summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-09-25iommu/vt-d: Handle memory shortage on pasid table allocationLu Baolu1-1/+1
Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o a PASID table, the device could continue to work with only shared virtual memory impacted. So, let's go ahead with context mapping even the memory allocation for pasid table failed. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107783 Fixes: cc580e41260d ("iommu/vt-d: Per PCI device pasid table interfaces") Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Pelton Kyle D <kyle.d.pelton@intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2018-07-20iommu/vt-d: Per PCI device pasid table interfacesLu Baolu1-0/+18
This patch adds the interfaces for per PCI device pasid table management. Currently we allocate one pasid table for all PCI devices under the scope of an IOMMU. It's insecure in some cases where multiple devices under one single IOMMU unit support PASID features. With per PCI device pasid table, we can achieve finer protection and isolation granularity. Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2018-07-20iommu/vt-d: Global PASID name spaceLu Baolu1-0/+21
This adds the system wide PASID name space for the PASID allocation. Currently we are using per IOMMU PASID name spaces which are not suitable for some use cases. For an example, one application (associated with a PASID) might talk to two physical devices simultaneously while the two devices could reside behind two different IOMMU units. Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>