summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>2006-03-22 11:08:58 +0300
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2006-03-22 18:54:04 +0300
commit4866920b93fd7d5b520278c3c76e6f4d5a352d81 (patch)
treec4b8642c83e11af6d8e57ab35dc479f2c1a651d0 /mm
parent9da61aef0fd5b17dd4bf4baf33db12c470def774 (diff)
downloadlinux-4866920b93fd7d5b520278c3c76e6f4d5a352d81.tar.xz
[PATCH] hugepage: Fix hugepage logic in free_pgtables() harder
Turns out the hugepage logic in free_pgtables() was doubly broken. The loop coalescing multiple normal page VMAs into one call to free_pgd_range() had an off by one error, which could mean it would coalesce one hugepage VMA into the same bundle (checking 'vma' not 'next' in the loop). I transferred this bug into the new is_vm_hugetlb_page() based version. Here's the fix. This one didn't bite on powerpc previously for the same reason the is_hugepage_only_range() problem didn't: powerpc's hugetlb_free_pgd_range() is identical to free_pgd_range(). It didn't bite on ia64 because the hugepage region is distant enough from any other region that the separated PMD_SIZE distance test would always prevent coalescing the two together. No libhugetlbfs testsuite regressions (ppc64, POWER5). Signed-off-by: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com> Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/memory.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index f6e3be9cbf5a..80c3fb370f91 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather **tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* Optimization: gather nearby vmas into one call down
*/
while (next && next->vm_start <= vma->vm_end + PMD_SIZE
- && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
+ && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(next)) {
vma = next;
next = vma->vm_next;
anon_vma_unlink(vma);