1 files changed, 78 insertions, 25 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index c907fde01eaa..3fffad3bc8a8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -53,9 +53,7 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
 	unsigned int		iowait_boost_max;
 	u64			last_update;
 
-	/* The fields below are only needed when sharing a policy: */
-	unsigned long		util_cfs;
-	unsigned long		util_dl;
+	unsigned long		bw_dl;
 	unsigned long		max;
 
 	/* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */
@@ -179,33 +177,90 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
 	return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq);
 }
 
-static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
+/*
+ * This function computes an effective utilization for the given CPU, to be
+ * used for frequency selection given the linear relation: f = u * f_max.
+ *
+ * The scheduler tracks the following metrics:
+ *
+ *   cpu_util_{cfs,rt,dl,irq}()
+ *   cpu_bw_dl()
+ *
+ * Where the cfs,rt and dl util numbers are tracked with the same metric and
+ * synchronized windows and are thus directly comparable.
+ *
+ * The cfs,rt,dl utilization are the running times measured with rq->clock_task
+ * which excludes things like IRQ and steal-time. These latter are then accrued
+ * in the irq utilization.
+ *
+ * The DL bandwidth number otoh is not a measured metric but a value computed
+ * based on the task model parameters and gives the minimal utilization
+ * required to meet deadlines.
+ */
+static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
+	unsigned long util, irq, max;
 
-	sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sg_cpu->cpu);
-	sg_cpu->util_cfs = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
-	sg_cpu->util_dl  = cpu_util_dl(rq);
-}
-
-static unsigned long sugov_aggregate_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
-{
-	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
+	sg_cpu->max = max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sg_cpu->cpu);
+	sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
 
 	if (rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
-		return sg_cpu->max;
+		return max;
+
+	/*
+	 * Early check to see if IRQ/steal time saturates the CPU, can be
+	 * because of inaccuracies in how we track these -- see
+	 * update_irq_load_avg().
+	 */
+	irq = cpu_util_irq(rq);
+	if (unlikely(irq >= max))
+		return max;
+
+	/*
+	 * Because the time spend on RT/DL tasks is visible as 'lost' time to
+	 * CFS tasks and we use the same metric to track the effective
+	 * utilization (PELT windows are synchronized) we can directly add them
+	 * to obtain the CPU's actual utilization.
+	 */
+	util = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
+	util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
+
+	/*
+	 * We do not make cpu_util_dl() a permanent part of this sum because we
+	 * want to use cpu_bw_dl() later on, but we need to check if the
+	 * CFS+RT+DL sum is saturated (ie. no idle time) such that we select
+	 * f_max when there is no idle time.
+	 *
+	 * NOTE: numerical errors or stop class might cause us to not quite hit
+	 * saturation when we should -- something for later.
+	 */
+	if ((util + cpu_util_dl(rq)) >= max)
+		return max;
+
+	/*
+	 * There is still idle time; further improve the number by using the
+	 * irq metric. Because IRQ/steal time is hidden from the task clock we
+	 * need to scale the task numbers:
+	 *
+	 *              1 - irq
+	 *   U' = irq + ------- * U
+	 *                max
+	 */
+	util = scale_irq_capacity(util, irq, max);
+	util += irq;
 
 	/*
-	 * Utilization required by DEADLINE must always be granted while, for
-	 * FAIR, we use blocked utilization of IDLE CPUs as a mechanism to
-	 * gracefully reduce the frequency when no tasks show up for longer
+	 * Bandwidth required by DEADLINE must always be granted while, for
+	 * FAIR and RT, we use blocked utilization of IDLE CPUs as a mechanism
+	 * to gracefully reduce the frequency when no tasks show up for longer
 	 * periods of time.
 	 *
-	 * Ideally we would like to set util_dl as min/guaranteed freq and
-	 * util_cfs + util_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet
-	 * ready for such an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
+	 * Ideally we would like to set bw_dl as min/guaranteed freq and util +
+	 * bw_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet ready for such
+	 * an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
 	 */
-	return min(sg_cpu->max, (sg_cpu->util_dl + sg_cpu->util_cfs));
+	return min(max, util + sg_cpu->bw_dl);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -360,7 +415,7 @@ static inline bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { return false; }
  */
 static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 {
-	if (cpu_util_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->util_dl)
+	if (cpu_bw_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->bw_dl)
 		sg_policy->need_freq_update = true;
 }
 
@@ -383,9 +438,8 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 
 	busy = sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
 
-	sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
+	util = sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
 	max = sg_cpu->max;
-	util = sugov_aggregate_util(sg_cpu);
 	sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, &util, &max);
 	next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);
 	/*
@@ -424,9 +478,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 		struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, j);
 		unsigned long j_util, j_max;
 
-		sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
+		j_util = sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
 		j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
-		j_util = sugov_aggregate_util(j_sg_cpu);
 		sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, &j_util, &j_max);
 
 		if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {