| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We used to need to include some headers in order to read the registers
and do all the calculations by ourselves, but this is not done anymore
(i.e. we let the firmware do this for us), so we don't need to include
those headers anymore.
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
When read, this new debugfs entry requests the current temperature
from the firmware and outputs it.
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
Reading the temperature directly from the hardware, without the help
of the firmware, is a complex process and is not entirely the same for
different hardware. Also, some NICs don't easily allow access to the
sensors when the firmware is not running, which would add even more
complexity to the code.
To reduce the code complexity and to avoid code duplication between
the firmware and the driver, boot the firmware briefly to read the
current temperature while in CT kill mode.
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
Our legal structure changed at some point (see wikipedia), but
we forgot to immediately switch over to the new copyright
notice.
For files that we have modified in the time since the change,
add the proper copyright notice now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
If we're manually testing the CT kill functionality via debugfs, we
shouldn't schedule the work to recheck the temperature after the
ct_kill_duration period has passed.
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
Since we can't read the actual temperature when the firmware is
running, just set the temperature to 0 when the test is disabled and
disable CT Kill if it was enabled.
Additionally, since we rely on iwl_mvm_tt_handler() to exit CT kill
when in test mode, call iwl_mvm_exit_ctkill() in that function if the
temperature is low again. Also make the iwl_mvm_enter_ctkill() and
iwl_mvm_exit_ctkill() return if called when not necessary anymore
(e.g. when iwl_mvm_exit_ctkill() is called when we're not in CT-kill).
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
Add iwl_mvm_ref_sync() calls (with new ref types) to
flows that might access the device directly.
These calls make sure the device is out of d0i3,
and the bus is available for direct access.
Since some of these functions are reentrant, convert
the refs_bitmap to a ref counter, so multiple refs
of the same type could be taken concurrently.
Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliadx.peller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
As part of thermal throttling, some data is being read from NVM.
The offset is in words, but was addressed as in octets. fixed.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
CMD_SYNC is really 0 which is confusing:
if (cmd.flags & CMD_SYNC) is always false.
Fix this by simply removing its definition.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
When NIC is exiting from thermal throttling state (i.e. after
heating and then cooling down), tx-backoff values are assigned
to be zero, instead of being restored to the minimal value. Fixed.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
When NIC exit thermal throttling while having minimal tx-backoff
restriction, the warning message that indicate about that state
won't show up. Fixed.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
The tx backoff settings used by the thermal throttling mechanism can
also be used for enforcing a limit on the power consumption of the module.
Handle the platform PCIe power limitation by translating the limit
(measured in mw) to its respective tx backoff value. The translation is
module specific.
The resulting tx backoff value is sent to the ucode, and also serves as the
minimal backoff value that can be set by the thermal throttling mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <idox.yariv@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
Happy new year!
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
The stop_hw trans callback is not well defined. It is missing in many
cleanup flows and the division of labor between stop_device/stop_hw
is cumbersome. Remove stop_hw and use stop_device to perform both.
Implement this for all current transports.
PCIE needs some extra configuration the op-mode is leaving to configure
RF kill. Expose this explicitly as a new op_mode_leave trans callback.
Take the call to stop_device outside iwl_run_mvm_init_ucode, this
makes more sense and WARN when we want to run the INIT firmware while
it has run already.
Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
This is just a helper function to go from the mac80211
station struct to our internal one, to later allow us
to avoid temporary 'mvmsta' variables.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
When the NIC is expected to operate in high temperature,
it is advisable to put more aggresive thermal throttling
parameters, in order to prevent CT-kill.
Signed-off-by: eytan lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
The LQ command argument isn't needed, it's always taken from the
station struct that's already passed, remove the argument.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
|
|
Add prints visible to the user when entering and exiting
thrermal throttling, because so users can tell that the
NIC is getting too hot (and throughput will decrease.)
Signed-off-by: eytan lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
The Thermal Throttling code could do that, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
In order to avoid NIC destruction due to high temperature,
CT kill will power down the NIC.
To avoid this, thermal throttling will decrease throughput
to prevent the NIC from reaching the temperature at which
CT kill is performed.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
