 (not shared) | block d -- level 1 (shared) | block e -- level 0 (shared) We go to build a backref tree for block e, we notice block d is shared and add it to the list of blocks to lookup it's backrefs for. Now when we loop around we will check edges for the block, so we will see we looked up block c last time. So we lookup block d and then see that the block that points to it is block c and we can just skip that edge since we've already been up this path. The problem is because we clear need_check when we see block d (as it is shared) we never add block b as needing to be checked. And because block c is in our path already we bail out before we walk up to block b and add it to the backref check list. To fix this we need to reset need_check if we trip over a block that doesn't need to be checked. This will make sure that any subsequent blocks in the path as we're walking up afterwards are added to the list to be processed. With this patch I can now mount Marc's fs image and it'll complete the balance without panicing. Thanks, Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-10-04Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_treeJosef Bacik1-29/+59
When balance panics it tends to panic in the BUG_ON(!upper->checked); test, because it means it couldn't build the backref tree properly. This is annoying to users and frankly a recoverable error, nothing in this function is actually fatal since it is just an in-memory building of the backrefs for a given bytenr. So go through and change all the BUG_ON()'s to ASSERT()'s, and fix the BUG_ON(!upper->checked) thing to just return an error. This patch also fixes the error handling so it tears down the work we've done properly. This code was horribly broken since we always just panic'ed instead of actually erroring out, so it needed to be completely re-worked. With this patch my broken image no longer panics when I mount it. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-10-02btrfs: let merge_reloc_roots return voidDavid Sterba1-2/+1
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: remove parameter blocksize from read_tree_blockDavid Sterba1-7/+4
We know the tree block size, no need to pass it around. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: inline code of reada_tree_block and remove itDavid Sterba1-10/+2
It's trivial with a single user. And remove one pointless BUG_ON. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: remove unused parameter from readahead_tree_blockDavid Sterba1-7/+2
The parent_transid parameter has been unused since its introduction in ca7a79ad8dbe2466 ("Pass down the expected generation number when reading tree blocks"). In reada_tree_block, it was even wrongly set to leafsize. Transid check is done in the proper read and readahead ignores errors. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-09-18btrfs: use nodesize everywhere, kill leafsizeDavid Sterba1-11/+10
The nodesize and leafsize were never of different values. Unify the usage and make nodesize the one. Cleanup the redundant checks and helpers. Shaves a few bytes from .text: text data bss dec hex filename 852418 24560 23112 900090 dbbfa btrfs.ko.before 851074 24584 23112 898770 db6d2 btrfs.ko.after Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-18btrfs: clenaup: don't call btrfs_release_path before free_pathDavid Sterba1-1/+0
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-10btrfs: remove stale newlines from log messagesDavid Sterba1-2/+2
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-10Btrfs: use bitfield instead of integer data type for the some variants in ↵Miao Xie1-8/+9
btrfs_root Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07Btrfs: do not reset last_snapshot after relocationJosef Bacik1-21/+0
This was done to allow NO_COW to continue to be NO_COW after relocation but it is not right. When relocating we will convert blocks to FULL_BACKREF that we relocate. We can leave some of these full backref blocks behind if they are not cow'ed out during the relocation, like if we fail the relocation with ENOSPC and then just drop the reloc tree. Then when we go to cow the block again we won't lookup the extent flags because we won't think there has been a snapshot recently which means we will do our normal ref drop thing instead of adding back a tree ref and dropping the shared ref. This will cause btrfs_free_extent to blow up because it can't find the ref we are trying to free. This was found with my ref verifying tool. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-10Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lockMiao Xie1-1/+1
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock, or we would make the tasks wait for a long time. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-01-29Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to relocate tree blocksWang Shilong1-0/+6
During balance test, we hit an oops: [ 2013.841551] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1174! The problem is that if we fail to relocate tree blocks, we should update backref cache, otherwise, some pending nodes are not updated while snapshot check @cache->last_trans is within one transaction and won't update it and then oops happen. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to merge reloc rootsWang Shilong1-7/+3
Previously, we will free reloc root memory and then force filesystem to be readonly. The problem is that there may be another thread commiting transaction which will try to access freed reloc root during merging reloc roots process. To keep consistency snapshots shared space, we should allow snapshot finished if possible, so here we don't free reloc root memory. signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29Btrfs: remove unused argument from select_reloc_root()Wang Shilong1-4/+2
@nr is no longer used, remove it from select_reloc_root() Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefixFrank Holton1-2/+2
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29Btrfs: remove unnecessary filemap writting and waiting after block group ↵Wang Shilong1-5/+0
relocation We have commited transaction before, remove redundant filemap writting and waiting here, it can speed up balance relocation process. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29Btrfs: improve forever loop when doing balance relocationWang Shilong1-38/+36
We hit a forever loop when doing balance relocation,the reason is that we firstly reserve 4M(node size is 16k).and within transaction we will try to add extra reservation for snapshot roots,this will return -EAGAIN if there has been a thread flushing space to reserve space.We will do this again and again with filesystem becoming nearly full. If the above '-EAGAIN' case happens, we try to refill reservation more outsize of transaction, and this will return eariler in enospc case,however, this dosen't really hurt because it makes no sense doing balance relocation with the filesystem nearly full. Miao Xie helped a lot to track this issue, thanks. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-12Btrfs: make sure we cleanup all reloc roots if error happensWang Shilong1-0/+7
I hit an oops when merging reloc roots fails, the reason is that new reloc roots may be added and we should make sure we cleanup all reloc roots. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-12Btrfs: skip building backref tree for uuid and quota tree when doing balance ↵Wang Shilong1-1/+3
relocation Quota tree and UUID Tree is only cowed, they can not be snapshoted. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-12-12Btrfs: fix an oops when doing balance relocationWang Shilong1-23/+47
I hit an oops when inserting reloc root into @reloc_root_tree(it can be easily triggered when forcing cow for relocation root) [ 866.494539] [<ffffffffa0499579>] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x79/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 866.495321] [<ffffffffa044c240>] record_root_in_trans+0xb0/0x110 [btrfs] [ 866.496109] [<ffffffffa044d758>] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x48/0x80 [btrfs] [ 866.496908] [<ffffffffa0494da8>] select_reloc_root+0xa8/0x210 [btrfs] [ 866.497703] [<ffffffffa0495c8a>] do_relocation+0x16a/0x540 [btrfs] This is because reloc root inserted into @reloc_root_tree is not within one transaction,reloc root may be cowed and root block bytenr will be reused then oops happens.We should update reloc root in @reloc_root_tree when cow reloc root node, fix it. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: rename btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodesMiao Xie1-1/+1
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always used at the same place. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: don't wait for the completion of all the ordered extentsMiao Xie1-1/+1
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem, if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12btrfs: Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1)Dulshani Gunawardhana1-9/+4
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix. Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: use 'u64' rather than 'int' to get extent's generationWang Shilong1-1/+1
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: stop committing the transaction so much during relocateJosef Bacik1-20/+13
I noticed with my horrible snapshot excercisor that we were taking forever to relocate the larger the file system got. This appeared to be because we were committing the transaction _constantly_. There were a few places where we do braindead things with metadata reservation, like start a transaction and then try to refill the block rsv, which not only keeps us from committing a transaction during the enospc stuff, but keeps us from doing some of the harder flushing work which will make us more likely to need to commit the transaction. We also were checking the block rsv and committing the transaction if the block rsv was below a certain threshold, but we were doing this in a place where we don't actually keep anything in the block rsv so this was always ending up false so we always committed the transaction in this case. I tested this to make sure it didn't break anything, but it takes about 10 hours to get the box to this state so I don't know how much of an impact it will really make. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: return an error from btrfs_wait_ordered_rangeJosef Bacik1-1/+6
I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it's data it won't actually error out, it will just carry on. This is because it doesn't check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn't actually return anything. So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look valid when it really isnt. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() casued by the reserved space migrationMiao Xie1-2/+4
When we did space balance and snapshot creation at the same time, we might meet the following oops: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3038! [SNIP] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa0411ec7>] btrfs_orphan_cleanup+0x293/0x407 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa042dc45>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.28+0x259/0x373 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa042de85>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x126/0x156 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa042dff1>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xd0/0x121 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0430b2c>] btrfs_ioctl+0x414/0x1854 [btrfs] [<ffffffff813b60b7>] ? __do_page_fault+0x305/0x379 [<ffffffff811215a9>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39 [<ffffffff81121d7c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2 [<ffffffff81057fe7>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0xb8 [<ffffffff81121e88>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83 [<ffffffff813b39ff>] ? do_device_not_available+0x12/0x14 [<ffffffff813b99c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [SNIP] RIP [<ffffffffa040da40>] btrfs_orphan_add+0xc3/0x126 [btrfs] The reason of the problem is that the relocation root creation stole the reserved space, which was reserved for orphan item deletion. There are several ways to fix this problem, one is to increasing the reserved space size of the space balace, and then we can use that space to create the relocation tree for each fs/file trees. But it is hard to calculate the suitable size because we doesn't know how many fs/file trees we need relocate. We fixed this problem by reserving the space for relocation root creation actively since the space it need is very small (one tree block, used for root node copy), then we use that reserved space to create the relocation tree. If we don't reserve space for relocation tree creation, we will use the reserved space of the balance. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: relocate csums properly with prealloc extentsJosef Bacik1-3/+15
A user reported a problem where they were getting csum errors when running a balance and running systemd's journal. This is because systemd is awesome and fallocate()'s its log space and writes into it. Unfortunately we assume that when we read in all the csums for an extent that they are sequential starting at the bytenr we care about. This obviously isn't the case for prealloc extents, where we could have written to the middle of the prealloc extent only, which means the csum would be for the bytenr in the middle of our range and not the front of our range. Fix this by offsetting the new bytenr we are logging to based on the original bytenr the csum was for. With this patch I no longer see the csum errors I was seeing. Thanks, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-12Btrfs: remove path arg from btrfs_truncate_free_space_cacheFilipe David Borba Manana1-10/+1
Not used for anything, and removing it avoids caller's need to allocate a path structure. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-10-11Btrfs: fix oops caused by the space balance and dead rootsMiao Xie1-1/+1
When doing space balance and subvolume destroy at the same time, we met the following oops: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2247! RIP: 0010: [<ffffffffa04cec16>] prepare_to_merge+0x154/0x1f0 [btrfs] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa04b5ab7>] relocate_block_group+0x466/0x4e6 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04b5c7a>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x143/0x275 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0495c56>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.27+0x5c/0x5a2 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0459871>] ? btrfs_item_key_to_cpu+0x15/0x31 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa048b46a>] ? btrfs_get_token_64+0x7e/0xcd [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04a3467>] ? btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking+0xb2/0xb7 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa049907d>] btrfs_balance+0x9c7/0xb6f [btrfs] [<ffffffffa049ef84>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x234/0x2ac [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04a1e8e>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd87/0x1ef9 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81122f53>] ? path_openat+0x234/0x4db [<ffffffff813c3b78>] ? __do_page_fault+0x31d/0x391 [<ffffffff810f8ab6>] ? vma_link+0x74/0x94 [<ffffffff811250f5>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39 [<ffffffff811258c8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2 [<ffffffff811259d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83 [<ffffffff813c3bfa>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff813c73c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b It is because we returned the error number if the reference of the root was 0 when doing space relocation. It was not right here, because though the root was dead(refs == 0), but the space it held still need be relocated, or we could not remove the block group. So in this case, we should return the root no matter it is dead or not. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21Btrfs: kill delay_iput arg to the wait_ordered functionsJosef Bacik1-1/+1
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it. However if we have an ordered extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on the inode to start work on the ordered extent. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21Btrfs: fixup error handling in btrfs_reloc_cowJosef Bacik1-17/+24
If we failed to actually allocate the correct size of the extent to relocate we will end up in an infinite loop because we won't return an error, we'll just move on to the next extent. So fix this up by returning an error, and then fix all the callers to return an error up the stack rather than BUG_ON()'ing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrf: cleanup: don't check for root_refs == 0 twiceStefan Behrens1-3/+0
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() already checks if btrfs_root_refs() is zero and returns ENOENT in this case. There is no need to do it again in three more places. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>