diff options
author | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> | 2012-07-13 09:21:56 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2012-07-15 12:39:07 +0400 |
commit | 2a8c0883c3cfffcc148ea606e2a4e7453cd75e73 (patch) | |
tree | 9a340aaef6785881ec0eab74c32ad35841441889 /kernel/time | |
parent | f2a5a0854efc62abe7f69e9947842cb135837f9a (diff) | |
download | linux-2a8c0883c3cfffcc148ea606e2a4e7453cd75e73.tar.xz |
time: Move xtime_nsec adjustment underflow handling timekeeping_adjust
When we make adjustments speeding up the clock, its possible
for xtime_nsec to underflow. We already handle this properly,
but we do so from update_wall_time() instead of the more logical
timekeeping_adjust(), where the possible underflow actually
occurs.
Thus, move the correction logic to the timekeeping_adjust, which
is the function that causes the issue. Making update_wall_time()
more readable.
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1342156917-25092-8-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index e43289df28c2..aeeaab8cba6e 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -980,6 +980,27 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset) timekeeper.xtime_nsec -= offset; timekeeper.ntp_error -= (interval - offset) << timekeeper.ntp_error_shift; + + /* + * It may be possible that when we entered this function, xtime_nsec + * was very small. Further, if we're slightly speeding the clocksource + * in the code above, its possible the required corrective factor to + * xtime_nsec could cause it to underflow. + * + * Now, since we already accumulated the second, cannot simply roll + * the accumulated second back, since the NTP subsystem has been + * notified via second_overflow. So instead we push xtime_nsec forward + * by the amount we underflowed, and add that amount into the error. + * + * We'll correct this error next time through this function, when + * xtime_nsec is not as small. + */ + if (unlikely((s64)timekeeper.xtime_nsec < 0)) { + s64 neg = -(s64)timekeeper.xtime_nsec; + timekeeper.xtime_nsec = 0; + timekeeper.ntp_error += neg << timekeeper.ntp_error_shift; + } + } @@ -1105,27 +1126,6 @@ static void update_wall_time(void) /* correct the clock when NTP error is too big */ timekeeping_adjust(offset); - /* - * Since in the loop above, we accumulate any amount of time - * in xtime_nsec over a second into xtime.tv_sec, its possible for - * xtime_nsec to be fairly small after the loop. Further, if we're - * slightly speeding the clocksource up in timekeeping_adjust(), - * its possible the required corrective factor to xtime_nsec could - * cause it to underflow. - * - * Now, we cannot simply roll the accumulated second back, since - * the NTP subsystem has been notified via second_overflow. So - * instead we push xtime_nsec forward by the amount we underflowed, - * and add that amount into the error. - * - * We'll correct this error next time through this function, when - * xtime_nsec is not as small. - */ - if (unlikely((s64)timekeeper.xtime_nsec < 0)) { - s64 neg = -(s64)timekeeper.xtime_nsec; - timekeeper.xtime_nsec = 0; - timekeeper.ntp_error += neg << timekeeper.ntp_error_shift; - } /* * Store only full nanoseconds into xtime_nsec after rounding |