| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Rather that try to trick LSPCON back into PCON mode from the .reset()
hook let's just do that as a regular part of the normal modeset
sequence, which is going to take care of the system resume case. During
a normal modeset this should normally be a nop as the mode should have
already been switched by .detect().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201016194800.25581-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
|
|
The "mmio" writes into vgpu registers are simple memory traps from the
guest into the host. We do not need to assert in the guest that the
device is awake for the io as we do not write to the device itself.
However, over time we have refactored all the mmio accessors with the
result that the vgpu reuses the gen2 accessors and so inherits the
assert for runtime-pm of the native device. The assert though has
actually been there since commit 3be0bf5acca6 ("drm/i915: Create vGPU
specific MMIO operations to reduce traps").
References: 3be0bf5acca6 ("drm/i915: Create vGPU specific MMIO operations to reduce traps")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200811092532.13753-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
If i915.ko is being used as a passthrough device, it does not know if
the host is using intel_iommu. Mixing the iommu and gfx causes a few
issues (such as scanout overfetch) which we need to workaround inside
the driver, so if we detect we are running under a hypervisor, also
assume the device access is being virtualised.
Reported-by: Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>
Suggested-by: Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de>
Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201019101523.4145-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Underruns happens when plane height + y offset is not a modulo of 4
when FBC is enabled. It happens when scanline is at vactive - 10 but
that is not feasible to do from the software side so here completely
disabling FBC when height + y offset matches to avoid visual glitches.
Specification says that it only affects TGL display C stepping and
newer but to simply the check and as TGL is already in final costumers
hands, pre-production display stepping A and B was also included.
BSpec: 52887 ICL
BSpec: 52888 EHL/JSL
BSpec: 52890/55378 TGL
BSpec: 53508 DG1
BSpec: 53273 RKL
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201019175609.28715-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
This sequence is not part of "Sequences to Initialize Display" but
as noted in the MBus page the DBUF_CTL.Tracker_state_service needs
to be set to 8.
BSpec: 49213
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201019173906.18892-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
intel_dp_ycbcr420_config() is rather pointless. Just inline it
directly into intel_dp_compute_config(). This gets rid of the
ugly double assignment of output_format.
Not really sure what the best policy would be when the user
supplies a mode classified by the display as "YCbCr 4:2:0
only", but we know that we can't do YCbCr 4:2:0 output. For
now keep the current behaviour of just silently upgrade
it to RGB 4:4:4.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200924184156.24491-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Remove the lspcon special case from intel_dp_compute_config() and
just treat it like any other DFP than can do 4:4:4->4:2:0 conversion.
The only difference between the two codepaths was that the lspcon
code tried to already halve port_clock. That was just total nonsense
as we hadn't even computed the base port_clock at that time.
All that stuff happens intel_dp_compute_link_config*() and it
already takes care of the 4:2:0 clock reduction.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200924184156.24491-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
crtc_state->lspcon_downsampling isn't particularly useful at
the moment since we can't even do proper readout for it.
Let's get rid of it. Will help with unifying the LSPCON with
the regular DFP YCbCr output support.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200924184156.24491-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
during fbdev init
Currently we leave the cache_level of the initial fb obj
set to NONE. This means on eLLC machines the first pin_to_display()
will try to switch it to WT which requires a vma unbind+bind.
If that happens during the fbdev initialization rcu does not
seem operational which causes the unbind to get stuck. To
most appearances this looks like a dead machine on boot.
Avoid the unbind by already marking the object cache_level
as WT when creating it. We still do an excplicit ggtt pin
which will rewrite the PTEs anyway, so they will match whatever
cache level we set.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2381
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007120329.17076-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
|
WAC6entrylatency is trying to fix excessive rc6 entry latency caused
by the extra delay from FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL, which is there for some
extra sync with uncore for frame buffer caching in LLC.
Reading through the hsd the recommendation was to set the FBC_LLC_FULLY_OPEN
bit to disable this extra delay entirely. This can be done whenever fb LLC
caching is not used. The alternative suggestion was to reduce the delay to
eg. 0x5 via updated BIOS programming instructions. But all the kbl/cfl
machines I've seen still have the default 0xff programmed. As we never use
fb LLC caching let's just apply the w/a to all skl derivatives to get
consistent rc6 latencies.
I was able to measure the effect of FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL to rc6 latency
via forcewake. Here's a graph of some of the results:
sleep;fw_req=1;wait fw_ack==1;sleep;fw_req=0;wait fw_ack==0
fw_ack==1 duration
160us +----------------------------------------------------------------+
| + + $$+ + + |
| $$ $ $ ******$$ ** $ $**$* #########$$######|
140us |-$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$*$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$|
| $ * # |
| $ * # |
120us |$+ * # +-|
|$ * # |
|$ * # # |
100us |$+ ************######################## +-|
|$ * *# |
|$ ***** ######### |
80us |$+ * # #### ## +-|
|$ **** ### # # |
| ** #### FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL: 0x8000 ******* |
60us |-###### FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL: 0xffff #######-|
|## + + FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL: 0x400000ff $$$$$$$ |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
0ms 10ms 20ms 30ms 40ms 50ms 60ms
sleep duration
The default FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL value of 0xff is documented to give us
a 170usec delay. That tracks well with the knees at 0xffff->~44msec and
0x8000->~22msec we see in the graph.
We can see that if we sleep longer than the FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL delay
we always observe the full (~145usec) rc6 wakeup latency. But if we sleep
for less than the FBC_LLC_READ_CTRL delay we see a quicker fw wakeup,
presumably due the hardware not having yet entered rc6 fully.
The other plateaus in the graph I suspect correspond to some shallower
internal rc states.
v2: s/usec/msec/ typo in commit msg
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716190426.17047-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
|
A recent bspec update has provided a new cdclk table for RKL. All of
the cdclk values are the same as those we've been using on ICL, TGL,
etc., but we obtain them by doubling both the PLL ratio and CD2X divider
numbers.
Bspec: 49202
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201015220038.271740-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
|
|
While we do lack the faster shared LLC, we should still have support
for snooping over PCIe.
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-11-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Update the DMC_DEBUG_DC5 register to its new location and do not try
reading the DC6 counter since DG1 doesn't support DC6.
v2: Use IS_DGFX() instead of IS_DG1(). Even if not having DC6 is not
directly related to DGFX, the register move to a new location is. So in
future, if there is one supporting DC6, it would just need to add the
other register rather than fixing the case of a wrong register being
read (Matt)
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
DC6 is not supported on DG1, so change the allowed DC mask for DG1.
This is not yet on bspec, but it has been confirmed by HW engineers.
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-9-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
DG1 shares some workarounds with TGL and RKL and also has some
additional workarounds of its own.
v2: Correct location of Wa_1408615072 (JohnH).
v3: Apply WAs 1606700617, 18011464164 and 22010931296 to DG1 (José)
v4 (Anusha)
- Add Wa_22010271021
- s/Wa_14010096844/Wa_1409836686
v5:
- Extend Wa_14010919138 to all revs (Matt Atwood)
- Power gate media is global gen12 design. (Rodrigo)
- Rebase (Lucas)
v6: use REG_BIT() to fix checkpatch warning (Lucas)
BSpec: 53508
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Add support to load DMC v2.0.2 on DG1
While we're at it, make TGL use the same GEN12 firmware size definition
and remove obsolete comment.
Bpec: 49230
v2: do not replace GEN12_CSR_MAX_FW_SIZE (from José)
and replace stale comment
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-7-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Add DG1 DPLL Enable register macro and use the macro to enable the
correct DPLL based on PLL id. Although we use
_MG_PLL1_ENABLE/_MG_PLL2_ENABLE these are rather combo phys.
While at it, fix coding style: wrong newlines and use if/else chain
v2: Rewrite original patch from Aditya Swarup based on refactors
upstream
Bspec: 49443, 49206
Cc: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Add entries for dg1 plls and setup dg1_pll_mgr to reuse ICL callbacks.
Initial setup for shared dplls DPLL0/1 for DDIA/DDIB and DPLL2/3 for
DDI-TC1/DDI-TC2. Configure dpll cfgcrx registers to drive the plls on
DG1.
v2 (Lucas): Reword commit message and add missing update_ref_clks hook
(requested by Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-5-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
DG1 has 4 DPLLs where DPLL0 and DPLL1 drive DDIA/B and
DPLL2 and DPLL3 drive DDI-TC1/DDI-TC2.
Introduce DG1_DPLL_CFCRx() helper macros to configure
DPLL registers.
Bspec: 50288, 50299
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
TGL power wells can be re-used for DG1 with the exception of the fake
power well for TC_COLD.
v2: use logic to skip power wells while copying instead of duplicating
the definition of TGL power wells (Matt Roper)
Bspec: 49182
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
The skus guarded by IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F() have port F and thus they need
those power wells. The others don't have those. Up to now we were
just overriding the number of power wells on !IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(),
relying on those power wells to be the last ones. Now that we have logic
in place to skip power wells by id, use it instead.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
This allows us to skip power wells on a platform allowing it to re-use
the table from another one instead of having to create a new table from
scratch that is basically a copy with a few removals.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
[ Adapt ignore logic to be based on pw id rather than adding a new
field, as suggested by Imre ]
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Recently we came across requirement to identify EHL and JSL
platform to program them differently. Thus Split the basic
platform definition, macros, and PCI IDs to differentiate
between EHL and JSL platforms. Also, IS_ELKHARTLAKE is replaced
with IS_JSL_EHL everywhere.
Changes since V1 :
- Rebased to avoid merge conflicts
- Added missed check for jasperlake in intel_uc_fw.c
Cc : Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc : Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201013192948.63470-1-tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com
|
|
BOE 2270 panel failed to control backlight brightness.
Add it in edid quirks to force using DPCD backlight control.
Then the brightness can be controlled.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009085750.88490-2-aaron.ma@canonical.com
|
|
BOE panel with ID 2270 claims both PWM_PIN_CAP and AUX_SET_CAP backlight
control bits, but default chip backlight failed to control brightness.
Check AUX_SET_CAP and proceed to check quirks or VBT backlight type.
DPCD can control the brightness of this pannel.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009085750.88490-1-aaron.ma@canonical.com
|
|
In commit 79946723092b ("drm/i915: Assume 100% brightness when not in
DPCD control mode"), we fixed the brightness level when DPCD control was
not active to max brightness. This is as good as we can guess since most
backlights go on full when uncontrolled.
However in doing so we changed the semantics of the initial
'backlight.enabled' value. At least on Pixelbooks, they were relying
on the brightness level in DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_MSB to be 0 on
boot such that enabled would be false. This causes the device to be
enabled when the brightness is set. Without this, brightness control
doesn't work. So by changing brightness to max, we also flipped enabled
to be true on boot.
To fix this, make enabled a function of brightness and backlight control
mechanism.
Fixes: 79946723092b ("drm/i915: Assume 100% brightness when not in DPCD control mode")
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Chowski <chowski@chromium.org>>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200918002845.32766-1-sean@poorly.run
|
|
The DP Standard's recommendation is to use the LTTPR non-transparent
mode link training if LTTPRs are detected, so let's do this.
Besides power-saving, the advantages of this are that the maximum number
of LTTPRs can only be used in non-transparent mode (the limit is 5-8 in
transparent mode), and it provides a way to narrow down the reason for a
link training failure to a given link segment. Non-transparent mode is
probably also the mode that was tested the most by the industry.
The changes in this patchset:
- Pass the DP PHY that is currently link trained to all LT helpers, so
that these can access the correct LTTPR/DPRX DPCD registers.
- During LT take into account the LTTPR common lane rate/count and the
per LTTPR-PHY vswing/pre-emph limits.
- Switch to LTTPR non-transparent LT mode and train each link segment
according to the sequence in DP Standard v2.0 (complete CR/EQ for
each segment before continuing with the next segment).
v2:
- Switch to non-transparent mode during connector detection, which is
required before reading the per-PHY LTTPR capabilities.
- Move the DP_PHY_LTTPR() macro to drm_dp_helper.h (Ville)
- Use the new drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status() instead of adding the
same logic to intel_dp_get_link_status(). (Ville)
- Make intel_dp_lttpr_phy_caps() return a pointer to the whole array
instead of a pointer to its first element. (Ville)
- Add the intel_dp_phy_is_downstream_of_source() helper. (Ville)
- Add a code comment about the disable->enable quirk of
non-transparent mode.
- Add the intel_dp_training_pattern_set_reg() helper.
- Fix checkpatch/sparse warns.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-7-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
By default LTTPRs should be in transparent link training mode,
nevertheless in this patch we switch to this default mode explicitly.
The DP Standard recommends this, supposedly because an LTTPR may be left
in the non-transparent mode (by BIOS, previous kernel, or after reset
due to a firmware bug). I haven't seen this happening, but let's follow
the DP Standard.
v2:
- Add a code comment about the explicit disabling of non-transparent
mode.
v3:
- Move check to prevent initing LTTPRs on eDP to init_dp_lttpr_init().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-6-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
Add the helpers and register definitions needed to read out the common
and per-PHY LTTPR capabilities and perform link training in the LTTPR
non-transparent mode.
v2:
- Add drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status() and DP_PHY_LTTPR() here instead
of adding these to i915. (Ville)
v3:
- Use memmove() to convert LTTPR to DPRX link status format. (Ville)
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-5-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
To prepare for a follow-up LTTPR change factor out a helper to disable
the training pattern in DPCD. We'll need to do this for each LTTPR
(without programming the port to output the idle pattern) when training
in LTTPR non-transparent mode.
While at it also move the disable-link-training logic from
intel_dp_set_link_train() to intel_dp_stop_link_train(), since the
latter is the only user of this.
v2:
- Move the disable-link-training logic to intel_dp_stop_link_train()
(Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-4-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
Split the prepare, link training, fallback-handling steps into their own
functions for clarity and as a preparation for the upcoming LTTPR
changes.
While at it also:
- Unexport and inline intel_dp_set_idle_link_train(), which is used at a
single place.
- Add some documentation to functions that are exported or that can use
a better description about which part of the LT sequence they
implement.
v2: (Ville)
- Unexport/inline intel_dp_set_idle_link_train()
- Make the documentation of
intel_dp_prepare_link_train()/intel_dp_stop_link_train() more accurate
wrt. HW specific details.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-3-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
An LTTPR can be trained with training pattern 4 even if the DPCD
revision is < 1.4, but drm_dp_training_pattern_mask() would change
pattern 4 to pattern 3 on those DPCD revisions.
Since intel_dp_training_pattern() makes already sure that the proper
training pattern is used, all that needs to be masked out is the
scrambling disable flag, which is or'd to the mask later based on the
training pattern.
v2:
- Use a helper instead of open-coding the masking. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-2-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
The updated bspec forcewake table also provides us with new multicast
ranges that should be reflected in our workaround code.
Note that there are different types of multicast registers with
different styles of replication and different steering registers. The
i915 MCR range lists we're updating here are only used to ensure we can
verify workarounds properly (i.e., if we can't steer register reads we
don't want to verify workarounds where an unsteered read might hit a
fused-off instance of the unit). Because of this, we don't need to
include any of the multicast ranges where all instances of the register
will always present and fusing doesn't play a role. Specifically, that
means that we are not including the MCR ranges designated as "SQIDI" in
the bspec.
Bspec: 66696
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009194442.3668677-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
The bspec's forcewake page was very stale and out of date for recent
platforms. The hardware team finally provided us with an updated gen12
table (which applies to TGL, RKL, and DG1) and there are a lot of
changes.
v2:
- Add comments showing the subregions of ranges that we've combined for
ease of code review. (Jose)
- Rebase on the s/FORCEWAKE_BLITTER/FORCEWAKE_GT/ patch
Bspec: 66696
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009194442.3668677-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
The power well that we've been referring to as the 'blitter' well is
actually more of a general GT power well which contains a lot of things
other than the blitter engine registers. The FORCEWAKE_BLITTER name in
the code was used for historic reasons, but no longer matches how the
bspec describes this power well and just causes confusion for people not
familiar with this area of the code. Let's rename it to FORCEWAKE_GT to
more accurately describe the role of the power well and match how the
modern bspec refers to it.
v2:
- Add a comment noting that the GT power well includes the blitter
engine. (Jose)
Bspec: 66696, 66534, 67609
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009194442.3668677-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane
selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but
for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes.
The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step.
v2:
- removed warn on when no plane is visible in state
- removed calculations using plane damaged area in
intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
v3:
- do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is
shifted
v4:
- only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL
v5:
- not masking bits for cursor
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
Due to the debugfs flag, has_psr2 in CRTC state could have a different
value than psr.psr2_enabled and it was causing PSR2 subfeatures(DC3CO
and selective fetch) to be set to not a expected state.
So here only taking in consideration the parameter and debugfs flag
when computing PSR state, this way the CRTC state will also have
the correct state.
intel_psr_fastset_force() was already broken as
intel_psr_compute_config() was already only enabling PSR when
psr_global_enabled() and all other PSR requirements are met.
So some changes was required in this function, now it iterates over
all connectors, if it is a eDP connector and is active force a modeset
in the CRTC driving this connector, what will cause the new PSR state
to be set based on the debugfs flag.
v2:
- end connector iterator in error cases
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-2-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
For platforms without selective fetch this register is reserved so
do not write 0 to it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
This will be used in future but already adding to VBT so we are
updated with VBT changes.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201008211932.24989-3-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
BDB_GENERAL_DEFINITIONS map
This will remove the "Expected child device config size for VBT
version 235 not known" debug message seen in TGL, although this is not
fixing anything it good to keep our VBT parser updated.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201008211932.24989-2-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
Child min_brightness is obsolete from VBT 234+, instead the new
min_brightness field in the main structure should be used.
This new field is 16 bits wide, so backlight_precision_bits is needed
to check if value needs to be scaled down but it is only available in
VBT 236+ so working around it by using the also new backlight_level
in the main struct.
v2:
- missed that backlight_data->level is also obsolete
v3:
- s/backlight/brightness to better match specification
- using u16 to specify brightness level instead of a u32 : 16
BSpec: 20149
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201008211932.24989-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
ggtt offsets/alignments are u32 everywhere else. Don't use
a signed int for them here.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201008101608.8652-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
|
|
when the hardware isn't going to use the aux plane there's no
real point in dealing with the relevant hardware restrictions.
So let's just skip all that when not necessary.
We can now also remove the offset=~0xfff behaviour for unused
color planes. Let's just zero out everyting so as to not leave
stale garbage behind to confuse people debugging the code.
v2: Explicitly set AUX_DIST to zero when there is no aux plane
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009120028.32422-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
|
When the number of potential color planes grew to 4 we stopped
setting all unused color plane offsets to ~0xfff. The code
still tries to do this, but actually does nothing since the
loop limits are bogus.
skl_check_main_surface() actually depends on this ~0xfff
behaviour as it will make sure to move the main surface
offset below the aux surface offset because the hardware
AUX_DIST must be a non-negative value [1], and for simplicity
it doesn't bother checking if the AUX plane is actually
needed or not. So currently it may end up shuffling the
main surface around based on some stale leftover AUX offset.
The skl+ plane code also just blindly calculates the AUX_DIST
whether or not the AUX plane is actually needed by the hw or
not, and that too will now potentially use some stale AUX
surface offset in the calculation. Would seem nicer to
guarantee a consistent non-negative AUX_DIST always.
So bring back the original ~0xfff offset behaviour for
unused color planes. Though it doesn't seem super likely
that this inconsistency would cause any real issues.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Fixes: 2dfbf9d2873a ("drm/i915/tgl: Gen-12 display can decompress surfaces compressed by the media engine")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201008101608.8652-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
|
|
i915_{save,restore}_state() are actually all about the display.
Currently they are split into display part + SWF part. But since
the SWF part is also related to the display let's just move that
part into its own thing and flip the roles around so that the
current display part is the main function.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201005171441.26612-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
As with eDP and LVDS we should also respect the power cycle
delay on DSI panels. We are not using the power sequencer
for these, and we have no optimizations around the sleep
duration, so we just msleep() the whole thing away.
Note that the ICL+ DSI code doesn't seem to have any power
off/power cycle delay handling whatsoever. The only thing it
handles is the power on delay. As that looks pretty busted
in general I won't bother dealing with it for the time being.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201001151640.14590-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Just like with eDP let's wait for the power sequencer power
cycle delay before we reboot the machine, as otherwise we
can't guarantee the panel's minimum power cycle delay will
be respected.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201001151640.14590-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Extend the eDP panel power cycle delay wait on reboot handling
to cover all platforms. No reason to think that VLV/CHV are
in any way special since the documentation states that the
hardware power cycle delay goes back to its default value on
reset, and that may not be enough for all panels.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201001151640.14590-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Currently VLV/CHV use a reboot notifier to make sure the panel
power cycle delay isn't violated across a system reboot. Replace
that with the new encoder .shutdown() hook.
And let's also stop overriding the power cycle delay with the
max value. No idea why the current code does that. The already
programmed delay should be correct.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201001151640.14590-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Add a new encoder hook .shutdown() which will get called at the end
of the pci .shutdown() hook. We shall use this to deal with the
panel power cycle delay issues.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201001151640.14590-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
