summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-07-26arm64: Add stack information to on_accessible_stackLaura Abbott1-1/+1
In preparation for enabling the stackleak plugin on arm64, we need a way to get the bounds of the current stack. Extend on_accessible_stack to get this information. Acked-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> [will: folded in fix for allmodconfig build breakage w/ sdei] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-07-12Revert "arm64: fix infinite stacktrace"Will Deacon1-3/+0
This reverts commit 7e7df71fd57ff2894d96abb0080922bf39460a79. When unwinding out of the IRQ stack and onto the interrupted EL1 stack, we cannot rely on the frame pointer being strictly increasing, as this could terminate the backtrace early depending on how the stacks have been allocated. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-07-04arm64: fix infinite stacktraceMikulas Patocka1-0/+3
I've got this infinite stacktrace when debugging another problem: [ 908.795225] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 908.796176] 1-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=952/1/4611686018427387904 softirq=1462/1462 fqs=355 [ 908.797692] 2-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=f42/1/4611686018427387904 softirq=1550/1551 fqs=355 [ 908.799189] (detected by 0, t=2109 jiffies, g=130, c=129, q=235) [ 908.800284] Task dump for CPU 1: [ 908.800871] kworker/1:1 R running task 0 32 2 0x00000022 [ 908.802127] Workqueue: writecache-writeabck writecache_writeback [dm_writecache] [ 908.820285] Call trace: [ 908.824785] __switch_to+0x68/0x90 [ 908.837661] 0xfffffe00603afd90 [ 908.844119] 0xfffffe00603afd90 [ 908.850091] 0xfffffe00603afd90 [ 908.854285] 0xfffffe00603afd90 [ 908.863538] 0xfffffe00603afd90 [ 908.865523] 0xfffffe00603afd90 The machine just locked up and kept on printing the same line over and over again. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-02-23arm64: fix unwind_frame() for filtered out fn for function graph tracingPratyush Anand1-0/+5
do_task_stat() calls get_wchan(), which further does unwind_frame(). unwind_frame() restores frame->pc to original value in case function graph tracer has modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook a function return. However, if function graph tracer has hit a filtered function, then we can't unwind it as ftrace_push_return_trace() has biased the index(frame->graph) with a 'huge negative' offset(-FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH). Moreover, arm64 stack walker defines index(frame->graph) as unsigned int, which can not compare a -ve number. Similar problem we can have with calling of walk_stackframe() from save_stack_trace_tsk() or dump_backtrace(). This patch fixes unwind_frame() to test the index for -ve value and restore index accordingly before we can restore frame->pc. Reproducer: cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/ echo schedule > set_graph_notrace echo 1 > options/display-graph echo wakeup > current_tracer ps -ef | grep -i agent Above commands result in: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff801bd3d1e000 pgd = ffff8003cbe97c00 [ffff801bd3d1e000] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP [...] CPU: 5 PID: 11696 Comm: ps Not tainted 4.11.0+ #33 [...] task: ffff8003c21ba000 task.stack: ffff8003cc6c0000 PC is at unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180 LR is at get_wchan+0xd4/0x134 pc : [<ffff00000808892c>] lr : [<ffff0000080860b8>] pstate: 60000145 sp : ffff8003cc6c3ab0 x29: ffff8003cc6c3ab0 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000000026 x26: 0000000000000026 x25: 00000000000012d8 x24: 0000000000000000 x23: ffff8003c1c04000 x22: ffff000008c83000 x21: ffff8003c1c00000 x20: 000000000000000f x19: ffff8003c1bc0000 x18: 0000fffffc593690 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001 x15: 0000b855670e2b60 x14: 0003e97f22cf1d0f x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 00000000e8f4883e x10: 0000000154f47ec8 x9 : 0000000070f367c0 x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 00008003f7290000 x6 : 0000000000000018 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff8003c1c03cb0 x3 : ffff8003c1c03ca0 x2 : 00000017ffe80000 x1 : ffff8003cc6c3af8 x0 : ffff8003d3e9e000 Process ps (pid: 11696, stack limit = 0xffff8003cc6c0000) Stack: (0xffff8003cc6c3ab0 to 0xffff8003cc6c4000) [...] [<ffff00000808892c>] unwind_frame+0x12c/0x180 [<ffff000008305008>] do_task_stat+0x864/0x870 [<ffff000008305c44>] proc_tgid_stat+0x3c/0x48 [<ffff0000082fde0c>] proc_single_show+0x5c/0xb8 [<ffff0000082b27e0>] seq_read+0x160/0x414 [<ffff000008289e6c>] __vfs_read+0x58/0x164 [<ffff00000828b164>] vfs_read+0x88/0x144 [<ffff00000828c2e8>] SyS_read+0x60/0xc0 [<ffff0000080834a0>] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4 Fixes: 20380bb390a4 (arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer) Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: replace WARN_ON with WARN_ON_ONCE] Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-09-14arm64: stacktrace: avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktracePrakash Gupta1-5/+13
The stacktraces always begin as follows: [<c00117b4>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x0/0x98 [<c0011870>] save_stack_trace+0x24/0x28 ... This is because the stack trace code includes the stack frames for itself. This is incorrect behaviour, and also leads to "skip" doing the wrong thing (which is the number of stack frames to avoid recording.) Perversely, it does the right thing when passed a non-current thread. Fix this by ensuring that we have a known constant number of frames above the main stack trace function, and always skip these. This was fixed for arch arm by commit 3683f44c42e9 ("ARM: stacktrace: avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1504078343-28754-1-git-send-email-guptap@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Prakash Gupta <guptap@codeaurora.org> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-08-15arm64: add on_accessible_stack()Mark Rutland1-6/+1
Both unwind_frame() and dump_backtrace() try to check whether a stack address is sane to access, with very similar logic. Both will need updating in order to handle overflow stacks. Factor out this logic into a helper, so that we can avoid further duplication when we add overflow stacks. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
2017-08-09arm64: unwind: remove sp from struct stackframeArd Biesheuvel1-4/+0
The unwind code sets the sp member of struct stackframe to 'frame pointer + 0x10' unconditionally, without regard for whether doing so produces a legal value. So let's simply remove it now that we have stopped using it anyway. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-08-09arm64: unwind: reference pt_regs via embedded stack frameArd Biesheuvel1-27/+6
As it turns out, the unwind code is slightly broken, and probably has been for a while. The problem is in the dumping of the exception stack, which is intended to dump the contents of the pt_regs struct at each level in the call stack where an exception was taken and routed to a routine marked as __exception (which means its stack frame is right below the pt_regs struct on the stack). 'Right below the pt_regs struct' is ill defined, though: the unwind code assigns 'frame pointer + 0x10' to the .sp member of the stackframe struct at each level, and dump_backtrace() happily dereferences that as the pt_regs pointer when encountering an __exception routine. However, the actual size of the stack frame created by this routine (which could be one of many __exception routines we have in the kernel) is not known, and so frame.sp is pretty useless to figure out where struct pt_regs really is. So it seems the only way to ensure that we can find our struct pt_regs when walking the stack frames is to put it at a known fixed offset of the stack frame pointer that is passed to such __exception routines. The simplest way to do that is to put it inside pt_regs itself, which is the main change implemented by this patch. As a bonus, doing this allows us to get rid of a fair amount of cruft related to walking from one stack to the other, which is especially nice since we intend to introduce yet another stack for overflow handling once we add support for vmapped stacks. It also fixes an inconsistency where we only add a stack frame pointing to ELR_EL1 if we are executing from the IRQ stack but not when we are executing from the task stack. To consistly identify exceptions regs even in the presence of exceptions taken from entry code, we must check whether the next frame was created by entry text, rather than whether the current frame was crated by exception text. To avoid backtracing using PCs that fall in the idmap, or are controlled by userspace, we must explcitly zero the FP and LR in startup paths, and must ensure that the frame embedded in pt_regs is zeroed upon entry from EL0. To avoid these NULL entries showin in the backtrace, unwind_frame() is updated to avoid them. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [Mark: compare current frame against .entry.text, avoid bogus PCs] Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-08-08arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointerArd Biesheuvel1-17/+7
Currently, when unwinding the call stack, we validate the frame pointer of each frame against frame.sp, whose value is not clearly defined, and which makes it more difficult to link stack frames together across different stacks. It is far better to simply check whether the frame pointer itself points into a valid stack. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-08-08arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stackMark Rutland1-2/+2
Our IRQ_STACK_PTR() and on_irq_stack() helpers both take a cpu argument, used to generate a percpu address. In all cases, they are passed {raw_,}smp_processor_id(), so this parameter is redundant. Since {raw_,}smp_processor_id() use a percpu variable internally, this approach means we generate a percpu offset to find the current cpu, then use this to index an array of percpu offsets, which we then use to find the current CPU's IRQ stack pointer. Thus, most of the work is redundant. Instead, we can consistently use raw_cpu_ptr() to generate the CPU's irq_stack pointer by simply adding the percpu offset to the irq_stack address, which is simpler in both respects. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-06-15arm64: Export save_stack_trace_tsk()Dustin Brown1-0/+1
The kernel watchdog is a great debugging tool for finding tasks that consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time in contiguous chunks. One can imagine building a similar watchdog for arbitrary driver threads using save_stack_trace_tsk() and print_stack_trace(). However, this is not viable for dynamically loaded driver modules on ARM platforms because save_stack_trace_tsk() is not exported for those architectures. Export save_stack_trace_tsk() for the ARM64 architecture to align with x86 and support various debugging use cases such as arbitrary driver thread watchdog timers. Signed-off-by: Dustin Brown <dustinb@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-03-02sched/headers: Prepare for new header dependencies before moving code to ↵Ingo Molnar1-0/+1
<linux/sched/task_stack.h> We are going to split <linux/sched/task_stack.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/task_stack.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-03-02sched/headers: Prepare for new header dependencies before moving code to ↵Ingo Molnar1-0/+1
<linux/sched/debug.h> We are going to split <linux/sched/debug.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/debug.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-11-11arm64: prep stack walkers for THREAD_INFO_IN_TASKMark Rutland1-0/+5
When CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is selected, task stacks may be freed before a task is destroyed. To account for this, the stacks are refcounted, and when manipulating the stack of another task, it is necessary to get/put the stack to ensure it isn't freed and/or re-used while we do so. This patch reworks the arm64 stack walking code to account for this. When CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is not selected these perform no refcounting, and this should only be a structural change that does not affect behaviour. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2016-11-11arm64: unexport walk_stackframeMark Rutland1-1/+0
The walk_stackframe functions is architecture-specific, with a varying prototype, and common code should not use it directly. None of its current users can be built as modules. With THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK, users will also need to hold a stack reference before calling it. There's no reason for it to be exported, and it's very easy to misuse, so unexport it for now. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2016-11-11arm64: factor out current_stack_pointerMark Rutland1-0/+1
We define current_stack_pointer in <asm/thread_info.h>, though other files and header relying upon it do not have this necessary include, and are thus fragile to changes in the header soup. Subsequent patches will affect the header soup such that directly including <asm/thread_info.h> may result in a circular header include in some of these cases, so we can't simply include <asm/thread_info.h>. Instead, factor current_thread_info into its own header, and have all existing users include this explicitly. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2016-09-26arm64: fix dump_backtrace/unwind_frame with NULL tskMark Rutland1-1/+4
In some places, dump_backtrace() is called with a NULL tsk parameter, e.g. in bug_handler() in arch/arm64, or indirectly via show_stack() in core code. The expectation is that this is treated as if current were passed instead of NULL. Similar is true of unwind_frame(). Commit a80a0eb70c358f8c ("arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust") didn't take this into account. In dump_backtrace() it compares tsk against current *before* we check if tsk is NULL, and in unwind_frame() we never set tsk if it is NULL. Due to this, we won't initialise irq_stack_ptr in either function. In dump_backtrace() this results in calling dump_mem() for memory immediately above the IRQ stack range, rather than for the relevant range on the task stack. In unwind_frame we'll reject unwinding frames on the IRQ stack. In either case this results in incomplete or misleading backtrace information, but is not otherwise problematic. The initial percpu areas (including the IRQ stacks) are allocated in the linear map, and dump_mem uses __get_user(), so we shouldn't access anything with side-effects, and will handle holes safely. This patch fixes the issue by having both functions handle the NULL tsk case before doing anything else with tsk. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Fixes: a80a0eb70c358f8c ("arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust") Acked-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2016-09-05arm64: ftrace: add save_stack_trace_regs()Pratyush Anand1-0/+21
Currently, enabling stacktrace of a kprobe events generates warning: echo stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_options echo "p xhci_irq" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at ../kernel/stacktrace.c:74 save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc4-dirty #5128 Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r1) (DT) task: ffff800975dd1900 task.stack: ffff800975ddc000 PC is at save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48 LR is at save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48 pc : [<ffff000008126c64>] lr : [<ffff000008126c64>] pstate: 600003c5 sp : ffff80097ef52c00 Call trace: save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48 __ftrace_trace_stack+0x168/0x208 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x5c/0x7c kprobe_trace_func+0x308/0x3d8 kprobe_dispatcher+0x58/0x60 kprobe_breakpoint_handler+0xbc/0x18c brk_handler+0x50/0x90 do_debug_exception+0x50/0xbc This patch implements save_stack_trace_regs(), so that stacktrace of a kprobe events can be obtained. After this patch, there is no warning and we can see the stacktrace for kprobe events in trace buffer. more /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace <idle>-0 [004] d.h. 1356.000496: p_xhci_irq_0:(xhci_irq+0x0/0x9ac) <idle>-0 [004] d.h. 1356.000497: <stack trace> => xhci_irq => __handle_irq_event_percpu => handle_irq_event_percpu => handle_irq_event => handle_fasteoi_irq => generic_handle_irq => __handle_domain_irq => gic_handle_irq => el1_irq => arch_cpu_idle => default_idle_call => cpu_startup_entry => secondary_start_kernel => Tested-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2016-02-12arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robustYang Shi1-7/+6
Switching between stacks is only valid if we are tracing ourselves while on the irq_stack, so it is only valid when in current and non-preemptible context, otherwise is is just zeroed off. Fixes: 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack") Acked-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2016-02-09arm64: disable kasan when accessing frame->fp in unwind_frameYang Shi1-2/+2
When boot arm64 kernel with KASAN enabled, the below error is reported by kasan: BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in unwind_frame+0xec/0x260 at addr ffffffc064d57ba0 Read of size 8 by task pidof/499 page:ffffffbdc39355c0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 flags: 0x0() page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected CPU: 2 PID: 499 Comm: pidof Not tainted 4.5.0-rc1 #119 Hardware name: Freescale Layerscape 2085a RDB Board (DT) Call trace: [<ffffffc00008d078>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x290 [<ffffffc00008d32c>] show_stack+0x24/0x30 [<ffffffc0006a981c>] dump_stack+0x8c/0xd8 [<ffffffc0002e4400>] kasan_report_error+0x558/0x588 [<ffffffc0002e4958>] kasan_report+0x60/0x70 [<ffffffc0002e3188>] __asan_load8+0x60/0x78 [<ffffffc00008c92c>] unwind_frame+0xec/0x260 [<ffffffc000087e60>] get_wchan+0x110/0x160 [<ffffffc0003b647c>] do_task_stat+0xb44/0xb68 [<ffffffc0003b7730>] proc_tgid_stat+0x40/0x50 [<ffffffc0003ac840>] proc_single_show+0x88/0xd8 [<ffffffc000345be8>] seq_read+0x370/0x770 [<ffffffc00030aba0>] __vfs_read+0xc8/0x1d8 [<ffffffc00030c0ec>] vfs_read+0x94/0x168 [<ffffffc00030d458>] SyS_read+0xb8/0x128 [<ffffffc000086530>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28 Memory state around the buggy address: ffffffc064d57a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 f4 f4 ffffffc064d57b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffffffc064d57b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^ ffffffc064d57c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffffffc064d57c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Since the shadow byte pointed by the report is 0, so it may mean it is just hit oob in non-current task. So, disable the instrumentation to silence these warnings. Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-12-21arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracerAKASHI Takahiro1-0/+17
Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries (return_to_handler) showing up in a) a stack tracer's output b) perf call graph (with perf record -g) c) dump_backtrace (at panic et al.) For example, in case of a), $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer $ echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/stack_trace_enabled $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/stack_trace Depth Size Location (54 entries) ----- ---- -------- 0) 4504 16 gic_raise_softirq+0x28/0x150 1) 4488 80 smp_cross_call+0x38/0xb8 2) 4408 48 return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 3) 4360 32 return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 ... In case of b), $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer $ perf record -e mem:XXX:x -ag -- sleep 10 $ perf report ... | | |--0.22%-- 0x550f8 | | | 0x10888 | | | el0_svc_naked | | | sys_openat | | | return_to_handler | | | return_to_handler ... In case of c), $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer $ echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger ... Call trace: [<ffffffc00044d3ac>] sysrq_handle_crash+0x24/0x30 [<ffffffc000092250>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 [<ffffffc000092250>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 ... This patch replaces such entries with real addresses preserved in current->ret_stack[] at unwind_frame(). This way, we can cover all the cases. Reviewed-by: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> [will: fixed minor context changes conflicting with irq stack bits] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-12-21arm64: pass a task parameter to unwind_frame()AKASHI Takahiro1-4/+4
Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame to hook a function's return. This will result in many useless entries (return_to_handler) showing up in a call stack list. We will fix this problem in a later patch ("arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer"). But since real return addresses are saved in ret_stack[] array in struct task_struct, unwind functions need to be notified of, in addition to a stack pointer address, which task is being traced in order to find out real return addresses. This patch extends unwind functions' interfaces by adding an extra argument of a pointer to task_struct. Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-12-15arm64: reduce stack use in irq_handlerJames Morse1-3/+16
The code for switching to irq_stack stores three pieces of information on the stack, fp+lr, as a fake stack frame (that lets us walk back onto the interrupted tasks stack frame), and the address of the struct pt_regs that contains the register values from kernel entry. (which dump_backtrace() will print in any stack trace). To reduce this, we store fp, and the pointer to the struct pt_regs. unwind_frame() can recognise this as the irq_stack dummy frame, (as it only appears at the top of the irq_stack), and use the struct pt_regs values to find the missing interrupted link-register. Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-12-10arm64: when walking onto the task stack, check sp & fp are in current->stackJames Morse1-2/+10
When unwind_frame() reaches the bottom of the irq_stack, the last fp points to the original task stack. unwind_frame() uses IRQ_STACK_TO_TASK_STACK() to find the sp value. If either values is wrong, we may end up walking a corrupt stack. Check these values are sane by testing if they are both on the stack pointed to by current->stack. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-12-08arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stackAKASHI Takahiro1-2/+27
This patch allows unwind_frame() to traverse from interrupt stack to task stack correctly. It requires data from a dummy stack frame, created during irq_stack_entry(), added by a later patch. A similar approach is taken to modify dump_backtrace(), which expects to find struct pt_regs underneath any call to functions marked __exception. When on an irq_stack, the struct pt_regs is stored on the old task stack, the location of which is stored in the dummy stack frame. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> [james.morse: merged two patches, reworked for per_cpu irq_stacks, and no alignment guarantees, added irq_stack definitions] Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2015-10-28Revert "ARM64: unwind: Fix PC calculation"Will Deacon1-5/+1
This reverts commit e306dfd06fcb44d21c80acb8e5a88d55f3d1cf63. With this patch applied, we were the only architecture making this sort of adjustment to the PC calculation in the unwinder. This causes problems for ftrace, where the PC values are matched against the contents of the stack frames in the callchain and fail to match any records after the address adjustment. Whilst there has been some effort to change ftrace to workaround this, those patches are not yet ready for mainline and, since we're the odd architecture in this regard, let's just step in line with other architectures (like arch/arm/) for now. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2014-09-08arm64: LLVMLinux: Use current_stack_pointer in save_stack_trace_tskBehan Webster1-2/+1
Use the global current_stack_pointer to get the value of the stack pointer. This change supports being able to compile the kernel with both gcc and clang. Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2014-05-29arm64: Add 'notrace' attribute to unwind_frame() for ftraceAKASHI Takahiro1-1/+1
walk_stackframe() calls unwind_frame(), and if walk_stackframe() is "notrace", unwind_frame() should be also "notrace". Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2014-02-17ARM64: unwind: Fix PC calculationOlof Johansson1-1/+5
The frame PC value in the unwind code used to just take the saved LR value and use that. That's incorrect as a stack trace, since it shows the return path stack, not the call path stack. In particular, it shows faulty information in case the bl is done as the very last instruction of one label, since the return point will be in the next label. That can easily be seen with tail calls to panic(), which is marked __noreturn and thus doesn't have anything useful after it. Easiest here is to just correct the unwind code and do a -4, to get the actual call site for the backtrace instead of the return site. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2013-12-19ARM64: fix framepointer check in unwind_frameKonstantin Khlebnikov1-1/+1
We need at least 24 bytes above frame pointer. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2012-09-17arm64: Exception handlingCatalin Marinas1-0/+127
The patch contains the exception entry code (kernel/entry.S), pt_regs structure and related accessors, undefined instruction trapping and stack tracing. AArch64 Linux kernel (including kernel threads) runs in EL1 mode using the SP1 stack. The vectors don't have a fixed address, only alignment (2^11) requirements. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>